Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.3 Hydrology<br />
The assessment of minimum flow <strong>and</strong> levels for the freshwater segment of the<br />
<strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> was supported by analyses of long-term streamflow records that date<br />
to the 1930s. Significant declining trends in flow have been documented or<br />
reported by a number of workers (Stoker et al. 1996, Hickey 1998, SDI 2003,<br />
Kelly 2004); however, the cause(s) of these declines has been the subject of<br />
some debate. Kelly (2004) attributed flow declines in the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> largely to<br />
climate, <strong>and</strong> that is a primary assumption inherent in the minimum flow analyses<br />
to follow.<br />
Although there has been considerable phosphate mining in the <strong>Alafia</strong> watershed<br />
(especially in the watersheds of the North <strong>and</strong> South Prongs) <strong>and</strong> substantial<br />
groundwater withdrawals from the <strong>Florida</strong>n aquifer, comparison of river flow<br />
declines with neighboring watersheds suggests a similar causative factor for flow<br />
declines. Our analyses indicate that flow declines attributed by Stoker et al.<br />
(1996) to groundwater withdrawals, <strong>and</strong> by SDI (2003) to increasing area of<br />
mined l<strong>and</strong> are due to another factor, namely the removal or reduction of<br />
discharges from the phosphate mining industry. These flow declines actually<br />
represent an increase in water use efficiency by the mining industry such that the<br />
large volumes of groundwater historically used for ore extraction <strong>and</strong> processing<br />
have been substantially reduced. In response to work done by SDI (2003), we<br />
have compared discharge volumes from the watersheds of the South <strong>and</strong> North<br />
Prongs of the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> to demonstrate that similar amounts of water are being<br />
discharged from both basins <strong>and</strong> thus increasing area of mined l<strong>and</strong>s has not<br />
lead to substantial nor quantifiable reductions in flow.<br />
Kelly (2004) concluded that the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO; see<br />
Enfield et al. 2001) has an important controlling effect on river flow volumes<br />
throughout southwest <strong>Florida</strong>, <strong>and</strong> is a major factor that must be considered<br />
when developing minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels (Shaw et al. 2004). This<br />
phenomenon is shown to affect the baseline or benchmark period against which<br />
flow reductions <strong>and</strong> MFLs should be judged.<br />
2.3.1 <strong>Florida</strong> <strong>River</strong> Flow Patterns <strong>and</strong> the Atlantic Multidecadal<br />
Oscillation<br />
"It would be reasonable to assume that given a fairly constant climate, the<br />
amount of water flowing down a river's course each year would vary<br />
evenly about an average value." (Smith <strong>and</strong> Stopp 1978)<br />
Smith <strong>and</strong> Stopp's statement reflects the typical paradigm with respect to the<br />
impact of climate on river flow. As a result, little attention has been paid to the<br />
2-28