Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Water</strong> Management District typically develops multiple flow requirements when<br />
establishing minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels (Chapter 40-C8, F.A.C) <strong>and</strong> for the Wekiva<br />
<strong>River</strong> noted that, “[s]etting multiple minimum levels <strong>and</strong> flows, rather than a single<br />
minimum level <strong>and</strong> flow, recognizes that lotic [running water] systems are inherently<br />
dynamic” (Hupalo et al. 1994).<br />
1.4 Ecologic Integrity <strong>and</strong> Significant Harm<br />
“A goal of ecosystem management is to sustain ecosystem integrity by protecting<br />
native biodiversity <strong>and</strong> the ecological (<strong>and</strong> evolutionary) processes that create <strong>and</strong><br />
maintain that diversity. Faced with the complexity inherent in natural systems,<br />
achieving that goal will require that resource managers explicitly describe desired<br />
ecosystem structure, function, <strong>and</strong> variability; characterize differences between<br />
current <strong>and</strong> desired conditions; define ecologically meaningful <strong>and</strong> measurable<br />
indicators that can mark progress toward ecosystem management <strong>and</strong> restoration<br />
goals; <strong>and</strong> incorporate adaptive strategies into resource management plans”<br />
(Richter et al. 1996). Although it is clear that multiple flows are needed to maintain<br />
the ecological systems that encompass streams, riparian zones <strong>and</strong> valleys, much of<br />
the fundamental research needed to quantify the ecological links between the<br />
instream <strong>and</strong> out of bank resources, because of expense <strong>and</strong> complexity, remains to<br />
be done. This research is needed to develop more refined methodologies, <strong>and</strong> will<br />
require a multi-disciplinary approach involving hydrologists, geomorphologists,<br />
aquatic <strong>and</strong> terrestrial biologists, <strong>and</strong> botanists (Hill et al. 1991).<br />
To justify adoption of a minimum flow for purposes of maintaining ecologic integrity,<br />
it will be necessary to demonstrate with site-specific information the effects that<br />
implementation <strong>and</strong> compliance with the proposed MFLs will have. As described in<br />
<strong>Florida</strong>’s legislative requirement to develop minimum flows, the minimum flow is to<br />
prevent “significant harm” to the state’s rivers <strong>and</strong> streams. Not only must<br />
“significant harm” be defined so that it can be measured; this also implies that some<br />
deviation from the purely natural or existing long-term hydrologic regime must occur<br />
before significant harm occurs. The goal of a minimum flow would, therefore, not be<br />
to preserve a hydrologic regime without modification, but rather to establish the<br />
threshold(s) at which modifications to the regime begin to affect the aquatic resource<br />
<strong>and</strong> at what level significant harm occurs. If recent changes have already<br />
“significantly harmed” the resource, it may be necessary to develop a recovery plan.<br />
1.5 Summary of the SWFWMD Approach for Developing <strong>Minimum</strong><br />
<strong>Flows</strong><br />
1.5.1 Elements of <strong>Minimum</strong> <strong>Flows</strong><br />
1-4