09.09.2014 Views

Designing for wellbeing

Designing for wellbeing

Designing for wellbeing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

posed during the exercise. In this way epiphanies may come to either party,<br />

and they can be instantly developed. This is a good example of bridging the<br />

discipline gap by finding mutually unfamiliar territories.<br />

Involving the stakeholders meant following an iterative process where<br />

the group visited the site regularly to discuss the project and listen to the<br />

representatives’ opinions. The representatives not only shared their specialist<br />

knowledge, they also played a role in the <strong>for</strong>mation of the results<br />

being developed by the designers. The designers acted as catalysts <strong>for</strong> the<br />

creation of a mutually desirable solution. Taken at face value the solution<br />

resulting from the project appears simple and obvious; however, it was<br />

simply not there be<strong>for</strong>e. This underlines the vuja de approach the designers<br />

brought to the project. They helped the specialists to view their discipline,<br />

and their everyday work, through fresh eyes. The Transfer Ticket is critical<br />

of the routine practices in psychiatric care and the relationship between<br />

the patients and the facilities they use. This is of great value, as it is the<br />

result of a collaboration between stakeholders and external provocateurs.<br />

The group’s process of interpretation through discussion with the situation<br />

and reflection on the actual user input closely follows Schön’s concept<br />

of reflective practice, while their use of metaphors and drawing of analogies<br />

from their own personal experiences of travel is an exemplary case<br />

of the vuja de-type thinking that Kelley talks about. The group managed<br />

to effectively cut corners in their own process, avoiding the difficulties of<br />

learning and understanding the nuances of patient transfer and its relation<br />

to care but understanding it enough to find a shortcut.<br />

What is notable about this way of working is that the facts do not dictate<br />

decisions. Working in this way postpones the cost engineering and other<br />

analyses to later stages of the project and allows more room <strong>for</strong> pursuing<br />

goals that are desirable despite their costs and difficulties. This may seem<br />

tedious, as it is through iteration that results can be gained, but when working<br />

towards the specific goal of contributing positively to a discipline that<br />

you know virtually nothing about it is a feasible route to follow.<br />

47 · We have always been here be<strong>for</strong>e: on design courting real disciplines

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!