07.09.2014 Views

Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...

Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...

Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3 Hydrology<br />

The assessment of minimum flow <strong>and</strong> levels for the freshwater segment of the<br />

<strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> was supported by analyses of long-term streamflow records that date<br />

to the 1930s. Significant declining trends in flow have been documented or<br />

reported by a number of workers (Stoker et al. 1996, Hickey 1998, SDI 2003,<br />

Kelly 2004); however, the cause(s) of these declines has been the subject of<br />

some debate. Kelly (2004) attributed flow declines in the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> largely to<br />

climate, <strong>and</strong> that is a primary assumption inherent in the minimum flow analyses<br />

to follow.<br />

Although there has been considerable phosphate mining in the <strong>Alafia</strong> watershed<br />

(especially in the watersheds of the North <strong>and</strong> South Prongs) <strong>and</strong> substantial<br />

groundwater withdrawals from the <strong>Florida</strong>n aquifer, comparison of river flow<br />

declines with neighboring watersheds suggests a similar causative factor for flow<br />

declines. Our analyses indicate that flow declines attributed by Stoker et al.<br />

(1996) to groundwater withdrawals, <strong>and</strong> by SDI (2003) to increasing area of<br />

mined l<strong>and</strong> are due to another factor, namely the removal or reduction of<br />

discharges from the phosphate mining industry. These flow declines actually<br />

represent an increase in water use efficiency by the mining industry such that the<br />

large volumes of groundwater historically used for ore extraction <strong>and</strong> processing<br />

have been substantially reduced. In response to work done by SDI (2003), we<br />

have compared discharge volumes from the watersheds of the South <strong>and</strong> North<br />

Prongs of the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> to demonstrate that similar amounts of water are being<br />

discharged from both basins <strong>and</strong> thus increasing area of mined l<strong>and</strong>s has not<br />

lead to substantial nor quantifiable reductions in flow.<br />

Kelly (2004) concluded that the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO; see<br />

Enfield et al. 2001) has an important controlling effect on river flow volumes<br />

throughout southwest <strong>Florida</strong>, <strong>and</strong> is a major factor that must be considered<br />

when developing minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels (Shaw et al. 2004). This<br />

phenomenon is shown to affect the baseline or benchmark period against which<br />

flow reductions <strong>and</strong> MFLs should be judged.<br />

2.3.1 <strong>Florida</strong> <strong>River</strong> Flow Patterns <strong>and</strong> the Atlantic Multidecadal<br />

Oscillation<br />

"It would be reasonable to assume that given a fairly constant climate, the<br />

amount of water flowing down a river's course each year would vary<br />

evenly about an average value." (Smith <strong>and</strong> Stopp 1978)<br />

Smith <strong>and</strong> Stopp's statement reflects the typical paradigm with respect to the<br />

impact of climate on river flow. As a result, little attention has been paid to the<br />

2-28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!