The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Salinity (ppt) 20 15 10 5 Average Daily Salinity Values: Sulphur Springs Pool and Run Run Pool 0 40 Daily Pumpage (cfs) Pumpage (cfs) 30 20 10 BSalRu nSSPum p.grf 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year Figure 3-5. Average daily salinity values for the spring pool and the data recorder in the upper spring run over pumpage from the pool for 1999 – 2002. 3 - 6
DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Salinity (ppt) 20 15 10 5 Average Daily Salinity Values: Sulphur Springs Pool and Mouth Pool Mouth 0 40 Daily Pumpage (cfs) Pumpage (cfs) 30 20 10 BSalMthSSP ump.g rf 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year Figure 3-6. Average daily salinity values for the spring pool and the data recorder at the spring mouth over pumpage from the pool for 1999 – 2002. 3 - 7
- Page 24 and 25: CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND OF
- Page 26 and 27: DRAFT water, or aquifer, provided t
- Page 28: DRAFT one the indicators were the f
- Page 31 and 32: DRAFT The spring and its run lie in
- Page 33 and 34: DRAFT Figure 2-3. Recent photograph
- Page 35 and 36: 2 - 6 DRAFT
- Page 37 and 38: DRAFT -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.4 4
- Page 39 and 40: DRAFT 10.0 Yrly_Pumpage.grf 15 Annu
- Page 41 and 42: DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 35 D
- Page 43 and 44: DRAFT Figure 2-14. Return flow stru
- Page 45 and 46: DRAFT 40 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Ju
- Page 47 and 48: DRAFT due to withdrawals for public
- Page 49 and 50: DRAFT Figure 2-19 . Temporal trend
- Page 51 and 52: DRAFT Figure 2-20. Temporal trends
- Page 53: DRAFT In comparison to specific con
- Page 57 and 58: DRAFT average daily withdrawals for
- Page 59 and 60: DRAFT Figure 2-25. Average specific
- Page 61 and 62: DRAFT withdrawal rate of 31 cfs dur
- Page 63 and 64: DRAFT Table 2-2. Sulphur Springs su
- Page 65 and 66: DRAFT These plots indicate that his
- Page 67 and 68: DRAFT CHAPTER 3 ECOLOGICAL RESOURCE
- Page 69 and 70: DRAFT 3 Run_Riv_Stg.grf Water Surfa
- Page 71: DRAFT 3.4 Salinity in the spring ru
- Page 75 and 76: DRAFT pumping events resulted in sa
- Page 77 and 78: DRAFT As discussed in Section 2.5.3
- Page 79 and 80: DRAFT tolerate and are frequently f
- Page 81 and 82: DRAFT Appendix B are color coded to
- Page 83 and 84: DRAFT habitat in the lower river pr
- Page 85 and 86: DRAFT The FWC using a modified stra
- Page 87 and 88: DRAFT increased with a return to no
- Page 89 and 90: DRAFT 2000. The results from three
- Page 91 and 92: DRAFT species (10 to 13) were colle
- Page 93 and 94: DRAFT 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
- Page 95 and 96: DRAFT . 1000.00 100.00 10.00 1.00 0
- Page 97 and 98: DRAFT 3.9.2 The effects of flows fr
- Page 99 and 100: DRAFT Data from the Tampa Bay Water
- Page 101 and 102: DRAFT EPCHC Period of Record Data L
- Page 103 and 104: DRAFT 35 30 1996 1997 1998 1999 200
- Page 105 and 106: 7 DRAFT Elevation (m) 1 0 -1 -2 -3
- Page 107 and 108: 8 24 25 29 DRAFT Figure 3-20, 3-21
- Page 109 and 110: DRAFT Figure 3-22 HBMP & EPCHC 2000
- Page 111 and 112: DRAFT of the river between the dam
- Page 113 and 114: DRAFT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11
- Page 115 and 116: DRAFT The HBMP project (PBSJ 2003)
- Page 117 and 118: DRAFT xanthurus) red drum (Sciaenop
- Page 119 and 120: DRAFT as manatees seek fresh water
- Page 121 and 122: 1999 2000 2001 2002 DRAFT 35 TmpSS_
DRAFT<br />
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Salinity (ppt)<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
Average Daily Salinity Values:<br />
<strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> Pool and Run<br />
Run<br />
Pool<br />
0<br />
40<br />
Daily Pumpage (cfs)<br />
Pumpage (cfs)<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
BSalRu nSSPum p.grf<br />
0<br />
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Year<br />
Figure 3-5. Average daily salinity values <strong>for</strong> the spring pool and the data recorder in the upper<br />
spring run over pumpage from the pool <strong>for</strong> 1999 – 2002.<br />
3 - 6