11.09.2014 Views

ACBSP Quality Assurance Report March 2013 - Tarleton State ...

ACBSP Quality Assurance Report March 2013 - Tarleton State ...

ACBSP Quality Assurance Report March 2013 - Tarleton State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

,<br />

Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (<strong>ACBSP</strong>)<br />

<strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong> (QA) <strong>Report</strong><br />

for<br />

Baccalaureate/Graduate Degree Programs<br />

Current as of July 2012<br />

Overview (O) 1. Complete all information requested.<br />

Submit your report as an attachment to reports@acbsp.org on or before February 15th or September 15th.<br />

This report should be limited to maximum of 50 pages. The average length of most good reports is 30 pages. To help<br />

reduce the page numbers you can remove the <strong>ACBSP</strong> examples used in this report template to help you complete<br />

the report.<br />

O 2. Institution Name: <strong>Tarleton</strong> <strong>State</strong> University Date: <strong>March</strong> 22, <strong>2013</strong><br />

Address: 1333 West Washington Street, Stephenville, TX, 76402<br />

O 3. Year Accredited/Reaffirmed: 1991, 1998, 2011 This <strong>Report</strong> Covers Years: 2011-<strong>2013</strong><br />

O 4. List All Accredited Programs (as they appear in your catalog):<br />

Administrative Systems (BS/BBA), Accounting (BS, BBA), Finance (BS, BBA), Management (BS, BBA), Computer<br />

Information Systems (BBA), Economics (BBA), Human Resource Management (BBA), Marketing (BBA),<br />

Interdisciplinary Business (BBA), International Business (BBA), Business Administration (BS), International<br />

Economics (BS), Business Occupations (BAAS), Master of Business Administration (MBA), Management and<br />

Leadership (MS), Human Resource Management (MS).<br />

1


Note: Listing new programs here does not confer accreditation. New degree programs, majors or emphases must be in effect<br />

for at least two years and have graduates and follow the guidance in the process book before accreditation will be granted<br />

O 5. List all programs that are in your business unit that are not accredited by <strong>ACBSP</strong> and how you distinguish accurately to<br />

the public between programs that have achieved accredited status and those that have not.<br />

Only the programs listed in item O4 above are identified as having received accreditation by ACSBP in the <strong>Tarleton</strong><br />

<strong>State</strong> University (TSU) Catalog (page 112 of the 2012-<strong>2013</strong> TSU Catalog). The following programs are not <strong>ACBSP</strong><br />

accredited:<br />

Computer Information Systems (BS), Economics (BS), Technology Occupations (BSAS), Information Systems (MS).<br />

O 6. List all campuses that a student can earn a business degree from your institution:<br />

Main campus in Stephenville, TX; campus in Fort Worth – SW Metroplex TX; campus in Waco, TX.<br />

O 7. Person completing report Name: Adolfo Benavides, Dean, College of Business Administration<br />

Phone: 254-968-9496<br />

E-mail address: benavides@tarleton.edu<br />

<strong>ACBSP</strong> Champion name: Dr. Adolfo Benavides<br />

<strong>ACBSP</strong> Co-Champion name: Dr. Thomas Bradley<br />

O 8. Conditions or Notes to be Addressed: You do not need to address Opportunity for Improvement (OFI).<br />

The following notes are addressed in this QA <strong>Report</strong>:<br />

Standard Two, Criteria 2.1; Standard Three, Criteria 3.h, Standard Four, Criteria 4.1; and Standard Six, Criteria 6.1.<br />

2


We are kindly requesting that <strong>ACBSP</strong>’s Board of Commissioners remove the notes identified above based on the<br />

following justifications:<br />

Justification for the removal of the notes identified above:<br />

Standard two, criteria 2.1: With the arrival of Dr. Adolfo Benavides on July 1, 2010 as the new dean of the College of<br />

Business Administration, the goals and initiatives identified in the short term one year plan and new strategic plan were in the<br />

initial stages of deployment.<br />

The following were goals and initiatives that were still in progress when our last report was submitted in early 2011 but that<br />

have now been accomplished:<br />

1. We have received reaffirmation of our <strong>ACBSP</strong> accreditation.<br />

2. We have initiated membership in AACSB while maintaining our commitment to preserve our <strong>ACBSP</strong> accreditation.<br />

3. The faculty have approved the criteria for Academically and Professionally Qualified status as per AACSB guidelines.<br />

4. The faculty have approved a document with the tenure and promotion guidelines and expectations for the College of<br />

Business Administration faculty.<br />

5. We have hired twelve doctorally qualified faculty since 2011 (nine of them have been replacements for faculty who retired<br />

or left and three are net new positions to address the shortage of full-time faculty.) These new faculty are identified on<br />

Table 5.2 under Standard 5 of this QA <strong>Report</strong>.<br />

6. We have reviewed and revised the administrative structure of the College of Business Administration, have realigned the<br />

disciplines of Business Law and Real Estate into the Department of Accounting, Finance, and Economics.<br />

7. We have strengthened our commitment to shared governance by establishing Graduate and Undergraduate Curriculum<br />

Committees.<br />

8. We have established a College of Business Administration Student Advisory Board and have regular meetings two times<br />

per semester.<br />

9. We have established a College of Business Administration Executive Advisory Board and have regular meetings once per<br />

semester.<br />

10. We have implemented a process to support faculty engagement in research and scholarship by providing funding for<br />

faculty to present research papers at regional, national, or international conferences.<br />

3


Standard Three, Criteria 3.h: Due to severe budget reductions in 2011 and 2012, the College of Business Administration opted<br />

to administer the EBI Undergraduate Exit Survey, whose cost is approximately $2,000, on a thre3-year cycle instead of every two<br />

years. It was administered in the fall of 2010 and will be administered again in the fall of <strong>2013</strong>. This unavoidable cost-saving<br />

measure, however, has not diminished our resolve to continue to be aware of and sensitive to the needs of our students. The<br />

COBA Student Advisory Board, consisting of the leaders of the various student organizations along with the student senators<br />

representing the college’s students in the Student Government Association, has evolved as a key conduit of two way<br />

communication between the students and the College’s administration. The dean, department heads, and faculty advisors meet<br />

twice per semester with the Student Advisory Board to discuss issues of common interest and to listen to students concerns.<br />

Two important issues have surfaced from these meetings over the past two years: insufficient parking, particularly for students<br />

with physical disabilities, and lack of informal, common learning spaces. This, in turn, has resulted in two very tangible<br />

improvements that have added value for our student stakeholders: The number of handicapped parking spaces in the parking lot<br />

adjacent to the College of Business Administration building has increased from two to six. Secondly, an area of 900 square feet<br />

of storage space has been remodeled, furnished, and turned into a Student Lounge whose grand opening is scheduled for<br />

Thursday, April 11, <strong>2013</strong>. . Students provided input on the selection of the carpet and paint colors.<br />

Standard Four, criteria 4.1: A College of Business administration <strong>Assurance</strong> of Learning Committee has been established<br />

since our Self Study report submitted for our reaffirmation of <strong>ACBSP</strong> accreditation in early 2011. This committee has struggled<br />

with trying to implement practical ways to generate assurance of learning data for comparison among our different student<br />

segments (first-time in college traditional students; non-traditional, working adult undergraduate learners, working professionals in<br />

our graduate programs.) Our <strong>Assurance</strong> of learning System is already complex and is becoming too onerous for our faculty to<br />

support adding additional complexities whose marginal cost and effort would exceed their marginal benefit. To address the issue<br />

of comparison data for the various segments of our student body the <strong>Assurance</strong> of Learning committee has opted to use data on<br />

our different locations and / or programs as representative of our specific student segments. For example, the typical student in<br />

our main campus in Stephenville is a first time in college traditional student. Secondly, by the very nature of the degree program,<br />

those students pursuing the Bachelor of Applied Arts and Sciences are, generally speaking, working adult learners mainly in our<br />

off-campus locations in the Fort Worth Southwest Metroplex and in Waco. Lastly, a good proportion of our graduate students are<br />

young working professionals taking graduate classes in our off-campus locations or online.<br />

4


As reported in our 2011 Self Study <strong>Report</strong> and also in this QA <strong>Report</strong> for our programs that are offered in various locations<br />

(Stephenville, Ft. Worth, Waco, or online) we have the same learning goals, regardless of location, and systematically use the<br />

same measurements to collect data. The <strong>Assurance</strong> of Learning Committee reviews data by program and location, engages<br />

faculty teaching courses involved in the measurement, and out of this process, ultimately actions plans are developed and<br />

implemented for program improvement in response to assessment results.<br />

Standard Six, Criteria 6.1: Below is a detailed description of the process employed to determine how credits are assessed and<br />

awarded for student technical training and work experience.<br />

The Bachelor of Applied Arts and Sciences (BAAS) is designed for the student with training in a technical area. The College of<br />

Business Administration offers the BAAS in Business Occupations. This degree utilizes education received at technical schools,<br />

community or junior colleges, military technical schools, among others. The A student must have completed at least 12 semester<br />

credit hours (or equivalent) in technical training to be eligible for consideration. With official documentation on the dates, duration,<br />

content, and results / successful completion of the technical training in question, such training may be supplemented with a<br />

maximum of 21 semester credit hours for documented full-time work experience (four (4) semester credit hours per year of<br />

qualifying experience). A student must have a minimum of 33 semester hours and a maximum of 48 hours (or equivalent) of<br />

occupational specialization to be eligible for consideration for the BAAS degree. Beginning Fall 2008, a maximum of 33 semester<br />

hours of credit (or equivalent) may be awarded.<br />

The technical training taken into consideration for the BAAS degree must meet the following criteria: it must be related to subject<br />

matter taught in the department or college sponsoring the degree program; it must be documented via transcripts from<br />

community, junior, or technical colleges, vocational/technical schools, military transcripts, certificates of completion, Continuing<br />

Education Units (CEU’s), employer sponsored training records, etc. The work component of the occupational specialization must<br />

also meet the following criteria: it must be related to subject matter taught in the department or college sponsoring the degree<br />

program; it must be consistent in nature (multiple employers are acceptable, but the employment must be in a similar type of<br />

position); it must have made the individual a specialist in the field; it must be documented through employer statements,<br />

resumes, etc. to be considered.<br />

Each prospective BAAS student is evaluated individually to determine eligibility for the degree program. This begins with<br />

specialized academic advisors from those departments sponsoring the BAAS degree program. If a student is found to meet the<br />

criteria described above, sponsored degree plan applications are considered by the Interdisciplinary Degree Programs<br />

Committee (formerly known as the Bachelor of Applied Arts and Sciences Committee). This University committee, appointed by<br />

the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs and made up of faculty, department heads, staff from Enrollment<br />

5


Management, and representation from Student Life Studies, screens and reviews all potential Bachelor of Applied Arts and<br />

Science (BAAS) students and evaluates student credentials. Each degree plan for the BAAS degrees must be approved by the<br />

committee. Upon approval of this body, the student’s occupational specialization credits awarded are then posted to their<br />

academic transcript by the Office of the Registrar.<br />

We offer no special classes for students in our BAAS in Business Occupations, they enroll in the same classes that our other<br />

majors in our BBA and BS degree programs take and therefore are subject to the same academic requirements.<br />

6


O 9. The business unit must routinely provide reliable information to the public on their performance, including student<br />

achievement such as assessment results.<br />

The <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, including results of student achievement in our assurance of learning program, is<br />

available through TSU’s College of Business Administration web page via a direct link<br />

List link here.<br />

Standard #1 Leadership<br />

Organization<br />

a. List any organizational or administrative personnel changes within the business unit since your last report.<br />

The following are the organizational and administrative changes that have occurred since our last report.<br />

Effective on September 1, 2012, Dr. Leah Schultz became the Computer Information Systems Department Head.<br />

Additionally, on October 1, 2012, Dr. Thomas Bradley was appointed Interim Head for the Management, Marketing, and<br />

Administrative systems Department.<br />

Lastly on January 15, <strong>2013</strong>, the academic disciplines of Business Law and Real Estate were realigned out of the<br />

Management, Marketing, and Administrative Systems Department into the Accounting, Finance, and Economics<br />

Department.<br />

b. List all new sites where students can earn an accredited business degree (international campus, off-campus or on<br />

campus, on-line) that have been added since your last report?<br />

In the spring semester of 2012 we started offering selected business classes on the campus of Navarro<br />

Community college in Midlothian, Texas but no full program leading to an accredited business degree is<br />

available there at this stage.<br />

7


Standard #2 Strategic Planning (this standard not typically addressed in the QA report) This is used as a place holder to allow<br />

all the other standards to be addressed in the QA report and keep the numbering system consistent with self-studies and QA<br />

reports.<br />

8


Standard #3 Student and Stakeholder Focus<br />

Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important<br />

data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.<br />

Standard 3 - Student and Stakeholder-Focused Results<br />

Student- and Stakeholder-Focused Student- and stakeholder-focused results examine how well your organization<br />

Results<br />

satisfies students and stakeholders key needs and expectations.<br />

Performance measures may include: satisfaction and dissatisfaction of current<br />

and past students and key stakeholders, perceived value, loyalty, persistence, or<br />

other aspects of relationship building, end of course surveys, alumni surveys,<br />

Internship feedback, etc.<br />

Measurement instrument or processes may include end of course surveys, alumni<br />

surveys, Internship feedback, etc.<br />

Each academic unit must demonstrate linkages to business practitioners and<br />

organizations, which are current and significant, including an advisory board.<br />

Performance<br />

Measure<br />

Measurable goal<br />

What is your<br />

goal?<br />

What is your<br />

measureme<br />

nt<br />

instrument<br />

or process?<br />

(Indicate<br />

length of<br />

cycle)<br />

Current<br />

Results<br />

What are<br />

your current<br />

results?<br />

Periodic surveys should be made of graduates, transfer institutions, and/or<br />

employers of graduates to obtain data on the success of business programs in<br />

preparing students to compete successfully for entry-level positions.<br />

Analysis of Results<br />

Analysis of<br />

Results<br />

What did<br />

you learn<br />

from the<br />

results?<br />

Action Taken or<br />

Improvement<br />

made<br />

What did you<br />

improve or<br />

what is your<br />

next step?<br />

9<br />

Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends<br />

(3-5 data points preferred)


Student<br />

satisfaction with<br />

support for job<br />

search will<br />

exceed 5.0<br />

Mean Score on<br />

a 0.0 (very<br />

dissatisfied) to<br />

7.0 (very<br />

satisfied) point<br />

Likert scale<br />

Students will<br />

express a high<br />

level of<br />

satisfaction with<br />

Common<br />

learning spaces<br />

in the College of<br />

business<br />

building<br />

EBI<br />

Undergrad<br />

Exit Survey<br />

every three<br />

years<br />

Twice per<br />

semester<br />

meetings<br />

with the<br />

Student<br />

Advisory<br />

Board<br />

representing<br />

the student<br />

body<br />

Mean score<br />

was 3.98 in<br />

Fall 2010<br />

Survey<br />

Persistent<br />

dissatisfacti<br />

on with lack<br />

of informal,<br />

common<br />

learning<br />

spaces in<br />

COBA<br />

building<br />

expressed<br />

in 201-<br />

2012<br />

meetings.<br />

Location of<br />

university’s<br />

Career<br />

Services<br />

Center<br />

discourage<br />

d students<br />

from<br />

seeking job<br />

placement<br />

assistance<br />

Generation<br />

NeXt<br />

students<br />

have a<br />

need for<br />

informal<br />

learning<br />

spaces<br />

Institutionalized<br />

four hours per<br />

week for a<br />

Career<br />

Services<br />

Counselor to<br />

hold office<br />

hours in the<br />

College of<br />

business<br />

building<br />

Secured<br />

funding to<br />

convert a large<br />

storage space<br />

(approx. 900<br />

sq. ft.) into a<br />

student lounge.<br />

Work is nearly<br />

completed and<br />

will open up for<br />

student use on<br />

April 11, <strong>2013</strong><br />

Career Services Office hours per Week in the<br />

College of Business Administration:<br />

2010-2011: 0 hours per week<br />

2011=2012: 4 hours per week<br />

Sq. Ft. in COBA building available as<br />

common/informal learning space /student lounge.<br />

2010-2011: 0 Sq. Ft.<br />

After April <strong>2013</strong>: 900 Sq.Ft.<br />

10


Students will<br />

express a high<br />

level of<br />

satisfaction with<br />

the physical<br />

facilities that<br />

affect their<br />

education<br />

Twice per<br />

semester<br />

meetings<br />

with the<br />

Student<br />

Advisory<br />

Board<br />

representing<br />

the student<br />

body<br />

Insufficient<br />

parking for<br />

student with<br />

physical<br />

disabilities<br />

We have to<br />

be<br />

sensitive<br />

and<br />

respond to<br />

the needs<br />

of all our<br />

students<br />

Worked with<br />

university<br />

administration<br />

and police<br />

department to<br />

increase the<br />

number of<br />

handicapped<br />

parking spaces<br />

in the college<br />

of business<br />

parking lot<br />

Number handicapped parking spaces in the<br />

College of Business Administration parking lot:<br />

2011: 2<br />

2012: 6<br />

11


Standard #4 Measurement and Analysis of Student Learning and Performance<br />

a. Program Outcomes<br />

List outcomes, by accredited program. Many of the program outcomes should be used as part of a student learning<br />

assessment plan and be measurable.<br />

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS<br />

Accounting BBA/BS: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Ethical Behavior for Accountants<br />

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles<br />

Technological Skills<br />

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards<br />

Effective Communication<br />

Functional Areas of Business<br />

Application of Tax Code<br />

Administrative Systems BBA/BS: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Communication Skills<br />

Use of Technology<br />

Administrative Systems Knowledge<br />

General Business Knowledge<br />

Business Administration, B.S.: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Communication Skills<br />

Technology Skills<br />

General Business Skills<br />

12


Business Occupations, B.A.A.S: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Communication Skills<br />

Technology Skills<br />

General Business Skills<br />

Computer Information Systems, BBA: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Fundamental CIS and networking knowledge<br />

Fundamental business knowledge<br />

Communication skills<br />

Economics BBA/BS: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Theories and Institutions<br />

Problem Solving and Policy<br />

Technology<br />

Finance BBA/BS: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Basic financial concepts and problem solving<br />

Technical skills<br />

Effective communication skills<br />

Ethical behavior<br />

Human Resource Management BBA: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Effective Communication Skills<br />

General Business Knowledge<br />

Use of Technology<br />

Fundamental Knowledge in Human Resource Management<br />

13


Interdisciplinary Business, B.B.A.: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Communication Skills<br />

Technology Skills<br />

General Business Skills<br />

Management BBA/BS: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Communication<br />

Technology<br />

Management Skills<br />

General Business Knowledge/Skill<br />

Marketing BBA: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Effective Communication Skills<br />

Use of Technology<br />

Marketing Problems<br />

General Business Knowledge<br />

GRADUATE PROGRAMS<br />

Business Administration MBA: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Depth of Knowledge in Literature<br />

Critical Thinking<br />

Student Engagement and Research Practice and/or Training<br />

14


Human Resource Management MS: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Depth of Knowledge in Literature<br />

Problem solving and critical thinking<br />

Research, practice, and/or training<br />

Management and Leadership MS: Students will demonstrate proficiency / perform satisfactorily in the following:<br />

Problem solving and critical thinking<br />

Depth of Knowledge in Discipline Literature<br />

Ongoing student engagement in research, practice, and/or training experience<br />

15


. Performance Results<br />

Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important<br />

data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.<br />

Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)<br />

Performance Indicator<br />

Definition<br />

1. Student Learning Results A student learning outcome is one that measures a specific competency attainment.<br />

Examples of a direct assessment (evidence) of student learning attainment that might be used include:<br />

(Required for each accredited capstone performance, third-party examination, faculty-designed examination, professional<br />

program)<br />

performance, licensure examination).<br />

Add these to the description of the measurement instrument in column two:<br />

Direct - Assessing student performance by examining samples of student work<br />

Indirect - Assessing indicators other than student work such as getting feedback from the student or<br />

other persons who may provide relevant information.<br />

Formative – An assessment conducted during the student’s education.<br />

Summative – An assessment conducted at the end of the student’s education.<br />

Internal – An assessment instrument that was developed within the business unit.<br />

External – An assessment instrument that was developed outside the business unit.<br />

Comparative – Compare results between classes, between online and on ground classes, Between<br />

professors, between programs, between campuses, or compare to external results such as results from<br />

the U.S. Department of Education Research and Statistics, or results from a vendor providing<br />

comparable data.<br />

16


Performance<br />

Measure<br />

Measurable<br />

goal<br />

What is your<br />

goal?<br />

Accounting<br />

BBA/BS<br />

Ethical<br />

Behavior for<br />

Accountants,<br />

At least 70% of<br />

students in ACC<br />

423 (Ethics for<br />

Accountants)<br />

will achieve at<br />

least 70% on<br />

related exam<br />

questions<br />

What is<br />

your<br />

measureme<br />

nt<br />

instrument<br />

or process?<br />

Do not use<br />

grades.<br />

(Indicate<br />

length of<br />

cycle)<br />

direct<br />

formative<br />

internal<br />

comparative<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

Analysis of Results<br />

Current Analysis of<br />

Results Results<br />

What are your<br />

current<br />

results?<br />

79% in<br />

Stephenville72<br />

% in Waco<br />

What did you<br />

learn from the<br />

results?<br />

Trend<br />

continues to<br />

be positive in<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

Action<br />

Taken or<br />

Improveme<br />

nt made<br />

What did<br />

you<br />

improve or<br />

what is<br />

your next<br />

step?<br />

Added<br />

additional<br />

questions<br />

into<br />

questions<br />

bank<br />

Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends<br />

(3-5 data points preferred)<br />

Stephenville Waco<br />

08/09 95.%% N/a<br />

09/10 64.3% 73.7%<br />

10/11 72% 76%<br />

11/12 79% 72%<br />

17


Technological<br />

Skills. 70% or<br />

more of the<br />

students will<br />

score at least<br />

70% on related<br />

exam questions<br />

in ACC 301,<br />

Analysis using<br />

spreadsheets.)<br />

General Acctg<br />

Principles.. 70<br />

%or more of the<br />

students in ACC<br />

401 (Financial<br />

Acctg.) will<br />

score at least<br />

70% on related<br />

exam questions<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

87% in<br />

Stephenville<br />

84% in Waco<br />

90% in<br />

Stephenville<br />

88.6% in<br />

Waco<br />

Declining<br />

trend in<br />

Stephenville<br />

Trend<br />

continues to<br />

be positive in<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

Added<br />

tutor in<br />

Acctg lab<br />

Added<br />

additional<br />

questions<br />

into<br />

questions<br />

bank<br />

Stephenville Waco<br />

08/09 85% 95%<br />

09/10 92% 80%<br />

10/11 91% 80%<br />

11/12 87% 84%<br />

Stephenville Waco<br />

08/09 94.4% 100%<br />

09/10 92.6% 88.9%<br />

10/11 89.2% 87%<br />

11/12 90.6& 88.6%<br />

Applied Arts &<br />

Science BAAS<br />

Verbal<br />

Communicatio<br />

n Skills. 75%or<br />

more of the<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher in GB 459<br />

(Bus. Strategy)<br />

oral presentation<br />

on scoring rubric.<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

100% in<br />

StephenvilleW<br />

aco,and SW<br />

Metroplex<br />

locations<br />

Trend<br />

continues to<br />

be positive in<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken Stephenville Waco<br />

08/09 100% 100%<br />

09/10 100% 100%<br />

10/11 100% 100%<br />

11/12 100% 100%<br />

18


Use of<br />

Technology<br />

70% or more of<br />

the students will<br />

score at least<br />

70% on related<br />

exam questions<br />

in ACC 301,<br />

Analysis using<br />

spreadsheets.)<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

78% in<br />

Stephenville<br />

95% in Waco<br />

Results are<br />

lower in<br />

Stephenville<br />

than in Waco<br />

Added<br />

tutor in<br />

Acctg lab<br />

in<br />

Stephenvill<br />

Stephenville Waco<br />

08/09 75% 100%<br />

09/10 75% 1005<br />

10/11 76% 90%<br />

11/12 78% 94%<br />

Economics<br />

BBA<br />

Use of<br />

technology.<br />

Students will<br />

score an avg. of<br />

70% or higher<br />

on assignments<br />

using Excel and<br />

web sites<br />

containing<br />

economic data<br />

Theories and<br />

institutions.<br />

Students in<br />

ECO 301<br />

Intermediate<br />

and 303 Money<br />

& banking will<br />

score at least<br />

an avg. 70% on<br />

comprehensive<br />

exams<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

78%.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

81%<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Trend<br />

continues to<br />

be positive in<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

Trend<br />

continues to<br />

be positive in<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken<br />

Updated<br />

and<br />

expanded<br />

test bank<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 75%<br />

09/10 75%<br />

10/11 76%<br />

11/12 78%<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 77%<br />

09/10 78%<br />

10/11 85%<br />

11/12 81%<br />

Waco<br />

Waco<br />

19


Finance BBA<br />

Communicatio<br />

n skills. 100%<br />

of students will<br />

pass written &<br />

oral<br />

communication<br />

requirements in<br />

FINA 403<br />

(Cases in<br />

Finance)<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

86%<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Declining<br />

trend was<br />

reversed in<br />

last year.<br />

Updated<br />

grading<br />

rubric<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 100%<br />

09/10 80.8%<br />

10/11 Class not<br />

offered<br />

11/12 86%<br />

Waco<br />

Basic financial<br />

concepts &<br />

problem<br />

solving.100%<br />

of students will<br />

achieve 80% or<br />

better in<br />

questions on<br />

exit exam in<br />

FINA 403<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

86%<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Trend<br />

continues to<br />

be positive in<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

Reviewed<br />

revised<br />

and added<br />

more<br />

challenging<br />

questions<br />

to test<br />

bank<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 100%<br />

09/10 100%<br />

10/11 97%<br />

11/12 98%<br />

20


Human<br />

Resource<br />

Mgmt, BBA<br />

Use of<br />

technology.<br />

75% or more of<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher on<br />

related<br />

questions in<br />

related<br />

questions in CIS<br />

301<br />

Effective<br />

Communicatio<br />

n skills. 75% or<br />

more of<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher in oral<br />

presentation in<br />

GB 459<br />

(Business<br />

Strategy)<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

79%<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

100%<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Slightly<br />

declining<br />

trend<br />

Trend<br />

continues to<br />

be positive in<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

Added<br />

tutor in<br />

Acctg /CIS<br />

lab in<br />

Stephenvill Stephenville<br />

08/09 67%<br />

09/10 83%<br />

10/11 83%<br />

11/12 79%<br />

No action<br />

taken<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 67%<br />

09/10 100%<br />

10/11 94%<br />

11/12 100%<br />

21


Fundamental<br />

knowledge in<br />

HR Mgmt. 75%<br />

or more of<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher on<br />

related<br />

questions in<br />

Mgmt 403<br />

(wage & Salary<br />

Adm.) 404<br />

(Selection &<br />

Recruitment)<br />

405 (HR<br />

Devlpmt),and<br />

GB 434<br />

(Emplmt Law)<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

43% in 2010-<br />

2011.<br />

Measured<br />

every two<br />

years.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Reviewed<br />

revised<br />

syllabi in<br />

those<br />

classes to<br />

strengthen<br />

coverage in<br />

HR Law,<br />

Wage &<br />

salary<br />

Adm., and<br />

HR<br />

Developmt,<br />

and<br />

Selection &<br />

Recruitmnt<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 39.20%<br />

09/10 Measurements<br />

every two years<br />

10/11 43%<br />

11/12 Measurements<br />

every two years<br />

Interdiscplinry<br />

Business, BBA<br />

Verbal Comm.<br />

Skills. 75% or<br />

more of<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher in oral<br />

presentation in<br />

GB 459<br />

(Business<br />

Strategy)<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

84%<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Stable trend<br />

in mid – 80%<br />

range, except<br />

for outlying<br />

year 09/10<br />

Will revise<br />

scoring and<br />

implement a<br />

scoring<br />

rubric<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 81.25%<br />

09/10 100%<br />

10/11 85%<br />

11/12 84%<br />

22


Use of<br />

Technology<br />

70% or more of<br />

the students will<br />

score at least<br />

70% on related<br />

exam questions<br />

in ACC 301,<br />

Analysis using<br />

spreadsheets<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

71%<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Declining<br />

trend in last<br />

three years. .<br />

Added tutor<br />

in Acc/ CIS<br />

lab Stephenville<br />

08/09 64.5%<br />

09/10 75%<br />

10/11 73%<br />

11/12 71%<br />

Management<br />

BBA / BS<br />

Verbal Comm.<br />

Skills. . 75%or<br />

more of the<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher in GB<br />

459 (Bus.<br />

Strategy) oral<br />

presentation on<br />

scoring rubric<br />

Written Comm.<br />

Skills. 75%or<br />

more of the<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher in GB 459<br />

(Bus. Strategy)<br />

written case study<br />

per scoring rubric<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

93%.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

84%.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Trend<br />

continues to<br />

be positive in<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

Stable trend<br />

over four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken<br />

Revised<br />

scoring<br />

rubric to<br />

reflect more<br />

accurately<br />

expectations<br />

of written<br />

assignment<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 93%<br />

09/10 95%<br />

10/11 92%<br />

11/12 93%<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 80%<br />

09/10 90%<br />

10/11 86%<br />

11/12 84%<br />

23


Fundamental<br />

Knowledge in<br />

Mgmt. 75% or<br />

more of stdnts<br />

will score 70%<br />

or higher<br />

related exams<br />

questions in<br />

MGMT 301, 302<br />

302, 350, 407,<br />

and 421<br />

Marketing BBA<br />

Verbal Comm.<br />

Skills. . 75%or<br />

more of the<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher in GB<br />

459 (Bus.<br />

Strategy) oral<br />

presentation on<br />

scoring rubric<br />

Written Comm.<br />

Skills. 75%or<br />

more of the<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher in GB<br />

459 (Bus.<br />

Strategy) written<br />

case study per<br />

scoring rub<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

72%.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

92%.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

88%.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

72% in 10/11<br />

Stable trend<br />

in mid 90%<br />

range in the<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

Stable trend<br />

over four year<br />

cycle<br />

Mapped<br />

course<br />

content in<br />

syllabi to<br />

ensure<br />

coverage of<br />

all essential<br />

topics<br />

No action<br />

taken<br />

Revised<br />

scoring<br />

rubric to<br />

reflect more<br />

accurately<br />

expectations<br />

of written<br />

assignment<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 33%<br />

09/10 Measured<br />

every two years<br />

10/11 72%<br />

11/12 Measured<br />

every two years<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 92%<br />

09/10 100%<br />

10/11 93%<br />

11/12 92%<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 80.7%<br />

09/10 90%<br />

10/11 86%<br />

11/12 88%<br />

24


GRADUATE<br />

PROGRAMS<br />

Master of<br />

Business<br />

Administration<br />

MBA<br />

Effective<br />

Decision-<br />

Making &<br />

Critical<br />

Thinking Skills<br />

70% or more of<br />

MBA students<br />

will perform at<br />

satisfactory<br />

level or higher<br />

on selected<br />

questions in the<br />

MBA<br />

comprehensive<br />

exam graded by<br />

faculty<br />

committee<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

92%.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Stable trend<br />

in mid 90%<br />

range in the<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 85%<br />

09/10 100%<br />

10/11 88%<br />

11/12 92%<br />

25


Communication<br />

Skills. 85% of<br />

MBA students<br />

will perform at<br />

satisfactory level<br />

or above on<br />

written and oral<br />

presentations in<br />

selected MBA<br />

classes (graded<br />

per scoring<br />

rubric)<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

95%.<br />

Program<br />

offered in<br />

Stephenville<br />

only<br />

Stable trend<br />

in mid 80% to<br />

90% range in<br />

the 08/09 and<br />

09/10 years.<br />

No action<br />

taken.<br />

Faculty to<br />

consider<br />

adding new<br />

learning<br />

goal related<br />

to<br />

knowledge<br />

of literature<br />

in field<br />

Stephenville<br />

08/09 85%<br />

09/10 95%<br />

10/11 Not measured<br />

11/12 *<br />

<br />

This outcome/objective is being replaced by<br />

one related to Depth of Knowledge in he<br />

literature<br />

Master of<br />

Science in<br />

Human<br />

Resource<br />

Mgmt, MS<br />

Written<br />

Communication<br />

80% or more of<br />

students will<br />

perform at<br />

satisfactory level<br />

or higher in<br />

written part of<br />

comprehensive<br />

exam<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

100%<br />

Program<br />

offered<br />

online only<br />

Stable trend<br />

in mid 90%<br />

range in the<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken<br />

Online<br />

08/09 100%<br />

09/10 100%<br />

10/11 100%<br />

11/12 100%<br />

26


Problem<br />

solving &<br />

comprehensive.<br />

Knowledge in<br />

HR, 80% or<br />

more of<br />

students will<br />

perform at<br />

satisfactory level<br />

or higher in<br />

comprehensive.<br />

blind-graded<br />

exam<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

100%<br />

Program<br />

offered<br />

online only<br />

Stable trend<br />

in upper 90%<br />

range in the<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken<br />

online<br />

08/09 100%<br />

09/10 100%<br />

10/11 96%<br />

11/12 100%<br />

Master of<br />

Science in<br />

Mgmt &<br />

Leadership, MS<br />

Problem<br />

solving &<br />

critical thinking<br />

80% or more of<br />

students will<br />

score 80% or<br />

higher on<br />

selected case<br />

analyses in the<br />

MGMT 509<br />

capstone class<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

95%<br />

Program<br />

offered<br />

online only<br />

Stable trend<br />

in upper 90%<br />

range in the<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken<br />

online<br />

08/09 80%+<br />

09/10 100%+<br />

10/11 95%<br />

11/12 95%<br />

27


Professional<br />

Ethics 80% or<br />

more of students<br />

will score 80% or<br />

higher on ethics<br />

case analysis in<br />

the MGMT 509<br />

capstone class<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

90%<br />

Program<br />

offered<br />

online only<br />

Stable trend<br />

in upper 90%<br />

range in the<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken online<br />

08/09 80%+<br />

09/10 100%+<br />

10/11 95%<br />

11/12 90%<br />

Knowledge<br />

Depth in<br />

Literature 80%<br />

or more of<br />

students will<br />

score 70% or<br />

higher in<br />

comprehensive<br />

exam on Mgmt<br />

theory &<br />

concepts<br />

Formative<br />

internal<br />

100%<br />

Program<br />

offered<br />

online only<br />

Stable trend<br />

in upper 90%<br />

range in the<br />

four year<br />

cycle<br />

No action<br />

taken online<br />

08/09 N/A<br />

09/10 100%+<br />

10/11 Not measured<br />

11/12 100%<br />

Standard #5 Faculty and Staff Focus<br />

Complete the following table Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data.<br />

It is not necessary to provide results for every process.<br />

28


Faculty and Staff Focused Results<br />

Faculty and staff-focused results examine how well the organization creates and<br />

maintains a positive, productive, learning-centered work environment for business<br />

faculty and staff.<br />

Performance<br />

Measure<br />

Measurable<br />

goal<br />

What is your<br />

goal?<br />

What is your<br />

measuremen<br />

t instrument<br />

or process?<br />

(Indicate<br />

length of<br />

cycle)<br />

Current<br />

Results<br />

What are<br />

your<br />

current<br />

results?<br />

Key indicators may include: professional development, scholarly activities, community<br />

service, administrative duties, business and industry interaction, number of advisees,<br />

number of committees, number of theses supervised, satisfaction or dissatisfaction of<br />

faculty and staff, positive, productive, and learning-centered environment, safety,<br />

absenteeism, turnover, or complaints.<br />

Analysis of Results<br />

Analysis<br />

of Results<br />

What did<br />

you learn<br />

from the<br />

results?<br />

Action Taken<br />

or<br />

Improvement<br />

made<br />

What did you<br />

improve or<br />

what is your<br />

next step?<br />

Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends<br />

(3-5 data points preferred)<br />

Table 5.1 Standard 5 - Faculty- and Staff-Focused Results<br />

29


Faculty<br />

satisfaction with<br />

support for<br />

pursing funded<br />

research will<br />

exceed 5.0<br />

Mean Score on<br />

a seven point<br />

Likert scale.<br />

0 = very<br />

dissatisfied to<br />

7.0 = very<br />

satisfied<br />

EBI Faculty<br />

Survey every<br />

three years<br />

Mean<br />

score<br />

was 2.62<br />

(slightly<br />

dissatisfi<br />

ed) in fall<br />

2010<br />

survey.<br />

Faculty<br />

need<br />

assistance<br />

in writing<br />

grant<br />

proposals<br />

Dean served<br />

on search<br />

committee to<br />

recruit a grant<br />

writer to assist<br />

faculty in<br />

searching for<br />

and submitting<br />

grant<br />

proposals and<br />

applications.<br />

Q033. Faculty Development - Satisfaction with the level<br />

of faculty development support you receive for<br />

enhancing your: Ability to secure funded research<br />

N = 29<br />

St<br />

d<br />

= 1.30<br />

De<br />

v<br />

Mean = 2.62<br />

2M<br />

N= 9<br />

S<br />

t<br />

1<br />

d<br />

.<br />

= 3<br />

D<br />

0<br />

e<br />

v<br />

One data point available, Next EFI faculty<br />

survey scheduled for fall <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

2M<br />

N= 9e<br />

a<br />

S n<br />

t<br />

1<br />

d =<br />

.<br />

= 3<br />

D 2<br />

0<br />

e<br />

v 6<br />

2<br />

30


Faculty<br />

satisfaction with<br />

support for to<br />

enhance their<br />

research will<br />

exceed 5.0<br />

Mean Score on<br />

a seven point<br />

Likert scale.<br />

0 = very<br />

dissatisfied to<br />

7.0 = very<br />

satisfied<br />

EBI Faculty<br />

Survey every<br />

three years.<br />

Next survey<br />

will be<br />

administered<br />

in fall of<br />

21013<br />

Mean<br />

score<br />

was 3.00<br />

(slightly<br />

dissatisfi<br />

ed) in fall<br />

2010<br />

survey.<br />

Support for<br />

research<br />

does lead<br />

to<br />

increased<br />

research<br />

productivity<br />

and,<br />

indirectly,<br />

to<br />

satisfaction<br />

with<br />

support<br />

Instituted<br />

internal<br />

monthly<br />

Research<br />

Seminar<br />

Series, and<br />

developed a<br />

process to<br />

fund up to<br />

$1,200 per<br />

faculty per<br />

year to<br />

present<br />

papers at<br />

conferences<br />

Total number of intellectual contributions, including<br />

journal articles, conf. proceedings, presentations,<br />

book chapters, etc:<br />

‘10/’11 academic yr. = 78<br />

‘11/’12 academic yr. 96, a 23% increase<br />

The increase in research productivity reflects the<br />

increase in support to engage in scholarly<br />

activities.<br />

20% or less of<br />

the faculty will<br />

be dissatisfied<br />

with salary<br />

compression /<br />

inversion<br />

problem<br />

Annual<br />

performance<br />

reviews and<br />

college-wide<br />

meetings<br />

50% of<br />

faculty<br />

are<br />

dissatisfi<br />

ed with<br />

salary<br />

compress<br />

inversion<br />

problem<br />

Compressi<br />

on /<br />

inversion<br />

problem is<br />

affecting<br />

morale and<br />

may lead<br />

to faculty<br />

turnover<br />

Received<br />

approval to<br />

use $100,000<br />

in funds un<br />

one half<br />

position plus<br />

additional<br />

funds from<br />

online course<br />

fees to begin<br />

addressing<br />

this issue<br />

No trend line exists yet but we expect the<br />

percentage of faculty dissatisfied with salary<br />

compression / inversion to decrease from current<br />

level of 50% over the next several years.<br />

Faculty Qualifications<br />

Complete Table 5.2 and 5.3 for new full-time and part-time faculty members since last self-study or QA report. Do not<br />

include faculty members previously reported.<br />

Table 5.2 Standard 5 - NEW FULL-TIME AND PART-TIME FACULTY QUALIFICATIONS<br />

31


NAME<br />

(List<br />

alphabetically<br />

by Last Name)<br />

MAJOR<br />

TEACHING<br />

FIELD<br />

COURSES<br />

TAUGHT<br />

(List the<br />

Courses<br />

Taught<br />

During the<br />

<strong>Report</strong>ing<br />

Period,<br />

Do Not<br />

Duplicate<br />

Listing)<br />

LIST ALL EARNED<br />

DEGREES<br />

(<strong>State</strong> Degree as<br />

Documented on<br />

Transcript, Must<br />

Include Major Field)<br />

DOCUMENT OTHER<br />

PROFESSIONAL<br />

CERTIFICATION<br />

CRITIERA<br />

Five Years Work<br />

Experience<br />

Teaching<br />

Excellence<br />

Professional<br />

Certifications<br />

<strong>ACBSP</strong><br />

QUALIFICATION<br />

1. Academically<br />

2. Professional<br />

3. Exception<br />

Baeza, Miguel<br />

(full-time)<br />

Bauer, Keldon<br />

(full-time)<br />

Esqueda, Omar<br />

(full-time)<br />

Jones, Dennis<br />

(full-time)<br />

Leach, Judd<br />

(full-time)<br />

Martinson,<br />

Brian<br />

(full-time)<br />

Management,<br />

International<br />

business.<br />

GB 103<br />

GB 444<br />

GB 591<br />

Finance FINA 301<br />

FINA 302<br />

FINA 400<br />

FINA 520<br />

Finance FINA 301<br />

FINA 401<br />

FINA 404<br />

FINA 520<br />

CIS<br />

CIS103<br />

CIS 518<br />

Bus. Law GB 432<br />

Human<br />

Resources<br />

Management<br />

GB 433<br />

MGMT 302<br />

MGMT 405<br />

MGMT 406<br />

BBA, MBA, Ph.D.,<br />

Bus. Administration,<br />

International<br />

Business<br />

BS, MBA,<br />

Ph.D.-Finance<br />

BBA,MBA,<br />

Ph.D.- Finance<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

BA,MED, MBA, EDD<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

BS, J.D.- Law Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

BS, MBA,<br />

Senior Professional in Academically<br />

ABD, Management Human Resources, (Doctoral)<br />

(Ph.D. expected HR Certification<br />

spring <strong>2013</strong>) Institute<br />

32


Mullens, Drake<br />

(full-time)<br />

Notgrass,<br />

David (full-time)<br />

Schieck,<br />

Ashley<br />

(full-time)<br />

Schuessler,<br />

Joseph<br />

(full-time)<br />

Management MGMT 301<br />

MGMT 303<br />

GB 459<br />

Management /<br />

Leadership<br />

Acctg. Bus.<br />

Law<br />

MGMT301<br />

MGMT 325<br />

MGMT 501<br />

MGMT 510<br />

ACC 204<br />

ACC 204<br />

ACC 304<br />

CIS CIS 226<br />

CIS 302<br />

CIS 345<br />

CIS 511<br />

CIS 519<br />

BBA, MBA,<br />

ABD, Management<br />

(Ph.D. expected<br />

spring <strong>2013</strong>)<br />

BA, MBA, Ph.D.<br />

Leadership Studies<br />

BBA, MAS (Acctg.)<br />

J.D. - Law<br />

BBA.MBA, MS<br />

(CIS), Ph.D. - CIS<br />

Six years work<br />

experience<br />

Security +, Network +,<br />

A+,CompTIA.<br />

Three years teach.exp.<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

Smith, Garry<br />

(full-time)<br />

Tanter, Alex<br />

(Part-Time<br />

Adjunct)<br />

Young, Arthur<br />

(full-time)<br />

Marketing MKTG 314<br />

MKTG 315<br />

MKTG 415<br />

MKTG 508<br />

Economics ECO 201<br />

ECO 203<br />

ECO 302<br />

ECO 304<br />

Accounting ACC 304<br />

ACC 435<br />

ACC 403<br />

ACC 424<br />

ACC 503<br />

BBA, MBA, Ph.D. -<br />

Marketing<br />

25 years work exp.,<br />

four yrs, teach.exp.<br />

BA, MA - Economics 12 yrs. work<br />

experience,5 yrs.teach<br />

exp.<br />

BS, MBA, Ph.D. -<br />

Accounting<br />

CPA<br />

Ten yrs. teach exp.<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

Professionally<br />

Academically<br />

(Doctoral)<br />

33


Full-Time<br />

Faculty (45)<br />

Highst<br />

Deg<br />

Eard<br />

Baeza, Miguel Ph.D.<br />

Most Recent<br />

Year<br />

Prof.<br />

Cert.<br />

Table 5.3, Standard 5, Criterion 5.8<br />

Scholarly and Professional Activities<br />

Scholarly Activities – See Code Below<br />

Papers Published Unpublishe Consultg<br />

Present Articles/ d Articles/<br />

Manuscript Manuscripts<br />

s/Books /Books<br />

Professional Activities –See Note Below<br />

Profession Professional Professional<br />

al Related Conferences Meetings<br />

Services /<br />

Workshops<br />

D=1 D=1 1 1 2<br />

Year 2 B=1 1<br />

Bauer, Keldon Ph.D.<br />

Most Recent<br />

Year<br />

D=1 2 2<br />

Year 2 D=1 D=1 1 D=2 1 2<br />

Esqueda, Ph. D.<br />

Omar<br />

Most Recent<br />

B=4 B=2 C=2 1 2 2<br />

Year<br />

Year 2 D=2 D=1 C=2 2 2<br />

Professional<br />

Membrshps<br />

Jones, Dennis EDD<br />

Most Recent<br />

Year<br />

A=3 A=1 A=1<br />

D=2<br />

Year 2 A=2 A=1<br />

D=2<br />

3 2<br />

3 2<br />

34


Leach, Judd J.D. Tax<br />

Law<br />

License<br />

Most Recent<br />

Year<br />

Year 2<br />

Martinson,<br />

Brian<br />

Most Recent<br />

Year<br />

ABD<br />

HR<br />

cert.<br />

B=2 B=1 A=1<br />

C=1<br />

A=2 1 1<br />

2 2<br />

Year 2 A=1 D=2 C=2 1 2<br />

B=1<br />

Mullens, Drake ABD<br />

Most Recent<br />

B=1 B=1 A=1 1 1 2<br />

Year<br />

C=1<br />

C=2<br />

Year 2 D=1 A=1 1 1 2<br />

C=2<br />

D=1<br />

Notgrass, Ph.D. A=2 2<br />

David<br />

Most Recent<br />

B=2 B=1 A=1 1 1 2<br />

Year<br />

D=2<br />

Year 2 A=1<br />

2<br />

D=2<br />

Schieck, Ashley J.D. CPA<br />

Most Recent<br />

A=2 3<br />

Year<br />

Year 2 A=1 2<br />

Schuessler, Ph.D. Sec.+,<br />

Joseph<br />

Ntwk+<br />

Most Recent<br />

D=1 D=2 A=1<br />

2 2<br />

Year<br />

D=2<br />

Year 2 D=1 C=2 1 1<br />

35


Smith ,Garry Ph.D.<br />

Most Recent<br />

D=2 D=2 A=3 1 2 3<br />

Year<br />

Year 2 D=1 1 1 3<br />

Young, Arthur Ph.D. CPA<br />

Most Recent<br />

A=1 D=1 1 A=1 2 1 2<br />

Year<br />

D=1<br />

Year 2 D=1 D=2 A=1 1 2<br />

Tanter, MA<br />

Alex<br />

Most Recent<br />

1 A=2 1<br />

Year<br />

Year 2 1 1<br />

36


Standard #6 Educational and Business Process Management<br />

a. Curriculum<br />

1. List any existing accredited degree programs/curricula that have been substantially revised since your last report and<br />

attach a Table - Standard 6, Criterion 6.1.3 – Undergraduate CPC Coverage for each program.<br />

N programs have undergone substantial revisions since our last report.<br />

2. List any new degree programs that have been developed and attach a Table - Standard 6, Criterion 6.1.3 –<br />

Undergraduate CPC Coverage for each new program since your last report.<br />

No new programs have been developed since our last report..<br />

Note: If you have a new degree at a level currently accredited by <strong>ACBSP</strong>, then report information on: student enrollment,<br />

program objectives, instructional resources, facilities and equipment, admissions requirements, graduation statistics, core<br />

professional components (CPCs) and the outcomes assessment process to <strong>ACBSP</strong>. If the new degree is at a higher level<br />

then what is currently accredited, the school must complete a self-study to add the degree.<br />

3. List any accredited programs that have been terminated since your last report.<br />

O accredited programs have been terminated since our last report.<br />

37


Complete table 6.1. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It<br />

is not necessary to provide results for every process.<br />

Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Organizational Performance Results<br />

5. Organizational Effectiveness Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each<br />

Results<br />

business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business<br />

program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic<br />

success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance.<br />

Performance<br />

Measure<br />

Measurable<br />

goal<br />

What is your<br />

goal?<br />

What is your<br />

measurement<br />

instrument or<br />

process?<br />

(Indicate<br />

length of<br />

cycle)<br />

Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, improvement in safety, hiring<br />

equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community<br />

organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by<br />

program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.<br />

Analysis of Results<br />

Current<br />

Results<br />

What are<br />

your<br />

current<br />

results?<br />

Analysis<br />

of Results<br />

What did<br />

you learn<br />

from the<br />

results?<br />

Action Taken<br />

or<br />

Improvement<br />

made<br />

What did you<br />

improve or<br />

what is your<br />

next step?<br />

Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends<br />

(3-5 data points preferred)<br />

38


Number of fulltime<br />

faculty per<br />

total Student<br />

Credit Hours<br />

generated.<br />

Increase fulltime<br />

faculty by<br />

10 to 12 net<br />

new faculty<br />

lines by 2020-<br />

2021<br />

Our Goal:<br />

One full-time<br />

faculty per<br />

every 300<br />

Semester Credit<br />

Hour generated<br />

Benchmarking<br />

data from peer<br />

institutions<br />

AACSB<br />

accreditation<br />

guidelines<br />

Four-year<br />

Undergraduate Undergraduate<br />

Presently<br />

we heave<br />

one full<br />

time<br />

faculty<br />

member<br />

for every<br />

380 SCH<br />

We are 10<br />

to12 fulltime<br />

faculty<br />

short of<br />

where we<br />

need to be<br />

Our request<br />

for a $19 per<br />

SCH tuition<br />

differential for<br />

business<br />

courses has<br />

been<br />

preliminary<br />

approved.<br />

Once final<br />

approval is<br />

granted, the<br />

additional<br />

funds will<br />

enable us to<br />

recruit for six<br />

or seven net<br />

new full-time<br />

faculty<br />

positions.<br />

Additionally,<br />

central<br />

administration<br />

has<br />

committed to<br />

budgeting<br />

one new<br />

faculty line<br />

per year.<br />

Continue to<br />

support<br />

39<br />

Semester Credit hours per full time faculty:<br />

2012-<strong>2013</strong>: 380 SCHs<br />

No trend line is available yet. We expect to bring<br />

the SCHs to about 300 per full-time faculty by 2020-<br />

2021.


Graduation<br />

Rate.<br />

Our Goal:<br />

Increase the<br />

four-year grad.<br />

rate of COBA<br />

graduates to<br />

45% by 2020<br />

Masters student<br />

one year<br />

retention rate.<br />

Our Goal:<br />

Increase the<br />

Masters<br />

students’ one<br />

year retention<br />

rate to 80% by<br />

2020<br />

Graduation<br />

Rates reported<br />

on request by<br />

Office of<br />

Institutional<br />

Research<br />

One year<br />

retention rates<br />

of masters<br />

students<br />

Rates reported<br />

on request by<br />

Office of<br />

Institutional<br />

Research<br />

35% in<br />

2012<br />

(2008<br />

cohort)<br />

73.1% in<br />

2012<br />

Five year<br />

trend is<br />

positive<br />

Five year<br />

trend is<br />

stagnant<br />

student<br />

engagement<br />

opportunities.<br />

Support<br />

university<br />

move to<br />

higher<br />

admission<br />

standards<br />

We are<br />

currently<br />

revising our<br />

leveling /<br />

Foundation<br />

courses for<br />

new students<br />

and reviewing<br />

our admission<br />

standards<br />

4 Yr Grad Rate<br />

2008 23.25%<br />

2009 25.6%<br />

2010 32.36%<br />

2011 32.8%<br />

2012 35%<br />

One Yr Master<br />

Retention Rate<br />

2008 72.1%<br />

2009 71.8%<br />

2010 70.9%<br />

2011 72.7%<br />

2012 73.1%<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!