09.09.2014 Views

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Especially problematic is the situation where one <strong>and</strong> the same word is given<br />

alternative conceptual definitions, while having also a more or less established<br />

everyday usage. Take for example saturation. Even if each of the definitions<br />

is clear, it is very confusing that one <strong>and</strong> the same term can have so<br />

many slightly varying definitions.<br />

There are also generic words <strong>and</strong> terms that have been given very specific<br />

meanings within a given scientific discourse. These can be misunderstood or<br />

confused with their more generic meanings outside that discourse. Examples<br />

of this are the terms inherent colour <strong>and</strong> identity colour. Within the conceptual<br />

framework of their discourse these terms are well defined (<strong>and</strong> thus useful),<br />

but considered out of that framework they can be very confusing.<br />

Colour identification through three properties<br />

Irrespective of the starting point, be it physical, psychophysical or perceptual,<br />

any single colour can be described <strong>and</strong> identified through three independent<br />

properties. This makes it possible to organise <strong>and</strong> examine all possible<br />

colours within a three-dimensional conceptual structure, called a colour<br />

space. There exists, however, some variation between systems as to which<br />

exact visual properties constitute the three parameters of colour – <strong>and</strong> even<br />

more disagreement about how these parameters are defined. The end result is<br />

that there are in use today several colour systems exhibiting various ideas of<br />

colour.<br />

It is relatively easy to build a model of colour from three variables such hue,<br />

lightness <strong>and</strong> saturation. The three dimensions lend themselves easily to a<br />

variety of geometric shapes. These colourful cubes, cylinders, spheres, cones,<br />

double cones, tetra- <strong>and</strong> octahedrons <strong>and</strong> their more complex asymmetrical<br />

variations may look convincing <strong>and</strong> beguilingly attractive as models for the<br />

parameters of colour. However, if colour is to be understood as something<br />

that is neither a property of objects nor entirely of the perceiver – but as<br />

something that happens in the dynamic interaction of the two – then no static<br />

geometric model could ever describe it.<br />

Many, but not all, colour systems include lightness as one of its variables.<br />

Sometimes other words are used to denote basically the same thing. In the<br />

Munsell system, for example, the darkness–lightness variable is called value.<br />

<strong>Lightness</strong> or value typically forms a scale between maximum blackness <strong>and</strong><br />

maximum whiteness. Although it is a basic variable it is not defined the same<br />

way in all systems. One system might define lightness in photometric terms,<br />

another with reference to st<strong>and</strong>ard samples. This <strong>and</strong> the conceptual confusion<br />

between lightness <strong>and</strong> brightness, is one of the topics of this article.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!