Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...

Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ... Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...

swfwmd.state.fl.us
from swfwmd.state.fl.us More from this publisher
07.09.2014 Views

As noted by Beecher (1990), “it is difficult [in most statutes] to either ascertain legislative intent or determine if a proposed instream flow regime would satisfy the legislative purpose”, but according to Beecher as cited by Stalnaker et al. (1995), an instream flow standard should include the following elements: 1) a goal - (e.g., non-degradation or, for the District’s purpose, protection from “significant harm”); 2) identification of the resources of interest to be protected; 3) a unit of measure (e.g., flow in cubic feet per second, habitat in usable area, inundation to a specific elevation for a specified duration); 4) a benchmark period, and 5) a protection standard statistic. The District’s approach for minimum flows development incorporates the five elements listed by Beecher (1990). The goal of an MFL determination is to protect the resource from significant harm due to withdrawals and was broadly defined in the enacting legislation as "the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area." What constitutes "significant harm" was not defined. Impacts on the water resources or ecology are evaluated based on an identified subset of potential resources of interest. Ten potential resources were listed in Section 1.1. They are: recreation in and on the water; fish and wildlife habitats and the passage of fish; estuarine resources; transfer of detrital material; maintenance of freshwater storage and supply; aesthetic and scenic attributes; filtration and absorption of nutrients and other pollutants; water quality and navigation. The approach followed in this report identifies specific resources of interest and identifies when it is important seasonally to consider these resources. While the main unit of measure used by the District for defining minimum flows is flow (in cubic feet per second), it will become evident that several different measures of habitat, along with elevations in feet above the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 1929) associated with these habitats were employed. Ultimately, however, these different measures of habitat and inundation elevations were related to flows in order to derive the minimum flow recommendations. Fundamental to the approach used for development of minimum flows and levels is the realization that a flow regime is necessary to protect the ecology of the river system. The initial step in this process requires an understanding of historic and current flow conditions to determine if current flows reflect past conditions. If this is the case, the development of minimum flows and levels becomes a question of what can be allowed in terms of withdrawals before significant harm occurs. If there have been changes to the flow regime of a river, these must be assessed to determine, if significant harm has already occurred. If significant harm has occurred, recovery becomes an issue. For development of minimum flows for the upper segment of the Peace River (i.e., the river corridor upstream of the United State Geological Survey 1-5

Peace River at Zolfo Springs, FL. streamflow gage site), the District used a "reference" period, from 1940 through 1956, to evaluate flow regime changes (SWFWMD 2002). More recently, the District has adopted an approach for establishing benchmark flow periods that involves consideration of the effects of multidecadal climatic oscillations on river flow patterns (Kelly 2004; Shaw et al. 2004). The approach, which led to identification of separate benchmark periods for flow records collected prior to and after 1970, has been utilized for analyses of flows in the Alafia River. Following assessment of historic and current flow regimes, and the factors that have affected their development, the District develops protection standard statistics or criteria for preventing significant harm to the water resource. For the upper Peace River, criteria associated with the fish passage in the river channel and maximization of the wetted perimeter were used to recommend a minimum low flow (SWFWMD 2002). Criteria associated with medium and higher flows that result in the inundation of woody habitats associated with the river channel and vegetative communities on the floodplain were described. These criteria were not, however, used to develop recommended levels, due to an inability to separate water withdrawal impacts on river flow from those associated with structural alterations within the watershed. For the Alafia River, the District has applied approaches associated with development of medium to high flow criteria per recommendations in the peer review of the proposed upper Peace River minimum flows (Gore et al. 2002). These efforts have included collection and analyses of in-stream fish and macroinvertebrate habitat data using the Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM) system, and evaluation of inundation characteristics of floodplain habitats. 1.5.2 A Building Block Approach The peer-review report on proposed MFLs for the Upper Peace River (Gore et al. 2002) identified a "building block" approach as "a way to more closely mirror original hydrologic and hydroperiodic conditions in the basin". A building block approach to the development of regulatory flow requirements typically involves description of the natural flow regime, identification of building blocks associated with flow needs for ecosystem specific functions, biological assemblages or populations, and assembly of the blocks to form a flow prescription (Postel and Richter (2003). As noted by the panelists comprising the Upper Peace River MFL review panel, "assumptions behind building block techniques are based upon simple ecological theory; that organisms and communities occupying that river have evolved and adapted their life cycles to flow conditions over a long period of pre-development history (Stanford et al. 1996). Thus with limited biological knowledge of flow requirements, the best alternative is to recreate the hydrographic conditions under which communities have existed prior to disturbance of the flow regime." Although in most cases, the District does not expect to recreate pre-disturbance hydrographic conditions through MFL 1-6

Peace <strong>River</strong> at Zolfo Springs, FL. streamflow gage site), the District used a<br />

"reference" period, from 1940 through 1956, to evaluate flow regime changes<br />

(SWFWMD 2002). More recently, the District has adopted an approach for<br />

establishing benchmark flow periods that involves consideration of the effects of<br />

multidecadal climatic oscillations on river flow patterns (Kelly 2004; Shaw et al.<br />

2004). The approach, which led to identification of separate benchmark periods for<br />

flow records collected prior to <strong>and</strong> after 1970, has been utilized for analyses of flows<br />

in the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong>.<br />

Following assessment of historic <strong>and</strong> current flow regimes, <strong>and</strong> the factors that have<br />

affected their development, the District develops protection st<strong>and</strong>ard statistics or<br />

criteria for preventing significant harm to the water resource. For the upper Peace<br />

<strong>River</strong>, criteria associated with the fish passage in the river channel <strong>and</strong> maximization<br />

of the wetted perimeter were used to recommend a minimum low flow (SWFWMD<br />

2002). Criteria associated with medium <strong>and</strong> higher flows that result in the inundation<br />

of woody habitats associated with the river channel <strong>and</strong> vegetative communities on<br />

the floodplain were described. These criteria were not, however, used to develop<br />

recommended levels, due to an inability to separate water withdrawal impacts on<br />

river flow from those associated with structural alterations within the watershed. For<br />

the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong>, the District has applied approaches associated with development of<br />

medium to high flow criteria per recommendations in the peer review of the<br />

proposed upper Peace <strong>River</strong> minimum flows (Gore et al. 2002). These efforts have<br />

included collection <strong>and</strong> analyses of in-stream fish <strong>and</strong> macroinvertebrate habitat<br />

data using the Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM) system, <strong>and</strong> evaluation of<br />

inundation characteristics of floodplain habitats.<br />

1.5.2 A Building Block Approach<br />

The peer-review report on proposed MFLs for the Upper Peace <strong>River</strong> (Gore et al.<br />

2002) identified a "building block" approach as "a way to more closely mirror original<br />

hydrologic <strong>and</strong> hydroperiodic conditions in the basin". A building block approach to<br />

the development of regulatory flow requirements typically involves description of the<br />

natural flow regime, identification of building blocks associated with flow needs for<br />

ecosystem specific functions, biological assemblages or populations, <strong>and</strong> assembly<br />

of the blocks to form a flow prescription (Postel <strong>and</strong> Richter (2003). As noted by the<br />

panelists comprising the Upper Peace <strong>River</strong> MFL review panel, "assumptions behind<br />

building block techniques are based upon simple ecological theory; that organisms<br />

<strong>and</strong> communities occupying that river have evolved <strong>and</strong> adapted their life cycles to<br />

flow conditions over a long period of pre-development history (Stanford et al. 1996).<br />

Thus with limited biological knowledge of flow requirements, the best alternative is to<br />

recreate the hydrographic conditions under which communities have existed prior to<br />

disturbance of the flow regime." Although in most cases, the District does not<br />

expect to recreate pre-disturbance hydrographic conditions through MFL<br />

1-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!