11.09.2014 Views

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Digitally (CAD) Designed vs. Waxed Units<br />

2009<br />

2012<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

91%<br />

70%<br />

82%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

18%<br />

CAD<br />

Custom Abutments<br />

Waxed<br />

Custom Abutments<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

CAD<br />

Custom Abutments<br />

9%<br />

Waxed<br />

Custom Abutments<br />

Figure 4: Comparative percentages of digitally designed Inclusive Custom Abutments versus conventionally waxed Inclusive Custom Abutments ordered from <strong>Glidewell</strong><br />

Laboratories in 2009 and 2012<br />

efficiency of CAD/CAM custom abutments,<br />

it bears looking at some of<br />

the industry-leading options available<br />

today. Dedicated to providing<br />

the highest-quality implant prosthetics<br />

possible, <strong>Glidewell</strong> Laboratories<br />

continuously improves the technologies,<br />

materials, and processes used to<br />

design and manufacture its Inclusive<br />

line of products. Recently, the lab’s research<br />

and development department<br />

conducted a same-case, microscopic<br />

comparison of an Inclusive Titanium<br />

Custom Abutment alongside patientspecific<br />

titanium abutments from two<br />

other leading manufacturers. Scanning<br />

electron microscopy (SEM) images<br />

provide an up-close look at the critical<br />

implant-abutment interface of these<br />

competing solutions (Fig. 5).<br />

Seen from this highly magnified view,<br />

the Inclusive Custom Abutment presents<br />

favorably in relation to its peers.<br />

The Inclusive abutment exhibits<br />

smooth transitions between features,<br />

an absence of burs or tooling marks,<br />

and an excellent finish of the mating<br />

surface. The second sample lacks a<br />

smooth transition between features,<br />

displays more pronounced roughness<br />

of the mating surface, and exhibits an<br />

inconsistent blend line in the gingival<br />

portion of the abutment. The third<br />

sample exhibits burs on and around<br />

the mating surface and connection<br />

geometry, and a tri-lobe interface with<br />

geometry that differs from the implant’s<br />

prosthetic connection. The clinical<br />

relevance of these defects could<br />

include an increased potential for<br />

micro-leakage 4 between implant and<br />

abutment, and a higher risk of screw<br />

loosening 5 caused by a less intimate fit<br />

around the connection.<br />

The fit and finish displayed in these images<br />

are indicative of the commitment<br />

at <strong>Glidewell</strong> Laboratories to achieve<br />

and maintain an unsurpassed level of<br />

quality. As the world’s largest dental<br />

implant laboratory, <strong>Glidewell</strong> leverages<br />

the expertise of dozens of certified<br />

dental technicians in the design of its<br />

prosthetic components. The abutment<br />

manufacturing division is ISO 13485<br />

Figure 5: SEM images comparing an Inclusive Titanium Custom Abutment (left) to same-case samples from a pair of leading custom abutment manufacturers<br />

– Lab Sense: Inclusive Custom Abutments – 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!