07.09.2014 Views

Please note - Swinburne University of Technology

Please note - Swinburne University of Technology

Please note - Swinburne University of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

References<br />

Alexander, J. and Seidman, 5. eds. Culture and Society<br />

Cambridge, Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1990<br />

Austin-Broos, D.J. (ed.) Creating Culture. Sydney, Allen & Unwin,<br />

1987<br />

Bronner, S.E. and Kellner, D.M. (eds.) Critical Theory and Society: A<br />

Reader. New York, Routledge, 1989<br />

Dupre, L. Marx's Social Critique <strong>of</strong> Culture. New Haven, Yale<br />

<strong>University</strong> Press, 1983<br />

Lodge, 0. Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader: London, New<br />

York, Longman, 1988<br />

Williams, R. Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected essays.<br />

London, Verso. 1980<br />

*AHZOS<br />

Social Philosophy, Politics and<br />

Ethics<br />

No, <strong>of</strong> hours per week: three hours<br />

Prerequisite: one <strong>of</strong> AH1 00, AH1 01, AH1 02,<br />

AH103 or approved equivalent<br />

Assessment: continuous and by examination<br />

Subject aims and description<br />

The focus <strong>of</strong> this subject is the analysis and critical appraisal<br />

<strong>of</strong> contemporary social and political discourse. In addressing<br />

the central issues, two broad approaches (or a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> these) may be adopted: the modernitylpostmodernity<br />

debate, directly engaged through exploration <strong>of</strong> the positions<br />

defended by such contemporary thinkers as Habermas and<br />

Foucault; or the issues approached from an historical<br />

perspective via exploration <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> positions from Plato<br />

to the present.<br />

References<br />

Consult with the lecturer before buying any books, as the<br />

recommended texts change depending on the orientation adopted in<br />

the course. But the following are likely to be useful.<br />

Beilharz, P. (ed.), Social Theory: A Guide to Central Thinkers. Sydney,<br />

Allen & Unwin, 1992.<br />

Bernstein, R. The New Constellation, MIT Press, 1992.<br />

Maclntyre, A. A Short History <strong>of</strong> Ethics. London, Routledge, 1967<br />

Muschamp, D. (ed.) Political Thinkers. South Melbourne, Macmillan,<br />

1986<br />

Skinner, Q. (ed.), The Return <strong>of</strong> Grand Theory in the Human Sciences<br />

Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1985.<br />

*Not available to students who have previously passed<br />

AH200 Moral and Political Philosophy.<br />

*AHZO~ Society, Culture, and Resources<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> hours per week: three hours<br />

Prerequisite: one <strong>of</strong> AH1 00, AH1 01, AH102,<br />

AH 103 or approved equivalent<br />

Assessment: continuous<br />

Subject aims and description<br />

Resources, people, survival, and development: within the<br />

general framework <strong>of</strong> social history this course emphasises<br />

the interaction between technology and social change from<br />

ancient to modern times. Politics, economics, religion, values,<br />

traditions, social structures, education, relations with<br />

neighbours, knowledge and skills, are factors which combine<br />

to influence the course <strong>of</strong> human development. Also<br />

considered are the moral dilemmas <strong>of</strong> industrial societies,<br />

including problems <strong>of</strong> pollution and environment control.<br />

Preliminary reading<br />

Buchanan, R.A. History and Industrial Civilisation. London, Macmillan,<br />

1979<br />

Textbook<br />

Mumford, L. The Cityin History Penguin, 1966<br />

References<br />

Basalla, G. The Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>. Cambridge, Cambridge<br />

<strong>University</strong> Press, 1988<br />

Dickson, D. Alternative <strong>Technology</strong>. London, Fontana/Collins, 1974<br />

Harris, M. Cannibals and Kings. New York, Random House, 1977<br />

Mokyr, J. The Lever <strong>of</strong> Riches. New York, Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />

1990<br />

Mumford, L. The Myth <strong>of</strong> the Machine: Technics and Human<br />

Development. London, Secker and Warburg, 1967<br />

* Not available to students who have previously passed<br />

AH202 <strong>Technology</strong> and Society.<br />

~ ~ 3 0 1 Rationality<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> hours per week: three hours<br />

Prereauisites: two <strong>of</strong> AH200. AH201. AH202.<br />

~~203, AH204, AH205, ~ ~206, or approved<br />

equivalents<br />

Assessment: continuous<br />

Subject aims and description<br />

This subject engages the contemporary debate about the<br />

meaning and value <strong>of</strong> rationality. The issues considered<br />

include: the problem <strong>of</strong> the rational justification <strong>of</strong> beliefs and<br />

actions in a way which does justice to our status as situated<br />

human agents; the relationship between rationality and<br />

scientific inquiry, and between western rationality and the<br />

rationality <strong>of</strong> other cultures; the problem <strong>of</strong> relativism; and<br />

the links between rationality and human well-being.<br />

Text book<br />

<strong>Please</strong> consult with the lecturer before buying textbooks.<br />

References<br />

Agassi, J. and Ja~ie, I.C. (eds.) Rationality: The Critical View.<br />

Dordrecht, Nijh<strong>of</strong>f, 1987<br />

Brown, H. Rationality London, Routledge, 1990<br />

Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.) Rationality and Relativism., Oxford,<br />

Blackwell, 1982<br />

Rescher, N. Rationality. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 1988<br />

Wilson, B. (ed.) Rationality Oxford, Blackwell, 1970<br />

~ ~ 3 0 6 Practical Ethics<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> hours per week: three hours<br />

Prerequisites: two <strong>of</strong> AHZOO, AH201, AH202,<br />

AH203, AH204, AH205, AH206, or approved<br />

equivalents<br />

Assessment: continuous<br />

Subject aims and description<br />

This subject attempts to develop an understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> moral decision making, with a view to improving<br />

the ability <strong>of</strong> participants to form ethical judgements and to<br />

be tolerant <strong>of</strong> the judgements <strong>of</strong> others.<br />

Presently, the two main areas <strong>of</strong> discussion are the moral<br />

value <strong>of</strong> human beinas and environmental ethics. Further<br />

areas may be added Tn future years.<br />

Textbooks<br />

Kannegiesser, H. Conception in the Test Tube. Melbourne, Macmillan,<br />

1988<br />

Rachels, 1. The Elements <strong>of</strong> Moral Philosophy. 2nd edn, New York,<br />

McGraw-Hill, 1993<br />

References<br />

De Marco, J. and F.R. New Directions in Ethics. New York. Routledge<br />

and Kegan Paul, 1986<br />

Elliot, R. and Gare, A. Environmental Philosophy Brisbane, <strong>University</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!