07.09.2014 Views

Two decades of community forestry in Nepal: What have we learned?

Two decades of community forestry in Nepal: What have we learned?

Two decades of community forestry in Nepal: What have we learned?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Two</strong> <strong>decades</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>community</strong> <strong>forestry</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepal</strong>: <strong>What</strong> <strong>have</strong> <strong>we</strong> <strong>learned</strong>?<br />

Much has changed <strong>in</strong> development th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, and also development needs, over the<br />

last t<strong>we</strong>nty years. This is clearly refl ected <strong>in</strong> the way the project focus shifted over<br />

time – from be<strong>in</strong>g primarily (although never solely) technically and environmentally<br />

oriented <strong>in</strong> early years, to focus<strong>in</strong>g more heavily on social and political aspects –<br />

especially poverty alleviation, equity and good governance - <strong>in</strong> later years.<br />

NSCFP was active <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g such trends, and <strong>in</strong>deed recognised the<br />

need for, and attempted to promote, social <strong>in</strong>clusion from the start.<br />

Development trends must also be set <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepal</strong>’s particular context<br />

<strong>of</strong> violent civil confl ict over the period 1996 to 2006. This <strong>in</strong>fl uenced<br />

both the way <strong>in</strong> which the project was implemented, and the whole<br />

focus <strong>of</strong> operations. To provide a somewhat simplifi ed overview, key trends <strong>in</strong><br />

project activities are captured <strong>in</strong> the table on the next page.<br />

Rather than provid<strong>in</strong>g a chronological summary <strong>of</strong> NSCFP’s activities, this<br />

document is structured <strong>in</strong>to n<strong>in</strong>e topics, as follows:<br />

• Implementation modality/fund management<br />

• Human resource and <strong>in</strong>stitutional development<br />

• Pro-poor livelihoods<br />

• Social <strong>in</strong>clusion: caste, ethnicity and gender<br />

• Good governance<br />

• Confl ict sensitive project management<br />

• Susta<strong>in</strong>able tree and forest management<br />

• Forest based enterprises<br />

• Forest policy contribution<br />

Whilst these topics are treated separately for purposes <strong>of</strong> analysis and<br />

documentation, they are <strong>of</strong> course <strong>in</strong>ter-l<strong>in</strong>ked and over-lapp<strong>in</strong>g. By focus<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

them, the <strong>in</strong>tention was to highlight fi nd<strong>in</strong>gs that should be taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong><br />

future support to <strong>Nepal</strong>’s <strong>community</strong> <strong>forestry</strong> programme – particularly through the<br />

new Multi-Stakeholder Forestry Programme. With this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, key issues for the<br />

future are listed at the end <strong>of</strong> each section.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!