Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ... Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Table 4-2. Beginning and ending dates for annual flow Blocks 1, 2, and 3 for the Alafia, Hillsborough, Myakka and Peace Rivers for non-leap years. Start Date (Julian day) End Date (Julian Day) Number of Days Block 1 April 20 (110) June 25 (176) 66 Block 2 October 27 (300) April 19 (109) 175 Block 3 June 26 (177) October 26 (299) 123 4.5 Low Flow Threshold for the Alafia As part of the protection of the flow regime, minimum flows and levels are intended to protect aquatic resources associated with low flows. To accomplish this goal, it is necessary to develop a low flow threshold, which identifies flows that are to be protected in their entirety (i.e., flows that are not available for consumptive-use). To determine this threshold, two low flow standards are developed. One is based on the lowest wetted perimeter inflection point; the other is based on maintaining fish passage along the river corridor. The low flow threshold is established at the higher of the two flow standards. Although flows less than the low flow threshold may be expected to occur throughout the year, they are most likely to occur during Block 1 (Figure 4-10). 4.5.1 Wetted Perimeter Standard Output from multiple runs of the HEC-RAS channel model were used to generate a wetted perimeter versus flow plot for each HEC-RAS cross-section of the Alafia River corridor (see Figure 4-11 as an example, Appendix WP). Plots were visually examined for inflection points, which identify flow ranges that are associated with relatively large changes in wetted perimeter. The Lowest Wetted Perimeter Inflection Point (LWPIP) for flows up to 200 cfs was identified for each cross-section. Inflection points for flows higher than 200 cfs were disregarded since the goal was to identify the LWPIP for flows contained within the stream channel. Many cross-section plots displayed no apparent inflection points between the lowest modeled flow and 200 cfs. These cross-sections were located in areas where the water surface elevation may exceed the lowest wetted perimeter inflection point even during low flow periods. For these cross-sections, the LWPIP was established at the lowest modeled flow. Flows associated with the LWPIP at each cross-section were converted to flows at the USGS Lithia Gage using empirical relationships from HEC-RAS channel model output. Flow at the USGS Lithia gage that was sufficient to inundate the LWPIP at all sampled cross-sections was used to define the wetted perimeter low flow standard for the Alafia River corridor. 4-20
Wetted Perimeter - USGS 84.5 - SWFWMD Shoal 9 4000 3500 3000 Flow (cfs) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Wetted Perimeter (feet) Wetted Perimeter - USGS 84.5 - SWFWMD Shoal 9 Flows less than 200 cfs 200 Flow (cfs) 150 100 50 0 15 cfs 0 50 100 150 200 Wetted Perimeter (feet) Figure 4-11. Discharge at HEC-RAS transect number 84.5 (Shoal 9). Wetted perimeter values for the entire range of modeled flows are shown in the upper plot; values for modeled flows up to 200 cfs are shown in the lower plot. 4-21
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 2-25. Lithia Springs Major b
- Page 87 and 88: 2.3.4.3.2 Discharge from Lithia Spr
- Page 89 and 90: Relationship Between Lithia Springs
- Page 91 and 92: Buckhorn Spring Main Discharge (Wit
- Page 93 and 94: versus flow. The third plot typical
- Page 95 and 96: Alafia River at Lithia, FL Phosphor
- Page 97 and 98: While elevated phosphorus concentra
- Page 99 and 100: Peace River at Arcadia, FL 20 Phosp
- Page 101 and 102: Alafia River at Lithia, FL Nitrate/
- Page 103 and 104: 2.4.2 Potassium and Trend Analysis
- Page 105 and 106: Alafia River at Lithia, FL 14 Potas
- Page 107 and 108: Table 2-10. Results of Kendall's ta
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 3 Ecological Resources of C
- Page 111 and 112: 1) maintenance of minimum water dep
- Page 113 and 114: flow regimes and these life history
- Page 115 and 116: subsidy of water and nutrients that
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Technical Approach for Es
- Page 119 and 120: 4.2.1 HEC-RAS Cross-Sections Cross
- Page 121 and 122: PHABSIM analysis required acquisiti
- Page 123 and 124: Figure 4-5. Upstream vegetation cro
- Page 125 and 126: level, whenever possible. Immature
- Page 127 and 128: major parameter altered during the
- Page 129 and 130: Alafia River - Cross Section 64 - W
- Page 131 and 132: Delphi method lacks the rapid feedb
- Page 133 and 134: TOTAL DAYS OF INUNDATION DURING THE
- Page 135: Period of Record Median Daily Flows
- Page 139 and 140: Alafia River Station 91.5 Stage in
- Page 141 and 142: section sites and corresponding flo
- Page 143 and 144: 4.9.1.2 Recreational Use Assessment
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 5 Results and Recommended M
- Page 147 and 148: greater than 25 cfs would inundate
- Page 149 and 150: For the USGS Lithia gage site, the
- Page 151 and 152: 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 T20 T21 T27 T3
- Page 153 and 154: Wetted Perimeter (linear feet) 2000
- Page 155 and 156: dominant vegetation zones, mucky so
- Page 157 and 158: 5.5.1 Application of PHABSIM for Bl
- Page 159 and 160: 5.5.3 Flow Relationships with Woody
- Page 161 and 162: River begins on October 28 and ends
- Page 163 and 164: Table 5-4. Maximum monthly percent-
- Page 165 and 166: 5.6.3 Short-Term Compliance Standar
- Page 167 and 168: Table 5-5. Maximum monthly percent-
- Page 169 and 170: 5.8 Short-Term Compliance Standard
- Page 171 and 172: Table 5-7. Proposed Minimum Flows f
- Page 173 and 174: Biological Services Program Report
- Page 175 and 176: Jones, G.W., and Upchurch, S.B., 19
- Page 177 and 178: SDI Environmental Services, Inc. 20
- Page 179 and 180: Upchurch, S.B. and J.R. Littlefield
- Page 181 and 182: A Review of “Alafia River Minimum
- Page 183 and 184: The draft report for setting MFLs f
- Page 185 and 186: methodologies, analyses, and conclu
Table 4-2. Beginning <strong>and</strong> ending dates for annual flow Blocks 1, 2, <strong>and</strong> 3 for the <strong>Alafia</strong>,<br />
Hillsborough, Myakka <strong>and</strong> Peace <strong>River</strong>s for non-leap years.<br />
Start Date (Julian day) End Date (Julian Day) Number of Days<br />
Block 1 April 20 (110) June 25 (176) 66<br />
Block 2 October 27 (300) April 19 (109) 175<br />
Block 3 June 26 (177) October 26 (299) 123<br />
4.5 Low Flow Threshold for the <strong>Alafia</strong><br />
As part of the protection of the flow regime, minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels are<br />
intended to protect aquatic resources associated with low flows. To accomplish<br />
this goal, it is necessary to develop a low flow threshold, which identifies flows<br />
that are to be protected in their entirety (i.e., flows that are not available for<br />
consumptive-use). To determine this threshold, two low flow st<strong>and</strong>ards are<br />
developed. One is based on the lowest wetted perimeter inflection point; the<br />
other is based on maintaining fish passage along the river corridor. The low flow<br />
threshold is established at the higher of the two flow st<strong>and</strong>ards. Although flows<br />
less than the low flow threshold may be expected to occur throughout the year,<br />
they are most likely to occur during Block 1 (Figure 4-10).<br />
4.5.1 Wetted Perimeter St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
Output from multiple runs of the HEC-RAS channel model were used to generate<br />
a wetted perimeter versus flow plot for each HEC-RAS cross-section of the <strong>Alafia</strong><br />
<strong>River</strong> corridor (see Figure 4-11 as an example, Appendix WP). Plots were<br />
visually examined for inflection points, which identify flow ranges that are<br />
associated with relatively large changes in wetted perimeter. The Lowest Wetted<br />
Perimeter Inflection Point (LWPIP) for flows up to 200 cfs was identified for each<br />
cross-section. Inflection points for flows higher than 200 cfs were disregarded<br />
since the goal was to identify the LWPIP for flows contained within the stream<br />
channel. Many cross-section plots displayed no apparent inflection points<br />
between the lowest modeled flow <strong>and</strong> 200 cfs. These cross-sections were<br />
located in areas where the water surface elevation may exceed the lowest wetted<br />
perimeter inflection point even during low flow periods. For these cross-sections,<br />
the LWPIP was established at the lowest modeled flow. <strong>Flows</strong> associated with<br />
the LWPIP at each cross-section were converted to flows at the USGS Lithia<br />
Gage using empirical relationships from HEC-RAS channel model output. Flow<br />
at the USGS Lithia gage that was sufficient to inundate the LWPIP at all sampled<br />
cross-sections was used to define the wetted perimeter low flow st<strong>and</strong>ard for the<br />
<strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> corridor.<br />
4-20