08.09.2014 Views

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 Chapter 3<br />

be exaggerated. Moreover, generally too small growth <strong>in</strong>crements will be obta<strong>in</strong>ed, especially<br />

if many factors are considered. For example, if each <strong>of</strong> four growth factors is 0.5,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n 0.5 4 = 0.0625, i.e. <strong>the</strong> actual growth rate is only 6% <strong>of</strong> maximum growth. A different<br />

approach was used e.g. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> FORECE model (Kienast 1987); it consists <strong>of</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

what has been called “Liebig's Law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>imum” (cf. Pomeroy & Alberts 1988):<br />

<strong>On</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> smallest <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> growth factors is used to reduce maximum growth. In this<br />

approach it is assumed that <strong>the</strong> growth factors are <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>of</strong> each o<strong>the</strong>r, and that no<br />

compensation is possible. The advantage is that unrealistically low growth rates are<br />

avoided, but this approach is satisfactory only if few factors are present: The more factors<br />

are considered <strong>the</strong> more probable it is that some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m can compensate for o<strong>the</strong>rs. Thus<br />

a syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two approaches will be developed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> FORCLIM model, which tries<br />

to comb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> desirable features <strong>of</strong> each approach.<br />

TREE MORTALITY<br />

Age-dependent mortality rates <strong>of</strong> trees can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from tree life tables (e.g.<br />

Harcombe 1987) and <strong>of</strong>ten have a characteristic U-shape: The mortality rate <strong>of</strong> young<br />

trees is high, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g strong competition for light and considerable self-th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, followed<br />

by a lower, constant mortality rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vigorous adult trees, and a higher mortality<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> old trees (G<strong>of</strong>f & West 1975, Harcombe 1987). The latter may be a consequence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir lower vigour and <strong>the</strong>ir size; <strong>the</strong>se factors make <strong>the</strong>m more susceptible to<br />

disease, w<strong>in</strong>dthrow, and lightn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

These features <strong>of</strong> tree mortality rates can be modelled by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a constant and a<br />

stress-<strong>in</strong>duced mortality rate (Fig. 3.2): The former reflects processes that are not<br />

modelled explicitly <strong>in</strong> FORCLIM, such as attacks by fungi or <strong>in</strong>sects and <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong><br />

small trees by fall<strong>in</strong>g boles. This mortality rate is augmented when a tree grows very<br />

slowly: Due to shad<strong>in</strong>g, small trees <strong>of</strong>ten reach a small fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possible maximum<br />

growth rate only. <strong>On</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, large trees <strong>of</strong>ten show negligible absolute growth<br />

rates. Thus, <strong>the</strong> stress-<strong>in</strong>duced mortality is assumed to occur if diameter growth has been<br />

less than a certa<strong>in</strong> absolute <strong>in</strong>crement or a certa<strong>in</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum <strong>in</strong>crement for<br />

several years (SGr, Fig. 3.2; Kienast 1987, Solomon & Bartle<strong>in</strong> 1993). The variable<br />

SGr conta<strong>in</strong>s a memory for past environmental conditions; <strong>the</strong>refore it is a state variable<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> model (Fig. 3.2). It should also be noted that <strong>the</strong> stress-<strong>in</strong>duced mortality provides<br />

a l<strong>in</strong>k between tree growth and tree mortality.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!