The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
DRAFT Problems with high coliform bacteria counts caused the City to close Sulphur Springs to swimming and bathing in the 1980s. Remediation of this problem was determined to be infeasible, and in the 1999 a swimming pool was constructed within the Sulphur Springs Park for public use. Since the 1960s, the City of Tampa has periodically made withdrawals from the spring pool to augment water supplies in the Hillsborough River Reservoir during times of water shortages. Over the years, modifications were made to the facilities and water control structures at Sulphur Springs to support its dual use for recreation and water supply. The determination of minimum flows for Sulphur Springs is based on the current configurations of the spring pool and run, which are described below. 2.2 Current physical setting of the spring pool and run The spring is enclosed by a circular concrete wall, which creates a pool approximately 40 feet (ft.) in diameter (Figure 2-3). When the pool is full under normal flow conditions (no withdrawals), water surface elevations in the spring pool generally fluctuate about 7.1 ft above the National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929 (NGVD). Water depths in the spring pool range from about 5 to 22 ft at normal operating levels, as elevations of the bottom of the pool range from about +2 to –15 ft. NGVD. Ground water discharges to the spring pool via a single vent that is located near the center of the pool Water discharges from the pool to the spring run through an operable water control structure (Figure 2-4). When this structure is closed, water flows over the top of this structure or flows through two flumes that are located on either side of an operable lift gate. When the gate is opened, water discharges through the bottom of the gate to the spring run. When the structure is closed, water levels in the spring pool are unaffected by tides. When the structure is fully opened, water levels in the spring pool may be affected by tidal water level fluctuations in the Lower Hillsborough River. The spring run extends from the water control structure about 500 ft. to the mouth of the run at the Lower Hillsborough River (Figure 2-5). The width of the run varies from about 50 to 100 ft., with the widest portions occurring in the upper half of the run near the spring pool. Two footbridges cross the spring run; one at the mouth of the run and another approximately 170 ft. upstream (Figure 2-6A). Midway between these two bridges there is a weir across the spring run that has a rectangular opening near the middle (Figure 2-6B). The top of the weir extends about 1½ to 2½ feet above the water surface in the run during high tides. The opening is approximately 10½ ft. wide, with a bottom elevation of approximately -0.7 ft. NGVD. All water discharging from the spring run to the Lower Hillsborough River flows through this opening. The spring run above this wall is referred to as the upper spring run, while the run below this wall is referred to as the lower spring run (Figure 2-5). The banks of the upper spring run are hardened by a seawall. Emergent vegetation is present in front of the seawall over much of the north bank of the upper run (Figure 2-6C). The entire southern shoreline of the upper run is un-vegetated, with the seawall extending to the waters edge (Figure 2-6D). The shoreline of the lower run is not hardened, although it is quite steep and rocky with emergent vegetation growing on much of the banks. Greater details about the vegetation and other biological communities of the spring run are described in Section 3.7 of this report. 2 - 3
DRAFT Figure 2-3. Recent photograph of Sulphur Springs Pool. Figure 2-4. Discharge structure at Sulphur Springs Pool. 2 - 4
- Page 1 and 2: The Determination of Minimum Flows
- Page 4 and 5: DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tab
- Page 6: 4.5 Goal 1 - Minimize the incursion
- Page 10 and 11: DRAFT LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 2 - P
- Page 12 and 13: Fig. 3-13 Fig. 3-14 Fig. 3-15 Fig.
- Page 14 and 15: Fig. 5-7 Fig. 5-8 Fig. 5-9 Fig. 5-1
- Page 16 and 17: Acronyms and Definitions DRAFT AMO
- Page 18 and 19: DRAFT Executive Summary The Southwe
- Page 20: DRAFT below 19 feet NGVD of 1929. T
- Page 24 and 25: CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND OF
- Page 26 and 27: DRAFT water, or aquifer, provided t
- Page 28: DRAFT one the indicators were the f
- Page 31: DRAFT The spring and its run lie in
- Page 35 and 36: 2 - 6 DRAFT
- Page 37 and 38: DRAFT -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.4 4
- Page 39 and 40: DRAFT 10.0 Yrly_Pumpage.grf 15 Annu
- Page 41 and 42: DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 35 D
- Page 43 and 44: DRAFT Figure 2-14. Return flow stru
- Page 45 and 46: DRAFT 40 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Ju
- Page 47 and 48: DRAFT due to withdrawals for public
- Page 49 and 50: DRAFT Figure 2-19 . Temporal trend
- Page 51 and 52: DRAFT Figure 2-20. Temporal trends
- Page 53: DRAFT In comparison to specific con
- Page 57 and 58: DRAFT average daily withdrawals for
- Page 59 and 60: DRAFT Figure 2-25. Average specific
- Page 61 and 62: DRAFT withdrawal rate of 31 cfs dur
- Page 63 and 64: DRAFT Table 2-2. Sulphur Springs su
- Page 65 and 66: DRAFT These plots indicate that his
- Page 67 and 68: DRAFT CHAPTER 3 ECOLOGICAL RESOURCE
- Page 69 and 70: DRAFT 3 Run_Riv_Stg.grf Water Surfa
- Page 71 and 72: DRAFT 3.4 Salinity in the spring ru
- Page 73 and 74: DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
- Page 75 and 76: DRAFT pumping events resulted in sa
- Page 77 and 78: DRAFT As discussed in Section 2.5.3
- Page 79 and 80: DRAFT tolerate and are frequently f
- Page 81 and 82: DRAFT Appendix B are color coded to
DRAFT<br />
Problems with high coli<strong>for</strong>m bacteria counts caused the City to close <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> to<br />
swimming and bathing in the 1980s. Remediation <strong>of</strong> this problem was determined to be<br />
infeasible, and in the 1999 a swimming pool was constructed within the <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong><br />
Park <strong>for</strong> public use. Since the 1960s, the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tampa</strong> has periodically made withdrawals<br />
from the spring pool to augment water supplies in the Hillsborough River Reservoir during<br />
times <strong>of</strong> water shortages. Over the years, modifications were made to the facilities and<br />
water control structures at <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> to support its dual use <strong>for</strong> recreation and water<br />
supply. <strong>The</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> minimum flows <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> is based on the current<br />
configurations <strong>of</strong> the spring pool and run, which are described below.<br />
2.2 Current physical setting <strong>of</strong> the spring pool and run<br />
<strong>The</strong> spring is enclosed by a circular concrete wall, which creates a pool approximately 40<br />
feet (ft.) in diameter (Figure 2-3). When the pool is full under normal flow conditions (no<br />
withdrawals), water surface elevations in the spring pool generally fluctuate about 7.1 ft<br />
above the National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929 (NGVD). Water depths in the spring pool<br />
range from about 5 to 22 ft at normal operating levels, as elevations <strong>of</strong> the bottom <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pool range from about +2 to –15 ft. NGVD. Ground water discharges to the spring pool via<br />
a single vent that is located near the center <strong>of</strong> the pool<br />
Water discharges from the pool to the spring run through an operable water control<br />
structure (Figure 2-4). When this structure is closed, water flows over the top <strong>of</strong> this<br />
structure or flows through two flumes that are located on either side <strong>of</strong> an operable lift<br />
gate. When the gate is opened, water discharges through the bottom <strong>of</strong> the gate to the<br />
spring run. When the structure is closed, water levels in the spring pool are unaffected by<br />
tides. When the structure is fully opened, water levels in the spring pool may be affected<br />
by tidal water level fluctuations in the Lower Hillsborough River.<br />
<strong>The</strong> spring run extends from the water control structure about 500 ft. to the mouth <strong>of</strong> the<br />
run at the Lower Hillsborough River (Figure 2-5). <strong>The</strong> width <strong>of</strong> the run varies from about 50<br />
to 100 ft., with the widest portions occurring in the upper half <strong>of</strong> the run near the spring<br />
pool. Two footbridges cross the spring run; one at the mouth <strong>of</strong> the run and another<br />
approximately 170 ft. upstream (Figure 2-6A). Midway between these two bridges there is<br />
a weir across the spring run that has a rectangular opening near the middle (Figure 2-6B).<br />
<strong>The</strong> top <strong>of</strong> the weir extends about 1½ to 2½ feet above the water surface in the run during<br />
high tides. <strong>The</strong> opening is approximately 10½ ft. wide, with a bottom elevation <strong>of</strong><br />
approximately -0.7 ft. NGVD. All water discharging from the spring run to the Lower<br />
Hillsborough River flows through this opening. <strong>The</strong> spring run above this wall is referred to<br />
as the upper spring run, while the run below this wall is referred to as the lower spring run<br />
(Figure 2-5).<br />
<strong>The</strong> banks <strong>of</strong> the upper spring run are hardened by a seawall. Emergent vegetation is<br />
present in front <strong>of</strong> the seawall over much <strong>of</strong> the north bank <strong>of</strong> the upper run (Figure 2-6C).<br />
<strong>The</strong> entire southern shoreline <strong>of</strong> the upper run is un-vegetated, with the seawall extending<br />
to the waters edge (Figure 2-6D). <strong>The</strong> shoreline <strong>of</strong> the lower run is not hardened, although<br />
it is quite steep and rocky with emergent vegetation growing on much <strong>of</strong> the banks.<br />
Greater details about the vegetation and other biological communities <strong>of</strong> the spring run are<br />
described in Section 3.7 <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />
2 - 3