Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ... Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Chapter 2 Basin Description with Emphasis on Land Use, Hydrology and Water Quality This chapter includes a brief description of the Alafia River watershed and is followed by a presentation and discussion of land use, hydrology, and water quality data relevant to the development of MFLs on the freshwater segment of the Alafia River. Land use changes within the basin are discussed to set the stage for a hydrology discussion that follows and to address questions that have been raised regarding the potential impact of land use changes on river flow volumes (see SDI 2003). Water chemistry changes are discussed to illustrate how land use changes associated with phosphate mining have played a significant role in observed trends in certain water quality parameters, and to demonstrate how these trends are useful in interpreting flow changes through time. With respect to hydrology and trends in flow, a number of important observations and conclusions are made that affect how MFLs are developed not only for the Alafia River but for flowing systems in general. Concern over apparent declining flow trends is an issue not only for the Alafia River, but for essentially all rivers in the SWFWMD for which MFLs will be developed. Before discussing trends in Alafia River flow, some discussion is devoted to river flow patterns and trends throughout the SWFWMD and Florida. This is important, since it is concluded that there is a significant climatic factor that must be considered when developing MFLs. It is argued that some flow trends that should be expected as a result of a natural climate oscillation have been interpreted as primarily anthropogenic (refer to Kelly 2004). In addition, it is demonstrated that there are at least two potential benchmark periods that should be considered when developing MFLs, and that selection of the proper benchmark period is a critical part of the process. A "Building Block" approach to establishing MFLs (as suggested in the peer review of the upper Peace River MFL – Gore et al. 2002) is developed based on the inherent seasonal hydrologic pattern of rivers in the SWFWMD. Further it is argued that the "percent of flow" approach to permitting surface water withdrawals has many desirable attributes. Biological connections with hydrology are addressed in Chapters 4 and 5, and result in MFL recommendations specific to the freshwater segment of the Alafia River. 2.1 Watershed Description 2.1.1 Geographic Location The Alafia River watershed extends over parts of two counties (Figure 2-1) including much of the eastern and southern portions of Hillsborough County, and a smaller portion of west-central Polk County. It is bounded on the north by the Hillsborough 2-1
River watershed, to the east by the Peace River watershed and to the south by the Little Manatee River watershed. The river originates from several creeks that form its two major tributaries, the North and South Prongs. The South Prong drains from Hookers Prairie, while the North Prong rises in a swampy area just to the north of Hookers Prairie (Dames and Moore 1975). The Alafia River proper is formed by the confluence of these two Prongs and flows generally westward into lower Hillsborough Bay. Based on current land use maps, the estimated watershed area is roughly 270,000 acres or 422 square miles. Urbanized areas include parts of Lakeland, Plant City, Mulberry, and the community of Brandon as well as large expanses of rural and undeveloped farm and mined lands. Figure 2-1. Map of Alafia River watershed showing USGS gage site locations and locations of Lithia and Buckhorn Springs. 2-2
- Page 1 and 2: Alafia River Minimum Flows and Leve
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Table of Contents
- Page 5 and 6: 4.3.1 HEC-RAS Modeling ............
- Page 7 and 8: Table of Figures Figure 1-1. Buildi
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 2-33. Phosphorus concentrati
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 5-12. Habitat Gain/Loss for
- Page 13 and 14: Table 5-2. Mean elevation, local (c
- Page 15 and 16: flow, with the exception that withd
- Page 17 and 18: Acknowledgement The authors would l
- Page 19 and 20: 9) Water quality; and 10) Navigatio
- Page 21 and 22: Water Management District typically
- Page 23 and 24: Peace River at Zolfo Springs, FL. s
- Page 25 and 26: Period of Record Median Daily Flows
- Page 27: to enhance understanding of histori
- Page 31 and 32: an adjacent area locally known as t
- Page 33 and 34: Water in the surficial aquifer is r
- Page 35 and 36: The Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA) sy
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 2-4. May and September 2001
- Page 39 and 40: head differences indicating breache
- Page 41 and 42: data (multiple regression) analyses
- Page 43 and 44: 2.2 Land Use Changes in the Alafia
- Page 45 and 46: Before discussing individual sub-ba
- Page 47 and 48: Table 2-2. Land use and land cover
- Page 49 and 50: Table 2-3. Land use and land cover
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2-13. 1972 and 1999 Land use
- Page 53 and 54: 2.2.4 Lithia Springs Sub-Basin The
- Page 55 and 56: 2.3 Hydrology The assessment of min
- Page 57 and 58: Period of Record Median Daily Flows
- Page 59 and 60: occurred during the spring were sim
- Page 61 and 62: Conversely, since most of the Unite
- Page 63 and 64: extending from 1940 to 1969 can be
- Page 65 and 66: Period of Record Median Daily Flows
- Page 67 and 68: third highest flow occurred early i
- Page 69 and 70: Flow (cfs) Alafia River at Lithia,
- Page 71 and 72: 100 North Prong Alafia River at Key
- Page 73 and 74: Flow (cfs) South Prong Alafia River
- Page 75 and 76: Alafia River at Lithia - Water Qual
- Page 77 and 78: South Prong Watershed Above USGS Ga
Chapter 2 Basin Description with Emphasis on L<strong>and</strong> Use,<br />
Hydrology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Quality<br />
This chapter includes a brief description of the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> watershed <strong>and</strong> is<br />
followed by a presentation <strong>and</strong> discussion of l<strong>and</strong> use, hydrology, <strong>and</strong> water quality<br />
data relevant to the development of MFLs on the freshwater segment of the <strong>Alafia</strong><br />
<strong>River</strong>. L<strong>and</strong> use changes within the basin are discussed to set the stage for a<br />
hydrology discussion that follows <strong>and</strong> to address questions that have been raised<br />
regarding the potential impact of l<strong>and</strong> use changes on river flow volumes (see SDI<br />
2003). <strong>Water</strong> chemistry changes are discussed to illustrate how l<strong>and</strong> use changes<br />
associated with phosphate mining have played a significant role in observed trends<br />
in certain water quality parameters, <strong>and</strong> to demonstrate how these trends are useful<br />
in interpreting flow changes through time.<br />
With respect to hydrology <strong>and</strong> trends in flow, a number of important observations<br />
<strong>and</strong> conclusions are made that affect how MFLs are developed not only for the<br />
<strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> but for flowing systems in general. Concern over apparent declining<br />
flow trends is an issue not only for the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong>, but for essentially all rivers in the<br />
SWFWMD for which MFLs will be developed. Before discussing trends in <strong>Alafia</strong><br />
<strong>River</strong> flow, some discussion is devoted to river flow patterns <strong>and</strong> trends throughout<br />
the SWFWMD <strong>and</strong> <strong>Florida</strong>. This is important, since it is concluded that there is a<br />
significant climatic factor that must be considered when developing MFLs. It is<br />
argued that some flow trends that should be expected as a result of a natural climate<br />
oscillation have been interpreted as primarily anthropogenic (refer to Kelly 2004). In<br />
addition, it is demonstrated that there are at least two potential benchmark periods<br />
that should be considered when developing MFLs, <strong>and</strong> that selection of the proper<br />
benchmark period is a critical part of the process. A "Building Block" approach to<br />
establishing MFLs (as suggested in the peer review of the upper Peace <strong>River</strong> MFL –<br />
Gore et al. 2002) is developed based on the inherent seasonal hydrologic pattern of<br />
rivers in the SWFWMD. Further it is argued that the "percent of flow" approach to<br />
permitting surface water withdrawals has many desirable attributes. Biological<br />
connections with hydrology are addressed in Chapters 4 <strong>and</strong> 5, <strong>and</strong> result in MFL<br />
recommendations specific to the freshwater segment of the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong>.<br />
2.1 <strong>Water</strong>shed Description<br />
2.1.1 Geographic Location<br />
The <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> watershed extends over parts of two counties (Figure 2-1) including<br />
much of the eastern <strong>and</strong> southern portions of Hillsborough County, <strong>and</strong> a smaller<br />
portion of west-central Polk County. It is bounded on the north by the Hillsborough<br />
2-1