11.09.2014 Views

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The all-on-four concept generally<br />

requires that posterior teeth beyond<br />

the first premolar are supported<br />

by a cantilever. Efforts to reduce or<br />

eliminate the cantilever by distal<br />

orientation of terminal implants are<br />

advocated. Bridge screws emerging<br />

at the first premolar or molar position<br />

can be achieved in this way. Malo<br />

has reported that this approach is<br />

associated with high implant and<br />

prosthesis survival over 10 years. 26 In<br />

2011, Malo reported on 245 patients in<br />

whom 980 implants were placed and<br />

immediately loaded. The cumulative<br />

patient-related and implant-related<br />

success rates were 94.8 percent and<br />

98.1 percent, respectively, at five years,<br />

and 93.8 percent and 94.9 percent,<br />

respectively, at 10 years. 26<br />

One other key factor contributing to<br />

the overloading of these components<br />

is prosthesis misfit. However, the accuracy<br />

of contemporary impression<br />

materials and the introduction of precision-milled<br />

frameworks for the ISFP<br />

reduce the prevalence of prosthetic<br />

misfit and its impact on the therapeutic<br />

outcome. The geometric distribution<br />

of the implant-abutment and the abutment-prosthesis<br />

interfaces remain the<br />

significant features of ISFP therapy<br />

that can be clinically managed to reduce<br />

complications.<br />

When considering the number of teeth<br />

to be provided distal to the canine or<br />

first premolar site, the minimal provision<br />

of one additional premolar and<br />

one molar is sufficient to meet the<br />

esthetic and functional requirements<br />

of most individuals. 27 These general<br />

guidelines can be converted to linear<br />

measurements. The average dimension<br />

of a mandibular premolar is<br />

approximately 6 mm, and that of the<br />

mandibular first molar is approximately<br />

10 mm. 23 Thus, a cantilever of<br />

16 mm can suffice to provide function<br />

and esthetics. The functional relationship<br />

between the cantilever length<br />

and the A-P spread has been debated<br />

(Figs. 7–9). More than 30 years of opinion,<br />

experimentation, and calculation<br />

have generated an array of suggested<br />

Figure 8: A-P spread in clinical situation. The parallel<br />

placement of the implants resulted in approximately<br />

4 mm to 5 mm of A-P spread.<br />

solutions. To provide the broadest<br />

range of success for the largest set of<br />

patients, a conservative estimate of<br />

this functional relationship should be<br />

selected. For a mandible with no more<br />

than four implants to be restored with<br />

a rigid framework, utilizing a cantilever<br />

length to A-P spread ratio of 1.5:1<br />

has been advised. 28 Thus, for the ideal<br />

situation of four implants placed in<br />

the parasymphyseal mandible with<br />

the distal-most implants located in the<br />

first premolar region, a cantilever of<br />

approximately 15 mm (one premolar<br />

and molar tooth) requires 10 mm of<br />

A-P spread. This represents the third<br />

Rule of 10.<br />

Applying the Rules of 10<br />

Several key steps are required for<br />

using the Rules of 10 in the treatment<br />

of mandibular edentulism. The previously<br />

mentioned reference points<br />

(i.e., occlusal plane and osseous crest)<br />

must be firmly established. To assure<br />

accurate measurement, all treatment<br />

should begin with the proper fabrication<br />

of complete dentures and<br />

verification of ideal tooth position<br />

(Figs. 10, 11).<br />

Rule No. 1 requires a volumetric<br />

assessment of the edentulous mandible<br />

with cone-beam computed tomography<br />

(CBCT). However, other<br />

important information can be found<br />

in the radiographic process, and no<br />

radiograph should be made for ISFP<br />

treatment-planning purposes without<br />

the presence of a radiographic stent.<br />

Figure 9: A-P spread in clinical situation. The divergent<br />

placement of the implants resulted in<br />

approximately 10 mm of A-P spread measured at the<br />

abutment/prosthesis interface.<br />

Figure 10: Conventional dentures<br />

Figure 11: Surgical guide<br />

The resultant images should display<br />

the location of the planned prosthesis<br />

in relation to the mandible.<br />

Rule No. 2 requires that the plane of<br />

occlusion is properly located and the<br />

appropriate vertical dimension of occlusion<br />

is defined. If the patient is also<br />

edentulous in the maxilla, this involves<br />

the fabrication of ideal maxillary and<br />

mandibular dentures. The dentures<br />

will define the location of the occlusal<br />

– “Rules of 10” — Guidelines for Successful Planning and Treatment of Mandibular Edentulism Using <strong>Dental</strong> Implants – 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!