08.09.2014 Views

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Behaviour <strong>of</strong> FORCLIM along a transect <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Alps 97<br />

600<br />

correlated T and P<br />

500<br />

Frequency<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

-.1 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7<br />

uDrStr<br />

Fig. 4.3: Frequency distribution <strong>of</strong> simulated drought stress (uDrStr) at <strong>the</strong> site Sion.<br />

The time series <strong>of</strong> soil water content as simulated by FORCLIM-E at <strong>the</strong>se sites<br />

(Tab. 4.2) are shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4.4. The Thornthwaite & Ma<strong>the</strong>r (1957) model tracks<br />

measured soil moisture fairly well. The deviations from <strong>the</strong> measurements should be<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpreted consider<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> measurements and <strong>the</strong>ir representativeness:<br />

The measured soil moisture content is <strong>in</strong>fluenced considerably by <strong>the</strong> water demand<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trees surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g devices, whereas <strong>the</strong> simulated water content corresponds<br />

to <strong>the</strong> average over a larger area. Moreover, it should be kept <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>the</strong><br />

FORCLIM-E model has a monthly time step only, whereas <strong>the</strong> measurements have a much<br />

f<strong>in</strong>er resolution that can not be produced by <strong>the</strong> model. Generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, FORCLIM-E<br />

appears to be capable <strong>of</strong> simulat<strong>in</strong>g realistic time series <strong>of</strong> soil moisture under conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> moderate drought. It can be expected that results <strong>of</strong> a similar quality would be obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

for o<strong>the</strong>r sites on <strong>the</strong> Swiss Plateau because <strong>the</strong>y are characterized by similar drought<br />

stress (Tab. 4.1). However, <strong>the</strong> precision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calculation for sites with much more<br />

drought (e.g. Sion) can not be <strong>in</strong>ferred from <strong>the</strong> above experiments and would have to be<br />

assessed separately.<br />

Tab. 4.2: Derivation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> field capacity parameter (kFC) at <strong>the</strong> sites used for test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> soil water balance model.<br />

Site<br />

Root<strong>in</strong>g<br />

depth [cm]<br />

Field capacity<br />

[%]<br />

kFC<br />

[cm]<br />

Observation<br />

years<br />

Reference<br />

Wallbach-Möhl<strong>in</strong> 350 38 132.3 1971, 1972 Germann (1976)<br />

Möhl<strong>in</strong> 300 38 114.0 1975, 1976 Borer (1982)<br />

Kaisten 150 25 37.5 1978, 1979 Vogelsanger (1986)<br />

Eiken-Laufenburg 150 25 37.5 1982–1984 Hurst (1988)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!