Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ... Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
2.4 Water Chemistry Although flow can affect water quality, it is not expected that the adoption and achievement of minimum flows will necessarily lead to substantial changes in Alafia River water quality; however, it is appropriate to review the water quality of the Alafia River to fully appreciate how land use changes have affected the river. The Alafia River has experienced high nutrient concentrations and loads rarely encountered in flowing water systems, because of its unique geologic setting and the mining and processing of phosphate ore in its watershed. Examination of water quality data is useful for understanding the complex nature of flow changes in the Alafia River. Long-term water quality changes were evaluated using USGS data gathered at gage sites on the Alafia River proper (near Lithia) and on the North and South Prongs of the Alafia River. Comparison of water quality data with flow records was made for evaluation of relationships between flow and land use. In addition, comparisons were made with sites on other river systems, specifically the Peace River at Arcadia, the Myakka River near Sarasota, and the Withlacoochee River near Holder. The Withlacoochee River in contrast to the Alafia and Peace Rivers exhibits relatively good water quality, perhaps the best of any river system within the District. This is in part attributable to land use differences and in part attributable to inherent differences in geologic setting. Because both the Alafia and Peace River watersheds lie in the Bone Valley geologic formation and because significant portions of both watersheds have been mined for phosphate, it was deemed desirable to evaluate water quality on a river system minimally impacted by phosphate mining. Phosphate mining has occurred historically in the Withlacocchee River watershed, specifically in the Dunnellon-Rainbow River area (which is downstream of the Holder gage), and actually predated mining activities on the Peace and Alafia Rivers. For the following analyses, all available water quality data for selected gages were retrieved from the USGS on-line database. While some data are available on a number of water quality parameters, analysis was restricted to those parameters for which it was felt that a sufficient number of observations existed for inspection of trends. The USGS has long-term flow and water quality data for a number of gage sites throughout the District. Flow records at many sites exceed 50 to 60 years, and some of these have water quality records of 40 years or more. Except for special studies of relatively short duration, water quality at most USGS sites was typically monitored on a quarterly basis at best. Data for each parameter discussed are typically presented in three plots. One plot is a simple time-series plot, which is followed by a plot of the parameter 2-65
versus flow. The third plot typically presented is a plot of the residuals obtained from a LOWESS regression of the parameter versus flow. The last plot is used to evaluate if a parameter loading has increased or decreased over time irrespective of flow. The results of a Kendall’s tau analysis on the residuals was used to help determine if apparent increasing or decreasing trends in a parameter were statistically significant. 2.4.1 Macronutrients: Phosphorus and Nitrogen Concentrations of the two major macronutrients, phosphorus and nitrogen, have been monitored for some time at the Lithia gage site and somewhat less frequently at the North and South Prong sites. The exact chemical form of the nutrient monitored has changed over time (e.g., total nitrate, dissolved nitrate, nitrite+nitrate, etc.), however, for purposes of the discussion that follows and for trend analysis, values for some constituents were combined to provide a sufficient number of data points for analysis. 2.4.1.1 Phosphorus Phosphorus concentrations have been reported by the USGS as total phosphorus, dissolved phosphate, and as ortho-phosphate. For purposes of this discussion, it was assumed that dissolved phosphate and ortho-phosphate are essentially equivalent. Although some of the older data were reported as mg/l phosphate, all values were converted and expressed as mg/l phosphorus (P). As similarly described for the Peace River (SWFWMD 2002), historic P concentrations in the Alafia River and its major tributaries (North and South Prongs) were impressive (see Figures 2-32, 2-33). A record high of 105 mg/l P was reported for a sample collected on the North Prong on April 28, 1969. Considering that background concentrations for a tributary in the Bone Valley area should probably be between 0.1 and 0.5 mg/l P, this high value is 200 to 1000 times higher than should be expected. Although 105 mg/l P is the extreme, values in excess of 20 mg/l were frequently found before 1975 in the North Prong. While considerably improved over past conditions, P concentrations in the neighborhood of 5 mg/l still occur in the North Prong of the Alafia. Fewer measurements have been taken from the South Prong, but it appears that concentrations have never been as high as those on the North Prong. However, concentrations above 1.5 mg/l should not be considered natural for this system. Because the North and South Prongs contribute approximately 81% of the flow (and a combined 72% of the watershed above the gage) as measured at the Lithia gage, it should be expected that concentrations of most constituents should be reflected in concentrations of water samples taken at Lithia. While concentrations greater than 4 mg/l P have not been recorded since 1990, P concentrations have not yet reached levels that would be considered 2-66
- Page 41 and 42: data (multiple regression) analyses
- Page 43 and 44: 2.2 Land Use Changes in the Alafia
- Page 45 and 46: Before discussing individual sub-ba
- Page 47 and 48: Table 2-2. Land use and land cover
- Page 49 and 50: Table 2-3. Land use and land cover
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2-13. 1972 and 1999 Land use
- Page 53 and 54: 2.2.4 Lithia Springs Sub-Basin The
- Page 55 and 56: 2.3 Hydrology The assessment of min
- Page 57 and 58: Period of Record Median Daily Flows
- Page 59 and 60: occurred during the spring were sim
- Page 61 and 62: Conversely, since most of the Unite
- Page 63 and 64: extending from 1940 to 1969 can be
- Page 65 and 66: Period of Record Median Daily Flows
- Page 67 and 68: third highest flow occurred early i
- Page 69 and 70: Flow (cfs) Alafia River at Lithia,
- Page 71 and 72: 100 North Prong Alafia River at Key
- Page 73 and 74: Flow (cfs) South Prong Alafia River
- Page 75 and 76: Alafia River at Lithia - Water Qual
- Page 77 and 78: South Prong Watershed Above USGS Ga
- Page 79 and 80: Comparisons of land use changes and
- Page 81 and 82: Comparison of Median Daily Flows fo
- Page 83 and 84: Comparisons of Annual 25% Exceedanc
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 2-25. Lithia Springs Major b
- Page 87 and 88: 2.3.4.3.2 Discharge from Lithia Spr
- Page 89 and 90: Relationship Between Lithia Springs
- Page 91: Buckhorn Spring Main Discharge (Wit
- Page 95 and 96: Alafia River at Lithia, FL Phosphor
- Page 97 and 98: While elevated phosphorus concentra
- Page 99 and 100: Peace River at Arcadia, FL 20 Phosp
- Page 101 and 102: Alafia River at Lithia, FL Nitrate/
- Page 103 and 104: 2.4.2 Potassium and Trend Analysis
- Page 105 and 106: Alafia River at Lithia, FL 14 Potas
- Page 107 and 108: Table 2-10. Results of Kendall's ta
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 3 Ecological Resources of C
- Page 111 and 112: 1) maintenance of minimum water dep
- Page 113 and 114: flow regimes and these life history
- Page 115 and 116: subsidy of water and nutrients that
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Technical Approach for Es
- Page 119 and 120: 4.2.1 HEC-RAS Cross-Sections Cross
- Page 121 and 122: PHABSIM analysis required acquisiti
- Page 123 and 124: Figure 4-5. Upstream vegetation cro
- Page 125 and 126: level, whenever possible. Immature
- Page 127 and 128: major parameter altered during the
- Page 129 and 130: Alafia River - Cross Section 64 - W
- Page 131 and 132: Delphi method lacks the rapid feedb
- Page 133 and 134: TOTAL DAYS OF INUNDATION DURING THE
- Page 135 and 136: Period of Record Median Daily Flows
- Page 137 and 138: Wetted Perimeter - USGS 84.5 - SWFW
- Page 139 and 140: Alafia River Station 91.5 Stage in
- Page 141 and 142: section sites and corresponding flo
versus flow. The third plot typically presented is a plot of the residuals obtained<br />
from a LOWESS regression of the parameter versus flow. The last plot is used<br />
to evaluate if a parameter loading has increased or decreased over time<br />
irrespective of flow. The results of a Kendall’s tau analysis on the residuals was<br />
used to help determine if apparent increasing or decreasing trends in a<br />
parameter were statistically significant.<br />
2.4.1 Macronutrients: Phosphorus <strong>and</strong> Nitrogen<br />
Concentrations of the two major macronutrients, phosphorus <strong>and</strong> nitrogen, have<br />
been monitored for some time at the Lithia gage site <strong>and</strong> somewhat less<br />
frequently at the North <strong>and</strong> South Prong sites. The exact chemical form of the<br />
nutrient monitored has changed over time (e.g., total nitrate, dissolved nitrate,<br />
nitrite+nitrate, etc.), however, for purposes of the discussion that follows <strong>and</strong> for<br />
trend analysis, values for some constituents were combined to provide a<br />
sufficient number of data points for analysis.<br />
2.4.1.1 Phosphorus<br />
Phosphorus concentrations have been reported by the USGS as total<br />
phosphorus, dissolved phosphate, <strong>and</strong> as ortho-phosphate. For purposes of this<br />
discussion, it was assumed that dissolved phosphate <strong>and</strong> ortho-phosphate are<br />
essentially equivalent. Although some of the older data were reported as mg/l<br />
phosphate, all values were converted <strong>and</strong> expressed as mg/l phosphorus (P). As<br />
similarly described for the Peace <strong>River</strong> (SWFWMD 2002), historic P<br />
concentrations in the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> its major tributaries (North <strong>and</strong> South<br />
Prongs) were impressive (see Figures 2-32, 2-33). A record high of 105 mg/l P<br />
was reported for a sample collected on the North Prong on April 28, 1969.<br />
Considering that background concentrations for a tributary in the Bone Valley<br />
area should probably be between 0.1 <strong>and</strong> 0.5 mg/l P, this high value is 200 to<br />
1000 times higher than should be expected. Although 105 mg/l P is the extreme,<br />
values in excess of 20 mg/l were frequently found before 1975 in the North<br />
Prong. While considerably improved over past conditions, P concentrations in<br />
the neighborhood of 5 mg/l still occur in the North Prong of the <strong>Alafia</strong>. Fewer<br />
measurements have been taken from the South Prong, but it appears that<br />
concentrations have never been as high as those on the North Prong. However,<br />
concentrations above 1.5 mg/l should not be considered natural for this system.<br />
Because the North <strong>and</strong> South Prongs contribute approximately 81% of the flow<br />
(<strong>and</strong> a combined 72% of the watershed above the gage) as measured at the<br />
Lithia gage, it should be expected that concentrations of most constituents<br />
should be reflected in concentrations of water samples taken at Lithia. While<br />
concentrations greater than 4 mg/l P have not been recorded since 1990, P<br />
concentrations have not yet reached levels that would be considered<br />
2-66