08.09.2014 Views

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The forest model FORCLIM 55<br />

<strong>the</strong> establishment and growth <strong>of</strong> trees and <strong>the</strong> decomposition <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter (cf.<br />

Prentice & Helmisaari 1991, Prentice et al. 1993).<br />

GENERATION OF WEATHER DATA<br />

The monthly means <strong>of</strong> temperature (T m,y,l ) and precipitation (P m,y,l ) are sampled<br />

stochastically from <strong>the</strong>ir respective long-term statistics (Fig. 3.4). It is assumed that both<br />

variables are distributed normally around <strong>the</strong>ir long-term means. This assumption is met<br />

better for temperature than for precipitation (Fliri 1974). In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, a different statistical<br />

distribution (such as <strong>the</strong> γ distribution, Bonan et al. 1990) could be fitted on a site-by-site<br />

basis to <strong>the</strong> precipitation data, and sampl<strong>in</strong>g from such a distribution would provide more<br />

realistic precipitation data for <strong>the</strong> current climate. However, <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence that <strong>the</strong><br />

assumption <strong>of</strong> normality <strong>of</strong> monthly precipitation sums falls short relative to <strong>the</strong> sensitivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> forest gap models; moreover, all <strong>the</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> more complicated distributions<br />

probably change with a chang<strong>in</strong>g climate, and it is more difficult to generate consistent<br />

scenarios for <strong>the</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> complicated distributions than for those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simple<br />

normal distribution. Thus, <strong>the</strong> assumption <strong>of</strong> normality is used for sampl<strong>in</strong>g both temperature<br />

and precipitation data <strong>in</strong> FORCLIM-E.<br />

Warm, sunny summer months tend to be dry, whereas cool, cloudy ones <strong>of</strong>ten are wet.<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> temperature and precipitation data are cross-correlated. It may be important<br />

to take this phenomenon <strong>in</strong>to account when modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> water balance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

soil: For example, if <strong>the</strong> evaporative demand <strong>in</strong> a given month is large due to high temperatures,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> soil water content will be reduced to a larger extent if <strong>the</strong>re is little<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall at <strong>the</strong> same time; this effect is not negligible even if <strong>the</strong> correlation is moderate<br />

(|r| < 0.64, cf. Appendix III), which was used as an argument aga<strong>in</strong>st modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

cross-correlation (Kräuchi & Kienast 1993). Thus <strong>the</strong> cross-correlation between monthly<br />

temperature and precipitation data is modelled explicitly <strong>in</strong> FORCLIM (Fig. 3.4).<br />

BIOCLIMATIC VARIABLES<br />

W<strong>in</strong>ter m<strong>in</strong>imum temperature (uWiT)<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> global data set by Müller (1982), Prentice et al. (1992) showed that <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

a good correlation between <strong>the</strong> absolute m<strong>in</strong>imum temperature and <strong>the</strong> average temper-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!