09.09.2014 Views

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

Lightness and Brightness and Other Confusions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pigment, the two mixtures may very well look different. Or a restorer of paintings<br />

may touch up an area <strong>and</strong> achieve a perfect match in the studio only to<br />

find that when the painting is shown in the lighting of the gallery the touchedup<br />

area is plainly visible.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, one who thinks that colours are simply spectral power<br />

distributions may be inclined to say silly things, such as “white light is a mixture<br />

of all colours.” This despite the fact that the original decomposer of white<br />

light, Isaac Newton, cautioned, “the rays are not coloured.” Furthermore,<br />

such a devotee of physical colours would be unable to underst<strong>and</strong> how it is<br />

that a monochromatic yellow light could be visually indistinguishable from a<br />

mixture of two lights that look respectively red <strong>and</strong> green. In short, he would<br />

be unable to underst<strong>and</strong> how colour television is possible. This brings us back<br />

to our second case, in which we might refer to the yellow as a psychophysical<br />

colour.<br />

Psychophysics is concerned with an organism’s behavioural response to physical<br />

stimuli. In the case of colour, we know that human visual systems heavily<br />

filter spectral energy information in their environment, reducing it, in daylight<br />

conditions, to the response ratios of three photoreceptor classes. In the<br />

first half of the 20th century, information about the actual response characteristics<br />

of the photoreceptors was unobtainable, so the colour matches made<br />

by observers under carefully controlled conditions were averaged <strong>and</strong> mathematically<br />

manipulated to yield the 1931 CIE St<strong>and</strong>ard Observer. This “Observer”<br />

(actually a lookup table), along with the specification of illuminant<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards enables one to calculate colour mixtures that correspond well with<br />

the colour mixtures that real people make. The CIE system <strong>and</strong> related<br />

psychophysical colour spaces have been developed <strong>and</strong> improved upon over<br />

the years. For the appropriate st<strong>and</strong>ard viewing <strong>and</strong> illumination conditions,<br />

the CIE Observer will predict a match between our “television patch” yellow<br />

<strong>and</strong> our paint chip. They are thus the same psychophysical colour.<br />

Despite the mathematical sophistication <strong>and</strong> practical success of colorimetry,<br />

we must bear in mind that its proper business is mixing <strong>and</strong> matching. It is<br />

common to see coloured renditions of the tongue-shaped CIE chromaticity<br />

diagram 1 . What is intended to be an intuitive aid in reading the figure all too<br />

readily makes the unwary suppose that the colour sample represented by a<br />

point in the diagram looks like the colour of the region in which the point<br />

appears, <strong>and</strong> that a straight line from a spectral locus to the white point will<br />

be a line of constant hue, with only the saturation varying. Typically this is<br />

not the case; in the chromaticity diagram the lines of constant hue are mostly<br />

curved to a greater or lesser extent. Hue shifts with desaturation.<br />

1<br />

See figure 14 on page 61.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!