Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ... Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
973 to 3091 ft. Local (cross-section site) flows needed to overflow the river's banks ranged from 566 to 2445 cfs (see Appendix RH for channel bank and other floodplain feature elevations and associated flows). Mean flow at the Lithia gage corresponding to the flow necessary for exceeding the elevation of the lowest bank on either side of the river averaged 1160 cfs; flows at the gage that would be sufficient for the river to overflow both banks averaged 2269 cfs (Table 5-1). Elevation (feet) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -1600 -1400 -1200 -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 Cumulative Length (feet) Figure 5-4. Elevation profile for floodplain vegetation cross-section (transect) 49. Distances (cumulative length) are shown centered on the middle of the river channel. Six vegetation classes were identified at the floodplain vegetation cross-section sites and their mean elevations at each transect are indicated in Figure 5-5. Detailed descriptions of the vegetation classes, which include Cypress/Palm Swamp, Cypress Swamp, Hardwood Swamp, Wet Hardwood Hammock, Dry Palm Bank and Dry Hardwood Hammock, are provided in PBS&J (2004). Mean elevations of vegetation classes were not related to location along the river channel and there were no apparent differences between "upstream" or "downstream" vegetation classes in the study. Consequently, elevation data were normalized to channel elevations at each transect for further comparisons. Normalized mean elevations for Cypress Palm Swamps, Cypress Swamps and Hardwood Swamps did not differ, but the swamp classes were found at lower elevations than the Wet Hardwood Hammocks (Wilcoxon Signed Rank, S=-13, p
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 T20 T21 T27 T32 T49 T51 T60 T64 Downstream Upstream Cypress/ Palm Sw amp Cypress Sw amp Hardw ood Sw amp Wet Hardw ood Hammock Dry Palm Bank Dry Hardw ood Hammock Figure 5-5. Mean elevations of six vegetation classes at eight Alafia River floodplain crosssections (transects). Inundation of the highest floodplain vegetation class would require local (crosssection site) flows of 2878 cfs or more (flows for only two cross-sections could be calculated, elevations for other sites were higher than could be modeled with the HEC-RES floodplain model; see Appendix RH). Corresponding flows of 3334 cfs or higher at the USGS Lithia gage would be required to inundate the highest floodplain vegetation classes (Table 5-1). Inundation of the mean elevation associated with the floodplain swamp classes (Cypress/Palm Swamp, Cypress Swamp, Hardwood Swamp) would occur when local flows range from 412 to 1478 cfs. Corresponding flows at the USGS Lithia gage would range from 529 to 1843 cfs, with a mean of 981 cfs (Table 5-1). To inundate the highest swamp class at each cross-section, flows ranging from 731 to 3233 (mean = 1480 cfs) would be required at the Lithia gage (Table 5-1). Floodplain wetted perimeter plots (patterned after the wetted perimeter plots used for identification of the Lowest Wetted Perimeter Inflection Point) were developed for each floodplain vegetation cross-section (see Appendix RH). The plots were developed to show the linear extent of inundated floodplain (wetted perimeter) associated with measured floodplain elevations, including the mean elevations of the floodplain vegetation classes. For example, Figure 5-6 shows a floodplain wetted perimeter plot for floodplain vegetation cross-section (transect) 51. Based on the plot, an average of 350 linear feet of floodplain would be inundated when the river is staged at the mean elevation of the Wet Hardwood Hammock vegetation class. Flows necessary to inundate the first major slope change at each transect were evaluated using the HEC-RAS model. Local flows 5-7
- Page 99 and 100: Peace River at Arcadia, FL 20 Phosp
- Page 101 and 102: Alafia River at Lithia, FL Nitrate/
- Page 103 and 104: 2.4.2 Potassium and Trend Analysis
- Page 105 and 106: Alafia River at Lithia, FL 14 Potas
- Page 107 and 108: Table 2-10. Results of Kendall's ta
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 3 Ecological Resources of C
- Page 111 and 112: 1) maintenance of minimum water dep
- Page 113 and 114: flow regimes and these life history
- Page 115 and 116: subsidy of water and nutrients that
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Technical Approach for Es
- Page 119 and 120: 4.2.1 HEC-RAS Cross-Sections Cross
- Page 121 and 122: PHABSIM analysis required acquisiti
- Page 123 and 124: Figure 4-5. Upstream vegetation cro
- Page 125 and 126: level, whenever possible. Immature
- Page 127 and 128: major parameter altered during the
- Page 129 and 130: Alafia River - Cross Section 64 - W
- Page 131 and 132: Delphi method lacks the rapid feedb
- Page 133 and 134: TOTAL DAYS OF INUNDATION DURING THE
- Page 135 and 136: Period of Record Median Daily Flows
- Page 137 and 138: Wetted Perimeter - USGS 84.5 - SWFW
- Page 139 and 140: Alafia River Station 91.5 Stage in
- Page 141 and 142: section sites and corresponding flo
- Page 143 and 144: 4.9.1.2 Recreational Use Assessment
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 5 Results and Recommended M
- Page 147 and 148: greater than 25 cfs would inundate
- Page 149: For the USGS Lithia gage site, the
- Page 153 and 154: Wetted Perimeter (linear feet) 2000
- Page 155 and 156: dominant vegetation zones, mucky so
- Page 157 and 158: 5.5.1 Application of PHABSIM for Bl
- Page 159 and 160: 5.5.3 Flow Relationships with Woody
- Page 161 and 162: River begins on October 28 and ends
- Page 163 and 164: Table 5-4. Maximum monthly percent-
- Page 165 and 166: 5.6.3 Short-Term Compliance Standar
- Page 167 and 168: Table 5-5. Maximum monthly percent-
- Page 169 and 170: 5.8 Short-Term Compliance Standard
- Page 171 and 172: Table 5-7. Proposed Minimum Flows f
- Page 173 and 174: Biological Services Program Report
- Page 175 and 176: Jones, G.W., and Upchurch, S.B., 19
- Page 177 and 178: SDI Environmental Services, Inc. 20
- Page 179 and 180: Upchurch, S.B. and J.R. Littlefield
- Page 181 and 182: A Review of “Alafia River Minimum
- Page 183 and 184: The draft report for setting MFLs f
- Page 185 and 186: methodologies, analyses, and conclu
- Page 187 and 188: The SWFWMD has employed a building
- Page 189 and 190: MFLs for the Alafia and Myakka rive
- Page 191 and 192: RALPH PLOTS AND ANALYSES Recent and
- Page 193 and 194: then used to estimate percent of fl
- Page 195 and 196: necessary. Such a framework should
- Page 197 and 198: to use to meet the criteria of no s
- Page 199 and 200: Shaw, D.T., C.N. Dahm, and S.W. Gol
973 to 3091 ft. Local (cross-section site) flows needed to overflow the river's<br />
banks ranged from 566 to 2445 cfs (see Appendix RH for channel bank <strong>and</strong><br />
other floodplain feature elevations <strong>and</strong> associated flows). Mean flow at the Lithia<br />
gage corresponding to the flow necessary for exceeding the elevation of the<br />
lowest bank on either side of the river averaged 1160 cfs; flows at the gage that<br />
would be sufficient for the river to overflow both banks averaged 2269 cfs (Table<br />
5-1).<br />
Elevation (feet)<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
-1600 -1400 -1200 -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400<br />
Cumulative Length (feet)<br />
Figure 5-4. Elevation profile for floodplain vegetation cross-section (transect) 49.<br />
Distances (cumulative length) are shown centered on the middle of the river channel.<br />
Six vegetation classes were identified at the floodplain vegetation cross-section<br />
sites <strong>and</strong> their mean elevations at each transect are indicated in Figure 5-5.<br />
Detailed descriptions of the vegetation classes, which include Cypress/Palm<br />
Swamp, Cypress Swamp, Hardwood Swamp, Wet Hardwood Hammock, Dry<br />
Palm Bank <strong>and</strong> Dry Hardwood Hammock, are provided in PBS&J (2004). Mean<br />
elevations of vegetation classes were not related to location along the river<br />
channel <strong>and</strong> there were no apparent differences between "upstream" or<br />
"downstream" vegetation classes in the study. Consequently, elevation data were<br />
normalized to channel elevations at each transect for further comparisons.<br />
Normalized mean elevations for Cypress Palm Swamps, Cypress Swamps <strong>and</strong><br />
Hardwood Swamps did not differ, but the swamp classes were found at lower<br />
elevations than the Wet Hardwood Hammocks (Wilcoxon Signed Rank, S=-13,<br />
p