EEG and Brain Connectivity: A Tutorial - Bio-Medical Instruments, Inc.

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fig. 4 – The correlation coefficient (and coherence) includes at least two possible couplings and mixtures of these two types of coupling: 1- where neuron A influences neuron B and vice versa and, 2- where a third neuron ‘C’ influences neuron A and neuron B and there is no connection between A and B. Comodulation omits the standard ‘C’ possibility and is limited to where neuron A influences neuron B and vice versa. The limitation of the term “comodulation” is that without partial correlation analyses or path analyses it is not possible to omit coupling number 2 which means that the term comodulation can be misleading unless these additional analyses are conducted. As discussed by Pikovsky et al (2003) the term modulation is complicated and it is possible for there to be modulation without synchronization and synchronization without modulation. As stated by Pikovsky et al (2003, p. 77) “Generally, modulation without synchronization is observed when a force affects oscillations, but cannot adjust their frequency.” Without further analyses to determine this distinction it is best to simply refer to amplitude or power correlation. The distinguishing characteristic of the application of the Pearson product correlation coefficient is the computation of the time course of the normalized covariance of spectra over an interval of time:
Eq. 1- r = ∑ N ∑ N ( X ( X − − X )( Y − Y ) X ) 2 ∑ N ( Y − Y ) 2 or the computationally simpler equation that one can compute more easily using a hand calculator: Eq. 2 - r = ( N N∑ XY − ∑ X∑Y 2 2 2 ∑ X − ( ∑ X ) )( N∑Y − ( ∑ Y ) 2 ) For example, if one computes the FFT over 1 second epochs for a 60 second recording period, i.e., N = 60, then the number of degrees of freedom in the spectral correlation coefficient (SCC) for channels X and Y = 60 – 1 = 59. For 59 degrees of freedom then a correlation of 0.258 or higher is statistically significant at P < .05. This is a valid and commonly used connectivity measure, however, it is important to remember that the correlation coefficient includes volume conduction + network connectivity, i.e., they are inextricably confounded. This is because the correlation coefficient omits phase difference and involves the “in-phase” or autospectral values and therefore volume conduction can not be separated and eliminated. This makes it more difficult to know if factors such as the number and strength of connections are what are changing due to experimental control or is it the “volume conduction” that is changing? As explained in section 8, coherence using complex numbers and phase differences separate volume conduction from network dynamics and automatically solve this problem. Another method of applying the Pearson Product correlation was developed by Lexicor, Inc. in the 1990s. This method computes the correlation between EEG spectra measured from two different locations and uses the individual spectral bin values within a frequency band. For example, if there are five frequency bins in the alpha frequency band (i.e., 8Hz, 9Hz, 10Hz, 11Hz and 12Hz), then N = 5 and the number of degrees of freedom = N – 1 = 4. When the degrees of freedom = 4 then a correlation coefficient of 0.961 or higher is necessary in order to achieve statistical significance at P < .05. Equations 1 and 2 are used to calculate the Pearson product correlation in both instances.
Page 1 and 2: (unpublished manuscript - Version 1
Page 3 and 4: 29- Definition of the Cross Channel
Page 5 and 6: possible and this is why the cospec
Page 7 and 8: is because there are relatively lon
Page 9 and 10: Fig. 1 - Illustration of volume con
Page 11 and 12: Fig. 3- Example of cospectrum (in-p
Page 13: coefficient is a valid and importan
Page 17 and 18: Fig. 5 - Comparisons between the Br
Page 19 and 20: to a Pearson product-moment correla
Page 21 and 22: constitute the basis for all spectr
Page 23 and 24: The frequency analysis of a time se
Page 25 and 26: That is, the cross-spectrum power i
Page 27 and 28: Demo). 11- Third Compute Coherence
Page 29 and 30: 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0
Page 31 and 32: frame” of consciousness (Thatcher
Page 33 and 34: Fig. 9 - Various degrees and types
Page 35 and 36: Fig. 10 - Illustrations of phase re
Page 37 and 38: when the 1 st derivative of the pha
Page 39 and 40: Fig. 13 shows an example of two 10
Page 41 and 42: Figure 15 - The x-axis are differen
Page 43 and 44: Fig - 16. Top is coherence (y-axis)
Page 45 and 46: Coherence inflation is defined as a
Page 47 and 48: time over which the average is comp
Page 49 and 50: Nonetheless, “instantaneous” ph
Page 51 and 52: Example of conventional digital EEG
Page 53 and 54: score; 2- Simplification by providi
Page 55 and 56: the brain. The integration of QEEG
Page 57 and 58: Multiple frequencies and multiple m
Page 59 and 60: Example of one of the progress char
Page 61 and 62: advantage of imaging of non-cortica
Page 63 and 64: where n is the number of observatio
Page 65 and 66:
Fig. 22 - Illustration of phase str
Page 67 and 68:
measure of the area under the curve
Page 69 and 70:
Fig. 24 - Top is filtered EEG at 25
Page 71 and 72:
Fig. 26 - Top is the spontaneous EE
Page 73 and 74:
27- How to compute Auto-channel Cro
Page 75 and 76:
30- Cross-Channel Cross-Frequency C
Page 77 and 78:
degrees or radians and is “normal
Page 79 and 80:
exhibits statistically significant
Page 81 and 82:
www.appliedneuroscience.com 37 - Co
Page 83 and 84:
elationships as defined by the phas
Page 85 and 86:
Fig. 33 - Example of phase differen
Page 87 and 88:
Fig. 35 - Example of 4 different fr
Page 89 and 90:
Fig. 37 - Example of a measure of c
Page 91 and 92:
Fig. 39- Illustration of how cross-
Page 93 and 94:
Fig. 41- Example of cross-frequency
Page 95 and 96:
Gray, C.M., Konig, P., Engle, A.K.
Page 97 and 98:
localization and functional connect
Page 99 and 100:
35 - 48, 2007. Thatcher, R.W., Bive
Page 101 and 102:
Cannon, R., Lubar, J., Sokhadze, E.
Page 103 and 104:
Lubar, J., Congedo, M. and Askew, J
Page 105 and 106:
Yoo, S. S. et al. Increasing cortic
Page 107 and 108:
F and likewise, F iω0t iϕ t [ y e
Page 109 and 110:
6- Phase Delay or phase difference
show all

EEG and Brain Connectivity: A Tutorial - Bio-Medical Instruments, Inc.

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?