The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4.5 Goal 1 – Minimize the incursion <strong>of</strong> high salinity river water into the upper spring run. ......................................................................... 4-4 4.6 Goal 2 - Maintain low salinity habitats in the Lower Hillsborough River .................................................................................................. 4-5 4.6.1 Distribution and volume <strong>of</strong>
Page 1 and 2: The Determination of Minimum Flows
Page 4 and 5: DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tab
Page 8: DRAFT LIST OF TABLES Chapter 2 - Ph
Page 11 and 12: Fig. 2-21 Temporal trend of specifi
Page 13 and 14: Fig. 3-25 Fig. 3-26 Fig. 3-27 Fig.
Page 15 and 16: Fig. 5-22 Average daily water level
Page 17 and 18: DRAFT TKN TN TOC TOC TSS UF USDA US
Page 19 and 20: DRAFT biological sampling in the sp
Page 22: DRAFT Acknowledgments This report i
Page 25 and 26: 1 - 2 DRAFT at which further withdr
Page 27 and 28: 1 - 4 DRAFT Lastly, the effects of
Page 30 and 31: DRAFT CHAPTER 2 PHYSICAL AND HYDROL
Page 32 and 33: DRAFT Problems with high coliform b
Page 34 and 35: DRAFT Figure 2-5. Diagram of Sulphu
Page 36 and 37: -4 -3 -2 DRAFT A bathymetric map of
Page 38 and 39: DRAFT Diversions from Sulphur Sprin
Page 40 and 41: DRAFT For the evaluation of minimum
Page 42 and 43: DRAFT The minimum flow rule for the
Page 44 and 45: DRAFT Formation and act as a hydrol
Page 46 and 47: DRAFT apparently declined over time
Page 48 and 49: DRAFT There is evidence that flows
Page 50 and 51: DRAFT Since April 1999, the USGS ha
Page 52 and 53: DRAFT Figure 2-21. Temporal trend o
Page 56 and 57:
DRAFT 7000 8 6000 7 Specific Conduc
Page 58 and 59:
DRAFT 8 A Gage Height (ft) Daily Pu
Page 60 and 61:
DRAFT While visually compelling, th
Page 62 and 63:
DRAFT The experimental withdrawals
Page 64 and 65:
DRAFT In the absence of pollution,
Page 66 and 67:
DRAFT Table 2-4. Results of Kruskal
Page 68 and 69:
DRAFT 3.3 Tidal water level fluctua
Page 70 and 71:
DRAFT Figure 3-3. Stage duration cu
Page 72 and 73:
DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Page 74 and 75:
DRAFT Table 3-1 Summary statistics
Page 76 and 77:
DRAFT duration of low flows and the
Page 78 and 79:
DRAFT northern shore of the upper s
Page 80 and 81:
DRAFT 3.7.3.3 Results of FWC qualit
Page 82 and 83:
DRAFT waters. Other species that oc
Page 84 and 85:
DRAFT abundance estimates in number
Page 86 and 87:
DRAFT Crustaceans also increased gr
Page 88 and 89:
DRAFT and possibly even high sulfid
Page 90 and 91:
DRAFT Table 3-2. Number of individu
Page 92 and 93:
DRAFT 3.9 Relationships of Sulphur
Page 94 and 95:
DRAFT 400 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980
Page 96 and 97:
DRAFT Figure 3-11. Time series of p
Page 98 and 99:
DRAFT data collection since the spr
Page 100 and 101:
DRAFT Figure 3-13 HBMP & EPCHC 2000
Page 102 and 103:
DRAFT The 15-minute data from the U
Page 104 and 105:
DRAFT Figure 3-16 illustrates salin
Page 106 and 107:
23 24 28 29 DRAFT Figure 3-18, 3-19
Page 108 and 109:
DRAFT presented in this report. Dis
Page 110 and 111:
DRAFT Figure 3-23 EPCHC Period of R
Page 112 and 113:
4 15 DRAFT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Page 114 and 115:
DRAFT underway to test the effect o
Page 116 and 117:
DRAFT In general, these studies dem
Page 118 and 119:
DRAFT 3.11 Thermal characteristics
Page 120 and 121:
DRAFT 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Page 122 and 123:
DRAFT 3.11.2 Thermal characteristic
Page 124 and 125:
DRAFT 35 35 Median Water Temperatur
Page 126 and 127:
DRAFT February 2002 when there was
Page 128 and 129:
DRAFT Figure 3-32 4 3 2001 2002 200
Page 130 and 131:
DRAFT The effects of removing or re
Page 132 and 133:
DRAFT 4.3 Consideration of seasonal
Page 134 and 135:
DRAFT Lastly, the relationship betw
Page 136 and 137:
DRAFT brackish waters often extend
Page 138 and 139:
DRAFT brackish marsh plants such as
Page 141 and 142:
CHAPTER 5 RESULTS OF THE MINIMUM FL
Page 143 and 144:
DRAFT Table 5-1 includes dates and
Page 145 and 146:
DRAFT Figure 5-2. Location of verti
Page 147 and 148:
DRAFT Experiment Number 5 Experimen
Page 149 and 150:
DRAFT The number of days of record
Page 151 and 152:
DRAFT There were some flow rates ab
Page 153 and 154:
DRAFT Table 5-2 Number of days and
Page 155 and 156:
DRAFT the river do not penetrate th
Page 157 and 158:
DRAFT occurring. The data discussed
Page 159 and 160:
DRAFT Maximum Daily Stage Minimum D
Page 161 and 162:
DRAFT greatest (see Section 3.3.7.4
Page 163 and 164:
DRAFT prevent excessive expansions
Page 165 and 166:
DRAFT Table 5-3. Volumes of water <
Page 167 and 168:
DRAFT Scenarios 6 through 8 in Tabl
Page 169 and 170:
10 23 17 24 25 28 29 DRAFT Figure 1
Page 171 and 172:
8 10 22 22 23 25 28 29 DRAFT Figure
Page 173 and 174:
23 24 25 DRAFT Figure 20 - 21 Eleva
Page 175 and 176:
DRAFT The biological data collected
Page 177 and 178:
DRAFT Water levels dropped below 19
Page 179 and 180:
DRAFT 5.5.2 Methods and description
Page 181 and 182:
DRAFT Figure 5-23. Model domain for
Page 183 and 184:
DRAFT requirements of a thermal ref
Page 185 and 186:
DRAFT Figure Temp 24 (C) Sulphur Sp
Page 187 and 188:
DRAFT 5.5.8 Time series of water te
Page 189 and 190:
DRAFT Figure 27 Temp (C) 22 Sulphur
Page 191 and 192:
DRAFT toward the end of the dry sea
Page 193 and 194:
CHAPTER 6 LITERATURE CITED DRAFT Al
Page 195 and 196:
DRAFT Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological
Page 197:
DRAFT Southwest Florida Water Manag
Page 200 and 201:
Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 211:
APPENDIX B (from Chapter 3) Presenc
Page 214 and 215:
Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
Page 216 and 217:
Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
Page 219 and 220:
APPENDIX C (CHAPTER 3) SULPHUR SPRI
Page 221 and 222:
Appendix C. Percent composition of
Page 223:
Appendix C. Percent composition of
Page 226 and 227:
APPENDIX D. Percent composition of
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Appendix E. Abundance of macroinver
Page 234 and 235:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 241 and 242:
APPENDIX F (from Chapter 3) Summary
Page 243 and 244:
APPENDIX G (from Chapter 5) Daily v
Page 245:
Experiment Number 4 RUN MEAN RUN MI
Page 252 and 253:
Experiment Number 5
Page 255:
APPENDIX I (from Chapter 5) Daily v
Page 258 and 259:
04AUG2000 7.1 7.5 1.4 2.9 1.5 . 11.
Page 260 and 261:
14MAR2001 12.0 11.0 1.4 9.3 7.9 1.6
Page 262 and 263:
----------------------------------
show all

The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?