08.09.2014 Views

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Chapter 1<br />

needs, which may serve as guidel<strong>in</strong>es for future field work <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> daunt<strong>in</strong>g complexity <strong>of</strong><br />

ecosystems.<br />

The palaeoecological record (Delcourt & Delcourt 1987, 1991) shows that biotic responses<br />

to past climatic changes were very complex (Davis 1990). Past changes affected each<br />

species differently; some communities present on today's landscape have formed only<br />

recently, such as <strong>the</strong> beech-hemlock zone <strong>in</strong> eastern North America about 6000 years ago<br />

(Graham & Grimm 1990). Moreover, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> communities that were present dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> Quaternary have no modern analog (Davis 1990), and <strong>the</strong> same will probably occur <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> future. Thus, <strong>the</strong> present communities will not simply shift geographically, and <strong>the</strong>y<br />

can not be expected to exhibit predictable responses and feedbacks to climate. Consequently,<br />

assessments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> climatic change on mounta<strong>in</strong>ous forests should be<br />

based on models that are detailed enough to predict <strong>the</strong> species composition and <strong>the</strong><br />

function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se future no-analog ecosystems (Shugart 1990).<br />

1.3 Spatial scales <strong>in</strong> forests and correspond<strong>in</strong>g models<br />

Many authors have classified forest models accord<strong>in</strong>g to a wide variety <strong>of</strong> criteria (Reed<br />

1980, Shugart & West 1980, Shugart 1984, Dale et al. 1985, Reynolds & Acock 1985,<br />

Joyce & Kickert 1987). All <strong>the</strong>se classifications concentrate on a few types <strong>of</strong> models<br />

only; none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m covers models across many scales. Thus, <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g review <strong>of</strong><br />

forest models will be organized accord<strong>in</strong>g to a scheme similar to <strong>the</strong> one used by Ågren et<br />

al. (1991): The classification criterion used here is <strong>the</strong> spatial scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> models, rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from landscape models to physiological ones. Global models (e.g. Goudriaan & Ketner<br />

1984, Emanuel et al. 1985) are excluded from <strong>the</strong> review because <strong>the</strong>ir large spatial scale<br />

renders <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong>appropriate for a detailed study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong>ous forest<br />

ecosystems. Moreover, even <strong>the</strong> most detailed global models (e.g. Prentice et al. 1992)<br />

are not capable <strong>of</strong> predict<strong>in</strong>g species composition.<br />

Landscape models: Most landscape models view a landscape as composed <strong>of</strong> patches<br />

<strong>of</strong> ecosystems or vegetation types, or <strong>the</strong>y assume <strong>the</strong> vegetation cover to be homogenous.<br />

Waggoner & Stephens (1970) used a Markov model (Caswell 1989) to predict<br />

<strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> five vegetation types on <strong>the</strong> landscape scale. Similar models were presented<br />

by Shugart et al. (1973) and Loucks et al. (1981). A disadvantage <strong>of</strong> this approach<br />

is that <strong>the</strong> transition probabilities are aggregate <strong>in</strong>dices which implicitly parametrize many<br />

phenomena, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g competition and climatic effects. The application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se models

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!