08.09.2014 Views

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

254 Appendix<br />

kG parameter:<br />

The kG parameters <strong>of</strong> FORENA were recalculated accord<strong>in</strong>g to Eq. A-1 (Appendix II) to<br />

conform to <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum growth equation accord<strong>in</strong>g to Moore<br />

(1989).<br />

kDDM<strong>in</strong> and kDDMax parameters:<br />

Both parameters were calculated based on <strong>the</strong> regression equation given <strong>in</strong> Fig. A-2.<br />

kWiT parameter:<br />

The calculation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kWiT parameter is given <strong>in</strong> Eq. A-3 (cf. Appendix II).<br />

kWiT FORCLIM = kWiT FORENA – 1<br />

(A-3)<br />

kNTol parameter:<br />

The kNTol parameter <strong>of</strong> FORCLIM was derived from <strong>the</strong> CM1 parameter <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

LINKAGES model (Pastor & Post 1985), which describes <strong>the</strong> nitrogen response function<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tree species (Eq. A-4):<br />

kNTol s =<br />

1 CM1 = 2.79<br />

2 CM1 = 2.94<br />

3 CM1 = 2.99<br />

(A-4)<br />

kBrow parameter:<br />

The kBrow parameter was determ<strong>in</strong>ed based on <strong>the</strong> boolean variable SWITCH4 <strong>in</strong><br />

FORENA, which determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> susceptibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tree species to brows<strong>in</strong>g (Eq. A-5):<br />

kBrow s =<br />

1 SWITCH4 = FALSE<br />

3 SWITCH4 = TRUE<br />

(A-5)<br />

kL y and kL a parameters:<br />

The light requirement parameters were determ<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> two light tolerance classes<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> FORENA (Eq. A-6). It should be noted that no differentiation between<br />

sapl<strong>in</strong>gs and older trees was possible due to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> data <strong>in</strong> FORENA.<br />

kL y,s = kL a,s =<br />

3 ITOL = 1<br />

7 ITOL = 2<br />

(A-6)<br />

kLQ parameter:<br />

The kLQ parameter was assigned by mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 12 leaf litter classes dist<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

LINKAGES model by Pastor & Post (1985, p. 34, parameter TL) to <strong>the</strong> three types <strong>of</strong> leaf<br />

litter dist<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> FORCLIM (Eq. A-7):<br />

kLQ s =<br />

1 1 ≤ TL ≤ 4<br />

2 5 ≤ TL ≤ 9<br />

3 10 ≤ TL ≤ 12<br />

(A-7)<br />

Tab. A-21 gives an overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 14 species parameters for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

72 eastern North American tree species.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!