PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs
PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs
PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
mitigate the painful and disruptive<br />
blanching often associated with seating<br />
a final abutment through tissue<br />
that has been left to form around a<br />
stock healing abutment.<br />
Summary<br />
A prefabricated implant abutment is<br />
often viewed as the most immediate,<br />
least expensive option for restoring<br />
implant cases. But a patient-specific<br />
abutment that takes into consideration<br />
the unique anatomical qualities of<br />
the patient’s edentulous space will, in<br />
most situations, provide more reliable<br />
function and more natural esthetics,<br />
maximizing long-term health and performance.<br />
As technological advancements<br />
decrease the costs associated<br />
with the design and manufacture of<br />
digital custom solutions, clinician demand<br />
for traditional cast and stock<br />
abutments is rapidly waning in favor<br />
of CAD/CAM precision and efficiency.<br />
Available for most major implant systems,<br />
Inclusive Custom Abutments<br />
consistently deliver the high quality<br />
that clinicians expect. IM<br />
References<br />
1. Castillo de Oyagüe R, Sánchez-Jorge MI, Sánchez<br />
Turrión A, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R.<br />
Influence of CAM vs. CAD/CAM scanning methods<br />
and finish line of tooth preparation in the vertical<br />
misfit of zirconia bridge structures. Am J Dent. 2009<br />
Apr;22(2):79-83.<br />
2. Kerstein RB, Castellucci F, Osorio J. Ideal gingival<br />
form with computer-generated permanent healing<br />
abutments. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000 Oct;<br />
21(10):793-7, 800-1; quiz 802.<br />
3. Lewis SG, Llamas D, Avera S. The UCLA abutment:<br />
a four-year review. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Apr;<br />
67(4):509-15. Review.<br />
4. Silva-Neto JP, Nobilo MA, Penatti MP, Simamoto PC<br />
Jr, Neves FD. Influence of methodologic aspects on<br />
the results of implant-abutment interface microleakage<br />
tests: a critical review of in vitro studies. Int J<br />
Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jul;27(4):793-800.<br />
5. Kano SC, Binon P, Bonfante G, Curtis DA. Effect<br />
of casting procedures on screw loosening in UCLAtype<br />
abutments. J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):<br />
77-81.<br />
<strong>Dental</strong> Scanning Systems<br />
Laboratory<br />
3Shape <strong>Dental</strong> System<br />
(3Shape) 3<br />
<strong>Dental</strong>CAD<br />
(exocad America) 3<br />
DWOS<br />
(<strong>Dental</strong> Wings) 3<br />
DentSCAN<br />
(Delcam) 3<br />
Lava C.O.S.<br />
(3M ESPE) 3<br />
Optimet <strong>Dental</strong> CAD/CAM Scanner<br />
(Optical Metrology) 3<br />
Chairside<br />
iTero<br />
(Align Technology) 3<br />
CEREC<br />
(Sirona <strong>Dental</strong> Systems) 3<br />
Lava C.O.S.<br />
(3M ESPE) 3<br />
E4D Dentist<br />
(D4D Technologies) 3<br />
IOS FastScan<br />
(IOS Technologies) 3<br />
<strong>Dental</strong> Software<br />
3Shape <strong>Dental</strong> Designer (3Shape) 3<br />
<strong>Dental</strong>CAD (exocad America) 3<br />
DWOS (<strong>Dental</strong> Wings) 3<br />
DentCAD (Delcam) 3<br />
Figure 10: Digital scanning systems and design software formats supported by <strong>Glidewell</strong> Laboratories<br />
Figure 11a: Representation of the soft tissue architecture<br />
resulting from the use of a custom healing<br />
component featured with the Inclusive Tooth Replacement<br />
Solution<br />
Figure 11b: Representation of the final Inclusive<br />
Custom Abutment, easily seated in the anatomically<br />
contoured sulcus<br />
– Lab Sense: Inclusive Custom Abutments – 71