Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...

Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ... Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...

swfwmd.state.fl.us
from swfwmd.state.fl.us More from this publisher
07.09.2014 Views

Executive Summary The Southwest Florida Water Management District, by virtue of its responsibility to permit the consumptive use of water and a legislative mandate to protect water resources from "significant harm," has been directed to establish minimum flows and levels (MFLs) for streams and rivers within its boundaries (Section 373.042, Florida Statutes). As currently defined by statute, "the minimum flow for a given watercourse shall be the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area. In this report, minimum flows are being proposed for the freshwater segment of the Alafia River and for two springs (Lithia and Buckhorn) that discharge to the river. Fundamental to the approach used for development of minimum flows and levels is the realization that a flow regime is necessary to protect the ecology of the river system. The initial step in this process requires an understanding of historic and current flow conditions to assess to what extent withdrawals or other anthropogenic factors have affected flows. To accomplish this task, the District has evaluated the effects of climatic oscillations on regional river flows and has identified two benchmark periods for evaluation of flows in the Alafia River. It has also been demonstrated that flow declines in the Alafia River, which have been ascribed to human causes by some investigators, are largely a function of climatic variation. For development of MFLs for the Alafia River, the District identified seasonal blocks corresponding to periods of low, medium and high flows. Short-term minimum flow compliance standards for the Lithia Springs gage site were developed for each of these periods using a "building block" approach. The compliance standards include prescribed flow reductions based on limiting potential changes in aquatic and wetland habitat availability that may be associated with seasonal changes in flow. Low flow thresholds, based on fish passage depth and wetted perimeter inflection points, are also incorporated into the short-term compliance standards. The low flow threshold is defined to be a flow that serves to limit withdrawals, with no withdrawals permitted unless the threshold is exceeded. For the Lithia gage site, the low flow threshold was determined to be 59 cubic feet per second (cfs). A Prescribed Flow Reduction for the low flow period (Block 1, which runs from April 20 through June 24) was based on review of limiting factors developed using the Physical Habitat Simulation Model (PHABSIM) to model potential changes in habitat availability for several fish species and macroinvertebrate diversity. It was determined using PHABSIM that the most restrictive limiting factor was the fry of largemouth bass for the Lithia gage. Simulated reductions in historic flows greater than 10% resulted in more than a 15% loss of available habitat at sites upstream from the Lithia gage site. Using this limiting factor, the prescribed flow reduction for the Lithia site during the low flow period was defined as a 10% reduction in xiv

flow, with the exception that withdrawals should not be allowed to reduce the flow to less than 59 cfs at the Lithia gage site. For the high flow season of the year (Block 3, which runs from June 25 to October 27), a prescribed flow reduction was based on review of limiting factors developed using the HEC-RAS floodplain model and Regional and Long Term Positional Hydrographic (RALPH) analyses to evaluate percent of flow reductions associated with changes in the number of days of inundation of floodplain features. It was determined that a stepped flow reduction of 13% and 8% of historic flows, with the step occurring at the 25% exceedance flow (374 cfs), resulted in a decrease of 15% or more in the number of days that flows would inundate floodplain features at the Lithia gage. Using these limiting factors, prescribed flow reductions consistent with the stepped flow reductions described above were established, with the exception that withdrawals should not be allowed to reduce the flow to less than 59 cfs at the Lithia gage site. For the medium flow period (Block 2, which runs from October 28 of one year to April 19 of the next), PHABSIM analyses were used to model flows associated with potential changes in habitat availability for several fish species and macroinvertebrate diversity. In addition, flows associated with inundation of instream woody habitats were evaluated using the HEC-RAS model and RALPH analyses. Using the more conservative of the two resulting flows, it was determined that woody habitat would define the percent flow reduction. It was determined that a flow of 255 cfs at the USGS Lithia gage is required for inundation to the mean elevation of exposed root habitat. Using these limiting factors, the prescribed flow reduction during the medium flow period was defined as a 15% reduction in flow at the Lithia gage site, with the exception that withdrawals would not be allowed to reduce flow at the Lithia site below 59 cfs. Because minimum flows are intended to protect the water resources or ecology of an area and because climatic variation can influence river flow regimes, we developed long-term compliance standard for the Alafia River gage site at the Lithia gage. The standards are hydrologic statistics that represent flows that may be expected to occur during long-term periods when short term-compliance standards are being met. The long-term compliance standards were generated using gage-specific historic flow records and the short-term compliance standards. For the analyses, the entire flow record for each site was altered by the maximum allowable flow reductions in accordance with the prescribed flow reductions and the low flow threshold. Hydrologic statistics for the resulting altered flow data sets, including five and ten-year mean and median flows were determined and identified as long-term compliance standards. Because these long-term compliance standards were developed using the short-term compliance standards and the historic flow records, it may be expected that the long-term standards will be met if compliance with short-term standards is achieved. xv

flow, with the exception that withdrawals should not be allowed to reduce the flow<br />

to less than 59 cfs at the Lithia gage site.<br />

For the high flow season of the year (Block 3, which runs from June 25 to October<br />

27), a prescribed flow reduction was based on review of limiting factors developed<br />

using the HEC-RAS floodplain model <strong>and</strong> Regional <strong>and</strong> Long Term Positional<br />

Hydrographic (RALPH) analyses to evaluate percent of flow reductions associated<br />

with changes in the number of days of inundation of floodplain features. It was<br />

determined that a stepped flow reduction of 13% <strong>and</strong> 8% of historic flows, with the<br />

step occurring at the 25% exceedance flow (374 cfs), resulted in a decrease of<br />

15% or more in the number of days that flows would inundate floodplain features<br />

at the Lithia gage. Using these limiting factors, prescribed flow reductions<br />

consistent with the stepped flow reductions described above were established,<br />

with the exception that withdrawals should not be allowed to reduce the flow to<br />

less than 59 cfs at the Lithia gage site.<br />

For the medium flow period (Block 2, which runs from October 28 of one year to<br />

April 19 of the next), PHABSIM analyses were used to model flows associated<br />

with potential changes in habitat availability for several fish species <strong>and</strong><br />

macroinvertebrate diversity. In addition, flows associated with inundation of<br />

instream woody habitats were evaluated using the HEC-RAS model <strong>and</strong> RALPH<br />

analyses. Using the more conservative of the two resulting flows, it was<br />

determined that woody habitat would define the percent flow reduction. It was<br />

determined that a flow of 255 cfs at the USGS Lithia gage is required for<br />

inundation to the mean elevation of exposed root habitat. Using these limiting<br />

factors, the prescribed flow reduction during the medium flow period was defined<br />

as a 15% reduction in flow at the Lithia gage site, with the exception that<br />

withdrawals would not be allowed to reduce flow at the Lithia site below 59 cfs.<br />

Because minimum flows are intended to protect the water resources or ecology of<br />

an area <strong>and</strong> because climatic variation can influence river flow regimes, we<br />

developed long-term compliance st<strong>and</strong>ard for the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> gage site at the<br />

Lithia gage. The st<strong>and</strong>ards are hydrologic statistics that represent flows that may<br />

be expected to occur during long-term periods when short term-compliance<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards are being met. The long-term compliance st<strong>and</strong>ards were generated<br />

using gage-specific historic flow records <strong>and</strong> the short-term compliance<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards. For the analyses, the entire flow record for each site was altered by<br />

the maximum allowable flow reductions in accordance with the prescribed flow<br />

reductions <strong>and</strong> the low flow threshold. Hydrologic statistics for the resulting<br />

altered flow data sets, including five <strong>and</strong> ten-year mean <strong>and</strong> median flows were<br />

determined <strong>and</strong> identified as long-term compliance st<strong>and</strong>ards. Because these<br />

long-term compliance st<strong>and</strong>ards were developed using the short-term compliance<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> the historic flow records, it may be expected that the long-term<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards will be met if compliance with short-term st<strong>and</strong>ards is achieved.<br />

xv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!