08.09.2014 Views

CANADA - SEXTONdigital

CANADA - SEXTONdigital

CANADA - SEXTONdigital

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF I JOURNAL DE LA SOCIETE POUR L'ETUDE DE L'<br />

ARCHITECTURE!~<br />

<strong>CANADA</strong><br />

VOL. 30 > N' 1 > 2005


THE SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF ARCHITECTURE IN <strong>CANADA</strong> is a learned society<br />

devoted to the examination of the role of the built environment in Canadian society. Its membership includes<br />

structural and landscape architects, architectural historians and planners, sociologists, ethnologists, and<br />

specialists in such fields as heritage conservation and landscape history. Founded in 1974, the Society is currently<br />

the sole national society whose focus of interest is Canada's built environment in all of its manifestations.<br />

The Journal of the Society for the Study of Architecture in Canada, published twice a year, is a refereed journal.<br />

Membership fees, including subscription to the Journal, are payable at the following rates: Student, $30;<br />

lndividual,$50; Organization I Corporation, $75; Patron, $20 (plus a donation of not less than $100).<br />

Institutional subscription: $75.<br />

There is a surcharge of $5 for all foreign memberships. Contributions over and above membership fees are welcome,<br />

and are tax-deductible. Please make your cheque or money order payable to the :<br />

SSAC > Box 2302, Station 0, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 5W5<br />

LA SOCIETE POUR L'ETUDE DE L'ARCHITECTURE AU <strong>CANADA</strong> est une societe savante qui se<br />

consacre a l'etude du role de l'environnement bati dans Ia societe canadienne. Ses membres sont architectes,<br />

architectes paysagistes, historiens de !'architecture et de l'urbanisme, urbanistes, sociologues, ethnologues<br />

ou specialistes du patrimoine et de l'histoire du paysage. Fondee en 1974, Ia Societe est presentement Ia seule<br />

association nationale preoccupee par l'environnement bati du Canada sous toutes ses formes.<br />

Le Journal de Ia Societe pour /'etude de /'architecture au Canada, publie deux fois par annee, est une revue dont les<br />

articles sont evalues par un co mite de lecture.<br />

La cotisation annuelle, qui comprend l'abonnement au Journal, est Ia suivante : etudiant, 30$; individuel, 50$;<br />

organisation I societe, 75$; bienfaiteur, 20$ (plus un don d'au moins 100$).<br />

Abonnement institutionnel: 75$.<br />

Un supplement de 5$ est demande pour les abonnements etrangers. Les contributions depassant l'abonnement<br />

annuel sont bienvenues et deductibles d'impot. Veuillez s.v.p. envoyer un cheque ou un mandat postal a Ia :<br />

StAC > Box 2302, Station 0, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 5W5<br />

www.canada-architecture.org<br />

The Journal of the Society for the Study of Architecture in Canada is produced<br />

with the assistance of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research<br />

Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chair on Urban Heritage.<br />

Le Journal de Ia Societe pour /'etude de /'architecture au Canada est publie<br />

avec I' aide du Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada et de<br />

Ia Chaire de recherche du Canada en patrimoine urbain.<br />

Publication Mail40739147 > PAP Registration No. 10709<br />

We acknowledge the financial assistance of the Government of Canada,<br />

through the Publications Assistance Program (PAP), toward our mailing costs.<br />

ISSN 1486-0872<br />

(supersedes I remplace ISSN 0228·0744)<br />

EDITING, PROOFREADING, TRANSLATION I REVISION LINGUISTIQUE, TR ADUCTION<br />

MICHELINE GIROUX-AUBIN<br />

ASSISTANT ED ITOR IADJOINTE A LA REDACTION<br />

ISABELLE CARON<br />

GRAPHIC DESIGN I CONCEPTION GRAPH IQUE<br />

MARIKE PARADIS<br />

PRINTING I IMPRESSION<br />

K2 IMPRESSIONS, QUEBEC<br />

COVER ICOUVERTURE<br />

Montreal. lnterieur de l'eglise Saint-Edouard.<br />

(PHOTO LUC NOPPEN)<br />

PAGE MAKE-UP I MISE EN PAGES<br />

B GRAPHISTES<br />

JOURNAL EDITOR I REOACTEUR DU JOURNAL<br />

LUC NOPPEN<br />

Chaire de recherche du Canada en patrimoine urbain<br />

Etudes urbaines et touristiques,<br />

Ecole des sciences de Ia gestion<br />

Universite du Quebec a Montreal<br />

CP 8888. succ. centre-ville<br />

Montreal, (QC) H3C 3P8<br />

(514) 987-3000 x-25621 I : (514) 987-7827<br />

e : noppen.luc@uqam.ca<br />

WEB SITE I SITE WEB<br />

LANA STEWART<br />

Lana Stewart<br />

Parks Canada<br />

25, Eddy Street, 5th floor<br />

Gatineau, QC K1A OMS<br />

(819) 997-6098<br />

e : lana.stewart@pc.gc.ca<br />

ED ITOR Of NEWS & VIEWS I<br />

REDACTRICE OE NOUVELLES ET COUPS D'CEIL<br />

HEATHER BRETZ<br />

CPV Group Architects & Engineers Ltd.<br />

Calgary, Alberta<br />

e : HeatherB@cpvgroup.com<br />

PRESIDENT I PRES I DENTE<br />

PIERRE DU PREY<br />

Department of Art<br />

Ontario Hall<br />

Queen 's University<br />

Kingston, ON KZL 3N6<br />

(613) 533-61661 I: (613) 533-6891<br />

e: pduprey@post.queensu.ca<br />

VICE-PRESIDENTS I VICE-PRESIDENTS<br />

ANDREW WALDRON<br />

Architectural Historian, National Historic Sites Directorate<br />

Parks Canada<br />

5"' floor, 25 Eddy Street<br />

Hull, QC K1A OMS<br />

(819) 953·5587 If: (819) 953-4909<br />

e : andrew.waldron@pc.gc.ca<br />

LUCIE K. MORISSET<br />

Etudes urbaines et touristiques<br />

Ecole des sceinces de Ia gestion<br />

Universite du Quebec a Montreal<br />

C.P. 8888, succ. Centre-ville<br />

Montreal, QC H3C 3P8<br />

(514) 987-3000 X 45851 I : (514) 987-7827<br />

e : morisset.lucie@uqam.ca<br />

TR EASURER I TRESORIER<br />

JULIE HARRIS<br />

Julie Harris<br />

342, Maclaren St.<br />

Ottawa, ON K2P OM6<br />

e : jharris@contentworks.ca<br />

SECRETARY I SECRE TAIRE<br />

MARIE-FRANCE BISSON<br />

Ecole de design, UQAM<br />

Case postale 8888, succursale "Centre-ville»<br />

Montreal (Quebec)<br />

H3C 3P8<br />

(514) 987 3000 # 3866<br />

e: docomomo@er.uqam.ca<br />

PROVINCIAL REPRESENTATIVES I<br />

REPRESENTANTS PROVINCIAUX<br />

GEORGE CHALKER<br />

Heritage foundation of Newfoundland and Labrador<br />

P.O. Box 5171<br />

St. John's, Nf AlC SVS<br />

(709) 739-1892 1 I: (709) 739-5413<br />

e: george@heritagefoundation.ca<br />

TERRENCE SMITH LAMOTHE<br />

193S Vernon<br />

Halifax, NS B3H 3N8<br />

(902) 42S-0101<br />

THOMAS HORROCKS<br />

ADI Limited<br />

1133 Regent Street. Suite 300<br />

fredericton, NB E3B 3Z2<br />

(506) 452-9000 I I: (906) 452-7303<br />

e · thd @adi.ca I horto@reg2.health .nb.ca<br />

CLAUDINE DEOM<br />

2078, avenue Claremont<br />

Montreal, QC H3Z 2P8<br />

I I I: (514) 488-4071<br />

e : cdeom@supernet.ca<br />

SHARON VATTAY<br />

11 Elm Avenue, Apt#322<br />

Toronto, Ontario M4W 1N2<br />

(416) 964-723S<br />

svattay@chass.utoronto.ca<br />

TERRENCE J. SINCLAIR<br />

Heritage Branch<br />

Saskatchewan Department of Municipal Affairs,<br />

Culture and Housing<br />

430·1855 Victoria Avenue<br />

Regina, SK S4P 3V7<br />

(306) 787-5777 I I : (306) 787-0069<br />

e: tsinclair@mach.gov.sk.ca<br />

L. FREDERICK VALENTINE<br />

CPV Group Architects & Engineers ltd.<br />

Suite 500 110-12th Avenue SW<br />

Calgary, AB T2R OG7<br />

(403) 262-5511 I I : (403) 262-5519<br />

e : fval@cpv-architecture.com<br />

DANIEL MILLETTE<br />

511-55 Water Street<br />

Vancouver, BC V68 1 A 1<br />

t I I: (604) 687-4907<br />

e : lucubratio@yahoo.com<br />

KAY HAN NADJI<br />

126 Niven Dr.<br />

Yellowknife, NT X1 A 3W8<br />

I I I : (867) 920-6331<br />

e : kayhan_nadji@gov.nt.ca<br />

SHELLEY BRUCE<br />

25 forks Market Road# 401<br />

Winnipeg, MB R3C 4S8<br />

(204) 983-2221


CONTENTS I TABLE DES MATU~RES<br />

JOURN AL OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF I JOU RNAL DE LA SOCIETE POUR L'ETUDE DE L'<br />

ARCHITECTURE~~<br />

<strong>CANADA</strong><br />

ANALYSES I ANALYSES<br />

ESSAIS I ESSAYS<br />

RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

COMPTE-RENDU I REVIEW<br />

> LUC NOPPEN<br />

Presentation I Presentation<br />

> SOPHIE RIOUX-HEBERT<br />

Un patrimoine religieu x en devenir<br />

les eglises de !'arrondissement Rosemont­<br />

La Petite-Patrie a M o ntreal<br />

> PETER COFFMAN<br />

St. Anne's Anglican Church and its Patron<br />

> RoBERT McGEACHY<br />

Polson Park and Calvin Pa rk, 1954-1962: Two<br />

Land Assembly Subdivisions in Kingston,<br />

Ontario<br />

> COLIN RIPLEY<br />

Emptiness and Landscape: National Identity in<br />

Canada's Centennial Projects<br />

> MELANIE BOUCHER<br />

Lo rsque les artistes e xposent dans les<br />

eglises. Les ca s de Carl Bouchard et de Laura<br />

Vickerson<br />

> KATE MACFARLANE<br />

Hangar No. 1 National Historic Site, Brandon<br />

Municipal Airport, Brandon, Manitoba<br />

> YONA JEBRAK<br />

De Ia Ruffiniere du Prey (2004).<br />

Ah Wilderness! Resort Architecture in the<br />

Thousand Islands.<br />

2<br />

3<br />

15<br />

25<br />

37<br />

47<br />

53<br />

61<br />

VOL. 30 > N' 1 > 2005


PRESENTATION I PRESENTATION<br />

Ce numero de Ia revue de Ia Societe pour !'etude de<br />

!'architecture au Canada marque le 30e anniversaire de sa<br />

parution. Du feuillet d'information qu'elle etait, Ia revue s'est<br />

au fil des ans metamorphosee en une veritable revue scientifique.<br />

Sa presentation graphique a connu des transformations, son<br />

contenu s'est enrichi de collaborations plus nombreuses- plus<br />

variees, aussi. Mais Ia revue cherche toujours, comme c'etait le<br />

cas lors de sa fondation, a donner une place enviable aux jeunes<br />

chercheurs.<br />

Pour souligner l'anniversaire, nous avons adopte une maquette<br />

graphique nouvelle- a Ia fois pour Ia couverture et pour les<br />

pages interieures- qui epouse les contours actuels de nos sensi ­<br />

bilites esthetiques changeantes. Marike Paradis, jeune graphiste<br />

de talent, fralchement dipl6mee de !'Ecole superieure d'arts<br />

appliques Estienne a Paris, nous a soumis plusieurs projets; nous<br />

vous proposons celui que nous avons retenu dans ce numero 1<br />

du volume 30 d'Architecture Canada .<br />

Lors de l'assemblee generale de Ia Societe, a Lethbridge, il a aussi<br />

ete decide de formaliser une pratique mise en ceuvre depuis<br />

quelques annees deja : Ia revue, desormais, est publiee deux<br />

fois l'an. Nous aurons done a Ia fin du printemps le numero<br />

1 et, a Ia fin de l'automne, le numero 2, chaque fois avec un<br />

nombre de pages equivalent a deux livraisons de l'ancienne<br />

edition trimestrielle.<br />

Notre revue sera aussi en vente au numero (15 $, plus les frais<br />

d'envoi s'il y a lieu) et offerte par le biais d'un abonnement institutionnel<br />

(75 $ par an, incluant les frais d'envoi). La cotisation<br />

a Ia Societe pour !'etude de !'architecture au Canada, qui pour sa<br />

part continue d'inclure l'abonnement a Ia revue, pourra dorenavant<br />

etre souscrite de fa~on triannuelle. Enfin, abonnements et<br />

cotisations seront renouvelables a leur terme et non plus a une<br />

date fixe a chaque an . En esperant que ces modifications plairont<br />

a notre lectorat, que nous souhaitons toujours plus vaste, nous<br />

proposons dans ce numero des articles issus de quelques-unes<br />

des ass·emblees annuelles passees, mais aussi des propositions<br />

soumises par de jeunes chercheurs qui, sans necessairement avoir<br />

participe aces assemblees, ont souhaite contribuer a Ia revue et<br />

vu leurs essais reconnus par les pairs.<br />

This issue marks the 30th anniversary edition of Architecture<br />

Canada, the journal of the Society for the Study of Architecture<br />

in Canada . With time, from its humble beginnings as<br />

an information leaflet, the magazine turned into a true scientific<br />

publication- its graphic grid was modified, and its content<br />

enriched thanks to more numerous, and varied, contributions.<br />

But, as was the case when it was founded, it still strives to lend<br />

enviable exposure to young researchers.<br />

To honour this milestone, we adopted a new look- both inside<br />

and out- which more accurately embodies the current outlines of<br />

our changing aesthetic sensibilities. To this end, Marike Paradis,<br />

a talented young graphic artist fresh out from Ecole superieure<br />

d'arts appliques Estienne in Paris, submitted a number of<br />

projects. It is a pleasure to introduce the one we retained with<br />

this first issue of volume 30 of Architecture Canada.<br />

During the general assembly of the Society held in Lethbridge,<br />

a decision was also made to officialize a practice which has<br />

already been implemented unofficially for a few years- the<br />

magazine is now published twice a year. Issue no. 1 will therefore<br />

be published at the end of spring and issue no. 2 at the end<br />

of fall, with twice the number of pages the previous quarterly<br />

editions held.<br />

Our magazine will also be sold on a per-issue basis ($15, plus applicable<br />

postage, if required) and available through corporate<br />

subscriptions ($75 per year, including shipping). From now on,<br />

membership fees to the Society for the Study of Architecture in<br />

Canada, which will continue to include a magazine subscription,<br />

can now be paid in three instalments. Finally, subscriptions and<br />

fees will be renewable upon term instead of on a fixed date<br />

each year. Hoping these changes will meet the expectations of<br />

our readers, whose numbers we always enjoy to see growing,<br />

we propose an issue filled with articles related to some of the<br />

past annual meeting topics, but also to proposals submitted by<br />

young researchers who, without necessarily having attended<br />

these meetings, wished to contribute to the magazine and see<br />

their efforts recognized by their peers.<br />

> LUC NOPPEN<br />

> LUC NOPPEN<br />

2


ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

UN PATRIMOINE RELIGIEUX EN DEVENIR:<br />

LES EGLISES DE IJ\RRONDISSEMENT<br />

ROSEMONT-LA PETITE-PATRIE A MONTREAL 1<br />

SOPHIE RIOUX-HEBERT complete un rnemowe<br />

de maitr-rse en geogr-aph re a I'UQAM sur<br />

>SOPHIE RIOUX-HEBERT<br />

les fonctrons geo-rdentrtawes des eglrses de<br />

quartrer. En septembre 2005 el le entreprend<br />

des etudes doctorales dans le programme<br />

con1ornt en etudes urbarnes [UOAM/INRS ]<br />

Elle est assocree a Ia Charre de r-echer-che du<br />

Canada en pacr'llllOrne urbarn.<br />

Le Quebec, comme plusieurs autres<br />

regions du monde occidental, est aux<br />

prises avec un probleme d'amenagement<br />

des plus complexes en ce qui concerne<br />

les lieux de cu lte desaffectes ou en voie<br />

de l'etre. En effet, Ia diminution de Ia<br />

pratique religieuse, jumelee a !'augmentation<br />

des couts d'entretien des eglises et<br />

au manque de releve sacerdotale oblige<br />

les dioceses, tant catholiques que protestants,<br />

a fusionner eta eliminer des<br />

paroisses dans le but de consolider leurs<br />

avoirs et leurs activites' . Ces dioceses procedent<br />

ensuite a Ia vente des lieux de culte<br />

excedentaires qui, si le transfert a une<br />

autre communaute religieuse se revele<br />

impossible, sont reconvertis a d'autres<br />

usages ou encore demolis.<br />

Cette tendance se remarque surtout dans<br />

les quartiers centraux des principales vi lies<br />

quebecoises, attendu que leur population,<br />

plus importante, y a genere un plus grand<br />

nombre de lieux de culte. Par contre, les<br />

residants de ces quartiers s'opposent frequemment<br />

a Ia liquidation de leurs eglises,<br />

alleguant que ces biHiments font partie<br />

du patrimoine collectif. Ce conflit d'usage<br />

interpelle !'administration municipale qui<br />

s'efforce de preserver les batiments religieux<br />

les plus significatifs a l'echelle du<br />

quartier. Toutefois, ce qui est significatif<br />

pour les experts en patrimoine et les<br />

autorites municipales ne l'est peut-etre<br />

pas pour les residants.<br />

Un tel contexte souleve plusieurs questions<br />

:Comment les residants d'un quartier<br />

procedent-ils pour determiner Ia valeur<br />

relative de leurs eg lises? Temoignentils<br />

d'une certaine conscientisation dans<br />

leurs choix ou plut6t d 'un attachement<br />

lie a l'usage et a Ia connaissance? Se re ­<br />

presentent-ils les eglises comme des lieux<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N 1 > 2005 > 5-16<br />

3


S OPH IE RIOUX-H EBERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

voues principalement au culte ou comme<br />

des lieux patrimoniaux qui possedent des<br />

valeurs historiques et artistiques ?<br />

A partir de l'exemple de !'arrondissement<br />

Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie a Montreal, le<br />

present article examine les representations<br />

que les residants se font de leurs eglises de<br />

quartier afin de decouvrir si ces representations<br />

temoignent de !'emergence d'une<br />

conscience patrimoniale.<br />

LES REPRESENTATIONS<br />

COLLECTIVES DES EGLISES, UNE<br />

PERSPECTIVE PEU ETUDIEE<br />

Un rapide survol de Ia litterature concernant<br />

les lieux de culte pe rmet de constater<br />

Ia pauvrete de Ia recherche scientifique sur<br />

les representations collectives des eglises<br />

de quartier dans un contexte de secularisation.<br />

La geographie de Ia religion, champ<br />

disciplinaire ou l'on pourrait s'attendre a<br />

trouver ce type d'etude, ne genere que<br />

peu de recherches en ce sens 3 . II existe<br />

bien deux etudes geographiques datant<br />

des annees 1980 qui examinent le recyclage<br />

des eglises rurales du Minnesota et<br />

du Manitoba en lien avec les represen ­<br />

tations identitaires qu'en possedent les<br />

families qui habitent a proximite•. Ces<br />

etudes concluent que les residants considerent<br />

toujours leurs eglises, malgre leur<br />

desaffectation, comme des batiments<br />

signifiants pour des raisons relig ieuse,<br />

historique et culturelle, mais surtout<br />

pa rce qu'ils entretiennent avec celles-ci<br />

des liens affectifs forts developpes sur<br />

plusieurs generations 5 .<br />

De !'autre cote de !'ocean, en France de<br />

!'Ouest, des geographes ont etudie !'impact<br />

des reamenagements paroissiaux sur<br />

les representations et les comportements<br />

religieux de divers groupes sociaux sans<br />

toutefois examiner les rapports possiblement<br />

affectifs et identitaires que ces<br />

groupes entretiennent avec leurs lieux<br />

de culte•.<br />

ILL. 1. MONTREAL ET L'ARRONDISSEME NT ROS EMO NT·LA PETITE·PATR IE<br />

Au Quebec, les etudes qui explorent le role<br />

des eglises dans Ia societe quebecoise ont<br />

emane principalement d'historiens, d'architectes<br />

et d'urbanistes. Toutefois, malgre<br />

le fait que le patrimoine religieux suscite<br />

depuis quelques annees un interet de plus<br />

en plus marque de Ia part des medias et<br />

de Ia population, comme en temoigne<br />

le nombre d'emissions de television et<br />

d'articles de journaux qui lui sont reserves,<br />

les etudes scientifiques qui abordent le<br />

probleme de Ia conservation des lieux de<br />

culte demeurent peu nombreuses. Au sein<br />

de ce mince corpus, nous n'avons trouve<br />

aucune etude scientifique analysant precisement<br />

les representations collectives<br />

des eglises de quartier dans le contexte<br />

actuel de Ia desaffectation ; tout au plus,<br />

certaines etudes soulignent !'importance<br />

des aspects culture! et identitaire dans<br />

Ia creation d 'un patrimoine religieux' .<br />

C'est pourquoi nous nous tournons<br />

vers Ia geographie de Ia representation<br />

pour alimenter le cadre theorique de<br />

notre etude.<br />

Les etu des geographiques sur les<br />

representations mentales se revelent<br />

particulierement fecondes pour notre<br />

!----!----!....<br />

analyse. A l'instar de Debarbieux et de<br />

Bailly 8 , nous considerons que Ia represen ­<br />

tation mentale de l'espace est un schema<br />

cognitif, une interpretation du reel, transmis<br />

soit par Ia perception d'un lieu, soit<br />

par les modes de communication, et qui<br />

s'inscrit dans un cadre ideologique. Ces<br />

representations individuelles interagissent<br />

entre elles grace aux moyens de communication,<br />

aux symboles et aux experiences<br />

pour se combiner et s'alterer mutuellement.<br />

De cette association, ou socialisation,<br />

resultent des representations collectives 9 •<br />

Celles-ci, continuellement alimentees par<br />

de nouvelles representations individuelles,<br />

fluctuent, se construisent ou se deconstruisent<br />

au fil du temps' 0 • Par ailleurs, ces<br />

representations collectives comportent<br />

une assise spatiale dans Ia mesure ou le<br />

groupe social ou culture! projette sur un<br />

lieu des valeurs affectives et identitaires,<br />

lui assignant par le fait meme une<br />

symbolique qui ancre dans celui-ci l'identite<br />

du groupe. Cette projection de valeurs<br />

resulte en un marquage territorial qui<br />

s'effectue par Ia production et l'entretien de<br />

referents identitaires, auxquels on accole<br />

frequemment le terme « patrimoine ».<br />

4<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


•,: r<br />

S OPHIE R IOUX-HE:BERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

., --=- ;:.'- \<br />

\ ,.,___,.....<br />

\<br />

\<br />

\ • • .-......:.: ~-4<br />

, . ··~~-_:;;. ,<br />

- ~·<br />

_...-·<br />

. '. \<br />

........<br />

...... - -.. ·~,: .~t ~Roy~l<br />

ILL. 4. L'EGLISE NOTRE-DAM E-D E-LA-DEFENSE I JONATHAN CHA<br />

ILL. 2. L'ARRONDISSEMENT ROSEMONT-LA PETI TE- PATRIE, SES TROIS QUART IE RS AIN SI<br />

QUE LE S DEU X EGLI SES DES PARO ISSES-MERES I PRODUIT PAR SOPHIE RIOUX-HEBERT<br />

Selon Gravaris-Barbas, « !'identification<br />

d'un groupe a un territoire [s 'exprime]<br />

compose de trois quartiers plus ou moins<br />

distincts : Ia Petite-Patrie, Rosemont et<br />

essentiellement a travers les elements Nouveau-Rosemont (ill. 1 et 2) .<br />

patrimoniaux materiels, portes par le territoire<br />

» 11 • Ainsi, les representations collectives<br />

peuvent mener a Ia patrimonialisation<br />

d'un lieu dans Ia mesure ou il y aurait un<br />

consensus au sein du groupe sur Ia valeur<br />

historique, architecturale, artistique et<br />

culturelle du lieu et sur !'importance de<br />

celui-ci dans !'affirmation identitaire et<br />

territoriale du groupe.<br />

LE CONTEXTE SOCIOHISTORIQUE<br />

DE L'ARRONDISSEMENT<br />

ROSEMONT-LA PETITE-PATRIE<br />

Pour illustrer nos propos, no us avons choisi<br />

d'explorer les representations que les re ­<br />

sidants de !'arrondissement Rosemont­<br />

La Petite-Patrie possedent de leurs eglises.<br />

Le choix de cet arrondissement n'est pas<br />

fortuit. Celui-ci possede une riche histoire<br />

religieuse, s'etant developpe autour<br />

de deux poles paroissiaux catholiques,<br />

les paroisses Saint-Edouard et Sainte­<br />

Philomene (qui devint, en 1964, Ia paroisse<br />

Saint-Esprit-de-Rosemont). II importe<br />

de mentionner que !'a rrondissement se<br />

La Petite-Patrie s'est developpe au tournant<br />

du vingtieme siecle grace a !'inauguration<br />

d'un trace de tramway qui Ionge Ia<br />

rue Saint-Denis (ancien chemin du Sault),<br />

entrainant le peuplement de ce quartier<br />

du nord de Ia ville". Les limites actuelles du<br />

quartier englobent une partie de deux an ­<br />

ciennes municipalites, Saint-Louis du Mile<br />

End et Coteau Saint-Louis, et de deux quartiers,<br />

Saint-Jean et Saint-Denis 13 • Compose<br />

majoritairement de Canadiens fran c;ais, a<br />

l'origine le secteur accueillit aussi des Italiens<br />

et des Canadiens anglais. Les premiers<br />

s'etablirent autour de Ia rue Saint-Denis<br />

et fonderent Ia paroisse Saint-Edouard en<br />

1895. La construction de l'eglise, situee au<br />

coin des rues Saint-Den is et Beaubien, fut<br />

terminee en 1909, ce qui en fait le lieu de<br />

culte le plus ancien de !'arrondissement<br />

(ill. 3) . Aujourd 'hui encore, l'eglise Saint­<br />

Edouard constitue le cceur nevralgique<br />

du quartier. De me me que les francophones,<br />

les Canadiens anglais s'etablirent a<br />

proximite de Ia ligne de tramway, mais ils<br />

nommerent le secteur Amherst Park, du<br />

I JONATHAN CHA<br />

ILL. 6. L'EG LI SE SAINT-ARSENE I JONATHAN CHA<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

5


S OPHIE R IOUX-H EBERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

nom d'une des compagnies immobilieres tive d'economie, ne s'est construit aucun dans le quartier. Par ailleurs, des angloqui<br />

le developpa. Les nombreux lieux de lieu de culte, utilisant plut6t l'eglise protestants et, plus tard, des immigrants<br />

culte protestants qui parsement toujours catholique Saint-Arsene (1954), situee ukrainiens de confessions orthodoxe et<br />

le quartier temoignent de cette presence sur Ia rue Belanger (ill. 6) . catholique s' installerent dans le quartier<br />

culturelle importante. Pour sa part, Ia<br />

communaute italienne s'etablit auteur du<br />

boulevard Saint-Laurent, entre les rues Saint­<br />

Zotique et Jean-Talon, et c'est pourquoi ce<br />

secteur est nomme Piccola ltalia (Petiteltalie).<br />

L'eglise Notre-Dame-de-la-Defense<br />

(1911), classee monument historique national<br />

par le gouvernement federal en 2002,<br />

et l'eglise Notre-Dame-de-la-Consolata<br />

(1961) demeurent les deux lieux de culte<br />

les plus visibles de cette communaute (ill. 4<br />

et 5). En 1985, pour tenter de renforcer<br />

l'appartenance des residants au quartier 14 ,<br />

!'administration municipale lui accola<br />

!'appellation de Petite-Patrie, inspiree du<br />

titre d'un roman autobiographique de<br />

Claude Jasmin dans lequel il raconte son<br />

enfance dans le quartier 15 • Aujourd'hui,<br />

Ia communaute anglophone a pratiquement<br />

disparu du quartier et Ia population<br />

italienne a beaucoup diminue 16 • Par contre,<br />

une population latino-americaine s'y<br />

est installee. Celle-ci, dans une perspec-<br />

De meme que La Petite-Patrie, Rosemont<br />

a connu une urbanisation rapide vers le<br />

tournant du vingtieme siecle. L'element<br />

declencheur en fut l'arrivee du Canadien<br />

pacifique dans le sud-ouest du quartier".<br />

En effet, en 1902, le Canadien pacifique<br />

decida d'y installer ses usines de fabri ­<br />

cation et d'entretien de locomotives,<br />

communement appelees les Shops Angus.<br />

A partir de ce moment, les possibilites<br />

d'emplois aux Shops Angus ont amene un<br />

flot constant de nouveaux residants dans<br />

le quartier. La paroisse Sainte-Philomene,<br />

qui devint Saint-Esprit en 1964, vit le jour<br />

en 1904 et, l'annee suivante, le village de<br />

Rosemont fut fonde et annexe a Ia ville de<br />

Montreal. En 1933, Ia chapelle Sainte-Philomene,<br />

devenue trop exigue, fut remplacee<br />

pa r !'actuelle eglise Saint-Esprit , plus vaste<br />

et majestueuse (ill. 7) ' 8 . Celle-ci, situee sur<br />

Ia rue Masson, principale artere commerciale,<br />

jouit toujours d'une position centrale<br />

pour travailler au x usines Angus. Tout<br />

com me les catholiques, ces communautes<br />

y ont laisse leur marque sous Ia forme de<br />

nombreux lieux de culte. En 1961, Ia fermeture<br />

partielle des usines Angus amor ~ a le<br />

lent declin de Rosemont. Les anglophones<br />

et les Ukrainiens quitterent graduellement<br />

le quartier pour s'etablir dans differents<br />

secteurs de !'ouest de Ia ville. Toutefois,<br />

depuis les dix dernieres annees, Rosemont<br />

a subi un embourgeoisement semblable<br />

a celui de La Petite-Patrie grace a Ia<br />

tendance au reinvestissement des<br />

quartiers centraux, mais surtout grace a<br />

Ia reconversion des usines Angus, fermees<br />

en 1992, en technop61e eta Ia construction<br />

d'un vaste projet domiciliaire sur une<br />

partie des terrains laisses vacants .<br />

Au contraire de Rosemont et de La Petite­<br />

Patrie qui se sont urbanisees des le debut<br />

du vingtieme siecle, Ia partie est de !'arrondissement<br />

ne se developpa veritablement<br />

6<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


S OPHIE R IOUX-HEBERT > ANA LYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

Ill. 11 . EGLISE SAINT-EUGENE I JONATHAN CHA<br />

que dans les annees 1950 pour repondre au !'arrondissement au centre de Ia polemique vifs debats societaux tant au sein qu'a !'exmanque<br />

de logement cause par le boom de- liee a Ia desaffectation des lieux de culte terieur de !'arrondissement, sur l'avenir des<br />

mographique de l'apres Deuxieme Guerre urbains. En effet, depuis les trois dernieres eglises de quartier. II y eut tout d'abord,<br />

mondiale. Deux projets ont favorise ce de- annees, quatre evenements ont suscite de en 2002, Ia demolition de l'eglise anglicane<br />

veloppement : le jardin botanique inaugure<br />

dans les annees 1930 et l'h6pital Maisonneuve<br />

construit dans les annees 1950. Considere<br />

comme une extension de Rosemont,<br />

le quartier s'est vu attribuee !'appellation<br />

de Nouveau-Rosemont. De plus, Ia population<br />

moins dense de ce quartier s'avere<br />

beaucoup plus homogene que dans le reste<br />

de !'arrondissement. Ainsi, seulement deux<br />

eglises catholiques francophones y ont pignon<br />

sur rue. Ne possedant aucun centre<br />

nevralgique, Nouveau-Rosemont peine toujours<br />

a se construire une identite distincte.<br />

ISD!¥1111<br />

Les cinq eglises les plus importantes selon les repondants et les types de raisons<br />

evoquees pour justifier ces choix<br />

1. Eglise 2. Eglise<br />

Saint-Edouard Saint-Esprit<br />

3. Cathedrale 4. Eglise Saintorthodoxe<br />

Jean-de-la-Croix<br />

Sainte-Sophie (avant sa reconversion)<br />

5. Eglise<br />

Saint-Marc<br />

Proportion de<br />

repondants ayant<br />

choisi ces eg lises<br />

67 % 50% 44% 38 % 34%<br />

Types de raisons<br />

Proportion de reponses se classant dans chaque categorie de raison pour chacune des egli ses<br />

En 1992, !'administration municipale<br />

regroupa ces trois quartiers en arrondissement,<br />

mais ce dernier n'obtint de veritables<br />

pouvoirs decisionnels qu'en 2001<br />

grace a Ia reforme municipale. Aujourd'hui,<br />

!'arrondissement compte 37 eglises de<br />

confession majoritairement catholique,<br />

mais aussi protestante et orthodoxe' 9 •<br />

Ce corpus imposant d'eglises positionne<br />

Valeurs architecturale 55% 57% 75% 62 % 50%<br />

et artistique<br />

Valeur identitaire<br />

(attachement et<br />

38% 33% 18% 28% 41%<br />

habitude)<br />

Valeurs sociale et 5 % 8%<br />

communautaire<br />

7% 5% 8 %<br />

Va leur historique 1 % 2 % 0% 3% 1 %<br />

Valeur spirituelle 1 % 2 % 0 % 2% 1 %<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

7


S OPHIE R IOUX-HEBERT > ANALYSI S I ANALYSE<br />

1. ~GLISE SAINT - ~DOUARD 2. ~GLISE SAINT-ESPRIT<br />

3. CATH~DRALE ORTHODOXE<br />

SAINTE-SOPHIE<br />

4. ~GLISE SAINT-JEAN -DE-LA-CROIX 5. ~GLISE SAINT-MARC<br />

St. Lukes (1928) qui fut remplacee par des<br />

condominiums, suivie en 2003 de Ia demolition<br />

de l'eglise catholique Saint-Etienne<br />

(1914) qui fit place a des logements<br />

sociaux et de Ia reconversion de l'eglise<br />

catholiq ue Saint-Jean-de-la-Croix (1926)<br />

en condominiums haut de gamme. Finalement,<br />

Ia reconversion, amorcee en 2004,<br />

de l'eglise catholique Saint-Eugene (1954)<br />

en hall communautaire d'un complexe de<br />

logements sociaux se poursuit toujours<br />

(ill. 6-9). Ces recents bouleversements,<br />

qui ont marque l'imaginaire collectif des<br />

residants, ainsi que Ia presence toujours<br />

forte des eglises dans le tissu urbain de<br />

!'arrondissement, en font un terrain privilegie<br />

pour l'etude des representations<br />

collectives de ces memes batiments.<br />

DES REPRESENTATIONS INEGALES<br />

Dans le but de decouvrir si les representations<br />

collectives des eglises temoignent<br />

d'un processus de patrimonialisation,<br />

nous avons interroge 304 residants de<br />

Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie au printemps<br />

2004' 0 • Nous avons classe les resultats en<br />

trois themes devant nous permettre de<br />

saisir, en partie du moins, Ia nature de<br />

leurs representations: !'importance relative<br />

des eglises et les raisons justifiant<br />

ces choix, les fonctions que les residants<br />

associent aux eglises et les valeurs qu'ils leur<br />

conferent.<br />

L'importance relative des eglises<br />

Nous avons cherche a connaTtre les eglises<br />

de !'arrondissement qui sont considerees<br />

par les residants comme etant les plus importantes.<br />

Pour ce faire, nous leur avons<br />

presente une planche-photo repertoriant<br />

toutes les eglises de !'arrondissement en<br />

leur demandant de choisir les trois plus importantes<br />

selon leurs propres criteres. S'ils<br />

avaient de Ia difficulte a repondre, nous<br />

leur demandions ensuite quelles etaient<br />

leurs trois eglises preferees. L'analyse<br />

des resultats montre que cinq eglises se<br />

demarquent particulierement des autres :<br />

l'eglise Saint-Edouard, l'eglise Saint-Esprit,<br />

Ia cathedrale orthodoxe Sainte-Sophie,<br />

l'eglise Saint-Jean-de-la-Croix et l'eglise<br />

Saint-Marc (tableau 1 ).<br />

Ce qui surprend de prime abord dans cette<br />

liste, c'est le rang qu'occupe l'ancienne<br />

eglise Saint-Jean-de- la -Croix. En effet,<br />

celle-ci se classe au quatrieme rang des<br />

eglises les plus importantes de !'arrondissement,<br />

selon les repondants, ce qui<br />

s'avere tout de meme etonnant pour une<br />

eglise qui fut reconvertie en coproprietes<br />

en 2003. Un autre resultat quelque peu<br />

surprenant concerne Ia cathedrale orthodoxe<br />

Sainte-Sophie qui se classe au<br />

troisieme rang. Pourtant, seulement un<br />

repondant de notre echantillon etait de<br />

confession orthodoxe, tandis que 71 %<br />

des repondants etaient de confession catholique".<br />

Cette majorite de repondants<br />

catholiques peut expliquer pourquoi les<br />

quatre autres eglises en tete de liste sont<br />

de vocation catholique. Fait a noter, les<br />

deux eglises des paroisses fondatrices de<br />

!'arrondissement, l'eglise Saint-Edouard et<br />

l'eglise Saint-Esprit, arrivent au premier et<br />

au deuxieme rangs respectivement. On<br />

note egalement que, a part Ia cathedrale<br />

orthodoxe Sainte-Sophie qui fut erigee<br />

en 1962, toutes les eglises de cette liste<br />

furent erigees pendant Ia periode allant<br />

de 1900 a 1935. On peut d'ailleurs observer<br />

des similitudes architecturales entre<br />

celles-ci. En effet, ces eglises possedent un<br />

style architectural traditionnel caracterise<br />

par une monumentalite, une elevation du<br />

plancher, un plan longitudinal et de hauts<br />

clochers 22 • Ces similitudes dans !'architecture<br />

de quatre des cinq eglises en tete de<br />

liste nous portent a croire que les repondants<br />

auraient une preference pour les<br />

eglises qui arborent ce style architectural<br />

traditionnel.<br />

Par ailleurs, il importe de noter qu'aucune<br />

de ces cinq eglises n'est classee patrimoniale<br />

par le gouvernement du Quebec ou du Ca ­<br />

nada. Seule l'eglise Saint-Esprit beneficie<br />

d'une protection a l'echelle municipale,<br />

car elle fait partie d'un site du patrimoine<br />

constitue en 1990 23 • La seule eglise qui<br />

possede une protection nationale, l'eglise<br />

Notre-Dame-de-la-Defense, classee monument<br />

historique du Canada, n'apparaTt<br />

qu'en treizieme position de notre liste.<br />

Ce constat suggere que l'eglise Notre-Damede-la-Defense<br />

jouit d'un statut mal defini<br />

a l'interieur de !'arrondissement, mais que<br />

8<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N• 1 > 2005


S OPHIE R IOUX-H EBERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

son statut d'eglise-mere de Ia communaute<br />

italienne de Montreal lui confere<br />

un rayonnement important aux echelles<br />

regionale et nationale.<br />

Nous avons classe en cinq categories les<br />

raisons qui justifient les choix des repondants<br />

: 1) valeurs architecturale et artistique,<br />

2) valeur identitaire liee a !'habitude<br />

et a l'attachement, 3) valeurs sociale et<br />

communautaire, 4) valeur historique et<br />

5) valeur spirituelle (tableau 1). De plus,<br />

puisque les repondants justifiaient fre ­<br />

quemment leurs choix en evoquant plusieurs<br />

raisons se classant dans differentes<br />

categories, nous avons divise le nombre<br />

de reponses dans chaque categorie par le<br />

total de raisons evoquees pour chacune<br />

des eglises et non par le total de repondants.<br />

Les resultats de cette analyse montrent<br />

que Ia raison principale qui motive<br />

les choix des repondants est d'ordre<br />

esthetique. De fait, les repondants se sont<br />

grandement bases sur les dimensions et le<br />

style architectural d'une eglise pour faire<br />

leurs choix. C'est pourquoi les eglises les<br />

plus majestueuses se trouvent en tete de<br />

liste alors que les eglises de style moderne<br />

n'y figurent pas. La deuxieme raison evoquee<br />

le plus souvent releve d'un sentiment<br />

identitaire lie a !'habitude et a l'attachement.<br />

Plusieurs repondants ont choisi des<br />

eglises au xquelles ils s'identifient, soit parce<br />

qu' ils les connaissent depuis longtemps<br />

(s'y etant maries, ayant passe leur enfance<br />

dans Ia paroisse, etc.), soit parce qu'ils les<br />

c6toient f requemment (y assistant a Ia<br />

messe regulierement, passant devant tous<br />

les jours, habitant a proximite, etc.). No us<br />

remarquons que Ia cathedrale orthodoxe<br />

Sainte-Sophie a ete choisie beaucoup plus<br />

pour ses qua lites esthetiques que pour des<br />

raisons liees a !'habitude et a l'attachement.<br />

Beaucoup de repondants semblaient<br />

Ia reconnaitre et apprecier son architecture<br />

de style byzantin qui ajoute, selon eux, un<br />

exotisme au quartier; cependant, com me<br />

c'est un lieu de culte orthodoxe, peu s'y<br />

sont identifies.<br />

Pour ce qui est des activites sociales et<br />

communautaires, peu de repondants<br />

ont choisi ces raisons pour justifier leurs<br />

choix. Encore plus marquant est le fait<br />

que personne ou presque n'ait evoque<br />

Ia valeur historique de ces eglises comme<br />

raison de leurs choix. Pourtant, l'eglise<br />

Saint-Edouard, Ia plus ancienne de<br />

!'arrondissement, a joue un role non<br />

negligeable dans le developpement du<br />

nord de Ia ville. Aussi, nous remarquons<br />

que 3 % des repondants accordent une<br />

valeur historique et 2 % une valeur spirituelle<br />

a l'eglise Saint-Jean-de-la-Croi x, une<br />

eglise qui pourtant n'existe plus comme<br />

lieu de culte. Finalement, pour ce qui est<br />

de Ia qualite spirituelle, c'est-a-dire Ia<br />

qualite et Ia frequence de Ia messe, Ia<br />

disponibilite du pretre, etc., Ia faible proportion<br />

de gens qui ont choisi cette raison<br />

reflete sans doute Ia faible frequentation<br />

de ces lieux pour le culte.<br />

Par contraste, l'examen des cinq eglises<br />

qui ont obtenu le moins de mentions de<br />

Ia part des repondants nous apporte un<br />

eclairage complementaire sur Ia nature des<br />

representations des residants (tableau 2). II<br />

importe d 'abord de noter qu'a part l'eglise<br />

nationale polonaise Sainte-Croix, toutes<br />

ces eglises sont de vocation protestante.<br />

La majorite des repondants etant catholiques,<br />

ces lieux de culte les interpellent done<br />

d'une maniere moindre. II faut dire que le<br />

lieu de culte pour les protestants ne revet<br />

pas Ia meme signification, Ia meme symbolique,<br />

que pour les catholiques. En effet,<br />

pour une grande partie des protestants, a<br />

!'exception des anglicans, le culte se celebre<br />

dans une sobriete et une simplicite qui<br />

lf11C!¥11tl<br />

En ordre decroissant, les cinq eglises les moins importantes de !'arrondissement selon les repondants<br />

1. Eglise adventiste<br />

Beer Sheba<br />

2. Ministere de Ia foi<br />

en Jesus-Christ<br />

3. Centre evangelique<br />

eglise du Nazareen<br />

4. Eglise nationale<br />

polonaise Sainte-Croix<br />

5. Rosemount<br />

United Church<br />

1. PHOTO : FONOATION DU PATRIMOINE REUGIEUX 2, 3, 4, 5. PHOTOS : JONATHAN CHA<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

9


S OPHIE R IOUX-HEBERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

100%<br />

80 %<br />

• 20 - 34 ans<br />

c<br />

• 35-54 ans<br />

0<br />

'f 60 %<br />

• 55 ans et +<br />

0<br />

c.<br />

0<br />

.t 40 %<br />

20 %<br />

0%<br />

Types de fonction<br />

economique<br />

touristique<br />

Les fonctions des eglises<br />

de /'arrondissement<br />

Un element qui revele une facette differente<br />

de Ia representation que possedent<br />

les res idants de leurs eglises reside dans<br />

leur perception de l'utilite de celles-ci .<br />

Nous avons done pose aux residants Ia<br />

question suivante : « A quoi servent les<br />

eglises de votre arrondissement selon<br />

vous ? >>. Nous avons classe leurs reponses<br />

en six categories qui ne sont pas exclusives,<br />

puisque plusieurs personnes ont nomme<br />

plus d'une fonction :<br />

ILL. 12. LES FONCTIONS DES EGLISES DE l'ARR ON DISSEME NT SELON LES REPONDANTS<br />

se refletent dans !'architecture depouiiiE~e<br />

du lieu de culte 24 • Au contraire, dans Ia<br />

tradition catholique romaine, les eglises,<br />

erigees pour Ia gloire de Dieu, temoignent<br />

de Ia grandeur de Ia foi de ceux qui financent<br />

leur construction et du pouvoir<br />

de I'Eglise catholique dans Ia societe. C'est<br />

pourquoi les eglises catholiques possedent<br />

bien souvent une somptuosite et un faste<br />

qui n'ont aucun egal dans !'architecture<br />

des batiments environnants". En outre, il<br />

faut com prendre que les communautes re-<br />

ligieuses protestantes qui se sont etablies<br />

dans !'arrondissement etaient de taille<br />

reduite et n'avaient done pas les moyens<br />

financiers ni le besoin de batir de plus<br />

grands et plus riches lieux de culte. Par<br />

consequent, le style architectural austere<br />

de ces quatre temples, qui se positionne a<br />

l'encontre de !'archetype de l'eglise pour<br />

les catholiques, a certainement joue en<br />

leur defaveur. Par ailleurs, leurs dimensions<br />

reduites et leur emplacement sur des<br />

rues residentielles ne leur donnent pas une<br />

visibilite et un rayonnement tres grands.<br />

Pourtant, elles font partie des dix eglises<br />

les plus anciennes de !'arrondissement.<br />

Trois de celles-ci, le centre evangelique<br />

eglise du Nazareen, le Ministere de Ia foi<br />

en Jesus-Christ et le Rosemount United<br />

Church, furent construites dans les annees<br />

1910, ce qui en fait les lieux de culte les<br />

plus anciens de !'arrondissement apres<br />

l'eglise Saint-Edouard. Ainsi, en depit de<br />

Ia modestie de leur architecture, ces lieux<br />

de culte possedent une valeur historique<br />

non negligeable puisqu'elles temoignent<br />

de Ia presence de Ia communaute angloprotestante<br />

des les debuts du developpement<br />

de !'arrondissement. Finalement,<br />

le pietre classement de l'eglise nationale<br />

polonaise Sainte-Croix peut s'expliquer par<br />

Ia banalite de son architecture, sa situation<br />

sur une rue tranquille ainsi que Ia faible<br />

representativite des residants d'origine<br />

polonaise dans notre echantillon 26 •<br />

45 %<br />

40 %<br />

35 %<br />

c 30 %<br />

0<br />

'f 25 %<br />

0<br />

c. 20%<br />

e<br />

a..<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

religieuse<br />

sociale<br />

Valeurs<br />

1. fonction spirituelle ;<br />

2. fonction communautaire<br />

(evenements de charite, bazars, etc. ) ;<br />

3. fonction sociale<br />

(lieux de rassemblement, endroits ou<br />

rencontrer des gens, etc.) ;<br />

4. fonction ludique<br />

(danses, fetes, etc.);<br />

5. fonction economique<br />

(pole d'attraction et de developpement<br />

dans le quartier);<br />

6. fonction touristique.<br />

ILL. 13. LES VALEURS DES EGLISES DE l'ARRONDISSEMENT SELON LES REPONDANTS<br />

• 20 · 34 ans<br />

• 35 · 54 ans<br />

• 55 ans et +<br />

10<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


S OPHIE R IOUX-HEBERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

L'analyse nous demontre que Ia grande<br />

majorite des gens considerent que Ia fonction<br />

principale des eglises est spirituelle<br />

(ill. 12). En deuxieme et troisieme positions<br />

arrivent les fonctions communautaire et<br />

sociale. La fonction touristique, envisagee<br />

par certains auteurs comme une possible<br />

solution de reconversion 27 , arrive loin derriere<br />

dans le classement avec seulement<br />

2 % des repondants de 20-34 ans qui<br />

l'ont suggeree. Ce 2 % annonce toutefois<br />

!'emergence d'une transition dans Ia<br />

perception de l'eglise d'un lieu cultuel a<br />

un lieu culture I. Cette transition s'observe<br />

d'ailleurs entre Ia perception des gens plus<br />

ages qui, a 80 %, considerent que l'utilite<br />

principale des eglises est le culte et celle<br />

des autres groupes d'age qui accordent un<br />

peu moins d'importance a cette fonction<br />

et un peu plus a Ia fonction communautaire.<br />

Malgre ce faible decalage entre les<br />

groupes d'age, les representations des repondants<br />

concernant l'utilite des eglises<br />

demeurent conservatrices. De fait, meme<br />

si Ia majorite de ceux-ci ne frequentent<br />

plus que tres rarement, sinon jamais, les<br />

eglises, ils les per 2005<br />

11


S OPHIE A IOUX-HE:BERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

de !'arrondissement de 1992, puis dans<br />

le rapport de !'evaluation du patrimoine<br />

urbain de !'arrondissement de 2004 30 • De<br />

plus, une etude de Ia Chaire de recherche<br />

du Canada en patrimoine urbain de I'Universite<br />

du Quebec a Montreal confirme<br />

Ia valeur patrimoniale elevee des eglises<br />

Saint-Edouard, Saint-Esprit et Saint-Marc 3 '.<br />

Bien que Ia valeur historique de l'eglise<br />

Saint-Jean-de-la-Croix y soit mentionnee,<br />

celle-ci n'a pas fait l'objet d'une evaluation<br />

patrimoniale de meme nature que les<br />

trois precedentes, puisqu'elle a deja subi<br />

passablement de modifications architecturales32.<br />

Enfin, notre etude souligne Ia<br />

valeur emblematique de Ia cathedrale<br />

orthodoxe Sainte-Sophie qui lui procure<br />

un rayonnement au-dela des frontieres<br />

de !'arrondissement. Cette comparaison<br />

avec les etudes patrimoniales de Ia ville<br />

et des experts nous incite a conclure que<br />

les repondants, malgre leur faible evocation<br />

de Ia valeur historique des eglises<br />

choisies, ont fait preuve d'une conscience<br />

patrimoniale dans leurs choix.<br />

Si les repondants demontrent une sensibilite<br />

a Ia beaute architecturale et artistique<br />

des eglises, ils semblent difficilement<br />

pouvoir se les representer autrement<br />

qu'en lieux de culte. De fait, les resultats<br />

lies a Ia perception de Ia fonction et des<br />

valeurs des eglises montrent des representations<br />

beaucoup plus traditionnelles<br />

que ce a quoi nous nous attend ions. Ainsi,<br />

en depit du fait que leur frequentation<br />

a beaucoup diminue, les repondants se<br />

representent toujours les eglises comme<br />

des lieux servant principalement au culte<br />

et comme des lieux investis d'une valeur<br />

religieuse avant tout.<br />

De tels resultats suggerent que les eglises<br />

possedent toujours une dimension sacree a<br />

leurs yeux et qu'elles repondent toujours a<br />

un besoin de spiritualite qui, meme s'il ne<br />

se materialise que pour les rites de passage<br />

ou les fetes religieuses, requiert, a tout<br />

le moins, Ia conservation de Ia fonction<br />

cultuelle pour quelques-unes des eglises<br />

de !'arrondissement. II importe de souligner<br />

que ces rites et ces celebrations font<br />

partie des traditions qui appartiennent a<br />

l'identite et a Ia culture quebecoises et<br />

c'est pourquoi certains residants y sont<br />

attaches. A ce sujet, il faut s'interroger<br />

sur un possible glissement semantique du<br />

terme N• 1 > 2005


SOPH IE R IOUX-HEBERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

3. Kong, Lily, 2001, « Mapping 'New' Geographies<br />

of Religion: Politics and Poetics in Modernity »,<br />

Progress in Human Geography, vol. 25, n• 2,<br />

p. 211-233; et Kong, Lily, 1990, >,<br />

Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast<br />

Geographers, n• 45, p. 55-70.<br />

5. Ibid.<br />

6. Humeau, Jean-Bertrand, 1997, ,<br />

dans Jacques Levy et Michel Lussault (dir.),<br />

Dictionnaire de Ia geographie et de l'espace des<br />

societl!s, Paris, Belin, p. 791 ; et Bailly, Antoine,<br />

1995, ><br />

dans Antoine Bailly, Roger Ferras et Daniel<br />

Pumain (dir.), Encyclopedie de geographie,<br />

Paris, Economica, p. 371-383.<br />

9. Relph, Edward, 1976, Place and Placelessness,<br />

Londres, Pion; et Durkheim, Emile, 1967,<br />

Sociologie et philosophie, Paris, Presses<br />

universitaires de France<br />

10. Debarbieux, Bernard, 2001, , n• 9,<br />

Montreal, Ville de Montreal / Ministere des<br />

Affaires culturelles.<br />

18. Cha, Jonathan, 2005, Evaluation du potentie/<br />

monumental du patrimoine religieux de<br />

/'arrondissement Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie<br />

a Montreal, memoire de maitrise, Montreal,<br />

Universite du Quebec a Montreal.<br />

19. Nous incluons sous le vocable N' 1 > 2005<br />

13


S OPHIE R IOUX-H EBERT > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

23. Ville de Montreal, Service de Ia mise en valeur<br />

du territoire et du patrimoine, Division du<br />

patrimoine et de Ia toponymie, 2004, Evaluatio!?<br />

du patrimoine urbain. Ville de Montreal,<br />

Arrondissement de Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie<br />

-26, 5 mai 2004, Montreal.<br />

24. Munkittrick, Judy A., 1984, Les eglises<br />

protestantes de Ia region de Coaticook,<br />

Coaticook, Quebec, Musee Beaulne; et<br />

Bergevin, Helene, 1981 , L'architecture des<br />

eglises protestantes des Cantons de /'Est et<br />

des Bois Francs au XIX' siecle, Art ancien du<br />

Quebec I Etudes, n' 3, Sainte-Fay, Quebec,<br />

Universite Laval.<br />

25. Martin, Paul-Louis, 2001, « Le paysage des<br />

noyaux religieux >>, dans Serge Courville et<br />

Normand Seguin (dir.), La Paroisse, Atlas<br />

historique du Quebec, Sainte-Fay, Quebec, Les<br />

Presses de I'Universite Laval, p. 53-81 .<br />

26. Sur les 304 repondants, un seul a affirme etre<br />

d'origine polonaise.<br />

27. Blais, Sylvie, et Pierre Bellerose, 1997, « Analyse<br />

du potentiel touristique du patrimoine religieux<br />

mont realais >>, Teoros, val. 16, n' 2, p. 38-40 ;<br />

Noppen, Luc, et Lucie K. Morisset, 1997, « A<br />

propos de paysage culture! : le patrimoine<br />

architectural religieu x, une offre distinctive au<br />

Quebec 7 >> Teoros, val. 16, n' 2, p. 14-20; et<br />

Noppen, Luc, et Lucie K. Morisset, 2003, « Le<br />

tourisme rellgieux et le patrimoine 7 >> Teoros,<br />

val. 22, n' 2, p. 69-70.<br />

28. Demers, Christiane, 1997, « Rapport de<br />

I' atelier 1: L'economie >> dans Nap pen, Luc,<br />

Lucie K. Morisset, et Robert Caron (dir.) 1997, La<br />

conservation des eg/ises dans /es vil/es-centres,<br />

Sillery, Les editions du Septentrion, p. 141 -144.<br />

29. Cha, /oc. 6 •.<br />

30. Ville de Montreal. 2004; et Ville de Montreal,<br />

Service de !'habitation et du deve·loppement<br />

urbaiA, 1992, Plan d'urbanisme : plan directeur<br />

de /'arrondissement Rosemont I Petite-Patrie,<br />

Montreal.<br />

31 . Cha, /oc. cit<br />

32. Cha, /oc. cit.<br />

33. Noppen et Morisset, 2003 : 69-70.<br />

14<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

ST. ANNE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH<br />

AND ITS PATRON<br />

PETER COFFMAN 1s a doctoral student at<br />

Queen's Univei'Sity, w1th prev1ous degrees from<br />

>PETER COFFMAN 1<br />

York. Ryerson. and the Un1vers1ty of Toronto.<br />

He has published on varrous aspects of English<br />

Rornanesque end Gothic Rev1val arch1tectu1'e.<br />

and h1s architectural photogl'aphy has been<br />

exhibited at d1fferent venues 111 Canada and<br />

the Un1ted States.<br />

Ther e is one city church which is not afraid of<br />

in novation [ ... ] When the present St. Anne's<br />

was built in Byzantine style instead of the<br />

conventional Gothic, there was surprise and<br />

to t his day its unusual lines [ ... ] stand out<br />

for their suggestion of the Moslem world<br />

[The Globe, December 15, 1923].<br />

By the time St . Anne's Anglican<br />

Church was completed in 1925, it was<br />

certainly the oddest Anglican church in<br />

Toronto, and arguably in the country<br />

(fig. 1). Designed in 1907 by Ford Howland,<br />

St. Anne's is Byzantine in style, with interior<br />

murals and sculptures by such artists as<br />

J.E.H . MacDonald, Frederick Varley, Frank<br />

Carmichael, Frances Loring, and Florence<br />

Wyle. It rema ins a singular monument<br />

to a wilful, visionary, and singularly<br />

determined patron, the Rev. Lawrence<br />

Skey.<br />

At the time St. Anne's was built, Gothic<br />

had for several decades been the accepted<br />

and expected style for Anglican churches.<br />

That had come about largely through the<br />

zeal of the Cambridge Camden Society,<br />

which held an iron grip on matters of Anglican<br />

architectural propriety in the middle<br />

and later nineteenth century.' Since<br />

the 1850s, their model church had been<br />

William Butterfield's All Saints, in London<br />

(fig. 2). 3 Later christened "The Ecclesiological<br />

Society," the Camdenians aired their<br />

views, praised "good" church architects,<br />

admonished "bad" ones, and generally<br />

bullied the architectural community into<br />

submission in the pages of their journal,<br />

The Ecclesiologist. The influence of<br />

the Society was enormous, and their<br />

judgements had a profound effect on the<br />

careers of many Victorian architects.'<br />

Ecclesiological Gothic arrived in British<br />

North America via the east coast. Christchurch<br />

Cathedral in Fredericton (begun<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N 1 > 2005 > 17-26<br />

15


PETER COFFMAN > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

1845), designed mostly by Frank Wills (the Gothic was complete. No other style,<br />

east end was completed by Butterfield), it seemed, was as beautiful, as pracwas<br />

one of the most ecclesiologically up<br />

to date buildings of its day. 5 That was closely<br />

tical, as adaptable, as rational-in short,<br />

as English.<br />

followed by the Anglican Cathedral of<br />

Seven years after the completion of All<br />

St. John's, Newfoundland, begun in 1847<br />

Saints, London, in 1867, Lawrence Edward<br />

to the designs of the most prolific and famous<br />

of all Victorian architects, Sir George<br />

Skey was born to a good Anglican family<br />

in Toronto. In 1902, Lawrence Skey-by<br />

Gilbert Scott.• Through the second half of<br />

then the Rev. Lawrence Skey-became Rector<br />

of St. Anne's Anglican Church, whose<br />

the nineteenth century, Ecclesiological Gothic<br />

established itself in Toronto 7 through<br />

congregation worshipped in a respectable<br />

such monuments as St. James' Cathedral by<br />

Gothic Revival church in Toronto's west<br />

Frederick Cumberland and Thomas Ridout<br />

end that had been designed by Kivas<br />

in 1849 (fig. 3), 8 St. James's Cemetery Chapel<br />

Tully (fig. 5). That church, built in 1862,<br />

(Cumberland and Storm, 1857-1861), 9<br />

had been enlarged by the addition of a<br />

St . Paul's Church (G .K. and E. Radford,<br />

south aisle in 1879, a north aisle in 1881 ,<br />

1861),' 0 All Saints Church (Richard Windeyer,<br />

1874), and the Church of St. Alban<br />

and by the addition of transepts and a<br />

new chancel in 1888. 17 Skey soon realized<br />

the Martyr (Richard Windeyer and John<br />

that his flock had yet again outgrown its<br />

Falloon, 1885-1891). The identification of<br />

space, and a special meeting of the congregation<br />

was called on April 17, 1906, to<br />

Gothic with the Established Church even<br />

extended to academia, where Bishop John<br />

discuss the building of a new church.' 8 By<br />

Strachan's Trinity College, founded in 1851,<br />

1907, Skey was ready to act.<br />

was housed in an appropriately "Pointed"<br />

building on Queen Street West designed<br />

by Kivas Tulley."<br />

It is not known whether, by 1907, the<br />

Anglican authorities in Toronto already<br />

knew that Lawrence Skey was born to be<br />

Thus, by the time St . Anne's was built,<br />

a square peg in a round hole. If not, then<br />

Gothic utterly dominated Anglican church<br />

they would know by 1908, when Skey held<br />

building in British North America. It did<br />

the first service in his newly built (but not<br />

not matter that Gothic had originated in<br />

yet decorated) church (fig. 6). The unsuspecting<br />

Toronto Anglicans of 1908, familiar<br />

medieval France," nor did it matter that<br />

the Gothic Revival's first great champion<br />

with the traditions of Anglican architecture,<br />

must have thought that a dreadful<br />

as a serious church style had been a zealous<br />

Catholic convert, A.W.N. Pugin. 13 To<br />

mistake had occurred. The architect, Ford<br />

the eyes of a century ago, Gothic was as<br />

Howland, produced a Byzantine design<br />

English, and as Anglican, as architecture<br />

that would have looked quite at home in<br />

could be. 14 That is reflected in St. Anne's<br />

very near contemporary, St. Paul's Anglican<br />

Church (the successor to the Radford<br />

brothers' building), designed by E.J . Lennox<br />

in 1913 (fig. 4) . 15 With its size, rectilinear<br />

apse, delicate arch mouldings, and<br />

cliff-like transept fa N' 1 > 2005


P ETER C OFFMAN > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

concerned with church union. Exceedingly<br />

resistant to the idea of papal supremacy,<br />

he had written off the Roman Catholics,<br />

and had, by his own admission, no<br />

sympathy at all for the Anglo-Catholics.<br />

Skey's hope was for union with the Protestant<br />

denominations and, according to<br />

Mastin, his choice of Byzantine was a deliberate<br />

attempt to evoke an early era of<br />

church history not blighted by interdenominational<br />

schisms and bickering.<br />

If that was his motivation, however, it is<br />

not clear why Byzantine would have seemed<br />

the right choice. An early Christian<br />

Basilica, being the style spread by Constantine<br />

himself when there was only one<br />

Christian Church, would have done just as<br />

well. Romanesque, a style which flourished<br />

centuries before the Reformation, was<br />

already well established in Toronto, both<br />

in sacred and secular contexts." Indeed<br />

Gothic, which also pre-dates the Reformation,<br />

would offer a distinctly English idiom<br />

within which to work, and enjoyed the<br />

wholehearted approval of the Anglican<br />

establishment as well as a solid grounding<br />

in Anglican theology. Moreover, anyone<br />

familiar enough with church history and<br />

architecture to have been concerned with<br />

that question in the first place would<br />

surely have known that, in choosing<br />

Byzantine, he was erecting a potent reminder<br />

not of church unity, but of the<br />

great and ancient schism in church history<br />

between Rome and Constantinople.»<br />

More recently, Marilyn MacKay has suggested<br />

that Skey's architect, Ford Howland,<br />

was the driving choice behind the selection<br />

of Byzantine. 23 Howland, she argues,<br />

is far more likely than his patron to have<br />

been up to date with current architectural<br />

trends, and by the time he began designing<br />

St. Anne's, the Byzantine Revival was<br />

a significant, though not widespread,<br />

trend. James Cubitt had recommended<br />

Byzantine for Protestant worship in his<br />

FIG. 5. 'OLD' ST. ANNE 'S, TORONTO, BY KIVAS TULLEY (1862)<br />

Church Designs for Congregations in<br />

1870. 24 Whether either Howland or Skey<br />

owned a copy of that book is unfortunately<br />

not known. John Oldrid Scott and<br />

Beresford Pite had each designed one<br />

Byzantine Anglican church in London."<br />

The best-known example of the Byzantine<br />

Revival, however, was the Roman Catholic<br />

Cathedral in Westminster-hardly a model<br />

likely to have been emulated by an anti­<br />

Catholic low-churchman like Skey. A letter<br />

in the Anglican archive in Toronto, written<br />

in 1960 by one P. Douglas Knowles,<br />

muddles things further.'• According to<br />

Knowles, who identified himself as a<br />

friend and neighbour of Ford Howland's<br />

from 1907-1910, the architect had intended<br />

St. Anne's to be a miniature version of the<br />

Roman Catholic Cathedral at Manila, Philippines.<br />

If that is true, then one can only<br />

suppose that Howland had kept it a secret<br />

from his patron-like Westminster Cathedral,<br />

this is hardly a model that would<br />

have impressed Skey. And therein lies the<br />

FIG. 6. ST. ANNE'S ANG LICAN CHU RCH, TORONTO;<br />

INTERIOR BEF ORE DECORATI ON<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N• 1 > 2005<br />

17


PETER COFFMAN > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

FIG. 7. WALMER ROAD BAPTIST CHURC H, TORONTO, BY LANGLEY AND BURKE (BEGUN 1889) I PETE R COFFMAN<br />

main problem with attributing too much<br />

credit to Howland: whatever his wishes<br />

and inspirations, nothing was going to<br />

happen unless Lawrence Skey agreed that<br />

it was a good idea. And, as we shall see,<br />

Skey was no pushover.<br />

A simpler explanation may suffice. Skey<br />

was a Low Church Anglican, deeply com ­<br />

mitted to both halves of that label. Gothic<br />

had been revived in large part to facilitate<br />

the Anglo-Catholic liturgy; thus, it was<br />

the style of the High Church, and would<br />

have been undesirable to Skey. Byzantine,<br />

on the other hand, was emphatically not<br />

High Church in appearance, as well as<br />

being spatially well suited to Low Church,<br />

sermon-centred services. Nor could it<br />

be confused with non-Anglican spaces<br />

built by Protestant denominations like<br />

the Baptists and Methodists, whose amphitheatrical<br />

plans (for example, Walmer<br />

Road Baptist Church, 1888-1992, fig . 7)<br />

were by that time a frequent feature of<br />

the Canadian architectural landscape. In<br />

Byzantine, Skey had a style that was practical,<br />

unique, beautiful, and free of ideological<br />

baggage that would play into the<br />

hands of the feuding Protestants of early<br />

twentieth-century Toronto.<br />

Those considerations may have justified<br />

the choice of Byzantine in Skey's mind,<br />

but the choice remained an extremely<br />

unconventional one for Canadian Anglicans.<br />

In order to execute a highly original<br />

and expensive project within a highly<br />

conservative institution, it helps to have a<br />

dynamic, charismatic, slightly bull-headed<br />

instigator pushing it along. By all accounts,<br />

that describes Lawrence Skey quite accurately<br />

(fig. 8) . A newspaper profile of 1917<br />

characterized him as follows:<br />

Slight of build, but well-knit, fresh of face,<br />

hair slightly gray, mind alert and exceptionally<br />

well-informed, quick and enthusiastic in<br />

speech, strong in his opinions, shrewd,<br />

warm-hearted , and wholly devoted to his<br />

work-there you have an impressionistic<br />

picture of Reverend Lawrence Skey, M.A 27<br />

His popularity among his parishioners<br />

seems to have been unbounded. Skey served<br />

as an army chaplain in the First World<br />

War, and his flock welcomed him back from<br />

the front with an elaborate celebration on<br />

December 5, 1918. The musical program<br />

leaves no doubt about the feelings of the<br />

18<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 200 5


P ETER C OFFMAN > ANALYSI S I ANA LYSE<br />

FIG. R. REV. LAWRENCE SKEY<br />

FIG. 9. ST. GEORGE'S ANGLICAN CATHEDRAL, KINGSTON, BY VARIO US ARCHITECTS (1825-1899) 1 PETE R COff MAN<br />

congregation for the Reverend Captain<br />

Lawrence Skey. To the tune of "Marching<br />

Through Georgia," they sang of how Skey<br />

had single-handedly won the war:<br />

Don't you all remember w hen he went<br />

to do his bit<br />

We all prophesied the huns would<br />

surely have a fit<br />

Hindy and the Kaiser, Little Willy<br />

all have quit<br />

Let's give a cheer for the Re ctor. 28<br />

Later, this verse rang out (to the tune of<br />

"When Johnny Comes Marching Home"):<br />

They say that when he got to France,<br />

Th ey do. Hurrah I<br />

The Kaiser said: "We haven't a chance,"<br />

He did. Hurrahl<br />

If he is only a chaplain, Gee I<br />

What must the regular soldiers be-<br />

Ach himmell Donnervetterl It's all<br />

off mit me. 29<br />

Had Skey suggested that they worship in<br />

an outhouse, he would probably have won<br />

the instant, wholehearted agreement of<br />

his flock. One doesn't generally win that<br />

kind of following by being an indecisive<br />

ditherer, so it comes as no surprise that<br />

Skey was not. Another newspaper clipping<br />

in the Anglican archive, unfortunately<br />

undated, tells of an occasion when Skey<br />

learned that a man in his church neighbourhood<br />

was in the habit of beating his wife.<br />

Skey paid the man a visit, and, finding<br />

him obstinate in the face of reasonable<br />

persuasion, determined to settle the<br />

matter once and for all:<br />

"Take off your coat," cried Mr. Skey, removing<br />

his own. Dumbly, the husband obeyed, and<br />

the fighting parson started at him. It was a<br />

fair fight, with no one to interfere. It lasted<br />

several minutes, but in the end the minister<br />

had "licked" his man. Mr. Skey came out of<br />

the fight with a black eye, but that worried<br />

him nothing at all. 30<br />

Whether that anecdote is true is less<br />

important than the fact that it was<br />

circulated. Moreover, Skey's feisty streak<br />

did not extend only to the weak and the<br />

drunk. In 1923, he held a special service to<br />

celebrate the completion of the decoration<br />

of St. Anne's. To mark the occasion, he invited<br />

one Rev. Pidgeon (a Methodist) and<br />

one Rev. MacNeill (a Baptist) to share his<br />

pulpit. Skey's bishop (Sweeney). in turn,<br />

marked the occasion by informing Skey<br />

that under no circumstances was he to<br />

share his pulpit with such company. Skey<br />

being Skey, he followed his convictions<br />

and ignored his boss. "I was glad," he reflected<br />

later, "that I stood by my principles<br />

in the matter." He then added a thought<br />

that could serve as his epitaph: "One must<br />

learn to defy opposition.""<br />

Such lack of regard for the approval of<br />

others-even of one's own superiors-was<br />

doubtless a useful trait for anyone planning<br />

to build a Byzantine Anglican church<br />

in Toronto in 1907. After the opening service<br />

of 1908, the Canadian Churchman<br />

summarized the resistance to Skey's new<br />

church :<br />

When this church w as in the course of<br />

erection many and various were the remarks<br />

made upon it, and many of them were far<br />

from flattering . Mosque, cyclorama and<br />

synagogue were among the most common<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N• 1 > 200 5<br />

19


P ETER COFFMAN > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

FIG. 10. ST. ANNE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH, J.E.H. MACDONALD'S ORIGINAL<br />

DECORATIVE SCHEME.<br />

and frequent epithets used, and, judged<br />

from the exterior view, having a dome as the<br />

main feature, it has of necessity a certain<br />

outward resemblance to the synagogue<br />

of the Jew, and no one is blamed fo r not<br />

altogether liking the external appearance. 32<br />

The writer does, however, make an<br />

attempt to defend Skey's church :<br />

The objections that have been made that<br />

it is contrary to church architecture are,<br />

of course, only made by the ignorant, for<br />

there is no rule or law that Gothic is the only<br />

type for Anglican churches. St. George's<br />

Cathedral, Kingston, is of the same [Greek or<br />

Byzantine] type, and though, like St. Anne's,<br />

many do not admire it from without, there<br />

are few who would not admit that when you<br />

enter in you find one of the most beautiful<br />

churches in our country. 33<br />

Several architectural and historical facts<br />

are muddled in that account: St. Anne's is<br />

Byzantine, not Greek; and Byzantine had,<br />

for 1300 years, been a Christian style only<br />

recently used in synagogues. The St. George's<br />

Cathedral referred to is not Byzantine<br />

(fig. 9), and has, in Wren's St. Paul's Ca ­<br />

thedral, London (begun 1675), as mainstream<br />

a lineage as one can wish for in the<br />

Anglican Church . 34 The claim that there<br />

was "no rule or law" that Anglican churches<br />

had to be Gothic, while technically<br />

true, displays remarkable ignorance the<br />

Ecclesiological Society and the very long<br />

shadow they had<br />

cast on Anglican<br />

church building.<br />

But perhaps more<br />

revea I i ng than<br />

the art historical FIG . 11 . ST. ANNE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH , INTERIOR I PETER COFFMAN<br />

mistakes is the assumption<br />

that identifying an architectu- J.E .H. MacDonald is famed as a founding<br />

ral precedent somehow made St. Anne's member of the Group of Seven . On the faacceptable.<br />

The need to find authority in ce of it, a more unlikely candidate for the<br />

historical precedent is a distinctly ecclesiological<br />

way of thinking, and one probably liturgical art in Canadian history would<br />

most ambitious programme of Anglican<br />

not shared by Skey. Despite the efforts be difficult to find. MacDonald had never<br />

of the Canadian Churchman, St . Anne's undertaken a large decoration job, and,<br />

remains, as the Toronto Star proclaimed as he himself admitted, his selection was<br />

in 1924, "Skey's Byzantine Defiance." 35 "an act of faith on Mr. Skey's part." 36 Yet,<br />

the more deeply one probes, the more<br />

That predilection for independent thought<br />

appropriate the choice seems. Although<br />

makes it easier to understand Skey's other,<br />

resistance to the work of the Group of<br />

more famous, unconventional decision<br />

Seven was not as universal as they would<br />

regarding St. Anne's. For the first fifteen<br />

later have had the world believe, the<br />

years of its life, the interior of St. Anne's<br />

battle was not yet won in 1923.'7 However,<br />

remained undecorated. When, in 1923, the<br />

some of the qualities that their critics most<br />

necessary funds to carry out the decoration<br />

became available, Skey hired neither<br />

disliked might actually have helped them<br />

when it came to decorating a Byzantine<br />

an established liturgical artist, nor an<br />

interior. The boldly graphic sense of design<br />

authority on Byzantine icons, nor even a<br />

and lack of academic painterly qualities<br />

good Anglican-but a landscape painter<br />

gives the Group's work a broad kinship<br />

whom he had met at the Arts and Letters<br />

to Byzantine work. Moreover, the visual<br />

Club, named J.E .H. MacDonald.<br />

and symbolic languages of the Group of<br />

Seven and of Christian art are arguably<br />

20<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 200 5


P ETER COFFMAN > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

FIG . 13. ST. AN NE 'S ANGLI CAN CHURCH, CHANC EL CE ILI NG I PETER COF FMAN<br />

not as far apart as might be assumed. The<br />

tree, for example, plays a central role in<br />

both : in Christian iconography, the tree<br />

participates in the Fall in the Garden of<br />

Eden, then reappears in association with<br />

redemption through the Tree of Jesse (see,<br />

for example, the stained glass of St-Denis<br />

and Chartres); the tree also resonates in<br />

Canadian painting, presenting an image<br />

of the human soul in a variety of states.<br />

Tom Thomson's The West Wind is arguably<br />

the most famous tree in Canada and, to<br />

many, the quintessential Group of Seven<br />

image (notwithstanding the fa ct that it<br />

was, technically, not painted by a Group<br />

member). Thomson's tree is vibrant, wild,<br />

and teeming with life; by comparison, Carl<br />

Schaeffer, painting in the middle of the<br />

Great depression, featured a dead tree in<br />

Summer Harvest (1935) . In the immediate<br />

aftermath of World War II, Charles Com ­<br />

fort painted a poignantly uprooted tree in<br />

Early Jun e, Albion Country (1949) . 38 When<br />

Skey and MacDonald began discussion of<br />

the programme at St. Anne's, they would<br />

have found at least some common ground<br />

in their respective lexicons. Finally, the<br />

project of St. Anne's must be seen in the<br />

context of the MacDonald's experience as<br />

a commercial designer. 39 Neither he nor<br />

other members of the Group of Seven<br />

were strangers to commissioned work.<br />

MacDonald's original plan for St . Anne's<br />

had been to design the whole program<br />

himself and execute it with the help of some<br />

of his students at the Ontario College<br />

of Art. 40 Unfortunately for him (if not for<br />

posterity), by the time he was ready to begin,<br />

his students had left for the summer<br />

break. He did what anyone would do in<br />

such circumstances: he called on his friends<br />

for help-including friends named Frederick<br />

Varley, Frank Carmichael, Frances Loring,<br />

and Florence Wyle. The participation<br />

of these artists-a who's who of Canadian<br />

art in the 1920s-accounts for whatever<br />

fame the building now enjoys.<br />

FIG. 14. ST. ANNE'S ANG LICAN CHURCH, EVANGELIST SYMBOL<br />

(JOHN) BY LORING AND WY LE I PETER COFFMAN<br />

As seen in MacDonald's cross-sectional<br />

sketch (fig. 10), the major areas for decoration<br />

were the dome (now re-done in a<br />

manner that does not show great sensi ­<br />

tivity to MacDonald's vision- see fig. 11),<br />

the base of the dome, the pendentives<br />

(fig. 11), and the chancel ceiling (figs. 12<br />

and 13) . Loring and Wyle provided lowrelief<br />

sculptures of the four evangelists'<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N• 1 > 2005<br />

21


P ETER COFFMAN > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

FIG. 16. ST. ANNE 'S ANGLICAN CHURCH, CRUCIFIXION<br />

BY J.E.H. MACDONALD I PETER COFFM AN<br />

symbols (fig. 14), while between them are<br />

portraits of prophets, painted by Varley.<br />

Dominating the central space are the huge<br />

pendentive paintings: the Nativity, by Varley<br />

(fig. 15); the Crucifixion, by MacDonald<br />

(fig. 16); with the Resurrection by H.S. Palmer<br />

and the Ascension by H.S. Stansfield<br />

on the other two pendentives.<br />

The artists' acceptance of the highly diagrammatic<br />

and flat Byzantine style is<br />

striking, as is the architectural solidity of<br />

the paintings. If architecture is the art of<br />

composition in mass, void, and light, these<br />

paintings unequivocally and unashamedly<br />

affirm that they are part of the mass. The<br />

same sensibility continues into the most<br />

elaborately decorated part of the church,<br />

the chancel (fig. 12). As well as a wealth of<br />

non-figural decoration, the chancel includes<br />

paintings by Frank Carmichael, Arthur<br />

Martin, Neil Mackechnie, J.E.H. MacDonald,<br />

and MacDonald's son Thoreau.<br />

The decoration of St. Anne's represents<br />

a remarkable collective effort, rendered<br />

perhaps even more remarkable by the<br />

fact that individual egos were, apparently,<br />

subordinated to the group project. Or,<br />

to use a distinctly Canadian metaphor,<br />

MacDonald and Skey assembled a group<br />

of first-team all-stars of Canadian art, got<br />

them to play as a team, and scored a stunning<br />

and unequivocal team victory. It is a<br />

unique, and uniquely Canadian, success.<br />

Works of striking originality often stand<br />

out more dramatically in relief, and the<br />

comparison between St . Anne's and<br />

St. Paul's, mentioned above (fig. 4), is instructive.<br />

Architecturally, St. Paul's defines<br />

itself entirely by reference to the English,<br />

Anglican, Gothic past. At St. Anne's, Skey<br />

proceeds as if the traditions of the Anglican<br />

Church didn't even exist. The two<br />

churches are of the same denomination,<br />

in the same city, and were built within<br />

five years of each other. Yet they could<br />

hardly be more different. They stand not<br />

side-by-side, but back-to-back, their gazes<br />

fixed in opposite directions.<br />

NOTES<br />

1. For their time, patience, assistance and<br />

expertise, the author would like to thank<br />

Robin Sewell and Rev. Peter Orme at St. Anne's<br />

Church, Mary Anne Nicholls and Marian<br />

Rhodes at the Diocese of Toronto Archives,<br />

Prof. Anna Hudson and Prof. Malcolm Thurlby<br />

of York University, and Prof. Pierre du Prey of<br />

Queen's University.<br />

2. For overviews of the importance of the<br />

Cambridge Camden I Ecclesiological Society,<br />

see Clark, Kenneth, 1928, The Gothic Revival:<br />

An Essay in the History of Taste, london,<br />

Constable; lewis, Michael, 2002, The Gothic<br />

Revival, london, Thames and Hudson; Brooks,<br />

Chris, 1999, The Gothic Revival, london,<br />

Phaidon Press. For recent sc holarship on<br />

specific issues, see Webster, Christopher, and<br />

John Elliott (eds.) 2000, 'A Church as it Should<br />

Be:' The Cambridge Camden Society and its<br />

Influence, Stamford, Shaun Tyas.<br />

3. On Butterfield, see Summerson, John,<br />

1963, « William Butterfield, or the Glory of<br />

Ugliness >>, Heavenly Mansions and other<br />

Essays on Architecture, london, W.W. Norton<br />

& Company, p. 159-176; see also Thomson,<br />

Paul, 1971 , William Butterfield, london,<br />

Routledge and K. Paul.<br />

4. For example, even the enormously successful<br />

Sir George Gilbert Scott showed a co ncern<br />

bordering on paranoia about how the Society<br />

reviewed his work. The paranoia was not<br />

altogether justified: see Stamp, Gavin, 2000,<br />

«George Gilbert Scott and the Cambridge<br />

Camden Society >, in Webster and Elliott,<br />

op.cit.: 173-189.<br />

5. See Richardson, Douglas, 1966, Christ Church<br />

Cathedral, Fredericton, New Brunswick, M.A .<br />

Th esis, Yale University; also Kalman, Harold,<br />

1994, A History of Canadian Architecture,<br />

vol. 1, Toronto, New York, Oxford, Oxford<br />

University Press, p. 282-287. For a contemporary<br />

discussion by the patron, Bi shop John Medley,<br />

see « Colonial Church Architecture: Chapter<br />

IX », The Ecclesiologist, no. LXVI - June, 1848<br />

(new series, no. XXX). p. 361-363.<br />

22<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


PETER C OFFMAN > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

6. The church was discussed in The Ecclesiologist<br />

prior to its completion, and is reproduced<br />

in Simmins, Geoffrey, 1992, Documents<br />

in Canadian Architecture, Peterborough,<br />

Broadview Press, p. 33-42.<br />

7. On Toronto architecture, see Arthur, Eric,<br />

1986, Toronto: No Mean City, 3'' ed ., revised<br />

by Stephen A. Otto, Toronto, University of<br />

Toronto Press. On Ontario church architecture,<br />

see McRae, Marion, and Anthony Adamson,<br />

1975, Hallowed Walls: Church Architecture<br />

of Upper Canada, Toronto, Clarke, Irwin &<br />

Company.<br />

8. On St. James', see Kalman: 289-290; also<br />

Simmins, Geoffrey, 1997, Fred Cumberland:<br />

Building the Victorian Dream, Toronto,<br />

Buffalo, London, University of Toronto Press,<br />

p. 124-138.<br />

9. See Simmins, 1997: 141-150.<br />

10. Research has been done on "old" St. Paul's<br />

Church by Stephen Otto, and reproduced in<br />

the unpublished St. Paul's Anglican Church:<br />

Inspection Report on the Condition of the<br />

Old Church, Cody Hall and New St. Paul's<br />

Anglican Church, Spencer R. Higgins, Architect<br />

Incorporated, June 29, 1992.<br />

11 . Trinity College joined the University of<br />

Toronto in 1903, and subsequently moved to<br />

a new Gothic building on Hoskin Avenue. The<br />

original college was demolished in 1955. See<br />

Dendy, William, 1993, Lost Toronto, Toronto,<br />

McClelland and Stewart, p. 158-163.<br />

12. There is abundant literature on the French<br />

origins of Gothic. For a relatively recent<br />

discussion, see Wilson, Christopher, 1990,<br />

The Gothic Cathedral, London, Thames and<br />

Hudson.<br />

13 . On Pugin, see Stanton, Phoebe, 1971 , Pugin,<br />

New York, Viking Press; see also Atterbury,<br />

Paul, and Clive Wainwright, 1994, Pugin: A<br />

Gothic Passion, New Haven and London, Yale<br />

University Press; O'Donnell, Roderick, Blink by<br />

[him] in Silence?>>, The Cambridge Camden<br />

Society and A.W.N. Pug in, Webster and Elliott,<br />

p. 98-120.<br />

14. On the "Englishness" of Gothic, see Frew, J.M .,<br />

1982, « Gothic is English: John Carter and the<br />

Revival of Gothic as England's National Style >>,<br />

Art Bulletin, vol. 64, p. 315-319.<br />

15 . On Lennox's St. Paul's, see Otto, 1992. On the<br />

vast and varied output of Lennox, see Litvak,<br />

Marilyn, 1995, Edward James Lennox, "Builder<br />

of Toronto, " Toronto, Dundurn Press; see also<br />

Coffman, Peter, 2003, >, Journal of the Society<br />

for the Study of Architecture in Canada,<br />

val. 28, nos. 3, 4, p. 3-12 .<br />

16. The evidence of the fabric suggests that<br />

St. Paul 's was intended to be even more like<br />

its monumental models than it currently is.<br />

The timber ce iling of the nave cuts awkwardly<br />

across the windows of the (liturgical) west<br />

wall; a stone vault would not have done so, and<br />

presumably that was the original intention.<br />

17. On "Old" St. Anne's, see Robertson, J. Ross,<br />

1904, Landmarks of Toronto, val. 4, Toronto,<br />

Robertson, J.R. , 1912, St. Anne's Church,<br />

Toronto: Fiftieth Anniversary and Jubilee<br />

1862-1912, Toronto, Carlton Press.<br />

18. Vestry Meeting Minutes, April 17, 1906,<br />

Diocese of Toronto Archive 88-1, Box 11.<br />

19 . Except that even Athens has a Gothic Anglican<br />

Church-St. Paul 's Church, on Philellinon<br />

Street.<br />

20. Mastin, Catherine, 1988, James Edward Hervey<br />

MacDonald and the St. Anne's Anglican Church<br />

Mural Decoration Program, unpublished M.A.<br />

Thesis, York University.<br />

21. Significant Toronto buildings in the<br />

Romanesque (or Richardsonian Romanesque)<br />

style include University College (Cumberland<br />

and Storm, 1856-1859), the Church of<br />

St. Andrew (William Storm, 1874-1875), and<br />

the "Old" City Hall (E .J. Lennox, 1889-1899).<br />

22. The final sch ism occurred in 1054.<br />

23 . MacKay, Marylin, 1997, « St. Anne's<br />

Anglican Church, Toronto, Byzantium versus<br />

Modernity », Revue d 'art canadienne I<br />

Canadian Art Review, XVIII/I, p. 6-25.<br />

24. Cubitt, James, 1870, Church Design for<br />

Congregations: its Developments and<br />

Possibilities, London, Smith, Elder.<br />

25. See MacKay : 12-13 .<br />

26 . " The present church was designed by W. Ford<br />

Howland, who was a friend of mine, and a<br />

neighbour, when I was manager of the Bank<br />

of British North America at Bloor Street and<br />

Lansdowne Avenue, 1907-1910. My recollection<br />

is that the present church is, to a large extent,<br />

a small copy of the Roman Catholic Cathedral<br />

at Manila, Philippines." (P. Douglas Knowles to<br />

the Rev. Warren N. Turner, Rector, St. Jude's,<br />

October 1960, Diocese of Toronto Archive 88-<br />

1, Box 11 .)<br />

27. Skelton, James, n.d., « Rev. L. Skey Would<br />

Reach Mothers >>, clipping from unidentified<br />

newspaper, Diocese of Toronto Archive 88-1,<br />

Box 11. As the article concerns recruitment of<br />

so ldiers for WWI, it can presumably be dated<br />

between the start of the war in 1914 and<br />

Skey's departure for the front in 1917.<br />

28. « Souvenir of St. Anne's Congregational<br />

'Welcome' to the Rector Rev. Capt. Lawrence E.<br />

Skey on the occasion of his return from the<br />

Front Thursday, December 5'". 1918 at 8 :00<br />

p.m., Musical Program >>, Diocese of Toronto<br />

Archive 88-1, Box 11 . Song #2 (n .p.), A Lot of<br />

Solos with One Chorus.<br />

29. Ibid., Song #4, A Short Solo and a Very Long<br />

Chorus.<br />

30. « Rev. L. Skey Beat Wife Beater Well >>, n.p.,<br />

clipping from unidentified newspaper,<br />

attributed to "J.D., " Diocese of Toronto<br />

Archive 88-1, Box 11 . The story is clearly<br />

written in retrospect, and may have appeared<br />

in connection with Skey's retirement in 1933.<br />

31 . « Play Golf After Sermon Canon Skey Advises<br />

Men >>, n.p., newspaper clipping possibly<br />

dating from Skey's retirement (1933), Diocese<br />

of Toronto Archive 88-1, Box 11.<br />

32. « St . Anne's Opening Services >>, Canadian<br />

Churchman, October 15, 1908, p. 669.<br />

33. Ibid.<br />

34. On St. George's, see Mckendry, Jennifer, 1995,<br />

With Our Past Before Us, Toronto, University<br />

of Toronto Press, p. 59-68.<br />

35. Greenway, C.R., 1924, « Lawrence Skey's<br />

Byzantine Defiance a Triumph of Toronto<br />

Artists >, Toronto Star Weekly, January 19,<br />

p. 22 .<br />

36. Greenway : 23.<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

23


PETER COFFMAN > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

37. For the most recent overview of the Group<br />

of Seven, see Hill, Charles, 1995, The Group<br />

of Seven : Art for a Nation, Ottawa, National<br />

Gallery of Canada; Toronto, McClelland &<br />

Stewart. See also Jessup, Lynda, 2002, « The<br />

Group of Seven and the Tourist Landscape<br />

in Western Canada, or The More Things<br />

Change .. . >>, Journal of Canadian Studies,<br />

vol. 37, p. 144-179.<br />

38. All three paintings are in the collection of the<br />

Art Gallery of Ontario.<br />

39. See Robert Stacey, J. E. H. MacDonald, Designer:<br />

an Anthology of Graphic Design, Illustration<br />

and Lettering, Archives of Canadian Art,<br />

1996.<br />

40. Greenway.<br />

24<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

POLSON PARK AND CALVIN PARK, 1954-1962:<br />

TWO LAND ASSEMBLY SUBDIVISIONS<br />

IN KINGSTON, ONTARIO<br />

Robert McGeachy has a B.A. from Trent University,<br />

an M .A. from the University of Ottawa. and a<br />

>RoBERT McGEACHY<br />

certificate in Masonry-Heritage and Traditonal<br />

from Algonquin Heritage Institute in Perth .<br />

He has taught in China and in Southern<br />

California. This coming fall he will begin teaching<br />

in New York City.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Between 1954 and 1962, the land assembly<br />

program, which involved all three governmental<br />

levels of the Canadian federal<br />

system, produced nearly 600 lots in two<br />

Kingston subdivisions: Polson Park and<br />

Calvin Park . This article is a case study of<br />

the political and social dynamics behind<br />

the creation of these two land assembly<br />

subdivisions. Particular attention is paid<br />

to how a policy formulated at the upper<br />

echelons of the federal and provincial<br />

governments was implemented at the<br />

municipal level and became enmeshed in<br />

local politics. In short, this presentation<br />

examines the relationship between the<br />

state and architecture in the form of<br />

housing.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Between 1954 and 1962, three levels of the<br />

Canadian federal system, the federal, provincial,<br />

and municipal governments, jointly<br />

created two subdivisions, consisting of<br />

approximately 600 lots, in Kingston, Ontario:<br />

Polson Park and Calvin Park. This article<br />

is a case study focusing on how a policy<br />

formulated at the upper echelons of the<br />

federal government, in consultation with<br />

provincial premiers, was executed within<br />

a municipal environment. These interactions<br />

also reflect the various governments'<br />

attitudes towards such crucial issues as<br />

private builders, home ownership, and<br />

public rental housing.'<br />

THE LAND ASSEMBLY PROGRAM<br />

Polson Park and Calvin Park were products<br />

of the federally directed land assembly<br />

program, which was introduced in 1949<br />

to help ease a severe housing shortage<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005 > 2 7-39<br />

25


R OBERT M c G EACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

program, which helped produce such subdivisions<br />

as Polson Park and Calvin Park.<br />

FIG. 2. KINGSTON DURING THE 1960S. POLSON PARK IS THE SUBDI VISION TO THE LEFT<br />

AND CALVIN PARK THE SU BDI VISION TO THE RIGHT.<br />

in Canada. Among the various factors<br />

causing the shortage were the steady<br />

urbanization of Canada's population, the<br />

sharp increase in the number of households<br />

being formed with the arrival of the<br />

"baby boomers," and the wartime residen ­<br />

tial construction slump.' A more intangible<br />

factor was that a higher proportion of<br />

the Canadian population than before the<br />

Second World War believed that owning<br />

a home was an attainable goal.'<br />

providing such necessities as sewer lines<br />

While in 1946 the Federal Minister of Re-<br />

and sidewalks. In short, the nation's housing<br />

predicament probably would have<br />

construction, C.D. Howe, estimated that<br />

480,000 units would be needed by 1952 to<br />

worsened without substantial public interalleviate<br />

the housing shortage, the private<br />

· vention in the housing field. Reluctantly,<br />

construction industry was having difficulty<br />

the federal government, with sometimes<br />

meeting this challenge.• With the notable<br />

equally reluctant provincial and municipal<br />

exceptions of such prominent financiers<br />

support, intervened in the housing field<br />

as E. Taylor, who built Don Mills, most<br />

with such programs as the land assembly<br />

building companies were small and unable<br />

to undertake ambitious multi-home projects<br />

.5 Furthermore, because of financial<br />

difficulties, many municipalities in Ontario<br />

and elsewhere discontinued their pre­<br />

Second World War practice of providing<br />

builders with serviced land to build on."<br />

As a result, already overstretched builders<br />

were often required to take on the additional<br />

financial responsibility of servicing<br />

the land for their projects; that is,<br />

In Canada, the federal government was<br />

the primary body charged with formulating<br />

a housing policy; various amendments<br />

to the National Housing Act (NHA) were<br />

the fundamental building blocks of this<br />

evolving housing policy. Faced with a<br />

severe housing crisis, the Liberal government<br />

of Louis St. Laurent made some noteworthy<br />

amendments to the NHA in 1949,<br />

including the land assembly program .<br />

During his November 15, 1949 House of<br />

Commons presentation, the then Minister<br />

of Reconstruction, Robert Winters,<br />

outlined the land assembly program's objectives:<br />

providing the means to increase<br />

the nation's housing supply and somewhat<br />

ease the pressure of urban sprawl. 7 More<br />

precisely, the land assembly program was<br />

to generate the infrastructure for subdivisions,<br />

such as Polson Park and Calvin Park,<br />

which were basically planned communities<br />

replete with relatively affordable housing<br />

organized in a comfortably ordered manner.<br />

These subdivisions would, in effect,<br />

act as bulwarks and decelerate the expansion<br />

of potentially chaotic urban sprawl<br />

around such municipalities as Toronto.• As<br />

urban theorist Allan Irving noted, "Urban<br />

planning represented one twentieth century<br />

thrust to establish something stable,<br />

structured and rationalized within a modernist<br />

world of chaos, flux and incessant<br />

change." In that respect, urban planning<br />

represents a modern "ideal of largescale,<br />

technical and efficient city plans."'<br />

Kingston 's land assembly subdivision<br />

represented efforts to achieve the modern<br />

ideal of urban planning.<br />

From an ideological perspective, the<br />

1949 NHA amendment marked a change<br />

in direction for the federal government<br />

in regards to city planning and housing;<br />

specifically, the federal government<br />

was beginning to play a progressively<br />

26<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N" 1 > 200 5


ROBERT M cGEACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

more interventionist role in these two<br />

interrelated fields. Although Part V of<br />

the1944 version of the NHA called for the<br />

federal government to start encouraging<br />

city planning in Canada, for constitutional<br />

reasons little had been done until the<br />

land assembly program was introduced<br />

to fulfill such mandate. 10 Traditionally,<br />

the federal government was reluctant to<br />

interact directly with municipalities since<br />

municipalities were well within provincial<br />

governments' constitutional sphere of influence,<br />

as C.D. Howe (the almost legendary<br />

"Minister of Everything") noted in<br />

a 1947 article." City planning was very<br />

much a municipal concern and, therefore,<br />

a provincial concern. Likewise, the Liberal<br />

governments of Mackenzie King and<br />

St. Laurent were averse to intervening directly<br />

in the housing market by providing<br />

such initiatives as extensive social housing<br />

programs. During the Second World War,<br />

and in the immediate postwar years, the<br />

federal government built thousands of<br />

houses for war industry workers and veterans;<br />

however, as Howe observed, these<br />

were extraordinary efforts to meet an immediate<br />

crisis . In normal times, the federal<br />

government preferred using more indirect<br />

means to stimulate the housing industry,<br />

such as providing credit to homebuyers and<br />

homebuilders. 12 In a 1953 speech Robert<br />

Winters, the Liberal Minister of Resources<br />

and Development, said : "In the field of<br />

real estate it has never been possible to<br />

entertain the myth that the interests of<br />

government and private enterprise are<br />

opposed." 13 The federal government, in<br />

his view, aided, not hindered, privatesector<br />

housing by providing such services<br />

as helping to create serviced land for<br />

developers to build houses on and by<br />

insuring mortgage funds. 14<br />

Because of the seriousness of the housing<br />

situation in 1949, St . Laurent decided to<br />

break with traditional federal practices,<br />

to introduce the land assembly program<br />

and to begin to deal directly with municipalities.<br />

After negotiations with provincial<br />

premiers were conducted and the necessary<br />

enabling acts to permit the federal<br />

government to work directly with municipalities<br />

were passed, the basic procedures<br />

for implementing the land assembly program<br />

were formulated. According to the<br />

official land assembly program protocol,<br />

at the request of a municipal government,<br />

the federal government, through<br />

the federal crown corporation called the<br />

Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation<br />

(CMHC), would purchase a tract of<br />

land for a subdivision. The CMHC would<br />

then plan the subdivision and construct<br />

its roads, sewers, and lot boundaries. Finally,<br />

the CMHC would sell the lots first to<br />

individual buyers and then to developers.<br />

Some provisions were made to try to ensure<br />

that the developers would sell the lots<br />

and houses at a reasonable price. In exceptionally<br />

rare cases, the CMHC itself built<br />

the houses in a land assembly subdivision.<br />

Most of the steps of a land assembly project<br />

were subject to approval by provincial<br />

and municipal authorities. 15<br />

From a financial perspective, the federal<br />

government was responsible for 75% of<br />

a land assembly project's costs and the<br />

respective provincial government was<br />

responsible for the remaining 25% . The<br />

revenue from the sales of a project's lots<br />

was divided by the same ratio.'• It is significant<br />

that the federal government expected<br />

to recover the costs of its investment:<br />

it was not interested in running the program<br />

at a deficit. A public housing project,<br />

though, with its reduced rents and<br />

ongoing capital and administrative costs,<br />

would almost certainly be run at a continual<br />

loss. In other words, the land assembly<br />

program did not break with the basic<br />

laws of the marketplace.<br />

The nature of the subsidy passed on to<br />

the buyer was a serviced lot sold at a<br />

price slightly below the prevailing market<br />

price for a comparative lot. In short,<br />

the land assembly program represented<br />

a compromise: the federal government<br />

intervened in the housing market without<br />

unduly disrupting the dynamics of<br />

the private market. According to a 1951<br />

CMHC document, lot prices in land assembly<br />

subdivisions were to be set at a level<br />

that was acceptable to 70% of an area's<br />

builders." The federal government was reluctant<br />

to undertake the more interventionist<br />

strategy of a public social housing<br />

program where it would build units and<br />

rent them to low-income tenants at a rate<br />

well below the prevailing market rate. Although<br />

the 1949 amendment to the NHA<br />

also called for a public housing program<br />

for low-income tenants, preference was<br />

given to the land assembly program. By<br />

1952 a reported 2,078 public housing units<br />

had been, or shortly would be, erected in<br />

Ontario. In contrast, 11,3451and assembly<br />

lots were sold or ready to be sold.'"<br />

The disparity between the land assembly<br />

and public housing programs was<br />

evident in Kingston as, from 1954 to<br />

1962, only 71 publicly funded rental units<br />

were constructed; these were located in<br />

northeastern neighbourhood Rideau<br />

Heights, one of the city's least affluent<br />

neighbourhoods.' 9<br />

Practical and attitudinal considerations<br />

can account for the output disparities<br />

between the public housing and land<br />

assembly programs. From a procedural<br />

perspective, constructing and running a<br />

public housing project was a more complex<br />

endeavour than preparing and selling<br />

the lots of a land assembly subdivision. 20<br />

As such, Polson Park and Calvin Park were<br />

reflective of their times and the federal<br />

government's preference for encouraging<br />

homeownership.<br />

From an architectural and city planning<br />

perspective, land assembly such as<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

2 7


R OBERT M c G EACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

Polson Park and Calvin Park reflected the<br />

prevailing trends of the 1950s and early<br />

1960s. For instance, as will be discussed in<br />

more detail later, the subdivisions' layouts<br />

incorporated several-what were then con ­<br />

temporary-city planning concepts drawn<br />

from British and American doctrines.<br />

From an architectural perspective, Polson<br />

Park and Calvin Park, as was common for<br />

North American subdivisions during that<br />

era, consisted mostly of small houses such<br />

as bungalows, which was also reflective of<br />

the federal government's homeownershipcentred<br />

housing policy. That predominance<br />

of small houses in the two subdivisions<br />

mirrored such key socio-economic trends<br />

during the late 1950s and early 1960s as<br />

the growing rate of homeownership and<br />

the rising middle class . 2 '<br />

From a more<br />

conceptual perspective, Polson Park and<br />

Calvin Park illustrate how such factors<br />

as status, aspirations, and gender can<br />

interact within the milieu of a newly<br />

created neighbourhood to fashion a sense<br />

of identity for its inhabitants. 22<br />

THE ONTARIO AND KINGSTON<br />

GOVERNMENTS AND LAND<br />

ASSEMBLY<br />

The CMHC needed the cooperation of<br />

provincial and municipal authorities to<br />

complete a land assembly project. During<br />

the 1950s and early 1960s, when a land<br />

assembly project was undertaken in On ­<br />

tario, the primary provincial authority,<br />

the CMHC, would interact with was the<br />

Department of Planning and Development<br />

(DPD), which was responsible for assisting<br />

municipalities produce and implement city<br />

plans. In Kingston, the provincial representative<br />

was W.M . Nickle, who became<br />

the Minister for the DPD in 1955. 23 The<br />

DPD was established to help the province<br />

cope with a growing and increasingly<br />

urbanized population : in 1951 , 55 .1% of<br />

Ontario's population lived in ci ties of at<br />

least 10,000 residents; in<br />

1971, the percentage had<br />

reached 73 .8 . 24 For vari ­<br />

ous reasons, the DPD had<br />

difficulty fulfilling its ap ­<br />

pointed role and, in the<br />

early 1960s, the larger<br />

and more established Department<br />

of Municipal Affairs<br />

absorbed most of the<br />

DPD's duties. 25<br />

Arguably, the most important<br />

political actor in<br />

a land assembly project<br />

was the municipal government.<br />

According to the<br />

FIG. 3. KINGSTON CITY HALL, AUGU ST 2, 1959<br />

land assembly program 's<br />

basic procedures, the municipal government<br />

was responsible for requesting a homeownership. For instance, from 1950<br />

government's preference for encouraging<br />

land assembly project, providing services to 1962, local entrepreneurs, mainly presidents<br />

or owners of small businesses, made<br />

up to the project 's edge, and approving<br />

the proposed subdivision's final plan. Any up nearly a third of the aldermen. 28 As the<br />

land assembly subdivision plan needed to Italian political theorist Gaetonio Mosca<br />

conform to municipal bylaws. 26<br />

noted, taxes frequently squeeze the middle<br />

class the hardest; consequently, they<br />

Kingston's municipal government, like<br />

are likely to seek public office. 29 To possibly<br />

others in Ontario, could be divided into<br />

over-generalize, office holders will often<br />

two basic branches: administrative and<br />

seek- and often with sound justificationto<br />

benefit those with backgrounds similar<br />

legislative. During the Polson Park and<br />

Calvin Park projects, the city planner,<br />

to their own. 30 In that case, evidence will<br />

George Muirhead, who began his career in<br />

demonstrate that Polson Park and Calvin<br />

Kingston in 1955, played a prominent role.<br />

Park can be considered middle-class subd<br />

ivisions, which were constructed with<br />

At that time, Kingston's population was<br />

approximately 48,000 and it was unusual<br />

government assistance.<br />

for a medium-sized city to have a planner<br />

on staff.n While Muirhead could provide a Real property played a vital role in city<br />

great deal of professional expertise, he did politics. Until 1960, only those Kingstonians<br />

who were at least 21 years old and<br />

not have the final authority to approve or<br />

reject a land assembly project plan. Kingston<br />

municipal government's legislative participate in municipal elections, either<br />

who owned $400 of real property could<br />

branch, more particularly Kingston City as candidates or voters." Kingston, like<br />

Council, had the power to decide the fate most other Canadian municipalities, derived<br />

most of its revenue from property<br />

of a land assembly project.<br />

taxes .n One result of that dependency<br />

Many of the 22 members of the biannually<br />

elected Kingston City Council were<br />

on real property was the erosion of<br />

municipalities' autonomy because the cost<br />

drawn f rom the elite of the local business<br />

of running a city was outstripping the<br />

community and shared the federal<br />

revenues that property taxes provided;<br />

28<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N• 1 > 2005


ROBERT M c GEACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

hence, municipal governments had to increasingly<br />

rely on provincial subsidies.H<br />

Understandably, substantial land assembly<br />

projects were of great interest to Kingston's<br />

aldermen as they could, to a limited<br />

extent, alleviate some the challenges the<br />

city was facing during the 1950's and 1960s.<br />

In fact, before Polson Park and Calvin Park,<br />

there had been two unsuccessful efforts<br />

to undertake land assembly projects in<br />

Kingston. 34 Some of these challenges<br />

were typical of those facing any Canadian<br />

medium-sized town; others were unique<br />

to Kingston.<br />

KINGSTON'S SPECIFIC NEEDS<br />

Kingston's downtown, located at the waterfront,<br />

was run-down . Kingston City<br />

Hall, without its imposing portico (fig. 3),<br />

in effect symbolized the poor condition<br />

of the city's commercial centre. In 1955,<br />

the portico was removed for safety reasons<br />

and was not restored until 1966; a<br />

move sharply criticized by S.D. Lash who,<br />

in a letter to the Kingston Whig Standard,<br />

characterized the removal of the portico<br />

as an act of vandalism. 35 In an extensive<br />

report written in 1960, A Planning Study<br />

of Kingston, Ontario, George Muirhead<br />

and George Stephenson (who was a professor<br />

in the University of Toronto Town<br />

and Regional Planning Program) went<br />

further and described the block adjacent<br />

to Market Square, which was behind the<br />

City Hall, as presenting a "scene of almost<br />

unbelievable desolation." 36 The two planning<br />

experts also noted that the waterfront<br />

by Kingston City Hall was the site<br />

of declining traditional heavy industries<br />

which were potentially impeding the possibility<br />

of constructing a marina to attract<br />

the steadily growing number of pleasure<br />

boaters plying Lake Ontario and other<br />

nearby waters. 37<br />

While many medium-sized cities during<br />

that era had a less-than-idyllic downtowns,<br />

Kingston's situation was exceptional because<br />

of its highly developed sense of self<br />

derived from its rich heritage; explicitly,<br />

Kingston was Canada's first capital, Sir<br />

John A . Macdonald's hometown, and the<br />

site of one of the nation's most prominent<br />

institutions of higher education, Queen's<br />

University. The downtown area was where<br />

much of the city's heritage architecture<br />

was located and where the city presented<br />

its image to a broader audience. 38 As historical<br />

geographer Brian Osborne and historian<br />

Donald Swainson observed, Kingston<br />

is often referred to as the "Limestone City"<br />

because of the abundance of limestone in<br />

its heritage buildings. That epithet refers<br />

to the "fabric of the architecture," which<br />

is "a dominant and striking element of<br />

the total urban image." 39 Yet the city's architectural<br />

fabric in the 1950s and 1960s<br />

was in danger of becoming permanently<br />

frayed. Lash decried the civic leaders' apparent<br />

lack of care for the city's unique<br />

ambience and lamented,<br />

possibly overdramatically,<br />

"Kingston is surely the city<br />

of barbarians, a city where<br />

the almighty dollar is all<br />

important-where history<br />

is bunk." 40<br />

The condition of Kingston's<br />

downtown was also<br />

important for more pragmatic<br />

financial reasons. As<br />

Muirhead and Stephenson<br />

reasoned, Kingston's<br />

downtown heritage buildings<br />

could be a lucrative<br />

tourist destination; nonetheless,<br />

it would be necessary<br />

to clean up the area<br />

before the tourists would<br />

come to visit and spend<br />

their money. With a great<br />

deal of work, downtown<br />

Kingston was capable of<br />

becoming a " stimulating<br />

and enticing shopping district and one of<br />

the finest and most unique in Canada." 41<br />

In order to succeed, Kingston needed to<br />

preserve its heritage, to placate concerned<br />

citizens such as Lash, while also turning a<br />

profit exploiting its heritage.<br />

Like many communities, Kingston suffered<br />

from a severe housing shortage<br />

whose causes included pockets of decrepit<br />

housing stock, a rising population and a<br />

shortage of land. 42 The situation was exacerbated<br />

by the high proportion of land<br />

within city limits devoted to institutional<br />

use. 43 The Federal Department of Justice<br />

owned one of the largest portions of institutional<br />

land in the city, the Penitentiary<br />

Farm . That farm, located in Kingston's<br />

west end, would become the site both of<br />

Polson Park and Calvin Park .<br />

Along its western borders, Kingston<br />

was also facing a challenge in the form<br />

of the rapidly growing upstart Kingston<br />

FIG . 4. LT. COL. S.M. POLSON TURNS THE SOD WHILE JESSIE POL SON<br />

AND W.M. NICKLE LOOK ON<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

29


ROBERT M cGEACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

Township. Like many municipalities,<br />

Kingston was competing with its suburban<br />

rival for much needed residents and<br />

industries. Though it may have lacked<br />

Kingston's strong sense of almost hagiographic<br />

heritage, the flourishing suburb<br />

had more land and cheaper taxes to offer<br />

new homeowners, developers, and industries.<br />

For Kingston City Council, the possibility<br />

of losing out to Kingston Township<br />

was probably galling as relations between<br />

these two entities were, at times, less·than<br />

cordial. 44<br />

In all probability, Kingston City Council<br />

never intended Polson Park and Calvin<br />

Park to be a cure-all for Kingston's problems.<br />

The Planning Study was an indication<br />

that they were trying to find a means<br />

to cope with a whole series of challenges<br />

within the city, which had just expanded<br />

with the annexation of substantial areas<br />

in 1952. Among the report's recommendations<br />

was the need to revitalize the<br />

Sydenham Ward and the Central Downtown<br />

Area. In addition, Rideau Heights,<br />

an impoverished area located in the city's<br />

northeastern section, was in need of improvement.45<br />

The new subdivisions and the<br />

Planning Study were essentially part of the<br />

ongoing process of improving Kingston's<br />

vitality. The land assembly subdivisions<br />

would provide some much-needed houses<br />

to supplement Kingston's overstretched<br />

housing stock. People who thought about<br />

moving from Kingston to the rapidly growing<br />

Kingston Township might decide to<br />

move to the new subdivisions within city<br />

limits. Furthermore, the new subdivision<br />

homeowners would contribute essential<br />

tax revenues that could help pay for such<br />

projects as repairing Kingston City Hall's<br />

portico.<br />

In 1954, Kingston City Council made a<br />

request for a land assembly project to be<br />

constructed on a piece of the Penitentiary<br />

Farm that had become available. 46 ln 1955,<br />

the CMHC purchased<br />

a substantial<br />

portion of the<br />

farm along with<br />

a plot belonging<br />

to the Provincial<br />

Department of<br />

Health; the cost of<br />

the purchase was<br />

$63,040, or $1,000<br />

per acre. 47 The official<br />

sod-turning ceremony<br />

for the new<br />

subdivision, named<br />

Polson Park, took<br />

place on June 22,<br />

1957 (fig. 4) . 48<br />

Figure 4 symbolically shows how three<br />

levels of government cooperated on the<br />

project. Lt. Col. S.M . Polson, who is kneeling<br />

with the shovel, and Jessie Polson, who<br />

is looking on, are descendents of Neil<br />

Polson, a notable Kingston mayor during<br />

the 1890's. 49 The name "Polson" ties<br />

into Kingston's strong sense of heritage.<br />

The participant standing to the centre of<br />

the ceremony is W.M . Nickle, the Kingston<br />

member of the provincial parliament.<br />

While Nickle represents the provincial<br />

government, the Poisons metaphorically<br />

represent the municipal government. The<br />

federal presence is inferred by the fact<br />

that Nickle definitely was and S.M. Polson<br />

probably was a First World War veteran. 5°<br />

That is, their wartime service on behalf<br />

of Canada allegorically represented the<br />

federal government.<br />

Polson Park was completed shortly after<br />

the sod-turning ceremony photograph<br />

was taken and its 228 lots were offered<br />

for sale to the general public on April 27,<br />

1957. 5 ' There was some scepticism in the<br />

period leading up to the sale, as a number<br />

of buyers were concerned about the<br />

quality of lots that were produced by a<br />

governmental program; nonetheless, by<br />

the time the lots went on sale, the scepticism<br />

had vanished Y Buyers lined up<br />

outside the CMHC office for their chance<br />

to purchase a fully serviced Polson Park<br />

lot that was priced between $1,375 and<br />

$1,450. In contrast, private developers<br />

were charging approximately $2,500 for<br />

unserviced lots in their various projects. 5 3<br />

The CMHC charged professional homebuilders<br />

an $800 surcharge for each lot<br />

to discourage excessive land speculation;<br />

the surcharge was refunded if the homebuilder<br />

charged CMHC approved prices. 54<br />

Those who could afford the Polson Park<br />

lot prices had the opportunity to live in a<br />

professionally planned subdivision.<br />

The majority of Polson Park's houses were<br />

completed in 1958. 55 The aerial view in<br />

figure 5 demonstrates how Polson Park 's<br />

layout created a sense of place that incorporated<br />

then-contemporary city planning<br />

concepts. As George Muirhead observed,<br />

selected aspects of the post-World War II<br />

British New Town movement were incorporated<br />

into Polson Park's design. He also<br />

noted that the CMHC planners who designed<br />

Polson Park were British or Britishtrained,<br />

as were most of the planners in<br />

Canada . 56 The British New Town movement<br />

30<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


R OBERT M c GEACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

emphasized the creation of medium-sized<br />

units, which would not overwhelm the residents.<br />

The units would have green spaces<br />

so the residents would not be completely<br />

disengaged from nature and to reduce the<br />

sense of alienation, which also could be<br />

termed "depersonalization."" British-born<br />

Humphrey Carver, a prominent advocate<br />

for social housing and a senior CMHC official,<br />

was in favour of planning on a relatively<br />

small scale to avoid overcrowding<br />

or a sense of detachment from society. 58<br />

As seen from figure 5, Polson Park shows<br />

some New Town movement's doctrinal<br />

influence, as it is relatively compact and<br />

interspersed with a reasonable amount<br />

of green spaces. The photograph was<br />

taken before Calvin Park was completed;<br />

hence the large tracts of undeveloped<br />

land surrounding Polson Park.<br />

American city planning doctrines strongly<br />

influenced Polson Park's design. The United<br />

States, like Canada, was facing the challenges<br />

of a rapidly urbanized population<br />

and the impact of the automobile. One<br />

result was the rise of low-density suburbs<br />

around major urban centres, which generally<br />

consisted of bungalows populated by<br />

white middle-class families. 5 9 The suburbs<br />

shared an architectural similarity as regional<br />

distinctiveness began to erode: by<br />

the 1960s, suburbs across the United States<br />

started to closely resemble each other.<br />

One benefit of that design homogenization<br />

was the reduction of housing prices to<br />

a point where middle-class families could<br />

afford their own home. 60 Although Polson<br />

Park was not a suburb, it did share many of<br />

the characteristics of American suburbs,<br />

such as a low density and relatively<br />

standardized architectural designs.<br />

The influence of American city planner<br />

C.A . Perry's principles on Polson Park's<br />

design can be discerned from figure 5. 61<br />

According to his concept, city planning<br />

should revolve around the smallest urban<br />

collective component: the neighbourhood<br />

unit. Elementary schools, retail stores, and<br />

public recreation facilities should be situated<br />

within walking distance of a neighbourhood<br />

unit's homesY An unpublished<br />

CMHC pamphlet strongly implied that Polson<br />

Park was a neighbourhood unit with<br />

amenities, such as an elementary school,<br />

situated within walking distance. 63 Nonetheless,<br />

Polson Park was an imperfect<br />

neighbourhood unit since it lacked local<br />

convenience stores, as could be found in<br />

several older Kingston quarters; as a result,<br />

local residents needed to drive to do<br />

their shopping. In 1957, the shopping situation<br />

improved for Polson Park residents<br />

when the nearby Kingston Shopping Centre<br />

opened. In 1963, the Kingston Branch<br />

of the YM-YWCA opened and provided<br />

recreational facilities a short distance from<br />

Polson Park. 64<br />

Polson Park's design was in keeping with<br />

the CMHC planning doctrine. In a 1946 article,<br />

senior CMHC official S.A. Gitterman<br />

demonstrated how the CMHC had incorporated<br />

some of Perry's ideas into its<br />

planning practices. Like Perry, Gitterman<br />

advocated using the neighbourhood unit<br />

as the smallest workable planning unit<br />

with an elementary school at the core.<br />

Houses in this unit, Gitterman stressed,<br />

should be a maximum of half a mile from<br />

a school. 65 Later CMHC publications also<br />

contained concepts that were strongly<br />

reminiscent of Perry's work in the field. For<br />

instance, Perry recommended protecting<br />

neighbourhood units from heavy traffic<br />

by having major streets flow around their<br />

circumference and serving their interiors<br />

with less-busy arterial roads. 66 The CMHC<br />

had a similar philosophy regarding traffic<br />

flow. According to the Crown corporation's<br />

1956 publication, Principles of Small<br />

House Grouping, a grid-pattern street system<br />

was unsatisfactory because it would<br />

invite "traffic to move in all directions,"<br />

thus multiplying traffic hazards and<br />

reducing the privacy of residential streets. 67<br />

It was preferable to design a subdivision<br />

that incorporated varied types of streets,<br />

including major thoroughfares, collector<br />

streets, and minor residential streets.<br />

Cui-de-sacs and loops could help slow<br />

traffic and create visually interesting<br />

areas. 68 As shown in figure 5, Polson Park's<br />

interior mostly consisted of winding roads<br />

and cui-de-sacs, while its exterior<br />

borders consisted of wide and straight<br />

thoroughfares.<br />

In his detailed study, urban planner<br />

Dimos A . Zarkadas compared Polson Park<br />

with Sydenham Ward, a neighbourhood<br />

dating from the eighteenth century and<br />

located in a southeastern sector of Kingston.<br />

Of the two neighbourhoods, Polson<br />

Park had larger lots, greater spacing<br />

between buildings, more homogeneous<br />

building types (i .e. small detached houses),<br />

more open spaces, proportionally fewer<br />

sidewalks, and a greater number of curvilinear<br />

roads. 69 Overall, the land use in<br />

Sydenham Ward was far more intensive. 70<br />

The older neighbourhood was a more integrated<br />

part of Kingston and embodied<br />

much of the city's traditional image. The<br />

newer neighbourhood, on the other had,<br />

was a more autonomous part of the city.<br />

In her critical assessment of city planning,<br />

The Death and Life of Great American<br />

Cities, originally published in 1961, Jane<br />

Jacobs argued that the modern tendency<br />

to isolate various functioning parts of a<br />

city damaged its life and spirit. 71 Diversity<br />

and organic interdependence, for<br />

her, enhanced the quality of life in the<br />

city. 72 As Irving pointed out, such notion<br />

was almost pre-modern and harkened<br />

back to a Romantic ideal that parts<br />

functioned to create an organic whole. 73<br />

Modern city planning tended to separate<br />

the various parts of a municipality.<br />

It is highly debatable if Polson Park<br />

damaged Kingston's life and spirit; still,<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

31


ROBERT M cGEACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

the subdivision was a concrete example of<br />

the modern city- planning trend of<br />

dividing an urban area into autonomous<br />

components.<br />

While the next land assembly subdivision<br />

to be constructed in Kingston, Calvin Park,<br />

shared many of Polson Pa rk's design attributes,<br />

its creation was a considerably more<br />

complicated process.<br />

CALVIN PARK<br />

In 1959, another section of Penitentiary<br />

Farm became available. Kingston City<br />

Council formally asked the federal and<br />

provincial governments to begin a land<br />

assembly project, which would be named<br />

Calvin Park (after the Calvins, a prominent<br />

local nineteenth-century family) . CMHC<br />

planners prepared a plan for t he subdivision<br />

(fig. 6), which Muirhead and Nickle<br />

approved. Kingston Traffic Engineer Ken<br />

Linesman, however, did not share their enthusiasm.<br />

74 He worried that if constructed<br />

as presented, Calvin Park would obstruct<br />

some of the city's principal traffic arteries.<br />

In the original plan, Avenue Road, a<br />

projected thoroughfare, is drawn as being<br />

Calvin Park's eastern border; that configuration<br />

was in keeping w ith the basic CMHC<br />

planning ethic of not having major roads<br />

cut through a projected subdivision.<br />

After some long-drawn-out political<br />

proceedings in Kingston City Council, a<br />

modified Calvin Park plan (fig. 6) , which<br />

addressed Linesmen ' s concerns, was<br />

adopted. Avenue Road (later renamed<br />

Sir John A. Macdonald Boulevard) was extended<br />

through Calvin Park. Incidentally,<br />

that is another example of heritage being<br />

evoked as the new "boulevard," a more<br />

elegant sounding name than "road," was<br />

named after one of Kingston's most famous<br />

sons, Canada's first Prime Minister.<br />

Although this disagreement was of relatively<br />

minor importance, it was indicative<br />

of the impact the escalating number of automobiles<br />

was having on city planning. As<br />

early as 1942, a traffic survey reported how<br />

the growing number of automobiles was<br />

steadily challenging the Kingston's road<br />

system. 75 The Calvin Park design disagreement<br />

highlighted how traffic engineers<br />

and city planners were, at times, in conflict<br />

over the planning process' priorities.<br />

City planners were primarily concerned<br />

with designing comfortably laid out,<br />

relatively traffic-free subdivisions, while<br />

traffic engineers concentrated on the<br />

impact of new subdivisions on a city's<br />

traffic flow. 76<br />

There was another political dispute during<br />

Calvin Park's creation, this time involving<br />

the YM-YWCA building located in the<br />

northwest corner of Calvin Park. In 1959,<br />

the organization received assurances that<br />

it would soon be able to purchase land<br />

for its building." Nickle listed his role in<br />

the YM-YWCA land deal as one of his accomplishments<br />

in his June 6, 1959 election<br />

advertisement, which appeared in<br />

the Kingston Whig Standard.'• In 1961,<br />

YM-YWCA executives were frustrated<br />

because they had not yet received an opportunity<br />

to purchase<br />

the land for the new<br />

building. YM-YWCA Director,<br />

Bruce Matthews,<br />

issued a strong statement<br />

criticizing the various<br />

politicians involved<br />

in the land dealings. 79<br />

The YM-YWCA was<br />

eventually able to purchase<br />

the land, albeit at<br />

a higher price than that<br />

promised by Nickle in<br />

1959, and constructed<br />

the new building. 80 In<br />

1963, the YM-YWCA<br />

located in Calvin Park<br />

opened its doors for its<br />

members. 81<br />

The planning vs. traffic and the YM-YWCA<br />

disputes underscore the sometimes-asymmetrical<br />

nature of power. On one hand,<br />

the CMHC had all the appearances of<br />

power: a large budget, offices in many<br />

cities throughout Canada, and access to<br />

the upper echelons of the federal government.82<br />

On the other hand, it was almost<br />

powerless during the Calvin Park project<br />

as its officials were reluctant to resist the<br />

traffic engineer's efforts to modify the<br />

subdivision's original plan and respond<br />

to the YM-YWCA executive's sharp public<br />

criticisms. 83 In short, even though the<br />

CMHC apparently had a great deal of potential<br />

political power, the organization's<br />

leaders could not or would not exercise<br />

that power for fear of inflaming the local<br />

political situation. The CMHC did, nevertheless,<br />

have the power to set the price<br />

for the lots in Calvin Park.<br />

Calvin Park's lots were reasonable when<br />

compared to the prices of lots then being<br />

sold in the Kingston area by private<br />

developers. In 1962, the average price for<br />

an unserviced lot was $1,859. The price<br />

was the product of a balancing act, as<br />

the CMHC sought to set lot prices that<br />

32<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


R OBERT M c G EACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

FIG . 7. CALVIN PARK MAP<br />

were reasonably affordable without<br />

being so low that they alienated local developers.••<br />

Phase 1 of Calvin Park had a very<br />

short-term effect on Kingston lot prices;<br />

in 1963, the average price was $2,594. The<br />

sharp price increase suggests that private<br />

investors were recouping revenues they<br />

had lost when they lowered their prices<br />

to compete with the Calvin Park Phase 1<br />

lots. 85<br />

According to a 1962 Kingston Whig Standard<br />

article, potential buyers needed<br />

an annual income of at least $5,350 to<br />

purchase a lot and house in the subdivision.••<br />

Evidence suggests that this<br />

figure is reasonably accurate. According<br />

to the 1961 census, the average income<br />

for the non-farm labour force in<br />

Ontario was $4,471. 8 ' A general guideline<br />

frequently used by real estate agents is<br />

that a family should be able to afford a<br />

house costing approximately two and half<br />

times its annual income.•• The 1961 census<br />

also showed that housing in Kingston was<br />

expensive. The median price for a house<br />

in Kingston was $14,190, almost $2,500<br />

more than in comparatively sized Ontario<br />

For CIS<br />

little as<br />

5<br />

1750 or '1850<br />

yo" con buy<br />

a fully serYicod<br />

resid•ntial building lot<br />

in<br />

CALVIN PARK<br />

KINGSTON 'S<br />

PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED<br />

COMMUNITY<br />

Sec your 1o,ol CMHC office<br />

for deto il•<br />

FIG. 8. CA LVIN PARK ADVERTISEMENT<br />

cities.•• Houses in Calvin Park probably<br />

cost around $15,000. Dacon Construction<br />

Limited, a Kingston firm that built houses<br />

in Calvin Park, advertised models costing<br />

from $15,790 to $16,248.' 0 In short, evidence<br />

strongly suggests that a substantial<br />

portion of Kingstonians probably did not<br />

earn enough to purchase a home in Calvin<br />

Park.<br />

The income range quoted in the Kingston<br />

Whig Standard cannot be considered a<br />

conclusive indicator as to who could afford<br />

to live in Calvin Park. The article's author<br />

evidently did not take into account such<br />

factors as interest rates, potential buyers'<br />

debt loads, and credit ratings when calculating<br />

the quoted figure. Nonetheless, the<br />

number demonstrates the complexity of<br />

formulating public policy vis-a-vis determining<br />

who would actually benefit from<br />

the land assembly program.<br />

CMHC statistics in 1956 indicate that the<br />

average income of a house-buyer using<br />

mortgage funds provided with the backing<br />

of the National Housing Act (NHA) was<br />

$5,312; that sum was over the midpoint<br />

of the nation's income range. 91 During the<br />

1950s and early 1960s, the land assembly<br />

program generally produced considerably<br />

more units than did the public housing<br />

program . 92 In 1957, the CMHC Director<br />

of Development Division, J.S. Hodgson,<br />

questioned the value of the land assembly<br />

program, as he believed it essentially<br />

subsidized middle-income homebuyers<br />

without benefiting those in the lower<br />

income brackets. 93 CMHC President Stewart<br />

Bates shared Hodgson's reservations.<br />

Bates, whose tenure lasted from 1954<br />

to 1964, favoured more social welfareoriented<br />

programs than those favoured<br />

by the governments of Prime Ministers<br />

Louis St. Laurent and John Diefenbaker. 94<br />

Evidence supports the assertion that Calvin<br />

Park was very much a product of the<br />

land assembly program, which primarily<br />

benefited middle-class homeowners.<br />

The CMHC advertisement's slogan for<br />

Calvin Park was "Kingston's Professionally<br />

Planned Community"(fig. 8). That slogan<br />

was probably intended to attract whitecollar<br />

professionals who were generally<br />

regarded by such social commentators as<br />

C. Wright Mill in the 1950's and 1960's as<br />

being the mainstay of the middle class. 95<br />

City planning was becoming recognized<br />

as a distinct professional discipline taught<br />

at such institutions as the University of<br />

Toronto••; hence, the term "professionally<br />

planned" created a sense of administrative<br />

order to which white-collar professionals<br />

probably aspired. A sampling of names<br />

taken from the 1964 Might's Kingston and<br />

District City Directory (the first year Calvin<br />

Park was included in the directory) shows<br />

that most of the recorded residents were<br />

white-collar middle-class professionals.<br />

The largest block (62.4%) consisted of the<br />

related professional classifications: owners<br />

and managers, self-employed, middle<br />

class : professional and related, middle<br />

class : supervisory positions (table 1) .<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

33


R OBERT M c G EACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

Available data also indicates that most Calvin<br />

Park residents came from other parts<br />

of Kingston; the dispersion of middleclass<br />

professionals in the new land assembly<br />

subdivision is, in a sense, reflective of<br />

Kingston's overall economic composition<br />

as the city had a very large service sector<br />

partly because of the large number<br />

of local institutions.'" While urban historians<br />

John Weaver and Michael Doucet<br />

observed that homeownership is not an<br />

automatic badge of membership to the<br />

middle class, evidence strongly suggests<br />

that Calvin Park could be classified as a<br />

middle-class subdivision as the majority<br />

of the sampled residents were members<br />

of that class.'' As such, it can be concluded<br />

that a fairly restricted portion of<br />

Kingston's population could actually take<br />

advantage of the land assembly program<br />

and the subsidy it offered: a serviced lot at<br />

a below market price. As Polson Park's lot<br />

prices were similar to those of Calvin Park,<br />

the occupational composition of both land<br />

assembly subdivisions was almost certainly<br />

parallel.<br />

In addition to having the power to set<br />

the prices of lots, the CMHC also had the<br />

power to use indirect and direct means<br />

•mnrw•<br />

Classification of occupations of 85 sampled<br />

Calvin Park residents, 1964 97<br />

Classification Number (%)<br />

Owners and managers 13 15.3<br />

Self-employed 2 2.4<br />

Middle class: professional and related 29 34.1<br />

Middle class: supervisory positions 9 10.6<br />

Working class: blue collar primary sector 6 7.1<br />

Working class : blue collar secondary sector 2 2.4<br />

Working class: white collar 1 1.2<br />

Occupation not given 13 15.3<br />

Military: no rank given 10 11 .8<br />

Total 85 100.2 *<br />

* 0.2 is the result of rounding off.<br />

FIG . 10. PEMBER PLACE MODEL<br />

to influence Calvin Park's architectural<br />

composition. Homeowners who wanted<br />

to attain NHA mortgage funds had to<br />

have houses that adhered to CMHC Building<br />

Standards; such safeguard constituted<br />

indirect CMHC control over houses'<br />

design.' 00 In 1963, the CMHC selected a<br />

few developers to construct 29 houses<br />

in a section of Calvin Park called Pember<br />

Place, thus directly controlling the design<br />

of the houses in that segment of Calvin<br />

Park. In keeping with its practices, as outlined<br />

in Principles of Small Group Housing,<br />

the Crown corporation sought to create<br />

a "balanced architectural appearance"<br />

in Pember Place (fig. 10) by having three<br />

selected developers construct houses that<br />

met strict criteria for such considerations<br />

as setbacks, landscaping, colour schemes,<br />

and structural design. 101 Elements such<br />

as spacing between and the size of the<br />

houses were coordinated so Pember Place<br />

exhibited a sense of cohesion without being<br />

either too monotonous or too eclectic.' 0 '<br />

As with Polson Park, there was a degree of<br />

consistency in design of the houses found<br />

in Pember Place and Calvin Park; nevertheless,<br />

the designs were not uniform,<br />

a trend that would become common in<br />

later "cookie cutter " subdivisions.' 03<br />

Pember Place represented CMHC's quest<br />

for modern orderliness and cohesive<br />

efficiency.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Polson Park and Calvin Park were very<br />

much products of their time. The land<br />

assembly program that created them<br />

reflected the attitudes of the respective<br />

governments towards property, ownership,<br />

and who should benefit from the<br />

offered assistance. The subdivisions' designs<br />

epitomized the trend of modern<br />

city planning during the 1950s and 1960s.<br />

The curved streets, for example, were an<br />

effort to deal with the automobile. The<br />

subdivisions' near segregation from the<br />

main body of the city was in keeping with<br />

modern city planning's tendency to isolate<br />

various components of a municipality.<br />

Finally, the predominance of middle-class<br />

professional homeowners in these neighbourhoods<br />

corresponds to the rise of the<br />

middle class during that era .<br />

NOTES<br />

1. For a comprehensive study of Canadian<br />

housing policies, see : Bacher, John C. , 1993,<br />

Keeping the Marketplace, Kingston and<br />

Montreal, McGill I Queen's University Press.<br />

2. Miron, John R., 1988, Housing in Post-War<br />

Canada: Demographic Change, Household<br />

Formation and Housing Demand, Toronto<br />

and Kingston, McGill I Queen's University<br />

Press, p. 7-9.<br />

3. G. Barker, J. Penney, and W. Secombe, 1973,<br />

High rise and Superprofits, Kitchener, Dumont<br />

Press, p . 8; and Porter, John, 1965, Vertical<br />

Mosaic: An Analysis of Social Cla ss and Power,<br />

Toronto, University of Toronto Press, p . 4-5.<br />

4. Howe, C. D., 1947, 2005


R OBERT M c GEACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

6. Rea, Kenneth, 1985, The Prosperous Years:<br />

The Economic History of Ontario, 1939-1975,<br />

Toronto, University of Toronto Press, p. 49.<br />

7. Winters, Robert, 1950, N' 1 > 2005<br />

35


ROBERT M c GEACHY > ANALYSIS I ANALYSE<br />

49. Gray, Jeff, 1994, «A Neighborhood from<br />

the Boom Years >>,<br />

Normandin : 659-660.<br />

50. Normandin : 659-660.<br />

KWS, July 9, p. 2; and<br />

51 . Sale of Lots-Polson Park Land Assembly<br />

Project, unpublished CMHC report, RG56,<br />

vol. 171, file 119-2-K, NA.<br />

52 . George Muirhead, Interview, June 19, 1989.<br />

53. «Sale of Lots-Polson Park Land Assembly<br />

Project >>; and Spurr, Peter, 1976, « Five Land<br />

Banks >>, City Magazine, vol. 2, no. 1, March­<br />

April, p. 12.<br />

54. Spurr : 11 .<br />

55. « Polson Park Project Taking Shape >>, KWS,<br />

July 19, 1958.<br />

56. Gray : 2; and Zarkadas, Dimos A. 1996,<br />

Urban Design Analysis of Two Residential<br />

Neighborhoods in the City of Kingston:<br />

Recommendations for Improving and<br />

Supplementing the City of Kingston Zoning<br />

By-Law, unpublished Master's Report,<br />

Queen's University, p. 2-3.<br />

57. Osborn, Frederic J., 1979, «New Towns>>,<br />

Encyclopedia of Urban Planning, New York,<br />

McGraw-Hill Book Company, p. 30-734.<br />

58. Carver, Humphrey, 1962, Cities in the Suburbs,<br />

p. 98-99; and Carver, 1975 : 117-118.<br />

59. Jackson, Kenneth T., 1985, Crabgrass Frontier:<br />

The Suburbanization of the United States,<br />

New York, Oxford University Press p. 241.<br />

60. Jackson : 240-241.<br />

61. Whitfield, Kate, 2004, «The Inner Suburbs<br />

of Kingston, Ontario: 1950's and 1960's<br />

Neighborhood Units >>, Urban Plans: Past and<br />

Present: An Exhibition in the WD. Jordan<br />

Special Collections & Music Library, January<br />

19" to February 1S" , 2004, W.O. Jordan<br />

Special Collections & Music Library Occasional<br />

Paper no. 2, Queen's University Library, p. 14-<br />

15.<br />

62. Perry, Clarence A., 1939, Housing for the<br />

Machine Age, New York, Russell Sage<br />

Foundation, p. 50-51.<br />

63. Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation,<br />

64.<br />

65.<br />

66.<br />

67.<br />

n.d., Kingston's Polson Park, unpublished<br />

pamphlet.<br />

Zarkadas: 2-12.<br />

Gitterman, S.A., 1947,<br />

Community Planning >>,<br />

October, p, 255.<br />

Perry: 57.<br />

« Objective of<br />

Public<br />

Affairs,<br />

Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation,<br />

Principles : 32.<br />

68. Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation,<br />

Principles : 47.<br />

69. Zarkadas : 3-13, 3-16, 3-18, 4-14.<br />

70. Zarkadas : 4-18.<br />

71. Jacobs, Jane, 1984, Death and Life of Great<br />

American Cities, Harmondsworth, Middlesex,<br />

Penguin Books, p. 15-17, 24.<br />

72. Jacobs: 156.<br />

73. Irving : 479.<br />

74. « Nickle OKs Pen-Land Plans: Project is<br />

Approved; Remainder Up to City >>, KWS,<br />

September 29, 1960.<br />

75. Low, R.A ., 1942, Traffic Survey of the City<br />

of Kingston, Kingston, Town Planning<br />

Commission of the City of Kingston, p. 2-3.<br />

76. >,<br />

Ontario Planning, vol. 8, no. 4 .,<br />

1961, p. 1.<br />

April-May<br />

77. >,<br />

KWS, November 2, 1960, p. 1.<br />

78. >, KWS, June 6,<br />

1959, p. 21 .<br />

79. >, KWS, May 17, 1961,<br />

p. 1.<br />

80. , KWS,<br />

May 30, 1959, p. 15; and Coli, A. E., 1961, Letter<br />

to the Secretary of the Executive, May 15, RG<br />

56, vol. 172, file 119-2-K, NA.<br />

81 . Official Opening and Dedication of the<br />

New YM-YWCA Building, April24, 1963,<br />

unpublished Program<br />

of the Dedication<br />

Ceremony, Vertical File, Kingston Frontenac<br />

Public Library, Central Branch.<br />

82. For example, see Central Mortgage and<br />

Housing Corporation, 1962, Annual Report:<br />

1962, Ottawa, Central Mortgage and Housing<br />

Corporation, p. 30-40.<br />

83. Report of the Proceedings of Special Joint<br />

Meeting in the Planning Office at 8:00<br />

p.m., Thursday, March the 24", 1960, RG56,<br />

vol. 172, file 119-2-K, NA; and Hunt, George,<br />

1961 Letter to C. MacDiarmid, May 31 , RG 56,<br />

vol. 172, file 119-2-K, NA.<br />

84. See >, The Central Mortgage<br />

and Housing Corporation Builder's Bulletin,<br />

vol. 79, September 14, 1956.<br />

85.<br />

86.<br />

Spurr: 12.<br />

>, KWS, October 24,<br />

1962, p. 8.<br />

87. Poduluk, Jenny R., 1968, Income of Canadians,<br />

Ottawa, Dominion Bureau of Statistics,<br />

p. 167.<br />

88. Harris : 35.<br />

89. Cited in Harris: 35.<br />

90. Dacon Construction Ltd., ca . 1962, Welcome<br />

to Easy Street, unpublished advertisement,<br />

Vertical File, Kingston Frontenac Library,<br />

Central Branch.<br />

91 . Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation,<br />

1961, Canadian Housing Statistics: 1957,<br />

Ottawa, Queen's Printer, p. 19.<br />

92 . By 1952, 2,078 public housing units and 11,345<br />

land assembly units were built or almost built<br />

in Ontario (Department of Planning and<br />

Development).<br />

93 . Hodgson, J.S., 1957, Letter to Hignett, May 3,<br />

RG56, vol. 171, file 119-2-K, NA.<br />

94. Carver, 1975 : 108.<br />

95. Mills, C. Wright, 1951, White Collar: The<br />

American Middle Classes, New York, Oxford<br />

University Press, p. ix-x.<br />

96. Hodge, Gerald, 1986, Planning Canadian<br />

Communities: An Introduction to the<br />

Principles, Practice and Participants, Toronto,<br />

Methuen, p. 362-364.<br />

97. The classification of occupations is taken<br />

from Harris, Democracy in Kingston: 160.<br />

The sampling is taken from Kingston and<br />

District City Directory, 1964, Toronto, Might's<br />

Directories Ltd.<br />

98. In 1951, 40.1% of Kingston's workforce was<br />

employed in the service sector. Stephenson<br />

and Muirhead : 24; and Kirkland, John, 1969,<br />

Housing Filtration in Kingston: 1953-1969,<br />

unpublished M.A. Thesis, Queen's University,<br />

p. 101 .<br />

99. Weaver, John, and Michael Doucet, Housing<br />

the North American City, Montreal and<br />

Kingston, McGill I Queen's University Press,<br />

1991, p. 468.<br />

100. Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation,<br />

1954, Building Standards, Ottawa, Central<br />

Mortgage and Housing Corporation, p. 7.<br />

101 . >,<br />

1963, KWS, August 21, p. 15.<br />

102. Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation,<br />

Principles : 43-45.<br />

103. Zarkadas : 4-19.<br />

36<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

EMPTINESS AND LANDSCAPE:<br />

NATIONAL IDENTITY IN <strong>CANADA</strong>'S<br />

CENTENNIAL PROJECTS<br />

COLIN RIPLEY IS a assistant professor of<br />

architectural des1gn. histoJ'y, and them'y 1n the<br />

Department of Architectural Sc1ence at Ryerson<br />

Un1vers1ty, as well as principal of Colin Ripley<br />

Architects. a crJtJcal architectural pract1ce based<br />

1n Toronto. In both of these arenas, Colin's work<br />

focuses on the use of sound in architecture: on<br />

issues of sexual 1dent1ty Within aJ'Chitecture: and<br />

on the study of Canad1an Modern Architecture.<br />

>COLIN RIPLEY 1<br />

Architecture, of course, has longperhaps<br />

always-had an intimate<br />

connection with the notion of identity.<br />

Indeed, one could claim that an expression<br />

of identity, whether cultural, national,<br />

sexual, or other, is one of the primary<br />

qualities distinguishing architecture from<br />

mere building.<br />

It should be equally obvious that this<br />

relationship between architecture and<br />

identity can be exploited or made use of<br />

for political purposes. Examples of that<br />

politicization, in which the relationship<br />

is inverted and architecture used not to<br />

simply express an autochthonous identity,<br />

but rather to impose and maintain a preconstructed<br />

identity, are easy enough to<br />

find, from the ancient world (one might<br />

think, for example, of the form of Roman<br />

colonial towns) to the postmodern world<br />

(for example, the embodiment of a politics<br />

of t ransparency in the Grands Projets in<br />

Paris in the 1990's).<br />

FIG. 1. FATHERS OF CON FEDERATION MEMORIAL BUILDING, COM PETI TI ON MODEL PHOTOGRAPH, 1960.<br />

ARCHITECTS: AFFLECK, DESBARATS, DIMAKOUPOULOS, LEBENSOLD, AND SISE.<br />

In Canada, the Centennial Projects, a group<br />

of Federal Government programs which<br />

amounted to a gigantic building campaign<br />

leading up to the Centennial of Confederation<br />

in 1967, can be understood to fall within<br />

that tradition. The Centennial Projects<br />

differ from the examples cited above, however,<br />

in one crucial way: while the examples<br />

mentioned attempted to express, impose,<br />

and maintain a specific, well-considered<br />

identification, imposing such an identity<br />

on an otherwise alien cultural substrate,<br />

the Centennial Projects aimed to express a<br />

national identity which was at best cloudy,<br />

imprecisely understood. Architecture was<br />

to be used as a research and production<br />

tool, whose role was to uncover and give<br />

form to a national identity, which would<br />

only become legible during, and as a result<br />

of, that process.<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N· 1 > 2005 > 39-43 37


COLIN RIPLEY > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

THE CENTENNIAL COMMISSION provided matching funds to municipalities<br />

(through the provinces) to support projects<br />

The Centennial programs we will be discussing<br />

in this paper were officially in­<br />

of a lasting nature, preferably related to<br />

culture or recreation. That program was<br />

augurated by the passing of the National<br />

to provide one dollar for every resident<br />

Centennial Act, which received Royal<br />

of every community in Canada, provided<br />

Assent on September 29, 1961 . Action on<br />

that dollar was matched by a second dollar<br />

from the province and a third from<br />

the part of the Federal Government, under<br />

Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, had<br />

the community itself for a total amount<br />

been prodded by the lobbying in the late<br />

of three dollars per capita (approximately<br />

1950's of a number of non-governmental<br />

$15 per capita in today's dollars). Such a<br />

groups, such as the YMCA, the YWCA, the<br />

relatively small amount of money funded<br />

Canadian Conference of Christians and<br />

some 2301 projects across the country, of<br />

Jews, the Canadian Citizenship Council<br />

which some 860 were buildings (including<br />

and the Canadian Amateur Sports Federation,<br />

which coalesced in 1959-1960 into<br />

renovations and restorations), and an additional<br />

520 were recreational structures.<br />

an umbrella organisation, the Canadian<br />

Projects completed under the program<br />

Centenary Council.' That citizen group<br />

for the city of Toronto, to give just one<br />

remained in place through 1967, but was<br />

example, included restoration of the<br />

largely subsumed in practice by the Na ­<br />

St. Lawrence Hall and the establishment of<br />

tional Centennial Administration (later<br />

the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts. Other<br />

renamed the Centennial Commission).'<br />

projects in smaller communities were of<br />

Once the Centennial Commission actually course much more modest in scope.<br />

got going (the Commissioner was not<br />

The second building-based program set up<br />

appointed until January 1963), a number<br />

by the Commission was the Confederation<br />

of programs and events were organized<br />

Memorial Program, which provided matching<br />

funds of up to $2 .5 million to each<br />

and planned. In addition to such mobile<br />

events as the Confederation Train and<br />

province to support a project, again preferably<br />

of a cultural nature, in the provinc­<br />

the Confederation Caravan, the minting<br />

of Centennial Medals, the promotion of<br />

ial capital (lesser amounts were granted<br />

Youth Travel, the production of films,<br />

to the territories). Unlike the Centennial<br />

and so on, two major building programs<br />

Grants Program, which found its impetus<br />

were developed, in addition to one major<br />

within the Centennial Commission (and in<br />

built project which fell outside of those<br />

particular with its Director of Special Projects,<br />

Peter Aykroyd), the Confederation<br />

programs, the National Arts Centre. The<br />

most visible event in relation to the 1967<br />

Memorial Program arose in response to<br />

Centennial, Expo '67, was not connected<br />

initiatives which were already happening<br />

in an official capacity to the Centennial<br />

at a local and, to some extent, unofficial<br />

Commission, nor did Expo receive funding<br />

level. By the time the Commissioner was<br />

from the Commission. In total, the Centennial<br />

Commission was responsible for<br />

appointed in 1963, plans were already well<br />

under way to build a Fathers of Confederation<br />

Memorial Building, a large performing<br />

expenditures of approximately $85 million<br />

($440 million in today's dollars).<br />

arts centre to be located in Charlottetown,<br />

The first of the building programs set P.E.I., to memorialise the first Confederaup<br />

by the Centennial Commission was tion Conference held in that city in 1864.<br />

the Centennial Grants Program, which A national competition had been held in<br />

1962, and a winning scheme by Montreal<br />

architects Affleck, Desbarats, Dimakoupoulos,<br />

Lebensold, and Sise (later ARCOP)<br />

selected. A grant of $2.8 million was made<br />

to the project by the Centennial Commission.<br />

As Peter Aykroyd tells the story, the<br />

awarding of that grant prompted Quebec<br />

to request funding for LeGrand Theatre<br />

de Quebec, in recognition of the second<br />

Confederation Conference, held in Quebec<br />

City, also in 1864; a grant of $2 .8 million<br />

was made by the Centennial Commission<br />

in November 1963. In February 1964, the<br />

two grants were incorporated into the<br />

Confederation Memorial Program, open<br />

to all provinces. 4 1n total, $20.7 million of<br />

federal funds were disbursed as a part of<br />

the program. With the exceptions of Nova<br />

Scotia, (a medical centre), and New<br />

Brunswick, (an administration building),<br />

all provinces built major buildings of a<br />

cultural nature: six cultural centres or<br />

performing arts spaces were constructed,<br />

two museums and archives, and the<br />

Ontario Science Centre in Toronto.<br />

In addition to the municipal and provincial<br />

programs, the Centennial Commission also<br />

oversaw and funded a number of projects<br />

of national significance. In fact, in terms of<br />

expenditures, this category outweighs the<br />

other two programs. The majority of the<br />

national programs are either travelling exhibitions,<br />

such as the Centennial Train and<br />

Caravans (the largest single expenditure of<br />

the Commission, rece iving $11.4 million),<br />

or funding for performances, publications,<br />

films, etc. The single sizable building project<br />

in that category was the National Arts<br />

Centre (NAC) in Ottawa, also designed<br />

by Affleck, Desbarats, Dimakoupoulos,<br />

Lebensold, and Sise, which actually opened<br />

two years after the Centennial, in 1969.<br />

The NAC received $2 .1 million in grants<br />

from the Centennial Commission.<br />

38 JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


C OLIN R IPLEY > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

Institute of Canada (RAIC) annual assembly.<br />

The first of these addresses, given by<br />

Prime Minister John Diefenbaker to the<br />

53 'd Annual Assembly in June 1960, 5 actually<br />

predated by over a year the National<br />

Centennial Act. As the transcript of the<br />

address in the July 1960 issue of the RAIC<br />

Journal reinforces, Diefenbaker announced<br />

at that early date that "[a]rchitects can<br />

play an important part in the planning of<br />

Canada's Centennial." It is striking that already,<br />

before any concrete plans had been<br />

made, long before the Commission would<br />

be formed, Diefenbaker was already<br />

certain of the role that architects-and<br />

therefore architecture-would play,<br />

although we should note that he likely did<br />

not come to that conclusion unprompted.<br />

It is li kely not coincidence that one of the<br />

two founders of the Canadian Centenary<br />

Council (and later Director of Planning for<br />

the Centennial Commission) was Robbins<br />

Elliot, who in 1960 was still the Executive<br />

Director of the RAIC. Equally striking, to<br />

us, is Diefenbaker's choice of words: architects<br />

are to play a part in the centennial<br />

planning, that is, take on a role, mount a<br />

performance.<br />

FIG. 2. FATHERS OF CONFEDERATION MEMORIAL BUILDING, EXTERIOR PHOTOGRAPH, 1960.<br />

ARC HITECTS: AFFLEC K, DESBARATS, DIMAKOUPOULOS, LEBENSOLD, AND SISE.<br />

ARCHITECTURE AND NATIONAL<br />

IDENTITY<br />

There can be little doubt that a major .goal<br />

of the Centennial Commission was the<br />

development, nurturing and strengthening<br />

of a Canadian national identity.<br />

Canada in the 1950's and early 1960's<br />

was still seen as a young country. Then,<br />

as now, a Canadian identity was difficult<br />

to pinpoint, given the internal cultural<br />

divisions as well as competing external<br />

influences from, on the one hand, England<br />

and France and, on the other, the United<br />

States. It is no surprise then that Peter<br />

Aykroyd ranked identity first on his list of<br />

goals not just for that occasion, but for<br />

any anniversary celebration.<br />

The notion that architecture would have a<br />

major role to play in such exercise of identity<br />

construction was made clear in two<br />

remarkable addresses given by Canadian<br />

Prime Ministers to the Royal A rchitectural<br />

Diefenbaker, as one might expect of a<br />

politician speaking to a room of architects,<br />

begins by making a link on the<br />

level of metaphor between architecture<br />

and politics, as each profession "deals<br />

with building."• The politician deals with<br />

the building of a nation in the world, the<br />

architect builds the world of everyday<br />

experience. Further, both the politician<br />

and the architect must be "able to see<br />

and understand what can be done in the<br />

future and then to lay those plans which<br />

make possible the realities of tomorrow." 7<br />

After praising the efforts of the RAIC in the<br />

field of historic preservation, Diefenbaker<br />

then reinforces the notion that architects<br />

must look to the future as well as the past,<br />

and he does so in the framework of the<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

39


COLI N R IP LEY > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

upcoming centennial, for which he asks<br />

architects to present<br />

[ .. ) something to touch the hearts of<br />

Canadians , something to represent t he<br />

unity of our country, something to embody<br />

that paradox of two great national stocks<br />

which joined together to make Con federation<br />

possible, something that w ill well represent<br />

the tremendous contributions of persons<br />

from all races and creeds w ho have come<br />

to Canada from all parts of the worldB<br />

In other words, Diefenbaker explicitly<br />

asks for an architecture of identity, and<br />

an identity bound up, in the first instance,<br />

with unity.<br />

The second of the two mentioned<br />

addresses was given by Diefenbaker's<br />

successor, Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson,<br />

to the 57 'h Annual Assembly in June<br />

1964. 9 While similar in many respects to<br />

Diefenbaker's address. Pearson makes<br />

much less reliance on metaphor. Where<br />

Diefenbaker had connected architects and<br />

politicians, seeing both as agents engaged<br />

in nation-or world-building, Pearson<br />

makes the connection between architecture<br />

and government, dealing with the<br />

issues and mechanisms these two institutions<br />

have in common.<br />

The re lationship of parts to the who leand<br />

the need to bring unity to the whole<br />

without inte r fering with t he functio n al<br />

needs and values of the parts-is a problem<br />

of government as well as of architecture.<br />

[ ... ) Architecture-like government-can get<br />

inspiration from the past without prejudicing<br />

its contribution , and indeed its obligation, to<br />

the futurem<br />

I<br />

~<br />

v<br />

FIG . 3. FATHE RS OF CONF EDERATI ON MEMORIAL BU ILDI NG, COMPETITI ON MODEL PH OTOGRA PH, 1960.<br />

ARC HITECTS: AF FLECK, DESBARATS, DIMAKOUPOU LOS, LEBE NSOLD, AND SISE.<br />

link between our two Canadian cultures"<br />

(although he does not pinpoint how architecture<br />

forms this link), Pearson discusses<br />

a recent report on the state of architecture<br />

in Canada w hich focused on regional disparities<br />

and the difficulty of finding common<br />

ground for policy. While recognizing<br />

that the problem was partly caused by the<br />

federal system of government, he goes on<br />

to stress the importance of finding that<br />

common ground.<br />

[ ... ) There can be no other foundation for<br />

national unity 11<br />

Aga i n, rather than stress the metaphor<br />

between nation building and the<br />

construction of buildings, Pearson exhorted<br />

architects to embrace the reality of<br />

the political within their own institution.<br />

National unity has to be created in a real<br />

sense within the nation's institutionsincluding<br />

architecture- before it could be<br />

represented in its buildings.<br />

Architecture and government are two<br />

separate realms of expertise, which can<br />

and should, however, act together in the<br />

pursuit of a single goal-for Pearson, the<br />

goal of national unity.<br />

After praising t he RAIC for being an<br />

"exampl e of useful collaboration [ .. .]<br />

between our English - spea k ing and<br />

French-spea ki ng citizens" and pointing out<br />

that "architecture itself is an important<br />

If you are to make your art's maximumand<br />

rightful-contribution to our national<br />

development, to our national insight, and to<br />

our national pride; if you are to remind us<br />

of our limitations and enshrine the richness<br />

and diversity of our future existence in cities<br />

which will have balance and even beauty, you<br />

have a r ight to enjoy the highest national<br />

standards and to be concerned over any<br />

barrier to your achievement of them.<br />

The responsibility for achieving this is yours<br />

[ ... ] This means, among other things, equal<br />

opportunities for all our people and provinces<br />

AN EMPTY LANDSCAPE: TWO<br />

CENTENNIAL PROJECTS<br />

Such an overt program of national identity I<br />

construction should, arguably, make itself<br />

evident in the form of the buildings constructed<br />

under the aegis of the Centennial<br />

Commission. In order to test that hypothesis,<br />

we propose to take a somew hat closer<br />

look at t w o project s already mentioned :<br />

40<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


C OLIN R IPLEY > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

The two squares, the two portions of the<br />

design, the historical monument, and the<br />

shrine to cement the future unity, have<br />

an odd relationship to each other. Not<br />

only are the two portions kept on their<br />

separate squares, but the new project only<br />

addresses the existing building laterally. It<br />

is striking that, in contemporary photos of<br />

the project, the existing Provincial Building<br />

rarely shows up (fig. 2). Furthermore,<br />

to quote Walter P. de Silva's review of the<br />

building in The Canadian Architect, "the<br />

important view of the Provincial Building<br />

from the inner part of Memorial Hall is<br />

only partial.""<br />

FIG . 4. FATHERS OF CONFEDERATION MEMORIAL BUILDIN G, EXTERIOR PHOTOGRAPH, 1960.<br />

ARCHITECTS: AFFLECK, DESBARATS, DIM AKO UPOULOS, LEBEN SOLD, AND SISE.<br />

the Fathers of Confederation Memorial<br />

Building, in Charlottetown and the Na ­<br />

tional Arts Centre, in Ottawa. These two<br />

projects have been chosen for a number<br />

of reasons. First of all, they are among the<br />

most significant projects in terms of scale<br />

to come out of the Centennial programs.<br />

Second, they are probably the most<br />

widely published of the Centennial<br />

Projects. Third, they "bookend" the program,<br />

with the Fathers of Confederation<br />

Memorial Building being the first major<br />

Centennial Project completed, and the<br />

National Arts Centre among the last.<br />

Fourth, as mentioned above, they share<br />

an architect. Finally, they are both built on<br />

or around sites that are national in significance-the<br />

Provincial Building in Charlottetown<br />

and the National Capital, Ottawa.<br />

Formally, the Fathers of Confederation<br />

Memorial Building is made up of a set of<br />

cubic volumes disposed on the rectangular<br />

site in some relationship to the Provincial<br />

Building. The model of the project shows<br />

a complex of four buildings: a library, a<br />

theatre, an art gallery, and a museum.<br />

These are grouped around a fifth space,<br />

which functions as an entry: the Memorial<br />

Hall (fig. 1 ). In the competition entry,<br />

that Memorial Hall was literally an exterior<br />

plaza, although provided with a glass<br />

roof. In the final scheme, the roof remains,<br />

but the hall has become an interior space,<br />

although sunken to a level lower than the<br />

plaza. On the other side of the site from<br />

this assembly of volumes sits the original<br />

artefact, the Provincial Building, surrounded<br />

by a plaza. The plan thus shows two<br />

distinct sides of the site, as though mirrored<br />

in a line drawn down the middle:<br />

where one is an empty space with a solid<br />

building at its centre, the other is a filled<br />

space with an empty hall at its centre.<br />

If the relationship between the past and<br />

the present is ambiguous and uncertain,<br />

even more tenuous is the relationship<br />

between the local and the national in<br />

the project. Even rarer than images of<br />

the Provincial Building are images of<br />

the surrounding context, of the City of<br />

Charlottetown. When such images do<br />

appear, the shops on the street behind are<br />

just glimpsed through slits between the<br />

cubic forms of the project. Thus, although<br />

Architectural Record in its review praised<br />

the project for maintaining the "modest<br />

scale" of the town" or, let us say mirroring<br />

that scale, Norbert Schoenauer, the urban<br />

design consultant, pointed out that the<br />

uniform height of the building-arguably<br />

one of the elements which gives it its<br />

modest scale-was designed to contrast<br />

the project with foreseen future unregulated<br />

development. 14 The ambiguity of<br />

that relationship was already evident in<br />

the competition brief, which made clear<br />

that the building was to be conceived as a<br />

"national shrine to which Canadians will<br />

forever pay homage as the birthplace of<br />

their nation." A third relationship which<br />

is not really developed in the project,<br />

between the rather static form of the<br />

building and the required flexibility of<br />

programming, was noted already in his<br />

1964 appraisal by Douglas Shadbolt.' 5 41<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N 1 > 2005


COLIN R IPLEY > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

Caught within this web of conflicting<br />

agendas-past I present, local I national,<br />

formal I programmatic-within what we<br />

might call, taking some liberties, a web<br />

of reflected identities, and protected by its<br />

surrounded layer of representations and<br />

performances (that is, galleries, museums,<br />

theatres), is the Memorial Hall itself. surely<br />

the symbolic as well as physical centre of<br />

the project, and the one place in which<br />

identity, if it is anywhere, must be seen<br />

to reside. And that symbolic centre, that<br />

locus of identity, is, of course, empty.<br />

Looking back at the model photographs<br />

from the competition entry, one can easily<br />

be struck by the fact that this entry-again,<br />

the symbolic heart of the project-is in<br />

a sense explicitly a void, sunk as it is to<br />

the a level lower than the surrounding<br />

plaza (fig. 3). Indeed, on looking again at<br />

contemporary published photographs of<br />

the project, one might come to the conclusion<br />

that emptiness is in fact a core<br />

concept for the project as a whole.<br />

Although it is not uncommon for architectural<br />

photographs to show empty buildings,<br />

it is uncommon for the photographs<br />

to be shot on a grey, rainy day, as the<br />

first published photos of the Fathers of<br />

Confederation Memorial Building were,<br />

with the emptiness made more tangible<br />

by the inclusion in the photos a solitary<br />

figure-a young child in a raincoat and<br />

galoshes (fig. 4)-or a group of figures<br />

huddled on the floor in the centre of the<br />

otherwise empty Memorial Hall (fig. 5) .<br />

Perhaps the story told by the project is just<br />

that Canadian national identity is in itself<br />

empty, a constitutive void, made up solely<br />

of the representations we make around<br />

it-the stories we tell, the images we make,<br />

perhaps even the buildings we build, a<br />

void that is delicate and in need of nurturing<br />

and protection, not so much caught<br />

in its conflicts as made up of them.<br />

FIG . 5. FATHERS OF CONFEDERATION MEMORIAL BUILDING, INTERIOR PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING MEMORIAL<br />

HALL, 1960. ARCHITECTS : AFFLECK , DESBARATS, DIMAKOUPOULOS, LEBENSOLD, AND SI SE.<br />

In the summer of 1964, as the Fathers<br />

of Confederation Building was finishing<br />

construction, as Prime Minister Pearson<br />

was delivering his address to the RAIC,<br />

design work was underway for the new<br />

National Arts Centre in Ottawa. The search<br />

for a symbolic centre, a locus of identity,<br />

at the National Art Centre in Ottawa is not<br />

so straightforward. This project on first<br />

analysis presents a similar type of site<br />

planning to the new portion of the Fathers<br />

of Confederation Memorial project, with<br />

the cubic volumes in Charlottetown replaced<br />

by hexagonal ones (perhaps in<br />

deference to the diagonal positioning<br />

of the Parliament Buildings, which could<br />

be understood to take the position in<br />

the overall scheme that the Provincial<br />

Building played in Charlottetown). A case<br />

could be made for the Salon, a relatively<br />

small room intended for receptions and<br />

chamber recitals, as the symbolic centre<br />

42<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N" 1 > 2005


COLIN R IPLEY > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

shows the project as an "outcropping."<br />

The inclusion in the photo of the Parliament<br />

Buildings does not serve here to<br />

connect the two buildings-the formal<br />

variance is just too great-, but rather to<br />

connect the Arts Centre to the rise of trees<br />

in the middle distance and, perhaps, to<br />

the formation of Parliament Hill . The view<br />

of the project from the city side, on the<br />

other hand, clearly articulates the Centre<br />

as an extension of a foregrounded green<br />

landscape. Unlike the Charlottetown<br />

photographs, this photo is far from empty,<br />

showing a large number of people using<br />

both the foregrounded landscape and the<br />

terrace of the Arts Centre for recreational<br />

purposes (fig. 7) .<br />

FIG . 6. NATIONAL ARTS CENTRE, EXTERIOR PHOTOGRAPH OF BUILDING AND CANAL, CA. 1970.<br />

ARCHITECTS: AFFLECK, DESBARATS, DIM AKOUPD ULD S, LEBEN SOLD, AND SISE.<br />

of the project, but while that room does<br />

project upward through the terrace above<br />

in the form of a skylight, echoing the<br />

Memorial Hall, it remains too small in scale<br />

in relation to the rest of the project to<br />

really command the centre. Nor does that<br />

room act as an entry to the complex, nor<br />

does it face an important precedent.<br />

In fact, unlike Charlottetown where the<br />

entrance faces the Provincial Building, the<br />

entrance to the NAC is from the side of<br />

the Rideau Canal-away from the Parliament<br />

Buildings, and arguably away from<br />

the city, on the side of a (albeit artificial)<br />

river. We would like to suggest that this<br />

positioning of the entrance in fact repeats<br />

the situation in Charlottetown, in which<br />

the entrance faces the symbolically most<br />

important existing component, except<br />

that now, that most important feature is<br />

not an existing building, but an existing<br />

landscape. In a September 1964 preconstruction<br />

review of the project, The<br />

Canadian Architect magazine commented<br />

that the "buildings for this project have<br />

been conceived as a series of terraces"<br />

with the main performance rooms " protruding<br />

almost as great stones."" A review<br />

in Architecture Canada 1970-1971 states<br />

that the "architectural concept envisages<br />

the total site as a focal outdoor area." "<br />

Macy Dubois, in his July 1969 review in<br />

Canadian Architect, referred to the project<br />

as "a very skilfully massed series of<br />

forms in which it is a pleasure to move<br />

through and around,"'" praising the connection<br />

to the river, but noting the cost<br />

to the city-side elevations. Putting all the<br />

various comments together amounts to a<br />

description which could almost be that of<br />

a natural landscape: a building which is a<br />

grouping of large rocks along the banks<br />

of a river, perhaps somewhere in the<br />

Canadian Shield (fig. 6) .<br />

We believe that such reading of the building<br />

is strengthened by the first published<br />

photos of the project. The view of the Arts<br />

Centre from the river, for example, clearly<br />

That idea of Architecture as landscape was<br />

certainly in the air in the summer of 1964.<br />

Looking back at Pearson's address to the<br />

RAIC, we see that before moving on to his<br />

own announcement of what must already<br />

have been well known to his audience, the<br />

Centennial Programs, Pearson reiterates<br />

Montesquieu's dictum that national character<br />

derives first of all from climate and<br />

geography. However, Pearson remindes<br />

his listeners that "today, as our population<br />

moves more and more to urban centres,<br />

it is buildings which make up our<br />

geography."' 9 ln other words, in the modern<br />

world, architecture plays the role of<br />

geography and climate, becoming responsible<br />

not simply for representing, but for<br />

creating, forming, a national identity.<br />

It is almost as though that project, which<br />

would have been in the throes of design<br />

at the time of Pearson's speech to the<br />

RAIC, takes Pearson's link literally, but<br />

in a sense turns the schema around: if<br />

buildings are to be our total environment,<br />

our urban landscape, this project builds<br />

that urban landscape as an image, a<br />

reflection, or perhaps a memory of the<br />

natural landscape. The symbolic centre<br />

of the project, then, is located not within<br />

the NAC (unless perhaps it is the central<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

43


C OLIN R IPLEY > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

FIG. 7. NATIONAL ARTS CENTRE, EXTERIOR PHOTOGRAPH OF BUILDING IN LANDSCAPE, CA. 1970. ARCHITECTS: AFFLECK, DESBARATS, DIMAKOUPOULOS, LEBENSOLD, AND SISE.<br />

terrace), but rather is external to it, in the<br />

natural landscape of Canada. The implication,<br />

of course, is that Montesquieu's<br />

comment still holds: the kernel, the centre, of<br />

Canadian identity is simply located in<br />

the Canadian landscape.<br />

Which, of course, is just another kind of<br />

empty centre.<br />

EPILOGUE: DRESSING UP<br />

The July 1964 issue of the RAIC Journal<br />

contains a transcript of the speech that<br />

Prime Minister Pearson made to the RAIC<br />

Assembly-the speech which, as we have<br />

seen, linked national identity to architecture,<br />

reinforced the importance of the<br />

unity visible in that identity, tied national<br />

identity to architecture, and probably, in<br />

a direct manner, influenced the design of<br />

the National Arts Centre.<br />

Two pages previous to that transcript are<br />

images from another event held at that<br />

same assembly: the receiving line. The<br />

first photo of the receiving line shows<br />

the wives of some of the architects at the<br />

convention, posing like movie stars for the<br />

camera. The second photo shows, in the<br />

same glamorous poses, their husbands-in<br />

drag. 20 Of course, the drag show is just for<br />

fun, a spoof, a stunt. Still, seeing these two<br />

images side by side-the drag show, and<br />

Pearson at his speech-makes us wonder if<br />

there is not something deeper connecting<br />

the two images, if the very idea of selfconsciously<br />

constructing an identity<br />

through architecture is not, in a way, like<br />

dressing up, like wearing a costume to<br />

the big party that was 1967. And it makes<br />

us wonder, too, what happens when the<br />

fancy dress comes off.<br />

On October 15, 1970, having been informed<br />

that the City of Montreal had requested<br />

the army sent in to restore order, Pearson's<br />

successor, Prime Minister Trudeau, went<br />

off to spend the evening at the National<br />

Arts Centre, at the debut gala of the NAC<br />

Orchestra, before returning home to invoke<br />

the war measures act...<br />

NOTES<br />

1. The author w ishes to acknowledge the assistance<br />

of the following individuals: ian Chodikoff<br />

of the Canadian Architect magazine,<br />

Anna MacDonald of the Confederation Centre<br />

for the Arts, Gerry Grace of the National Arts<br />

Centre, and his research assistant, Kevin James.<br />

This research was co nducted with support from<br />

Ryerson Universit y and the Ontario Ministry of<br />

Education and Training.<br />

44 JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N 1 > 2005


COLIN R IPLEY > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

2. Aykroyd, Peter H., 1992, The Anniversary Com ­<br />

pulsion: Canada's Centennial Celebra t ions, a<br />

Model Mega-Anniversary, Toronto, Dundurn<br />

Pre ss, p. 43.<br />

3. Aykroyd : 62.<br />

4. Ayk royd : 82- 83 .<br />

18. Dubois, M acy, 1969, « Critique>>, Th e Canadian<br />

Architect, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 44.<br />

19. Ibid.<br />

20. Bow ker, Walter B. (ed.), 1964, « The 57" Assem ­<br />

bl y>>, RAIC/L'IRAC, serial number 466, vol. 41,<br />

no. 7, p. 34, author of article not credited.<br />

5. Di et enbaker, John, 1960, « A Tas k tor the Profession<br />

», Journal RAIC, serial numbe r 418,<br />

vol . 37, no. 7, p. 286 -2 88.<br />

6. Diet enbaker : 286.<br />

7. Ibid.<br />

8. Dietenbaker: 287.<br />

9. Pearson, Lester B., 1964, « The Prime Minister's<br />

Speech at the A ss embly », RAICIL'IRAC, serial<br />

number 466, vol. 41 no. 7, p. 37-38.<br />

10. Pearson : 37.<br />

11 . Ibid.<br />

12. d e Sil va , Walter P., 1964, >, The<br />

Canadian Architect, vol. 9, no. 11, p . 50 -51 .<br />

13. Go ble, Emerson (ed .), 1965, « Monumental<br />

Ci vic Architecture, Modest in Scale », Architectural<br />

Record, April 1965, p. 161, author of<br />

article not credited .<br />

14. Schoenauer, Norbert, 1964, « Design Considerations<br />

>>, The Canadian Architect, vol. 9, no. 11 ,<br />

p. 42.<br />

15. Shadbolt, Douglas, 1964, « Confederation<br />

Centre- An Apprai sal >>, RAIC/L'IRAC, seria l<br />

number 471, vol. 41, no. 12, p. 25 .<br />

16. Murray, James A . (ed .), 1964, « Project: Canadian<br />

Centre tor the Performing Arts, Ottawa >>,<br />

The Canadian Architect, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 64-65,<br />

author of article not credited.<br />

17. Slaight, Annabel, Patrick Hailstone, Ron Butler,<br />

Janeva Van Buren, and Michael de Pen sier<br />

(editorial board), 1970, « Massey Medals tor<br />

Architecture>>, Architecture Canada New s­<br />

magazine, October 12, serial number 545, vol.<br />

47, p. 13 (author of article not credited).<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

45


ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

LORSQUE LES ARTISTES EXPOSENT DANS LES EGLISES<br />

LES CAS DE CARL BOUCHARD ET<br />

DE LAURA VICKERSON 1<br />

MELANIE BOUCHER poursuit des etudes de<br />

doctorat a I'UQAM. Elle est responsable de<br />

>MELANIE BOUCHER<br />

l'ed1t1on et de Ia recherche a EXPRESSION.<br />

Centre d 'expos1tion de Sa1nt-Hyacmthe. Elle<br />

a ete aSSIStante a Ia programmation et a Ia<br />

coordmat1on pour Ia Manifestation 1nternat1onale<br />

d'art de Quebec. en 2000, et est directr1ce<br />

de publication de ORANGE. L'evenement d'art<br />

actuel de Sa1nt-Hyacinthe.<br />

'<br />

Al'occasion du Symposium international<br />

de Montreal en 1964, douze artistes<br />

ont realise et present€ des sculptures sur<br />

le site du Mont-Royal, ce qui constituait<br />

a l'epoque un mode de diffusion inedit.<br />

Depuis, au Quebec, on compte un nombre<br />

important de projets artistiques qui n'ont<br />

pas ete proposes a l'interieur de galeries<br />

ou de musees, mais plut6t dans d'autres<br />

espaces publics comme des pares, des batiments<br />

inoccupes ou des eglises 2 • II va sans<br />

dire que cette integration d' N 1 > 2005 > 4 7-52<br />

47


M ELANIE B ouCHER > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

entrent en resonance avec les ceuvres et<br />

les gens. Comme l'a souligne Ia sociologue<br />

Andree Fortin,<br />

Evoquer l'esprit des lieux , c'est renvoyer aux<br />

lieux geogr aphiques, a leurs caracteristiques<br />

phys iques, ecologiques et sociales, avec<br />

lesq ue ls une per sonne, une ceuvre, un<br />

evenement peut entrer en resonance.<br />

Par ticiper a l'e sprit des li eux, c'est se gr effer<br />

a un lieu et a sa specificite et, en r etour,<br />

contribuer a sa definition en r e n for~;a n t ou<br />

en inflechissant ses specifici t es. Processus<br />

de retroaction, processus (( dialectique ».<br />

S'a ncrer dans un lieu et da ns sa specifi cite<br />

cont ribue a marquer enc ore dava ntage<br />

cette specificite, a Ia renforcer, a Ia limite,<br />

« !'inve nter » 4 .<br />

L'esprit des lieux de culte peut generer des<br />

resonances particulieres. Les eglises et les<br />

autres batiments voues a Ia celebration du<br />

culte catholique ont Ia capacite d'etablir<br />

un dialogue fecond avec les ceuvres et les<br />

individus. lis marient, pour Ia majorite<br />

d'entre eux, une forte symbolique a une<br />

architecture ornementee et imposante.<br />

Les plafonds hauts et voutes, les dorures<br />

scintillantes, Ia lumiere filtree par les<br />

vitraux et l'odeur distinctive des eglises<br />

n'ont de cesse de transporter l'esprit, de<br />

faire voyager l'imaginaire et Ia pensee<br />

dans un etat de recueillement auquel nous<br />

ne pouvons guere acceder dans d'autres<br />

espaces publics.<br />

C'est pourquoi il est necessaire de considerer<br />

l'esprit des lieux lorsqu'il s'agit d'integrer<br />

des ceuvres d'art contemporain dans<br />

des espaces voues au culte. La charge des<br />

eglises, des chapelles et des cathedrales<br />

est si grande que les ceuvres ne peuvent<br />

s'y tailler une place sans en tenir compte.<br />

L'ignorer, c'est mettre en peril le projet ;<br />

c'est risquer de le mettre a plat, de le<br />

banaliser. En tenir compte, c'est miser sur<br />

des integrations reussies.<br />

Deux projets exemplaires ont ete presentes<br />

dans le cadre de Ia premiere edition de<br />

Ia Manifestation internationale d'art de<br />

Quebec, en 2000 5 • Ces projets de Laura<br />

Vickerson, artiste de Calgary (Alberta), et<br />

de Carl Bouchard, artiste de Chicoutimi,<br />

etaient respectivement exposes a l'eglise<br />

Saint-Roch et a l'eglise Notre-Dame-de­<br />

Jacques-Cartier.<br />

Ceux et celles qui sont familiers avec le<br />

patrimoine religieux de Ia vieille capitale<br />

connaissent Ia disparite qui existe entre<br />

les deux eglises. La premiere, l'eglise<br />

Saint-Roch, construite pendant Ia periode<br />

1914-1923, est un vaisseau amiral de<br />

notre patrimoine religieux, pour citer le<br />

cure Mario Dufour• qui, a l'epoque, etait<br />

en charge des deux eglises investies. Elle<br />

est un carrefour cultuel, culture! et communautaire<br />

ou se tient depuis 1997 le<br />

Festival des musiques sacrees de Quebec<br />

et ou se croisent bien des gens dont plusieurs<br />

ne sont pas des paroissiens. Situee<br />

au cceur de Ia revitalisation du quartier<br />

Saint-Roch, entamee il y a de cela une<br />

quinzaine d'annees, elle est Ia plus grande<br />

eglise de Quebec'.<br />

La deuxieme, l'eglise Notre-Dame-de­<br />

Jacques-Cartier, date de 1851". Selon<br />

Mario Dufour, elle est une petite eglise<br />

de quartier qui se compare a une eglise de<br />

campagne, Ia messe en semaine y reunissant<br />

une vingtaine d'individus, essentiellement<br />

des personnes agees. Elle constitue<br />

un lieu de culte en peril, contrairement a<br />

l'eglise Saint-Roch qui ne risque pas dans<br />

les prochaines annees de voir ses portes se<br />

fermer au public.<br />

LAURA VICKERSON<br />

OFFERING A L'EGLISE SAINT-ROCH<br />

L'eglise Saint-Roch accueillait Offering<br />

(2000) (ill. 1), une installation in situ de<br />

Laura Vickerson constituee de longs tissus<br />

d'organdi sur lesquels des milliers<br />

de petales de roses etaient juxtaposes,<br />

individuellement epingles. De l'organdi,<br />

ce tissu fin qui est utilise pour les voiles<br />

de mariees, etait enroule sur les colonnes<br />

du chceur, deferlant aussi sur l'autel et le<br />

sol. Le procede de fabrication d'Offering<br />

revelait un travail repetitif de collecte et<br />

d'epinglage, traditionnellement associe a<br />

l'univers de Ia femme- que l'on pense a<br />

Ia broderie, au tissage ou au tricot, par<br />

exemple.<br />

Pero:;u a distance, Offering apparaissait<br />

tels d'immenses et somptueux drapes de<br />

velours rouge chatoyant. Les variations de<br />

teintes entre les petales generaient des<br />

modulations de couleurs qui n'etaient pas<br />

sans rappeler l'esthetique des courtepointes.<br />

De pres, les petales fixes a l'organdi<br />

ne procuraient cependant plus l'effet du<br />

velours. Les epingles etablissaient toujours<br />

un lien avec le travail de couture,<br />

mais elles faisaient egalement songer a Ia<br />

souffrance ; a celle de se fa ire transpercer<br />

par le metal, d'etre meurtri, cloue Ia . Les<br />

petales de roses ainsi intriquees incitaient<br />

a une reflexion sur l'amour et Ia douleur,<br />

Ia rose rouge etant le symbole de l'amour,<br />

alors que les petales evoquaient des gouttes<br />

de sang et les epingles Ia violence ou<br />

l'agression. Les petales juxtaposes faisaient<br />

aussi penser a des ecailles, brillantes<br />

et imbriquees les unes dans les autres.<br />

II n'est pas necessaire d'interpreter davantage<br />

Offering pour saisir sa polysemie et<br />

de ce fait Ia diversite des angles d'approche<br />

a partir desquels les visiteurs pouvaient Ia<br />

com prendre et se l'approprier. Bien sur, le<br />

lieu d'exposition encourageait une lecture<br />

de l'ceuvre dans laquelle le domaine religieux<br />

eta it mis a contribution. L'ensemble<br />

impressionnait, le travail associe a l'intrication<br />

des petales etant colossal et le resultat<br />

des plus magnifiques. A l'immensite<br />

et a !'opulence de l'eglise, qui impose le<br />

respect et Ia contemplation, se couplait<br />

pour un temps Offering, ceuvre in situ<br />

qui demandait, elle aussi, Ia consideration<br />

et le regard admiratif que l'on porte aux<br />

grandes ceuvres.<br />

4 8<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


MELANIE B oUCHER > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

Pour reprendre les mots de Jean-Marc<br />

Poinsot,<br />

En fait, l'rnuvre in situ preleve dans le reel qui<br />

l'environne des elements aussi divers que le<br />

cadre architectural et nature! ou les traces<br />

et marques d'evenements et d'activites.<br />

Une des manifestations de Ia maniere dont<br />

opere l'rnuvre in situ sur le reel apparait avec<br />

l'effet particulier que l'rnuvre ou Ia prestation<br />

produit en retour sur le reel dont elle a<br />

preleve un element. Elle etend son registre<br />

esthetique a !'ensemble de ce reel et ne le<br />

rend visible desor mais que de ce seul point<br />

de vue, ou integre les autres points de vue<br />

anterieurs [discours architectural, marques<br />

d'une occupation specifique, etc.] dans le<br />

nouveau discours instaure•.<br />

L'reuvre in situ preleve l'esprit des lieux<br />

pour diriger ou enrichir sa portee ainsi que<br />

celle de l'espace qu'elle habite.<br />

Le prelevement qui fut opere avec<br />

Offering est d'ordre architectural. Laura<br />

Vickerson considera les composantes baties<br />

de l'eglise dans Ia mise en exposition<br />

de son reuvre, sans reorienter sa demarche<br />

en fonction des caracteristiques historiques,<br />

sociales, culturelles ou cultuelles de<br />

l'eglise et de son environnement. Ni les<br />

petales epingles sur l'organdi, ni le caractere<br />

majestueux de !'ensemble n'etaient,<br />

avec Offering, exploites pour Ia premiere<br />

fois par Laura Vickerson . Cinq ans avant<br />

Ia creation de cette reuvre, !'artiste avait<br />

d'ailleurs presente Fragile Heart, a Ia Walter<br />

Phillips Gallery (Banff, Alberta, 1995),<br />

et Velvet, a !'Illingworth Kerr Gallery (Cal ­<br />

gary, Alberta, 1995), deux installations si ­<br />

milaires a Ia premiere, de grand format<br />

et elles aussi constituees de milliers de<br />

petales de rose.<br />

CARL BOUCHARD<br />

LES PLEUREUSES [OUBLIER PAR<br />

DON) A lJ~ GLISE NOTRE-DAME-DE­<br />

JACQUES-CARTIER<br />

L'installation in situ Les Pleureuses (Oublier<br />

par don) (2000) de Carl Bouchard jouait<br />

sur d'autres registres que celle de Laura<br />

Vickerson. Disseminee a l'interieur de<br />

l'eg lise Notre-Dame-de-Jacques-Cartier,<br />

elle se constituait d'interventions distinctes<br />

les unes des autres, qui faisaient sens<br />

lorsqu'elles etaient mises en relation.<br />

L'artiste avait applique du vinyle troue de<br />

differentes couleurs sur des fenetres de<br />

l'eglise, suggerant l'effet des vitraux et<br />

rappelant les suintements d 'eau sur les<br />

vitres ou les pleurs sur les joues. L'eglise<br />

en larmes, les souffrances du Christ ou les<br />

malheurs d'autrui, pouvait-on etre amene<br />

a penser. II avait investi deux confessionnaux<br />

qui n'etaient plus employes de sa cs<br />

d'epicerie, d'un necessaire pour nettoyer<br />

les planchers, de quenouilles pansees de<br />

diachylons et d'un dispositif comprenant<br />

differents elements dont un siege, un<br />

tue-mouches et une voix enregistree qui<br />

confessait ses peches. Les expressions la ­<br />

ver ses ptkhes, panser ses plaies et purger<br />

sa peine revenaient en memoire a Ia vue<br />

de ces confessionnaux, comme s' ils les<br />

exemplifiaient.<br />

Sur deux des trois tableaux surplombant<br />

l'autel, des photographies etaient superposees<br />

(ill. 2) . Sur Ia premiere, un individu<br />

- l'artiste - effectuant un signe de benediction<br />

etait presque totalement cache<br />

sous des pierres sur lesquelles des serrures<br />

etaient esquissees. La deuxieme photographie<br />

revelait un assemblage de porte-clefs<br />

suspendu a son bras. Comme si l'on avait<br />

jete des pierres au prophete et que, dans<br />

l'abondance, on ne pouvait trouver Ia clef<br />

du paradis ou celui qui detient Ia clef du<br />

Mystere.<br />

Carl Bouchard avait egalement superpose<br />

a un tableau de Ia Sainte Trinite un autoportrait<br />

(ill. 3), perce, dans lequel il contemplait<br />

son squelette, sa pro pre mort. Du<br />

vinyle rouge et troue recouvrait aussi une<br />

sculpture de Ia derniere Cene et le parement<br />

d'autel. Sur celui-ci , une main soutenant<br />

un distributeur a gelules etait pose.<br />

La croyance est-elle un narcotique a nos<br />

malheurs ? semblait interroger l'artiste.<br />

Une horloge situee au milieu de l'allee cen ­<br />

trale eta it masquee par un miroir de forme<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

4 9


M ELANIE B OUCHE R > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

convexe, de maniere a refleter le portrait<br />

de celui qui chercherait a savoir l'heure.<br />

Regardons-nous, nous qui celebrons<br />

tout en comptant le temps qui passe,<br />

presses que nous sommes a retourner a<br />

nos obligations.<br />

Enfin, sur le sol de !'entree, avec des<br />

feuilles d'or, !'artiste avait inscrit le mot<br />

moi, com me le font ceux qui pratiquent le<br />

graffiti dans l'illegalite. Se centrer au cceur<br />

d'une pratique artistique ou religieuse, se<br />

pencher ego·lstement sur soi-meme alors<br />

que l'on nous enseigne a donner, voila a<br />

quoi referait surement ce mot imposant en<br />

feuilles d'or, sur lequelles fideles devaient<br />

marcher pour se rendre a leur bane.<br />

Dans Ia publication de Ia Manifestation<br />

internationale d'art de Quebec, Ia commissaire<br />

Andree Daigle ecrit au sujet du<br />

travail de Carl Bouchard :<br />

L'amour, qui implique un don de soi et Ia<br />

reception de ce don, ainsi que Ia notion du<br />

temps , celui de l'attente, du desir, de Ia<br />

creation et des vi ci ssitudes de !'existence,<br />

impregnent les installations de Carl Bouchard.<br />

Ses ceuvres se composent de materiaux et<br />

ob1ets de toutes sortes, utilises pour leur<br />

aspect esthetique et pour Ia symboli que qu 'il<br />

est possible d'extraire de leur cote utilitaire<br />

au des qualites de leurs matieres. Bouchard<br />

les t r anspose dans des dispositifs installatifs<br />

d'ou emergent des images subtiles chargees<br />

d'affects qui portent un regar d lucide sur Ia<br />

qualite de notre presence dans le monde, les<br />

motifs de nos actes et les patterns de nos<br />

comportements sociaux ' 0<br />

Ainsi, l'installation Les Pleureuses<br />

(Oublier par don) ne se situe pas en<br />

marge de Ia pratique de Carl Bouchard.<br />

Elle s'inscrit, au contraire, au cceur de<br />

sa pratique.<br />

Les deux ceuvres in situ presentees dans<br />

ce texte ont ete elaborees en lien avec les<br />

composantes architecturales des eglises<br />

qui les accueillaient. Le tissu recouvert<br />

de petales de roses d'Offering s'enroulait<br />

sur les colonnes du chceur ou deferlait<br />

sur l'autel et le sol , faisant corps avec Ia<br />

structure en place. Les differentes interventions<br />

des Pleureuses (Oublier par don)<br />

se deployaient a partir des elements ba ­<br />

tis de l'eglise - fenetres, confessionnaux,<br />

tableau x, horloge, sculpture, autel et<br />

sol d'entree -, de maniere a ce que<br />

!'ensemble devienne inoperant s'il etait<br />

transpose dans un autre espace.<br />

II s'agit Ia d 'une difference significative<br />

entre les deux ceuvres. Bien qu'elle etait<br />

impregnee d 'un sen s insuffle par l'eglise,<br />

Offering aura it pu etre montree dans une<br />

galerie ou un musee tout en con servant<br />

son efficacite. En<br />

le Heart et Velvet.<br />

A !'inverse, il aurait<br />

ete impossible de<br />

presenter Les Pleureuse<br />

(Oublier par<br />

don) a un autre endroit<br />

qu'en l'eglise<br />

Notre - Dame-de­<br />

Jacques-Cartier,<br />

sans que !'ensemble<br />

perde son sens.<br />

Quelle signification<br />

prendrait en effet<br />

le miroir, s' il n'etait<br />

pas superpo se a<br />

l'horloge de l'eglise<br />

- une horloge<br />

que connaissent<br />

et qu'utilisent les<br />

pratiquants de !'en ­<br />

droit? Comment<br />

interpreterait- on<br />

les v inyles troues<br />

s' ils etaient, par<br />

exemple, appliques<br />

sur des fenetres<br />

d'un musee I Alors<br />

qu 'Offering etait<br />

con N' 1 > 2005


MELAN IE B OUCHER > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

Le travail de Laura Vickerson possedait des<br />

affinites naturelles avec l'eglise Saint-Roch<br />

-que l'on songe a son caractere imposant<br />

ou a l'etat de meditation qu' il inspire.<br />

Quant a Carl Bouchard, il demontrait sa<br />

capacite a developper un projet d'apres<br />

les specificites d'une realite donnee. Ses<br />

CEuvres, critiques et poetiques, savent<br />

amener le visiteur a accomplir un exercice<br />

introspectif.<br />

II etait astucieux de jouer sur Ia magnificence<br />

a l'eglise Saint-Roch, puisqu'elle est<br />

un batiment patrimonial hors du commun<br />

qui accueille une diversite d'individus. II<br />

eta it aussi judicieux de miser sur Ia remise<br />

en question a l'eglise Notre-Dame-de­<br />

Jacques-Cartier, cet espace etant un<br />

lieu de culte en peril frequente par une<br />

poignee de gens qui y sont encore tres<br />

attaches. Avoir inverse le choix, c'est-a-dire<br />

avoir presente I'CEuvre de Laura Vickerson<br />

en l'eglise Notre-Dame-de-Jacques-Cartier<br />

et avoir demande a Carl Bouchard d'investir<br />

l'eglise Saint-Roch, n'aurait probablement<br />

pas donne des resultats aussi<br />

convaincants.<br />

II va de soi que Ia reussite des deux integrations<br />

a ete possible grace a l'ouverture<br />

d'esprit temoignee par Mario Dufour.<br />

Conscient des changements qu'a subis et<br />

que vivra dans le futur I'Eglise catholique,<br />

le cure des deux paroisses a ouvert les portes<br />

des eglises a des projets novateurs. II<br />

a lui-meme mis sur pied des initiatives<br />

qui debordent de Ia celebration du culte<br />

catholique et rejoignent d'autres visees,<br />

de nature artistique ou communautaire.<br />

Elargir les fonctions des lieux de culte a<br />

une epoque ou ceux-ci sont delaisses par Ia<br />

communaute constitue un moyen efficace<br />

de les maintenir ouverts et de favoriser<br />

leur integration dans les nouvelles dynamiques<br />

des cites. Revoir leurs fonctions en<br />

lien avec les besoins de Ia collectivite aide<br />

a prevenir !'appropriation du patrimoine<br />

commun par une minorite d'individus qui<br />

ont des interets prives.<br />

La majorite des CEuvres contemporaines<br />

s'integreraient difficilement dans un lieu<br />

de culte. Elles n'entreraient pas en reso ­<br />

nance avec l'espace d'accueil. Comme nous<br />

avons tente de le demontrer, une insertion<br />

reussie de l'art dans l'eglise force a<br />

se questionner sur les specificites de !'endroit<br />

choisi, sur les artistes qui ont le profil<br />

pour l'habiter et sur les visees recherchees.<br />

Cela demande aussi une ouverture d'esprit<br />

de Ia part des differentes parties en<br />

cause ainsi qu'une capacite d'adaptation,<br />

puisqu'il est question de mettre en place<br />

des CEuvres dans des lieux dont Ia fonction<br />

d'origine n'est pas d'exposer. Qui plus est,<br />

Ia majorite de ces lieux sont patrimoniaux,<br />

complexifiant d'autant Ia tache.<br />

Malgre les exigences et les obstacles,<br />

!'exposition d'CEuvres d'art contemporain<br />

dans des eglises demeure un moyen efficace<br />

de se reapproprier ces dernieres et<br />

de revoir leur fonction en ne detruisant<br />

pas, mais en affirmant l'esprit du lieu qui<br />

y est preserve. L'exposition est de plus une<br />

fa~on de renouveler le discours artistique,<br />

de voir sous un nouvel angle certaines pratiques<br />

et d'offrir aux artistes des occasions<br />

uniques d'exercer leur creativite. II s'agit<br />

certainement Ia de raisons pour lesquelles<br />

de nombreux artistes, commissaires et<br />

organismes ont deja choisi d'investir des<br />

lieux de culte, dans differents pays en<br />

Amerique et en Europe.<br />

NOTES<br />

1. Cet article est issu d'une conference presentee<br />

le 9 fevrier 2005 dans le cadre de Ia table<br />

ronde Qu'advient-il du patrimoine religieux ?<br />

qui s'est deroulee a Expression, Centre d'exposition<br />

de Saint-Hyacinthe. L'auteure remercie<br />

Marcel Blouin, directeur d'Expression, de<br />

l'avoir invitee a participer et d'avoir partage<br />

avec elle ses reflexions sur !'integration d'reuvres<br />

d'art contemporain dans des lieux de cu lte.<br />

Des remerciements vont aussi a Laurier Lacroix<br />

et Maxi me Lacroix, pour leur lecture critique<br />

du texte.<br />

2 A titre d'exem ples revelateurs, notons Corridart<br />

qui, avant son demantelement precipite<br />

et imprevu, proposait, dans le cadre des Jeux<br />

Olympiques de 1976, un ensemble d'reuvres sur<br />

Ia rue Sherbrooke, a Montreal, ou encore le<br />

Symposium international de sculpture environnementa/e<br />

de Chicoutimi en 1980, sur le site de<br />

Ia Vieille Pulperie. Mentionnons aussi Aurora<br />

Borealis, !'exposition des premiers Cent jours<br />

d'a rt contemporain de Montreal du Centre international<br />

d'art contemporain, presentee en<br />

1985 a Ia Place du Pare eta Ia Place Ville-Marie,<br />

ainsi que Territoires d'artistes. Paysages verticaux,<br />

un projet du Musee national des beauxarts<br />

du Quebec qui s'est deroule en 1989 en<br />

differents endroits de Ia vieille capitale. Par<br />

ailleurs, il y a eu Artifice'96 et Artifice'98, deux<br />

projets du Centre des arts Saidye Bronfman<br />

proposes dans des locaux commerciaux desaffectes,<br />

au centre-ville de Montreal, ainsi que<br />

Sur /'experience de Ia ville, une initiative d'Optica<br />

egalement presentee a Montreal, en 1997.<br />

Plu s pres de nous, so ngeons aux deux premieres<br />

editions de Ia Manifestation internationale<br />

d'art de Quebec en 2000 et 2003, proposees a<br />

differents endroits du quartier Saint-Roch et<br />

de sa peripherie, a Artcite, une exposition hors<br />

les murs du Musee d'a rt co ntemporain deMontreal,<br />

eta Orange, L'evenement d'art actuel de<br />

Saint-Hyacinthe, qui s'est deroule a l'exterieur<br />

com me a l'interieur dans Ia ville de Saint-Hyacinthe.<br />

La premiere edition de cet evenement,<br />

dont l'auteure etait l'une des commissaires, a<br />

ete presentee en 2003 par Expression, Centre<br />

d'exposition de Saint-Hyacinthe.<br />

3. Dans son ouvrage Inside the White Cube: The<br />

Ideology of the Gallery Space, Santa Monica,<br />

Lapis Press, 1986.<br />

4. Andree Fortin, Nouveaux territoires de /'art.<br />

Regions, reseaux, place publique, Quebec,<br />

Nota Bene, 2000, p. 20 -21.<br />

5. Produite par le centre d'artistes I' N' 1 > 2005<br />

51


MELANIE B OUCHER > ESSAI I ESSAY<br />

les cachots de l'ancienne prison de Quebec qui,<br />

depuis des travaux d'agrandissement effectues<br />

de 1989 a 1991, constitue l'un des trois<br />

pavilions du Musee national des beaux-arts du<br />

Quebec.<br />

6. Entretien de l'auteure avec le cure Mario Dufour,<br />

automne 2000.<br />

7. Voir le site Internet de Ia Corporation du pa ­<br />

trimoine et du tourisme religieux de Quebec:<br />

[http://www.patrimoine-religieux.com/ ].<br />

8. Ibid.<br />

9. Jean-Marc Poinsot,


RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

HANGAR NO. 1 NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE,<br />

BRANDON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT,<br />

BRANDON, MANITOBA<br />

KATE MACFARLANE is an architectural historian<br />

with Parks Canada. She has a B.A. from the<br />

>KATE MACFARLANE<br />

University of Winn1peg and a M.A. from York<br />

Un1vers1ty in Toronto.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In 2001, the former British Commonwealth<br />

Air Training Plan (BCATP) Hangar No. 1<br />

in Brandon, Manitoba, 1 was designated a<br />

National Historic Site. The building is significant<br />

as an "excellent and exceptionally<br />

well-preserved representative example of<br />

a British Commonwealth Air Training Plan<br />

hangar," one which remains in its original<br />

location and in a functioning airport<br />

environment. Furthermore, as the home<br />

of the Commonwealth Air Training Plan<br />

Museum, it retains a direct link with the<br />

program responsible for its design and<br />

construction .><br />

Hangar No. 1 is located at the Brandon<br />

Municipal Airport, which is the site of<br />

the former No. 12 Service Flying Training<br />

School (SFTS) of the BCATP. It is a standard<br />

BCATP double hangar, measuring 112 x 160<br />

feet, with a flat roof, shingle cladding, and<br />

single-storey lean-tos on the east and west<br />

sides. There are sliding hangar doors on<br />

the north elevation and large, multi-paned<br />

windows at the upper levels on the<br />

west and south elevations provide natural<br />

light to the interior. Inside, but for a<br />

relatively small area of display space, the<br />

hangar continues to provide a large open<br />

space in which period aircraft and vehicles<br />

are housed.<br />

THE COMMONWEALTH AIR<br />

TRAINING PLAN MUSEUM INC.<br />

FIG . 1. BRANDON, MANITOBA. HANGAR NO. 1, WEST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS.<br />

The Commonwealth Air Training Plan Museum<br />

Inc. is the only museum in Canada<br />

dedicated solely to preserving the history<br />

and artefacts of the BCATP. Incorporated<br />

in 1981, its stated Mission is to "commemorate<br />

the British Commonwealth Air Training<br />

Plan by telling its story, preserving its<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N• 1 > 2005 > 53-60 53


KATE M ACFARLANE > RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

FIG. 2. BRANDON, MANITOBA. SERVICE FLYING TRAINING SCHOOL (SFTS) 12, N.D.<br />

artefacts, and paying tribute to the over<br />

18,000 Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF)<br />

personnel who gave their lives during<br />

World War 11." 3 The museum is home to<br />

over 15,000 artefacts consisting of photographs,<br />

uniforms and clothing, personal<br />

papers, logbooks, station magazines,<br />

tools, equipment, trade badges, medals,<br />

and so forth. Thirteen aircraft are on display<br />

and four (The Harvard, Tiger Moth,<br />

Cornell, and Stinson HW-75) are airworthy<br />

and flown occasionally. The museum has<br />

nine other RCAF wartime vehicles on display,<br />

including: a staff car, six wheel drive<br />

crash tender, half-ton truck, Ford airfield<br />

tractor, Jeep, panel truck, stake flat deck<br />

truck, FWD snowblower, and aircraft re ­<br />

fuelling tanker. These aircraft and vehicles<br />

(as well as other displays) are housed in<br />

the museum's most significant artefact,<br />

Hangar No. 1, one of five (two of which<br />

remain) built at No. 12 SFTS and originally<br />

used to hangar the Cessna Crane aircraft<br />

that served for pilot training.<br />

The museum also contains a chapel featuring<br />

the Memorial Book,• They Shall Grow<br />

Not Old and private memorials placed by<br />

the families of airmen and airwomen lost<br />

in training and operations. That reflects<br />

the mission statement, which emphasizes<br />

paying tribute to the personnel who<br />

died. On June 4, 1984, the museum was<br />

officially dedicated as memorial to all<br />

of Canada 's airmen and women killed in<br />

training and operations during the Second<br />

World War.<br />

FIG . 3. BRANDON, MANITOBA. THREE PI LOTS, SFTS 12, N.D.<br />

Museum membership is broadly based<br />

with over 900 members from across<br />

Canada, the United States, England,<br />

Australia, and other parts of the world.<br />

The facility is open year-round and places<br />

special emphasis on getting its message<br />

out to young people (school groups,<br />

4-H clubs, churches, Scouts and Girl Guides)<br />

through conducted tours. The museum<br />

also participates at anniversary celebrations<br />

54<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


KATE M ACFARLANE > RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

and province-wide fairs and air shows,<br />

having four flying aircraft available.<br />

Within the broader community of military<br />

and aviation history scholars and enthusiasts,<br />

the museum plays a significant role<br />

in the protection, study, and dissemination<br />

of military history (particularly that of the<br />

BCATP), through its ongoing research and<br />

preservation activities. The museum also<br />

publishes a quarterly newsletter entitled<br />

Contact.<br />

THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH<br />

AIR TRAINING PLAN<br />

One of Canada's most important contributions<br />

to the Allied effort during the<br />

Second World War was the training of over<br />

130,000 Commonwealth airmen at Canadian<br />

air bases constructed for the BCATP<br />

between 1940 and 1943 . The agreement,<br />

signed December 17, 1939, reflected Canada's<br />

political commitment to the war<br />

effort, its role in training Royal Air Force<br />

personnel during the Second World War,<br />

its sensitivity to national sovereignty, its<br />

ideal climatic conditions for flying, and its<br />

geographical location, beyond the threat<br />

of enemy attack but close to American<br />

industry, and to Britain, via the North<br />

Atlantic shipping lanes.<br />

FIG . 5. BRANDON, MANITOBA. MAIN GATE, SFTS 12, N.D.<br />

FIG. 4. "BRANDON 3 MILES," N.D.<br />

At the outbreak of war, the Royal Canadian<br />

Air Force had only five airports of its<br />

own with six more under construction.' Its<br />

total strength was approximately 4,000<br />

personnel and its activities confined mainly<br />

to two stations organized under one<br />

Air Training Command.• Rapid expansion<br />

was necessary to meet the requirements<br />

of the plan and that was done through<br />

the cooperative effort of the RCAF and<br />

the Department of Transport (DOT) . The<br />

former designed and erected buildings<br />

while the latter selected and developed<br />

airfields after RCAF's approval. 7 Eighteen<br />

airports were chosen for immediate use<br />

by the BCATP, because they needed little<br />

development other than additional buildings<br />

and 75 other sites were chosen for<br />

development, including Brandon.<br />

The training plan was divided into several<br />

units: initial training schools, elementary<br />

flying training schools, service flying training<br />

schools (SFTSs, as at Brandon), air<br />

observer schools, air navigation schools,<br />

wireless schools, bombing and gunnery<br />

schools, and operational training units. It<br />

was at SFTSs that pilots and gunners were<br />

trained. The first two SFTSs were at Camp<br />

Borden and Trenton in Ontario, • Brandon<br />

was No. 12. At the plan's peak, there were<br />

29 SFTSs in operation, each of which had<br />

facilities for 240 students at a time. Courses<br />

emphasized cross-country navigational<br />

flights, instrument flying, night flying, and<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

55


KATE M ACFARLANE > RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

During the first four and one half years<br />

over 8,300 buildings were constructed,<br />

701 of which were hangars or hangar type<br />

construction. This work not only involved a<br />

multiplicity of designs for the various types<br />

of buildings but in order to comply with the<br />

opinions of the heads of other branches and<br />

finally receive ministerial approval a complete<br />

design or layout might have to be done<br />

over several times before final decisions<br />

and approval [was] received. Likewise the<br />

specifications would have to be completely<br />

changed and in many instances these would<br />

have to be altered several times after the<br />

contracts were awarded due to the inability<br />

of manufacturers to supply the quantity of<br />

type of materials concerned. During the<br />

period 1939-44 over one and three quarter<br />

million blue prints were made and issued as<br />

well as thirty three thousand finally approved<br />

drawings-"<br />

reconnaissance missions, and many were<br />

associated with bombing ranges. Many<br />

SFTSs were located on the prairies because<br />

of the ideal practice areas and clear weather.<br />

Thirty-five thousand pupils received<br />

their wings at western schools.•<br />

Each SFTS had a main aerodrome with<br />

three to six hard-surfaced runways laid out<br />

in a triangular form. There were two relief<br />

fields built a few miles away for emergency<br />

landing and practice. Each base required<br />

dozens of buildings to accommodate servicemen,<br />

teachers, and ground crew, as well<br />

as to provide technical airport services.<br />

The buildings were grouped according to<br />

their use- administrative, technical and/or<br />

training- and were arranged as follows:<br />

Buildings were, as far as possible, concentrated<br />

in one area, preferably convenient<br />

to t he landing strip in t he direction of the<br />

prevailing wind to reduce the amount of<br />

taxiing to the minimum and good entrance<br />

roads. Hangars were set back on a zoned<br />

line parallel to this strip with provision for a<br />

150' taxi strip and a 200' apron in front of<br />

the hangar entrance so that aircraft could<br />

stand out for refuelling and running up, and,<br />

awaiting their turn, use the field without<br />

interference with flying operations. Clearing<br />

rights on adjacent properties were obtained<br />

where necessary and buildings, trees, power<br />

lines and other obstructions were removed<br />

to the required locations.' 0<br />

The construction challenges faced by<br />

the RCAF were enormous. According<br />

to the RCAF's History of Construction<br />

Engineering,<br />

The chief purpose of those 701 hangars,<br />

"the airline's equivalent to the railroad<br />

engine house," was to provide exten ­<br />

sive enclosed interior space without<br />

intermediate supports.' 2 Besides providing<br />

areas of clear space, hangars met the main<br />

design needs for aircraft servicing and<br />

safety, these being adequate lighting,<br />

heating, and fire protection. Most BCATP<br />

hangars were constructed to a standard<br />

plan and hangar size varied according to<br />

the type of school or unit concerned and<br />

the type of aircraft and operational work<br />

56<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N• 1 > 2005


K ATE M ACF ARLANE > RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

involved . Some standard sizes were as<br />

follows: single (112' x 126'), double (112 ' x<br />

160') and double/double (224' x 320'). The<br />

bulk were built of wood, due to wartime<br />

shortages of steel, and their frameworks<br />

consisted of heavy wooden trusses<br />

with bolted joints and supported by rigidly<br />

braced wooden timber columns."<br />

The design and construction of wooden<br />

trusses for the length of span were challenging<br />

jobs. The timbers were all of Douglas<br />

fir and all connections were bolted<br />

with TECO connection rings used between<br />

all timbers, which resulted in a stronger,<br />

more rigid joint. Those flat wooden<br />

roof trusses were not designed for any<br />

interior suspended load but merely for<br />

the actual dead load plus a snow load of<br />

up to 40 pounds per square foot, and a<br />

horizontal wind load of 35 pounds per<br />

square foot.<br />

FIG . 8. BRANDON, MANI TOBA. HANGAR NO. 1, NORTH ELEVATI ON I STEPHEN HAYTER. 1999<br />

Hangar roofs were covered with two layers<br />

of tarred felt, covered in fibreboard, then<br />

tarred and gravelled. Hangar doors were<br />

either the lifting or the horizontally folding<br />

type. 14 In order to provide access<br />

for personnel without having to open<br />

the large doors, pilot or wicket doors were<br />

installed in the large doors, one at each<br />

side of the hangar.<br />

The most common siding material used was<br />

cedar sh ingles over diagonal sheeting."<br />

Significant natural lighting was provided<br />

by large windows placed at a height of<br />

approxi mately 18 feet above floor level on<br />

the sides and six feet above the floor on<br />

the closed end of the building.<br />

Hangar floors were of concrete, pou ­<br />

red in sections to a depth of five inches.<br />

Reinforcing steel (either rods or mesh) was<br />

used during 1940 and early 1941, but it<br />

was later discontinued due to shortages.<br />

By late 1943, however, steel reinforcing<br />

of concrete was once again generally<br />

allowed.<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

57


KATE M ACFARLANE > RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

and heated, but also dealt successfully<br />

with wartime constraints and requirements<br />

such as material shortages and the<br />

need to erect enormous numbers of such<br />

buildings in a very short time.<br />

HANGAR NO.1<br />

FIG . 10. BRANDON, MANITOBA. HANGAR NO. 1, SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS I STEPHEN HAYTER,1999<br />

FIG . 11 . BRANDON, MANITOBA. HANGAR NO. 1, VIEW OF SEVERAL REPAIRED TIMBER WARREN TRUSSES, SHOWING<br />

THAT REPAIRS ARE UNOBTRUSIVE AND DO NOT ALTER THE HERITAGE CHARACTER<br />

Single or, in some cases, double hangar<br />

used for offices were covered with hardlean-tos<br />

were built on either one or both<br />

sides of the hangars. These were divided<br />

up into offices, equipment stores,<br />

washrooms, heating plants, and so forth.<br />

Lean-to floors were constructed of three<br />

inch concrete and sections that were<br />

wood. Washrooms and toilet rooms were<br />

surfaced with a mastic floor.<br />

The standard plan hangar developed by<br />

the RCAF met not only the functional<br />

requirements of a large, open space for<br />

the servicing of aircraft, adequately lit<br />

Hangar No. 1 is a standard BCATP "double<br />

landplane hangar" designed by the<br />

Construction Engineering Branch, RCAF.<br />

It was built in 1940-1941, under the British<br />

Commonwealth Air Training Plan,<br />

for the training of aircrews from Canada<br />

and Commonwealth countries for service<br />

during World War II. It is rectangular in<br />

configuration, measuring 112' x 160', with<br />

a two-storey high elevation, green shingle<br />

cladding, and a single storey lean-to on<br />

the east and west sides. There are sliding<br />

hangar doors on the north elevation and<br />

large, multi-paned windows at the upper<br />

levels on the west and south elevations<br />

provide natural light to the interior.<br />

The hangar has a flat roof of 112' clear<br />

span, supported on heavy timber Warren<br />

trusses of Douglas fir with bolted joints<br />

and TECO split ring connectors-a standard<br />

connection ring, developed in the 1930s.<br />

The split ring connectors provide a strong<br />

and rigid joint, permitting an increase in<br />

span lengths. The Warren truss is a patented<br />

(1848) bridge and roof truss, which<br />

consists of parallel upper and lower chords<br />

with web members inclined throughout<br />

to form a continuous series of equilateral<br />

triangles. The roof trusses are strengthened<br />

and interconnected, with sway and<br />

cross bracing at right angles to better resist<br />

wind loads, and are supported on rigidly<br />

braced wood columns. The chords and<br />

columns are of select structural Douglas<br />

fir, and the truss diagonals and end verticals<br />

are of common grades. When erected,<br />

the truss timbers were treated with<br />

either creosote or zinc chloride. The roof<br />

covering was specially designed to withs-<br />

58<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005


K ATE M AC FARLANE > RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

COMPARATIVE CONTEXT<br />

FIG. 12. BRANDON, MANITOBA. HANGAR NO. 1, WEST (FRONT) ELEVATION I STEPHEN HAYTER. 1999<br />

tand the suction lift of high velocity winds notable changes to the building include<br />

passing over the hangar, as well as to resist<br />

ruptures by preventing any ballooning side, the replacement of random panels of<br />

the filling in of large windows on the east<br />

effect caused by interior air pressure generated<br />

by high winds blowing through tion of museum related signage.<br />

lost window glass by wood, and the addi­<br />

open doors and penetrating through gaps<br />

In the 1990s, truss failure became a concern<br />

and sympathetic repair was an issue.<br />

in the roof sheeting.<br />

The wide-span, interior column-free space It was done through utilizing the new<br />

was necessary for housing the training aircraft<br />

which were stored and maintained in elsewhere for repairing and strengthening<br />

steel truss insertion approach developed<br />

the hangar, while the lean-tos along the timber hangar trusses. At Brandon, three<br />

sides of the hangar accommodated offices, failed trusses were repaired by building a<br />

workshops, and equipment storage areas, steel truss piecemeal within the existing<br />

washrooms, and heating plants.••<br />

timber truss to form a composite truss capable<br />

of sustaining the roof design loads.<br />

INTEGRITY<br />

Elsewhere, a number of timber trusses<br />

showing less serious deterioration were<br />

Hangar No. 1 is remarkably unaltered and<br />

repaired through placing clamps and/or<br />

intact. It is typical in its framing, cladding,<br />

steel splice plates over weak joints, and<br />

arrangement of doors and windows, and<br />

through replacing failed web members<br />

single-storey side lean-tos. Most of the<br />

in kind with glue-laminated wood pieces<br />

original features and finishes remain.<br />

of the same dimensions. Although the laminated<br />

pieces are not a totally accurate<br />

The interior has been altered somewhat<br />

with the addition of some partitioning to<br />

replication of the solid wood pieces they<br />

create display and office space, but this<br />

replaced, they are of the same material<br />

is unobtrusive and reversible. The most<br />

and difficult to distinguish.<br />

It is difficult to determine how many of<br />

the 701 Second World War BCATP hangars<br />

constructed by the RCAF remain across<br />

Canada and to determine the condition<br />

of those that do. An original list of these<br />

hangars and their location may never have<br />

been compiled." In 2001, when Hangar<br />

No. 1 came before the Board, 41 BCATP<br />

hangars were identified' 8 and it was assumed<br />

there were others. Not surprising ly,<br />

many of the remaining hangars, now in<br />

private hands, have evolved as to function<br />

(or are vacant) and are in a deteriorated<br />

and/or altered condition. Those hangars,<br />

which continue in use and in much the<br />

same function (for example, those owned<br />

by flying clubs and the Department of National<br />

Defence-DND). tend to be in good<br />

condition but have often been much<br />

altered, most frequently by new cladding<br />

and new roofs.<br />

Perhaps the closest functional comparison<br />

to the Brandon hangar found to<br />

date is the Alberta Aviation Museum in<br />

Edmonton . Dedicated to the collection,<br />

preservation, restoration, research, and<br />

display of the history of aviation in Alberta<br />

and the city of Edmonton, the museum<br />

is housed in a double-wide, double-long<br />

BCATP hangar, said to be the only surviving<br />

hangar of its type.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Faced with the enormous chal lenge of<br />

constructing huge numbers of hangars in<br />

a limited time and hampered by wartime<br />

shortages of material, the RCAF perfected<br />

a standard plan, wood frame, Warren truss<br />

hangar, which was constructed by the<br />

hundreds across the country. Today, most<br />

of those buildings have been lost and<br />

many that remain are in poor condition<br />

and used for unrelated functions .<br />

Within the context provided by known<br />

survivors, Hangar No. 1 is exceptional for its<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005<br />

59


KATE MACFARLANE > RAPPORT I REPORT<br />

cumulative merits. It is largely unaltered,<br />

in very good condition for its age, on its<br />

original site (which is still an airport),<br />

associated with other wartime structures<br />

at the site, and it retains both its<br />

functional integrity and an ongoing and<br />

close association with the BCATP due to its<br />

function as a museum.<br />

NOTES<br />

1. Brandon is in southwestern Manitoba, 197 kilometres<br />

west of Winnipeg.<br />

2. Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada,<br />

Minutes, June 2001, p. 37-38.<br />

3. Quoted in Commonwealth Air Training Plan<br />

Museum, Background Material (n.d.), p. 6.<br />

4. The Memorial Book contains the name and<br />

short biography of each of the Canadian airmen<br />

and women lost in training and operations<br />

during World War II. Also included are<br />

the names of airmen from other countries who<br />

served and died with the RCAF. That book contains<br />

over 18,000 names and is displayed in the<br />

Museum's Chapel. The first edition published<br />

in 1992 sold out and the second edition was<br />

printed in 1996.<br />

5. Douglas, W.A.B., The Creation of a National Air<br />

Force: The Official History of the Royal Canadian<br />

Air Force, Vol. II, 1986, Toronto, University<br />

of Toronto Press, p. 220.<br />

6. Canada, National Defence, Directorate of History,<br />

1945, Final Report of the Chief of the Air<br />

Staff to the Members of the Supervisory Board<br />

BCATP, Aprill6, p. 7.<br />

7. Canada, National Archives of Canada, 1939-<br />

1940, RG24, vol. 4775, File HQ103-74/68,<br />

vol. I.<br />

8. Trenton is the eastern Canadian site of the<br />

HSMBC plaque to the BCATP.<br />

9. Hatch, F.J., 1983, Aerodrome of Democracy:<br />

Canada and the British Commonwealth Air<br />

Training Plan, 1939-45, Ottawa, Department<br />

of National Defence, p. 141 .<br />

10. Wilson, J.A., n.d., «Aerodrome Construction<br />

for the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan<br />

1940 >>, in Canada, Department of Transport,<br />

Development of Aviation in Canada, 1879-1948:<br />

Articles by J.A. Wilson, C. B. E., p. 32.<br />

11. Canada, National Defence, Directorate of History,<br />

n.p., N' 1 > 2005


COMPTE-RENDU I REVIEW<br />

DE LA RUFFINIERE DU PREY, PIERRE (CONS. INV.). 2004.<br />

AH WILDERNESS! RESORT ARCHITECTURE<br />

IN THE THOUSAND ISLANDS.<br />

YONA JEBRAK est candidate au doctorat en<br />

etudes urba1nes. dans le programme conjo1nt<br />

UQAM/INRS. Elle est associee a Ia Chaire<br />

de recherche du Canada en patrimoine urba1n<br />

et au Celat.<br />

Catalogue d'exposition (Kingston , Agnes Etherington Art Centre, 30 mai-29<br />

septembre 2004). Kingston : Agnes Etherington Art Centre. 128 p., 103<br />

reprod. caul. , ISBN [).88911-543-5, 29.90 $.<br />

> YDNA JEBRAK<br />

Pour le citadin, posseder une residence<br />

de villegiature repond a des besoins<br />

a Ia fois psychologiques et ideologiques.<br />

Au desir de quitter un monde urbain<br />

en pleine effervescence, s'ajoute celui<br />

de trouver- voire de creer si necessaire<br />

- un mode de vie propice au repos et au<br />

recueillement. Proche des centres industriels,<br />

et pourtant suffisamment difficile<br />

d'acces pour etre preservee d'un developpement<br />

urbain incontr61e, Ia region des<br />

Mille-lies a represente, pour les families<br />

fortunees du tournant du siecle dernier,<br />

cet ideal de calme, de beaute et de<br />

reclusion volontaire, propice a l'etablissement<br />

d'une residence d'ete. Mais quelles<br />

reponses architecturales une telle ideologie<br />

a-t-elle amenees? Tel est !'objet du catalogue<br />

Ah, Wilderness! Resort Architecture in<br />

the Thousand Island de Pierre de Ia Ruffiniere<br />

du Prey, professeur au departement<br />

d'art de I'Universite Queen's, et de ses collaborateurs,<br />

publie en 2004 dans le cadre<br />

de !'exposition du meme nom au Centre<br />

artistique Agnes Etherington a Kingston.<br />

Voyage tempore! et architectural dans Ia<br />

region des Mille-lies, !'exposition proposait<br />

de decouvrir le developpement d'une<br />

architecture de villegiature, a mi-chemin<br />

entre Ia villa urbaine et Ia residence balneaire.<br />

La combinaison d'objets usuels,<br />

de plans et de photographies permettait<br />

aux visiteurs de constater Ia multitude<br />

de chalets de tout genre, construits des<br />

annees 1870 a 1920, et de souligner leur<br />

denominateur commun ainsi que leurs<br />

differences esthetiques. Aboutissement<br />

d'un travail de recherche mene par Pierre<br />

du Prey et ses etudiants sur plus d'une<br />

dizaine d'annees, le catalogue d'exposition<br />

servait a Ia fois d'accompagnement<br />

a !'exposition et d'essai d'histoire de<br />

!'architecture de Ia region.<br />

JSSAC I JSEAC 30 > N' 1 > 2005 > 61 -62<br />

61


Y DNA J EBRAK > COMPTE-RENDU I REVIEW<br />

L'ouvrage propose une lecture en deux<br />

temps. La premiere partie s'interesse aux<br />

origines ideologiques et esthetiques de<br />

!'architecture des chalets presentes a !'exposition.<br />

Elaborant autour de Ia these de<br />

N' 1 > 2005


COLLOQUE INTERNATIONAL<br />

Quel avenir pour quelles eglises?<br />

Universite du Quebec a Montreal<br />

19-22 octobre 2005<br />

UN COLLOQUE ORGANISE PAR LA CHAIRE DE RECHERCHE DU <strong>CANADA</strong> EN PATRIMOINE URBAIN DE L'UQAM,<br />

LE CONSEIL DU PATRIMOINE DE MONTREAL ET LA FONDATION DU PATRIMOINE RELIGIEUX DU QUEBEC,<br />

AVEC L'APPUI DE LA VILLE DE MONTREAL, LA VILLE DE QUEBEC, LE MINISTERE DE LA CULTURE ET<br />

DES COMMUNICATIONS DU QUEBEC, LE CENTRE INTERUNIVERSITAIRE D'ETUDES SUR LES LETTRES,<br />

LES ARTS ET LES TRADITIONS ET L'UNIVERSITE CONCORDIA.<br />

Des eglises de plus en plus nombreuses ferment, pour etre<br />

converties ou demolies. Ce probleme se pose partout en Occident;<br />

au Quebec, par exemple, pres de 3000 « lieux de culte », parmi<br />

lesquels se trouvent les hauts lieux de l'investissement collectif<br />

quebecois, de leur imaginaire et du paysage construit, sont<br />

menaces a plus ou moins breve echeance de disparition. Impossible,<br />

en effet, de trouver les moyens financiers qui soutiendraient Ia<br />

conservation de ce patrimoine. Dans le contexte plus large du big<br />

bang du patrimoine occidental qui requiert des Etats des fonds<br />

qu'ils n'ont pas, et dans celui de Ia desaffection massive des<br />

traditions religieuses historiques, ce colloque rassemblera des<br />

decideur~ et des professionnels quebecois de toutes les regions<br />

du Quebec, ainsi qu'une quarantaine de chercheurs de plus de<br />

dix provinces, Etats et pays de I'Europe et de !'Amerique du<br />

Nord, afin de ITiettre en commun les experiences occidentales<br />

en matiere de patrimonialisation des eglises. II s'agit, au bout<br />

du compte, d'identifier des solutions concretes et des moyens<br />

de mise en ceuvre de ces solutions par les autorites publiques,<br />

a Ia lumiere de trois grandes thematiques qui federent Ia<br />

problematique: les regimes de propriete des eglises, leurs valeurs<br />

d'usages et Ia planification urbaine de leur requalification au<br />

titre d'espaces communautaire, tant en termes de participation<br />

de Ia societe civile a Ia gouvernance que du point de vue du<br />

design urbain qui reiterera leur presence au XXI• siecle.<br />

Parmi les conferenciers, les participants inscrits pourront, entre<br />

autres, rencontrer: Yvon Abiven, maire de Saint-Thegonnec<br />

(France); Virginia Benson, Center for Sacred Landmarks,<br />

Cleveland State University (Ohio); Eric Breitkreutz, Historic<br />

Boston Incorporated/Boston Steeples Project (Massachusetts) ;<br />

Thomas Coomans, KADOC-Katholiek Documentatie en<br />

Onderzoekscentrum, Leuven (Belgique); Kathleen Crowther,<br />

Cleveland Restoration Society (Ohio); Joel Duvignacq, Plan<br />

eglises, Ville de Paris; Ann-Isabel Friedman, Sacred Sites Program,<br />

New York Landmarks Conservancy (New York); Xavier Greffe,<br />

professeur d'economie des arts et des medias, Universite de<br />

Paris I (Pantheon-Sorbonne); Robert A. Jaeger, Partners for<br />

Sacred Places, Philadelphie (Pennsylvanie); Jean-Michel Leniaud,<br />

Ecole nationale des chartes et Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes<br />

(Paris); Wies van Leeuwen, Monumentenzorg Provincie Noord<br />

Brabant (Monuments et sites du Brabant septentrional, Pays­<br />

Bas); Jan De Maeyer, KADOC-Katholiek Documentatie en<br />

Onderzoekscentrum, Leuven (Belgique); Max Ingar M0rk, Church<br />

of Norway Employers' Association, Oslo (Norvege); Luc Noppen,<br />

Chaire de recherche du Canada en patrimoine urbain de I'UQAM<br />

(Montreal); Hermann Reidel, Commission pontificale pour les<br />

biens culturels de I'Eglise (AIIemagne); Oddbj0rn S0rmoen,<br />

Directorate for Cultural Heritage (Norvege); Yvon Tranvouez,<br />

Centre de recherche bretonne et celtique, Universite de Bretagne<br />

occidentale; Crispin Truman, Churches Conservation Trust<br />

(Royaume-Uni).<br />

Un service d'interpretation simultanee franc;ais/anglais sera offert tout au long du colloque.<br />

Les actes seront disponibles (Presses de I'Universite du Quebec) des fevrier 2006 et distribues gratuitement aux participants<br />

inscrits. Pour informations, suivi en ligne ou pour s'inscrire : www.avenireglises.ca ou www.churchesfuture.ca.


INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM<br />

What Future for What Churches?<br />

Universite du Quebec a Montreal<br />

October 19-22, 2005<br />

A SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZED BY UQAM'S <strong>CANADA</strong> RESEARCH CHAIR ON URBAN HERITAGE, THE MONTREAL<br />

HERITAGE COUNCIL, AND THE QUEBEC RELIGIOUS HERITAGE FOUNDATION<br />

WITH SUPPORT FROM THE CITY OF MONTREAL, THE CITY OF QUEBEC, MINISTERE DE LA CULTURE<br />

ET DES COMMUNICATIONS DU QUEBEC AND CELAT AND CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY.<br />

An increasing number of churches are closing their doors,<br />

either to be converted or demolished. This problem is pervasive<br />

throughout the Western world. In Quebec, for example, almost<br />

3,000 places of worship-some of which showcase Quebec's<br />

collective investments, creativity, and built landscape-are<br />

in danger of disappearing in the somewhat near future. The<br />

financial resources to preserve this heritage are nowhere to be<br />

found. In the broader context of the Western heritage big bang,<br />

which has required governments to provide funding they do not<br />

have, and in light of the sharply declining interest in historic<br />

religious traditions, this symposium will bring together decision<br />

makers and professionals from throughout Quebec, as well as<br />

some forty researchers from more than ten European and North<br />

American provinces, governments, and countries, in order to<br />

pool the Western experience in church "heritagization." In the<br />

end, the issue is one of identifying concrete solutions and ways<br />

for public authorities to implement these solutions in light of<br />

three main themes that govern the issue-church ownership,<br />

possible church uses, and urban planning to convert them into<br />

community spaces-both in terms of community involvement<br />

in running the properties as well as the new roles urban design<br />

will lead them to play in the 21st century.<br />

Amongst speakers, registered conference participants will meet:<br />

Yvon Abiven, mayor of Saint-Thegonnec (France); Virginia Benson,<br />

Center for Sacred Landmarks, Cleveland State University (Ohio);<br />

Eric Breitkreutz, Historic Boston Incorporated/Boston Steeples<br />

Project (Massachusetts); Thomas Coomans, KADOC-Katholiek<br />

Documentatie en Onderzoekscentrum, Leuven (Belgique);<br />

Kathleen Crowther, Cleveland Restoration Society (Ohio); Joel<br />

Duvignacq, Plan eglises, City of Paris; Ann-Isabel Friedman,<br />

Sacred Sites Program, New York Landmarks Conservancy (New<br />

York); Xavier Greffe, professor in arts and medias economy,<br />

Universite de Paris I (Pantheon-Sorbonne); Robert A . Jaeger,<br />

Partners for Sacred Places, Philadelphie (Pennsylvanie);<br />

Jean-Michel Leniaud, Ecole nationale des chartes et Ecole Pratique<br />

des Hautes Etudes (Paris); Wies van Leeuwen, Monumentenzorg<br />

Provincie Noord Brabant (Monuments et sites du Brabant<br />

septentrional, Pays-Bas); Jan De Maeyer, KADOC-Katholiek<br />

Documentatie en Onderzoekscentrum, Leuven (Belgique);<br />

Max Ingar M0rk, Church of Norway Employers' Association,<br />

Oslo (Norvege); Luc Noppen, Canada Research Cha ir on Urban<br />

Heritage, UQAM (Montreal); Hermann Reidel, Pontificatl<br />

Commission for the Cultural Heritage of the Church (AIIemagne);<br />

Oddbj0rn S0rmoen, Directorate for Cultural Heritage (Norvege) ;<br />

Yvon Tranvouez, Centre de recherche bretonne et celtique,<br />

Universite de Bretagne occidentale; Crispin Truman, Churches<br />

Conservation Trust (Royaume-Uni).<br />

A simultaneous French/English interpretation service will be available throughout the symposium.<br />

The proceedings, which will be available from Presses de I'Universite du Quebec in February 2006, will be distributed free of charge<br />

to registered conference participants. For more information or to register, go to www.avenireglises.ca or www.churchesfuture.ca.


CALL FOR PAPERS I APPEL A TEXTES<br />

JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF I JOURNAL DE LA SOCIETE POUR lETUDE 0[ L<br />

ARCHITECTURE~~<br />

<strong>CANADA</strong><br />

EDITORIAL STATE MENT<br />

POLITIQUE EDITORIALE<br />

The Journal of the Society for the Study of Architecture in Canada is a bilingual<br />

refereed publication whose scope encompasses the entire spectrum of Canadian architecture<br />

from all historical periods and all cultural traditions. In addition to historical,<br />

cultural, and


Nouveautes<br />

Les eglises du Quebec<br />

Un patrimoine a reinventer<br />

Luc Noppen et Lucie K. Morisset<br />

2005 I 456 pages<br />

Bien plus qu'ailleurs,les eglises au Quebec ant profondement marque le developpement<br />

du paysage construit des villes et des villages et impregnent l'imaginaire collectif des<br />

habitants et de leurs visiteurs. C'est ce qu'on appelle un patrimoine.<br />

D'ici 2010, plus de Ia moitie des 3 000 eglises du Quebec seront vendues, converties ou<br />

demolies. En restera-t-il quelques-unes pour les generations futures?<br />

Le combat du patrimoine a Montreal<br />

(1973-2003)<br />

Martin Drouin<br />

2005 I 400 pages<br />

Visiteurs et residants s'accordent aujourd'hui pour affirmer que Montreal est<br />

une ville ou il fait bon vivre et que cela tient, entre autres, a son « caractere<br />

patrimonial ».<br />

Si plusieurs se souviennent, taus ne savent cependant pas qu'il a fallu plus de<br />

trente ans de luttes urbaines pour fonder cette image par laquelle Ia metropole<br />

se represente aujourd'hui.<br />

JJf Presses de l'Universite du Quebec<br />

Sans frais: "1 800 859.7474<br />

Commandez en ligne et economisez<br />

v.~v.~v.~. lJIJlil .ca

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!