09.09.2014 Views

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Perception<br />

Processing<br />

Recognition<br />

Transduction<br />

Action<br />

Proximal stimulus<br />

Distal stimulus<br />

Figure 6. The visual process as a circle. (After Goldstein)<br />

Goldstein emphasizes that the process is a lot more complicated <strong>and</strong> dynamic<br />

<strong>and</strong> could also be described as a circle (above). In this circle of interactions,<br />

as in the linear representation, the prime cause of visual perceptions is the<br />

distal stimulus. The arrows show the main direction of processing (bottom<br />

up). I have added the weaker anti-clockwise arrows to indicate that there is<br />

also some signalling from the top down, from the higher cortical levels to the<br />

lower. How much of this is taking place <strong>and</strong> what its effects on seeing are is<br />

still unclear. It seems obvious, though, that our actions influence recognition,<br />

which in turn influences perception. The diagram probably needs to be three<br />

dimensional to depict the process of interactions more faithfully.<br />

Where does seeing come into this? How to define it? According to the above<br />

chart, more than half of the visual process occurs in the brain. Examined as<br />

neural processing, perception proper occurs quite late in this chain. Does<br />

seeing require recognition <strong>and</strong> does recognition involve conscious experience?<br />

We are faced with this question in the following examples. Richard<br />

Gregory says that the peripheral areas of the retina can produce a perception<br />

of movement in the field of vision without perception of form: “Movement is<br />

seen, but it is impossible to identify the object, <strong>and</strong> there is no colour” … <strong>and</strong><br />

furthermore “When movement stops the object becomes invisible.” (Gregory<br />

2003). So we still perceive – <strong>and</strong> perhaps see – the movement, if not the<br />

object. But consider this: “The extreme edge of the retina is even more primitive:<br />

when it is stimulated by movement we experience nothing; but a reflex is<br />

initiated, rotating the eye to bring the moving object into central vision,<br />

bringing our highly developed foveal region into play for identifying the object.”<br />

(Ibid., my emphases). We do not see the movement, but we react to it.<br />

Only after that we may see the object.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!