Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Water</strong> Resources Act of 1972, minimum flows are defined as “the minimum flow<br />
for a given watercourse shall be the limit at which further withdrawals would be<br />
significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area” (Section<br />
373.042 F.S.). A minimum level is defined as “the level of groundwater in an<br />
aquifer <strong>and</strong> the level of surface water at which further withdrawals would be<br />
significantly harmful to the water resources of the area.” Statutes provide that<br />
MFLs shall be calculated using the best available information.<br />
The process of analyzing minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels for the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>and</strong> Myakka rivers is<br />
built upon the analyses previously performed on the Upper Peace <strong>River</strong> (SWFWMD<br />
2002), peer reviewed by Gore et al. (2002), <strong>and</strong> more recently, on the Middle Peace <strong>River</strong><br />
(SWFWMD, 2005a), peer reviewed by Shaw et al. (2005). The <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>and</strong> Myakka MFL<br />
methodologies incorporate many of the recommendations of these earlier peer reviews, as<br />
well as key improvements developed by District staff. Establishment of minimum flows<br />
<strong>and</strong> levels generally is designed to define thresholds at which further withdrawals would<br />
produce significant harm to existing water resources <strong>and</strong> ecological conditions if these<br />
thresholds were exceeded in the future.<br />
This review follows the organization of the Charge to the Peer Review Panel <strong>and</strong> the<br />
structure of the draft report. It is the job of the Peer Review Panel to assess the strengths<br />
<strong>and</strong> weaknesses of the overall approach, its conclusions, <strong>and</strong> recommendations. This<br />
review is provided to the District with our encouragement to continue to enhance the<br />
scientific basis that is firmly established for the decision-making process by the<br />
SWFWMD. Combined comments <strong>and</strong> recommendations are given for the basic approach<br />
for analyzing <strong>and</strong> setting MFLs in both rivers, followed by separate comments on aspects<br />
unique to each river; i.e., approaches for setting MFLs for springs in the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
for dealing with agricultural flow augmentation that occurs in the Myakka <strong>River</strong>.<br />
Extensive editorial comments <strong>and</strong> suggestions to improve the draft reports on the <strong>Alafia</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> Myakka rivers are provided in the Appendices.<br />
1.0 THE CHARGE<br />
The charge to the Peer Review Panel contains five basic requirements:<br />
1. Review the District’s draft documents used to develop provisional minimum<br />
levels <strong>and</strong> flows for the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>and</strong> Myakka rivers.<br />
2. Review documents <strong>and</strong> other materials supporting the concepts <strong>and</strong> data<br />
presented in the draft document.<br />
3. Participate in an open (public) meeting at the District’s Tampa Service Office<br />
for the purpose of discussing directly all issues <strong>and</strong> concerns regarding the<br />
draft report with a goal of developing this report.<br />
4. Provide to the District a written report that includes a review of the data,<br />
Appendix A V