2012 Conference Executive Record Report.pdf - YMCA of Greater ...

2012 Conference Executive Record Report.pdf - YMCA of Greater ... 2012 Conference Executive Record Report.pdf - YMCA of Greater ...

rochesterymca.org
from rochesterymca.org More from this publisher
10.09.2014 Views

10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 STATE OF NEW YORK YMCA YOUTH AND GOVERNMENT BILL NUMBER S – 04 A INTRODUCED BY: Nana Apraku, Tenaja Smith-Butler, Jainaba Darboe and Joy Ugiagbe AN ACT TO: Cap funding for correctional services and allocate the money towards educational facilities. The People of the State of New York, represented in the Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows: Purpose The purpose of our bill is to ensure that education is given proper priority in the NYS budget system. We wish to allocate more funds to education upon the passage of our bill. Summary of Provisions Section 1: Allocation: To set apart for a special purpose; designate. NYS (New York State) Budget: A drafting of how and where funding for NYS will be spread. Educational facilities can be daycares, schools, afterschool programs or a library. Section 2: Our bill is going to cap funding for correctional services and put the money that would have been given to correctional services to educational facilities. At the end of the drafting, where legislators create the budget, cap for correctional services made and all the extra original funds will be deducted from the planned amount and allocated to the educational portion of the NYS Budget. Justification Education is a major element in the development of children and young adults in society. However recent studies have shown that there is a growing unbalance in the amount of money spent on education compared to correctional institutions. California spends almost 3-5 times more money on jails and prisons than on education with a graduation rate of only 68% and this situation is where New York will be soon if there isn’t a plan to prevent it. New York spends about $56,000 per inmate compared to the average $16,000 per student enrolled in the school system. There has been an increasing trend to spend more money on jail systems, in 1986 the U.S. allocated almost 10 billion dollars toward correctional facilities by 2005 that number quadrupled to almost 43 billion dollars. State prisons have as many as 8,000 excess beds at their 67 facilities, and the ratio of correction officers to inmates far exceeds national averages, state records show. Millions of dollars are also paid to improve jail beds or front gate presentation. New York State must set priorities and make sure that when money is tight that we are allocating it properly. Fiscal Implications We do not plan to add or reduce the amount of funds provided we wish to spread them more fairly. Effective Date The 2013-2014 NYS Budget Drafting process. (Begins in Spring). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 STATE OF NEW YORK YMCA YOUTH AND GOVERNMENT BILL NUMBER S-04 B INTRODUCED BY: Heather Kilmer, Jaye Kudreyko, Brittany Bassett, and Marisa Passaro AN ACT TO: Add subsection 14 to section 220.16 of the New York State Penal Law. The People of the State of New York, represented in the Senate and Assembly do enact as follows: Purpose To ban “bath salts”, the manufacture, sale, and distribution of bath salts in New York State. Summary of Provisions Section 1: Definitions “Bath Salts”: A mixture of hallucinogenic substances such as mephedrone, Methylenedioxypyrovalerone, or MDPV, methylone, and various other substances based on the manufacturer and brand. D.E.A: Drug Enforcement Administration; a component of the U.S. Department of Justice. Section 2: Provisions A person is guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree when he knowingly and unlawfully posses: 1. A narcotic drug with intent to sell it; or 2. A stimulant, hallucinogenic substance, or lysergic acid diethylamide, with intent to sell it and has previously been convicted of an offence defined in article two hundred twenty or the attempt or conspiracy to commit any such offense; or 3. A stimulant with intent to sell it and said stimulant weighs one gram or more; or 4. Lysergic acid diethylamide with intent to sell it and said lysergic acid diethylamide weighs one milligram or more; or 5. A hallucinogen with intent to sell it and said hallucinogen weights twenty-five milligrams or more; or 6. A hallucinogenic substance with intent to sell it and said hallucinogenic substance weighs one gram or more; or 7. One or more preparations, compounds, mixtures or substances containing methamphetamine, its salts, isomers or salts of isomers with intent to sell it and said preparations, compounds, mixtures or substances are of an aggregate weight of one-eighth ounce or more; or 8. A stimulant and said stimulant weighs five grams or more; or 9. Lysergic acid diethylamide and said lysergic acid diethylamide weighs five milligrams or more; or 10. A hallucinogenic substance and said hallucinogen weighs one hundred twenty-five milligrams or more; or 11. A hallucinogenic substance and said hallucinogenic substance weighs five grams or more; or 12. One or more preparations, compounds, mixtures or substances containing a narcotic drug and said preparations, compounds mixtures or substances are of an aggregate weight of one-half ounce or more; or 13. Phencyclidine and said phencyclidine weighs one thousand two hundred fifty milligrams or more; or 14. A “bath salt” containing mephedrone, methylenedioxypyrovalerone, and methylone with intent to sell or use it. Fiscal Implications There are no necessary funds needed, there is no tax paid on this substance. Justification This Bill will ensure the safety of the public in New York State. By banning “bath salts”, New York State can protect users of this drug and the people around them. Effective Date This bill will go into effect one year after its passage.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 STATE OF NEW YORK YMCA YOUTH AND GOVERNMENT BILL NUMBER S-11 INTRODUCED BY: Bree Dexter, Helen Dillingham, Ashley Moss, Gail Van Valkenburg AN ACT TO: Amend § 134 of article 4 of New York State Labor Law The People of the State of New York, represented in the Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows: Purpose The purpose of this bill is to extend the hours of work available for minors sixteen and seventeen years of age beyond the set maximum in § 134 of article 4 of New York State Labor Law in order to allow them to further support their families financially. Summary of Provisions Section 1 Hours of work for minors sixteen and seventeen years of age. 1. When school is in session, no minor sixteen or seventeen years of age enrolled in a daytime school, other than a part-time or continuation school, shall be employed: a. (i) More than four hours on any day preceding a school day, other than on a Sunday or holiday; (ii) except that students enrolled in a cooperative work experience program approved by the department of education may be employed for no more than six hours on any day preceding a school day, other than on a Sunday or holiday, if such hours of employment occur solely pursuant to such program. Any hours worked by students in such programs shall be included when calculating the number of hours worked for purposes of subparagraph (i) of this paragraph; b. More than eight hours on a Friday, Saturday, Sunday or holiday; c. More than twenty-eight thirty-five hours a week. d. More than six days a week; e. After ten o'clock at night on any day preceding a school day, or after midnight on any day preceding a school day provided the employer receives and maintains both the written consent of the minor's parent or guardian and a certificate which shall be provided to the employer at the end of each marking period by the minor's school which shall assert that such minor is in satisfactory academic standing according to the standards in such school district; f. After ten o’clock at night on any day preceding a non-school day or, if the employer receives and maintains the written consent of the minor's parent or guardian, after midnight; or g. Before six o'clock in the morning. Section 2 When school is not in session, no minor sixteen or seventeen years of age shall be employed: a. More than eight nine hours a day, except that for the purpose of making one or more shorter work days or a holiday in a week, such persons may be employed up to ten hours on any one day of the week, and nine hours on any of four other days, but not in excess of forty-eight fifty-four hours in any such week; b. More than forty-eight fifty-four hours a week. c. More than six days a week; or d. After twelve midnight or before six o'clock in the morning. Justification This bill gives teens more opportunities to earn money during a time of economic turmoil. The amount of families that rely on teens’ income is increasing, and it is time that these teens are given more of a chance to assist their families. This bill only benefits families and minors that wish to work more. Fiscal Implications There are no fiscal implications. Effective Date If passed, this bill shall go into effect as of January 1, 2013. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 STATE OF NEW YORK YMCA YOUTH AND GOVERNMENT BILL NUMBER S - 12 Introduced By: Maria Henry, Ani Marellapudi, Andrew Quigley, Cassius Wilkinson AN ACT TO: This bill will address flaws in the current system of criminal probation. The People of the State of New York, represented in the Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows: Purpose The institution of an intensively supervised probation system, similar to Hawaii’s HOPE (Hawaii's Opportunity Probation with Enforcement) program, will minimize the amount of repeat offenders (of drug related crimes) within our State’s criminal justice system. A combination of swift and consistent punishment for the violation of probation, coupled with the full cooperation of probation officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and New York State police forces, we can effectively induce the behavioral change that will allow probationers to return to their rightful place in society. Summary of Provisions Probationers in HOPE Probation receive swift, predictable, and immediate sanctions – typically resulting in several days in jail – for each detected violation, such as detected drug use or missed appointments with a probation officer. In HOPE Probation, defendants are clearly warned that if they violate the rules, they go to jail. Defendants are required to call a hotline each weekday morning to find out if they must take a drug test that day. Random drug testing occurs at least once a week for the first two months. If probationers test positive, they are arrested immediately. If they fail to appear for the test or violate other terms of probation, warrants for their arrest are issued immediately. Once they are apprehended, a probation modification hearing is held two days later, and violators are typically sentenced to a short jail term. The jail time may increase for subsequent violations and repeat offenders are often ordered into residential treatment. Amendments will be made to New York State Penal Law Article 65.00 and 65.10 concerning the repeated probation of drug users. Such criminals would be given a regimen of HOPE probation. Justification In New York State, we see the same fundamental problems in probation enforcement that once plagued the Hawaii Justice System. Offenders, convicted of drug related crimes, are placed in a probation system that is too lenient and too negligent of their problems. Probation officers frequently allow offenders to have multiple violations of their parole without consequence. Then, after an arbitrarily chosen number of violations, offenders’ probation is revoked and they serve the rest of their sentences in jail. Our current system is flawed on a psychological level as it offers offenders no incentive to change their behavior. They are allowed to violate the terms of their parole until their probation is suddenly and arbitrarily revoked. The policy of fast and consistent punishment will create the deterrence that offenders currently lack. New York State will see that the threat of punishment, when upheld by the entire criminal justice system, will be enough alone to deter the violation of probation. Justification of this reform is warranted by the ineffectiveness of the current New York State probation. In 2010, there were 113,858 people arrested for drug offenses and among those, 61.8% of the arrestees had prior offenses. Being on the HOPE program reduces an offender’s chance of facing sanction by one half, and of going to prison by two-thirds. Furthermore, it reduces the chance of being arrested for a new crime by over fifty percent. Institution of the HOPE program will not only shrink the drug market, but will save lives, as the vast majority of offenders are deterred from using drugs, and the small percentage that continue to do will receive rehabilitative treatment on a more personal and effective level. Fiscal Implications The establishment of this parole reform would hold strong economic incentives for the state, in its current fiscal condition. The cost per offender in the system is an additional $1400 per year (inclusive of the mandatory rehabilitation programs for offenders who continue to fail tests), and saves $7000 per year. An average of $30,00 of public tax money is required to imprison a convict for one year. This probation system would help reduce the necessities from taxpayer funds, as it would create an environment in which a lower proportion of those on probation return to prison. With these results, taxes can either be decreased, or can instead be invested in state institutions with more productive returns (i.e. education). Effective Date If passed, this bill’s legislation would go into effect beginning on June 1, 2012. 1

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

37<br />

38<br />

39<br />

40<br />

41<br />

42<br />

STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> YOUTH AND GOVERNMENT<br />

BILL NUMBER S-11<br />

INTRODUCED BY: Bree Dexter, Helen Dillingham, Ashley Moss, Gail Van Valkenburg<br />

AN ACT<br />

TO: Amend § 134 <strong>of</strong> article 4 <strong>of</strong> New York State Labor Law<br />

The People <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> New York, represented in the<br />

Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:<br />

Purpose<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this bill is to extend the hours <strong>of</strong> work available for minors sixteen and seventeen years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

beyond the set maximum in § 134 <strong>of</strong> article 4 <strong>of</strong> New York State Labor Law in order to allow them to further<br />

support their families financially.<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> Provisions<br />

Section 1<br />

Hours <strong>of</strong> work for minors sixteen and seventeen years <strong>of</strong> age. 1. When school is in session, no minor sixteen or<br />

seventeen years <strong>of</strong> age enrolled in a daytime school, other than a part-time or continuation school, shall be<br />

employed: a. (i) More than four hours on any day preceding a school day, other than on a Sunday or holiday; (ii)<br />

except that students enrolled in a cooperative work experience program approved by the department <strong>of</strong> education<br />

may be employed for no more than six hours on any day preceding a school day, other than on a Sunday or<br />

holiday, if such hours <strong>of</strong> employment occur solely pursuant to such program. Any hours worked by students in<br />

such programs shall be included when calculating the number <strong>of</strong> hours worked for purposes <strong>of</strong> subparagraph (i)<br />

<strong>of</strong> this paragraph;<br />

b. More than eight hours on a Friday, Saturday, Sunday or holiday;<br />

c. More than twenty-eight thirty-five hours a week.<br />

d. More than six days a week;<br />

e. After ten o'clock at night on any day preceding a school day, or after midnight on any day preceding a school<br />

day provided the employer receives and maintains both the written consent <strong>of</strong> the minor's parent or guardian and<br />

a certificate which shall be provided to the employer at the end <strong>of</strong> each marking period by the minor's school<br />

which shall assert that such minor is in satisfactory academic standing according to the standards in such school<br />

district;<br />

f. After ten o’clock at night on any day preceding a non-school day or, if the employer receives and maintains<br />

the written consent <strong>of</strong> the minor's parent or guardian, after midnight; or<br />

g. Before six o'clock in the morning.<br />

Section 2<br />

When school is not in session, no minor sixteen or seventeen years <strong>of</strong> age shall be employed:<br />

a. More than eight nine hours a day, except that for the purpose <strong>of</strong> making one or more shorter work days or a<br />

holiday in a week, such persons may be employed up to ten hours on any one day <strong>of</strong> the week, and nine hours on<br />

any <strong>of</strong> four other days, but not in excess <strong>of</strong> forty-eight fifty-four hours in any such week;<br />

b. More than forty-eight fifty-four hours a week.<br />

c. More than six days a week; or<br />

d. After twelve midnight or before six o'clock in the morning.<br />

Justification<br />

This bill gives teens more opportunities to earn money during a time <strong>of</strong> economic turmoil. The amount <strong>of</strong><br />

families that rely on teens’ income is increasing, and it is time that these teens are given more <strong>of</strong> a chance to<br />

assist their families. This bill only benefits families and minors that wish to work more.<br />

Fiscal Implications<br />

There are no fiscal implications.<br />

Effective Date<br />

If passed, this bill shall go into effect as <strong>of</strong> January 1, 2013.<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

37<br />

38<br />

39<br />

40<br />

41<br />

42<br />

43<br />

STATE OF NEW YORK<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> YOUTH AND GOVERNMENT<br />

BILL NUMBER S - 12<br />

Introduced By: Maria Henry, Ani Marellapudi, Andrew Quigley, Cassius Wilkinson<br />

AN ACT<br />

TO: This bill will address flaws in the current system <strong>of</strong> criminal probation.<br />

The People <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> New York, represented in the<br />

Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:<br />

Purpose<br />

The institution <strong>of</strong> an intensively supervised probation system, similar to Hawaii’s HOPE (Hawaii's Opportunity<br />

Probation with Enforcement) program, will minimize the amount <strong>of</strong> repeat <strong>of</strong>fenders (<strong>of</strong> drug related crimes) within our State’s<br />

criminal justice system. A combination <strong>of</strong> swift and consistent punishment for the violation <strong>of</strong> probation, coupled with the full<br />

cooperation <strong>of</strong> probation <strong>of</strong>ficers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and New York State police forces, we can effectively induce the<br />

behavioral change that will allow probationers to return to their rightful place in society.<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> Provisions<br />

Probationers in HOPE Probation receive swift, predictable, and immediate sanctions – typically resulting in several days<br />

in jail – for each detected violation, such as detected drug use or missed appointments with a probation <strong>of</strong>ficer. In HOPE<br />

Probation, defendants are clearly warned that if they violate the rules, they go to jail. Defendants are required to call a hotline each<br />

weekday morning to find out if they must take a drug test that day. Random drug testing occurs at least once a week for the first<br />

two months. If probationers test positive, they are arrested immediately. If they fail to appear for the test or violate other terms <strong>of</strong><br />

probation, warrants for their arrest are issued immediately. Once they are apprehended, a probation modification hearing is held<br />

two days later, and violators are typically sentenced to a short jail term. The jail time may increase for subsequent violations and<br />

repeat <strong>of</strong>fenders are <strong>of</strong>ten ordered into residential treatment.<br />

Amendments will be made to New York State Penal Law Article 65.00 and 65.10 concerning the repeated probation <strong>of</strong><br />

drug users. Such criminals would be given a regimen <strong>of</strong> HOPE probation.<br />

Justification<br />

In New York State, we see the same fundamental problems in probation enforcement that once plagued the Hawaii Justice<br />

System. Offenders, convicted <strong>of</strong> drug related crimes, are placed in a probation system that is too lenient and too negligent <strong>of</strong> their<br />

problems. Probation <strong>of</strong>ficers frequently allow <strong>of</strong>fenders to have multiple violations <strong>of</strong> their parole without consequence. Then,<br />

after an arbitrarily chosen number <strong>of</strong> violations, <strong>of</strong>fenders’ probation is revoked and they serve the rest <strong>of</strong> their sentences in jail.<br />

Our current system is flawed on a psychological level as it <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>of</strong>fenders no incentive to change their behavior. They are allowed<br />

to violate the terms <strong>of</strong> their parole until their probation is suddenly and arbitrarily revoked. The policy <strong>of</strong> fast and consistent<br />

punishment will create the deterrence that <strong>of</strong>fenders currently lack. New York State will see that the threat <strong>of</strong> punishment, when<br />

upheld by the entire criminal justice system, will be enough alone to deter the violation <strong>of</strong> probation.<br />

Justification <strong>of</strong> this reform is warranted by the ineffectiveness <strong>of</strong> the current New York State probation. In 2010, there<br />

were 113,858 people arrested for drug <strong>of</strong>fenses and among those, 61.8% <strong>of</strong> the arrestees had prior <strong>of</strong>fenses. Being on the HOPE<br />

program reduces an <strong>of</strong>fender’s chance <strong>of</strong> facing sanction by one half, and <strong>of</strong> going to prison by two-thirds. Furthermore, it reduces<br />

the chance <strong>of</strong> being arrested for a new crime by over fifty percent. Institution <strong>of</strong> the HOPE program will not only shrink the drug<br />

market, but will save lives, as the vast majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders are deterred from using drugs, and the small percentage that continue<br />

to do will receive rehabilitative treatment on a more personal and effective level.<br />

Fiscal Implications<br />

The establishment <strong>of</strong> this parole reform would hold strong economic incentives for the state, in its current fiscal<br />

condition. The cost per <strong>of</strong>fender in the system is an additional $1400 per year (inclusive <strong>of</strong> the mandatory rehabilitation programs<br />

for <strong>of</strong>fenders who continue to fail tests), and saves $7000 per year. An average <strong>of</strong> $30,00 <strong>of</strong> public tax money is required to<br />

imprison a convict for one year. This probation system would help reduce the necessities from taxpayer funds, as it would create<br />

an environment in which a lower proportion <strong>of</strong> those on probation return to prison. With these results, taxes can either be<br />

decreased, or can instead be invested in state institutions with more productive returns (i.e. education).<br />

Effective Date<br />

If passed, this bill’s legislation would go into effect beginning on June 1, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!