07.09.2014 Views

The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa

The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa

The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DRAFT<br />

withdrawal rate <strong>of</strong> 31 cfs during April 26 to May 11 and two days in late May. <strong>The</strong> effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> these higher pumping rates on lowering water levels are apparent. For most <strong>of</strong> this<br />

experimental period, however, withdrawals were considerably smaller. Withdrawal rates<br />

near 10 cfs were maintained <strong>for</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 38 days between mid-April and mid-June. <strong>The</strong><br />

effect <strong>of</strong> the 10 cfs diversion rate on water levels in the pool were considerably less than<br />

withdrawals near the historic rate. In addition, a two-week period <strong>of</strong> pumping at a rate <strong>of</strong><br />

17 cfs began on June 20 th . Pumping at this rate lowered water levels in the pool to<br />

about 6.7 to 6.9 feet. A brief change to a pumping rate <strong>of</strong> 11 cfs on June 30 th resulted in<br />

a quick rebound in water levels.<br />

8<br />

Gage Height (ft)<br />

Daily Pumpage (cfs)<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Conductivity<br />

Pumpage<br />

Gage Height<br />

SSPmp_drwdwn3.grf<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

Conductivity (umho/cm)<br />

4/4/02 5/24/02 7/13/02 9/1/02<br />

Figure 2-27. Response <strong>of</strong> water levels and conductance to<br />

withdrawals after modification <strong>of</strong> water diversion facilities at <strong>Sulphur</strong><br />

<strong>Springs</strong>, March - September, 2002.<br />

Specific conductance values did not show a clear response to any <strong>of</strong> the withdrawal<br />

rates implemented during the experimental period. Similar to the seasonal trend shown<br />

in Figure 2-20, conductance values declined during April to reach minimum values in<br />

May and then rebounded in June. Changes in withdrawals rates showed very little effect<br />

on this seasonal pattern. This lack <strong>of</strong> response may have been related to the brief<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> the high pumping events, or that much <strong>of</strong> the pumping was done at lesser<br />

withdrawal rates.<br />

2 - 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!