Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
Alafia River Minimum Flows and Levels - Southwest Florida Water ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a 15% change in habitat availability as a measure of unacceptable loss, it is<br />
important to note that percentage changes employed for other instream flow<br />
determinations have ranged from 10% to 33%. For example, Dunbar et al.<br />
(1998) in reference to the use of PHABSIM noted, "an alternative approach is to<br />
select the flow giving 80% habitat exceedance percentile," which is equivalent to<br />
a 20% decrease. Jowett (1993) used a guideline of one-third loss (i.e., retention<br />
of two-thirds) of existing habitat at naturally occurring low flows, but<br />
acknowledged that, "[n]o methodology exists for the selection of a percentage<br />
loss of "natural" habitat which would be considered acceptable." The state of<br />
Texas utilized a target decrease of less then 20% of the historic average in<br />
establishing a MFL for Matagorda Bay ( http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/texaswater/<br />
coastal/freashwater/matagorda/matagorda.phtml).<br />
3.2 Resources <strong>and</strong> Area of Concern<br />
The resources addressed by the District's minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels analyses<br />
include the surface waters <strong>and</strong> biological communities associated with the river<br />
system, including the river channel <strong>and</strong> its floodplain. A river system is<br />
physiographically complex, with a me<strong>and</strong>ering channel <strong>and</strong> associated floodplain<br />
wetl<strong>and</strong>s. This hydrologic <strong>and</strong> physical setting provides habitat for a diverse<br />
array of plant <strong>and</strong> animal populations. Because "[a]quatic species have evolved<br />
life history strategies primarily in direct response to the natural flow regimes"<br />
(Bunn <strong>and</strong> Arthington 2002), a primary objective of minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels<br />
analysis is to provide for the hydrologic requirements of biological communities<br />
associated with the river system. Human uses of the natural resources are also<br />
an important consideration for the establishment of minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels.<br />
Such uses include fishing, swimming, wildlife observation, aesthetic enjoyment,<br />
<strong>and</strong> boating.<br />
3.3 Resource Management Goals <strong>and</strong> Key Habitat Indicators<br />
The SWFWMD approach for setting minimum flows <strong>and</strong> levels is habitat-based.<br />
Because river systems include a great variety of aquatic <strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong> habitats<br />
that support a diversity of biological communities, it is necessary to identify key<br />
habitats for consideration, <strong>and</strong>, when possible, determine the hydrologic<br />
requirements for the specific biotic assemblages associated with the habitats. It<br />
is assumed that addressing these management goals will also provide for other<br />
ecological functions of the river system that are more difficult to quantify, such as<br />
organic matter transport <strong>and</strong> the maintenance of river channel geomorphology.<br />
Resource management goals for the <strong>Alafia</strong> <strong>River</strong> addressed by our minimum<br />
flows analysis include:<br />
3-2