08.09.2014 Views

Systems Analysis of Zaragoza Urban Water - SWITCH - Managing ...

Systems Analysis of Zaragoza Urban Water - SWITCH - Managing ...

Systems Analysis of Zaragoza Urban Water - SWITCH - Managing ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Systems</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zaragoza</strong> UWS<br />

Guillermo Penagos<br />

1. Phosphorus<br />

2. Non biodegradable organic matter<br />

3. Nitrogen<br />

4. Heavy metals<br />

5. BOD<br />

This is a very interesting outcome that reflects several internal aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zaragoza</strong><br />

UWS as well as its relation to the surrounding environment.<br />

Secondary WWT via activated sludge is a technology for BOD removal and it works<br />

quite well on this regard. Therefore it is possible to say that improving BOD removal<br />

is not a priority for this UWS.<br />

Since activated sludge is a biological treatment it does not work that well to remove<br />

non biodegradable OM, remaining COD in treated sewage has got a relatively high<br />

impact on the receiving water body.<br />

<strong>Zaragoza</strong> WWT system is not designed to remove nitrogen. However biodegradable<br />

OM removal is also removing about 40% nitrogen from sewage. The remaining 60%<br />

is still high but it does not seem to have an important impact on the Ebro River, which<br />

might be explained by the fact that nitrogen concentrations in the river are already<br />

high (see table 7).<br />

Concerning heavy metals, again it is important to say that <strong>Zaragoza</strong> WWT system is<br />

not designed to remove those, nearly 40% are retained by the sludge though. Also<br />

untreated <strong>Zaragoza</strong> sewage does not contain high heavy metal concentrations.<br />

Therefore this impact is not that significant.<br />

Concerning phosphorus it is possible to say that 68% <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zaragoza</strong> WWT system<br />

(Cartuja plant) is actually designed to remove phosphorus. However the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> this technology is just around 80%, in addition to this, the combined<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> Almozara and paper mills WWTPs, which do not remove nutrients, is so<br />

important that TP has got a large impact on the Ebro River. Therefore reducing<br />

phosphorous loads may be considered as the priority for improving <strong>Zaragoza</strong> UWS<br />

with regard to the Ebro River.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!