- Page 1 and 2:
The Determination of Minimum Flows
- Page 4 and 5:
DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tab
- Page 6:
4.5 Goal 1 - Minimize the incursion
- Page 10 and 11: DRAFT LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 2 - P
- Page 12 and 13: Fig. 3-13 Fig. 3-14 Fig. 3-15 Fig.
- Page 14 and 15: Fig. 5-7 Fig. 5-8 Fig. 5-9 Fig. 5-1
- Page 16 and 17: Acronyms and Definitions DRAFT AMO
- Page 18 and 19: DRAFT Executive Summary The Southwe
- Page 20: DRAFT below 19 feet NGVD of 1929. T
- Page 24 and 25: CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND OF
- Page 26 and 27: DRAFT water, or aquifer, provided t
- Page 28: DRAFT one the indicators were the f
- Page 31 and 32: DRAFT The spring and its run lie in
- Page 33 and 34: DRAFT Figure 2-3. Recent photograph
- Page 35 and 36: 2 - 6 DRAFT
- Page 37 and 38: DRAFT -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.4 4
- Page 39 and 40: DRAFT 10.0 Yrly_Pumpage.grf 15 Annu
- Page 41 and 42: DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 35 D
- Page 43 and 44: DRAFT Figure 2-14. Return flow stru
- Page 45 and 46: DRAFT 40 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Ju
- Page 47 and 48: DRAFT due to withdrawals for public
- Page 49 and 50: DRAFT Figure 2-19 . Temporal trend
- Page 51 and 52: DRAFT Figure 2-20. Temporal trends
- Page 53: DRAFT In comparison to specific con
- Page 57: DRAFT average daily withdrawals for
- Page 61 and 62: DRAFT withdrawal rate of 31 cfs dur
- Page 63 and 64: DRAFT Table 2-2. Sulphur Springs su
- Page 65 and 66: DRAFT These plots indicate that his
- Page 67 and 68: DRAFT CHAPTER 3 ECOLOGICAL RESOURCE
- Page 69 and 70: DRAFT 3 Run_Riv_Stg.grf Water Surfa
- Page 71 and 72: DRAFT 3.4 Salinity in the spring ru
- Page 73 and 74: DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
- Page 75 and 76: DRAFT pumping events resulted in sa
- Page 77 and 78: DRAFT As discussed in Section 2.5.3
- Page 79 and 80: DRAFT tolerate and are frequently f
- Page 81 and 82: DRAFT Appendix B are color coded to
- Page 83 and 84: DRAFT habitat in the lower river pr
- Page 85 and 86: DRAFT The FWC using a modified stra
- Page 87 and 88: DRAFT increased with a return to no
- Page 89 and 90: DRAFT 2000. The results from three
- Page 91 and 92: DRAFT species (10 to 13) were colle
- Page 93 and 94: DRAFT 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
- Page 95 and 96: DRAFT . 1000.00 100.00 10.00 1.00 0
- Page 97 and 98: DRAFT 3.9.2 The effects of flows fr
- Page 99 and 100: DRAFT Data from the Tampa Bay Water
- Page 101 and 102: DRAFT EPCHC Period of Record Data L
- Page 103 and 104: DRAFT 35 30 1996 1997 1998 1999 200
- Page 105 and 106: 7 DRAFT Elevation (m) 1 0 -1 -2 -3
- Page 107 and 108: 8 24 25 29 DRAFT Figure 3-20, 3-21
- Page 109 and 110:
DRAFT Figure 3-22 HBMP & EPCHC 2000
- Page 111 and 112:
DRAFT of the river between the dam
- Page 113 and 114:
DRAFT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11
- Page 115 and 116:
DRAFT The HBMP project (PBSJ 2003)
- Page 117 and 118:
DRAFT xanthurus) red drum (Sciaenop
- Page 119 and 120:
DRAFT as manatees seek fresh water
- Page 121 and 122:
1999 2000 2001 2002 DRAFT 35 TmpSS_
- Page 123 and 124:
DRAFT Platt Street 1974-2002 Columb
- Page 125 and 126:
DRAFT Median and minimum water temp
- Page 127 and 128:
DRAFT Figure 3-31 1999 2000 2001 20
- Page 129 and 130:
DRAFT Figure 3-33 2001 2002 2003 20
- Page 131 and 132:
DRAFT CHAPTER 4 TECHNICAL APPROACH
- Page 133 and 134:
DRAFT The sum of these consideratio
- Page 135 and 136:
DRAFT It is the conclusion of this
- Page 137 and 138:
DRAFT criteria. The
- Page 139:
DRAFT reach of the river 50 meters
- Page 142 and 143:
DRAFT of the dam. The experiments w
- Page 144 and 145:
DRAFT Salinity incursions above the
- Page 146 and 147:
DRAFT Figure 5-3. A - D. Box and wh
- Page 148 and 149:
DRAFT The results of the vertical p
- Page 150 and 151:
DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 152 and 153:
DRAFT Other breakpoints in the data
- Page 154 and 155:
DRAFT 40 Percent of Observations -
- Page 156 and 157:
DRAFT It is possible that infrequen
- Page 158 and 159:
DRAFT The effects of tide stage on
- Page 160 and 161:
DRAFT medians rise to near -0.2 fee
- Page 162 and 163:
DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 164 and 165:
DRAFT Sulphur Springs on salinity d
- Page 166 and 167:
7 29 DRAFT Elevation (m) 0/0cfs 1 0
- Page 168 and 169:
23 24 24 25 25 29 DRAFT Figures 14,
- Page 170 and 171:
DRAFT Viewed strictly from the infl
- Page 172 and 173:
DRAFT water removed would fluctuate
- Page 174 and 175:
DRAFT euryhaline, there were also m
- Page 176 and 177:
DRAFT 01/90 01/93 01/96 01/99 01/02
- Page 178 and 179:
DRAFT the intent of that condition
- Page 180 and 181:
DRAFT included inflows to the model
- Page 182 and 183:
DRAFT Flows for Sulphur Springs wer
- Page 184 and 185:
DRAFT ∆T represents the differenc
- Page 186 and 187:
DRAFT Figure 25 Temp (C) 22 Histori
- Page 188 and 189:
DRAFT Figure 26 Temp (C) 24 22 Hist
- Page 190 and 191:
DRAFT Similar to the coldest period
- Page 192 and 193:
DRAFT 5.7. Consideration of future
- Page 194 and 195:
DRAFT Culter, J. 1986. Benthic Inve
- Page 196 and 197:
DRAFT Shafland, P. L. and K. J. Foo
- Page 199 and 200:
APPENDIX A (from Chapter 2) Time se
- Page 201 and 202:
Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 203 and 204:
Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 205 and 206:
Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 207 and 208:
Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 209:
Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 213 and 214:
Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 215 and 216:
Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 217:
Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 220 and 221:
Appendix C. Percent composition of
- Page 222 and 223:
Appendix C. Percent composition of
- Page 225 and 226:
APPENDIX D (from Chapter 3) Percent
- Page 227 and 228:
APPENDIX D. Percent composition of
- Page 229 and 230:
APPENDIX D. Percent composition of
- Page 231 and 232:
APPENDIX E (from Chapter 3) Abundan
- Page 233 and 234:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 235 and 236:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 237 and 238:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 239:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 242 and 243:
APPENDIX F - HILLSBOROUGH RIVER TEM
- Page 244 and 245:
Appendix G Daily values for mean, m
- Page 247:
APPENDIX H (from Chapter 5) Time se
- Page 253:
Experiment Number 6
- Page 257 and 258:
Appendix I Daily values for minimum
- Page 259 and 260:
28FEB2000 9.8 0.0 1.9 9.7 7.8 . 18.
- Page 261 and 262:
12FEB2001 14.0 3.5 1.7 4.6 2.9 1.1
- Page 263:
----------------------------------