On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...
On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...
On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The forest model FORCLIM 73<br />
3.3.2 FORCLIM-S: A model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> turnover <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter<br />
Both LINKAGES (Pastor & Post 1985) and FORCLIM-S are formulated as difference equation<br />
systems with a time step (∆t) <strong>of</strong> one year. The symbols used <strong>in</strong> FORCLIM-S are<br />
listed <strong>in</strong> Tab. 3.7.<br />
LITTER INPUT AND CREATION OF NEW LITTER COHORTS<br />
For each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> six types <strong>of</strong> litter that are accumulated every year (Eq. 3.43–3.46), a litter<br />
cohort is created unless <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> litter for a type is zero. These new litter cohorts are<br />
characterized by <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>itial organic matter content (LOM c,<strong>in</strong>it , Eq. 3.47), which is required<br />
to calculate litter lign<strong>in</strong> content (Eq. 3.50), and by <strong>the</strong>ir nitrogen content (LN c,<strong>in</strong>it ,<br />
Eq. 3.48), which is calculated by assum<strong>in</strong>g an average nitrogen concentration depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on <strong>the</strong> tissue type (Ellenberg 1986):<br />
LOM c,<strong>in</strong>it = uXL (3.47)<br />
LN c,<strong>in</strong>it = kInitN X · LOM c,<strong>in</strong>it (3.48)<br />
where LOM is litter organic matter, LN is litter nitrogen, X is a placeholder for F kLQ<br />
(three types <strong>of</strong> foliage litter), T (twigs), R (f<strong>in</strong>e roots), or W (stemwood), and kInitN X is<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial nitrogen concentration <strong>of</strong> litter type X. The litter type subsequently <strong>in</strong>fluences<br />
<strong>the</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> litter decay rates (Eq. 3.49) and nitrogen leach<strong>in</strong>g (Eq. 3.56).<br />
LITTER DECAY AND NITROGEN IMMOBILIZATION<br />
For foliage and root litter, <strong>the</strong> decomposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organic matter (LOM) is predicted<br />
from <strong>the</strong> lign<strong>in</strong> to nitrogen ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tissue (Melillo et al. 1982) and actual evapotranspiration<br />
(uAET, Meentemeyer 1978). Stemwood and twigs are assumed to decay at constant<br />
rates (Eq. 3.49). Pastor & Post (1985) derived <strong>the</strong>se empirical relationships from a<br />
large body <strong>of</strong> field data by regression analysis.<br />
∆LOM c<br />
∆t<br />
=<br />
– k 1 +k 2·uAET – (k 3 +k 4·uAET) · gLign c<br />
· LOM<br />
foliage<br />
gNMR c<br />
c & roots<br />
– kLoss W · LOM c stemwood<br />
– kLoss T · LOM c twigs<br />
(3.49)