The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
DRAFT Similar to the coldest period simulations, the thermal refuge simulations also found little difference in bottom temperatures between any of the springflow scenarios. Again, there were differences in surface water temperatures, with these differences increasing with the amount of springflow removed from the system. Differences in mean temperatures between the baseline and the other scenarios for the entire thermal refuge period ranged from 0.53 o C degrees for scenario A to –1.35 o C degrees for scenario C It is reiterated that during these conditions temperatures were above 20 o C were in bottom waters. 5.5.9 Summary and application of thermal modeling results to a minimum flow for Sulphur Springs The combined results for the coldest period and thermal refuge period scenarios indicate that that flows from Sulphur Springs have an effect on water temperatures in the lower Hillsborough River. This thermal effect is largely manifested in the surface layers above the pycnocline, or the depth at which there is strong vertical gradient in water density. The thermal refuge scenarios indicated that all of the springflow scenarios would provide a suitable thermal refuge when surface water temperatures fluctuated between 17 and 20 o C. The coldest period scenarios, however, indicated that only scenario A would not exceed the 2 o C change suggested by the FRMI. To prevent unacceptable changes to a thermal refuge in the lower river, scenario A (18 cfs flow to the spring run) should be required when water temperatures in the river fall to low values. As described in Section 5.4, scenario A is the recommended minimum flow for routine operation based on salinity criteria. Requiring scenario A to be in effect during very cold periods would be in keeping with the desirability of this flow rate based on other criteria. Water temperature measurements are now collected at a number of sites in the Lower Hillsborough River and one or more of these sites could be continued with real time data availability to track the occurrence of low temperatures in the river. Based on the results of the thermal modeling simulations, it is recommended that if water temperatures in either surface or bottom waters fall below 15 o C, then a minimum flow of 18 cfs be required at Sulphur Springs with no adjustment for low tide stages. Using either surface or bottom as the trigger for the determination of low temperatures would ensure that this minimum flow would be implemented before the entire water column went below 15 o C. Such a low temperature stipulation would likely be in effect for only short periods of time. A plot of daily surface and bottom temperatures for a continuous recorder located in the river about 100 meters upstream from Sulphur Springs was presented in Figure 3- 31. Of the four winter seasons covered by this graphic, water temperatures were below 15 o C in either surface or bottom waters for a total of 11 days. Low reservoir levels and impending water shortages are most acute for the City of Tampa in the late spring 5 - 50
DRAFT toward the end of the dry season. The implementation of an 18 cfs minimum flow during relatively brief periods in the winter should thus have a very minor effect on the use of the spring to augment the City's water supplies during water shortages. Considering these factors, the minimum flows recommended in Section 5.4.1 should be supplemented with a restriction that the minimum flow will be 18 cfs when water temperatures in either surface or bottom waters in the Lower Hillsborough River near the spring outfall are below 15 o C. The compete minimum flow recommendation for Sulphur Springs is: The proposed minimum flow for Sulphur Springs is 18 cfs. This minimum flow may be reduced to 10 cfs during low tide stages in the lower Hillsborough River if it does not result in salinity incursions from the Lower Hillsborough River into the upper spring run. Salinity incursions shall be defined as when salinity values in the upper spring pool are 1 ppt greater than the concurrent salinity value in the spring pool. A minimum flow of 13 cfs can be implemented when water levels in the Hillsborough River reservoir fall below 19 feet NGVD. This minimum flow can be reduced to 10 cfs at low tide stages in the lower river if it does not result in salinity incursions into the upper spring run. A minimum flow of 18 cfs will be maintained if the temperature of either surface or bottom waters in the Lower Hillsborough River near the mouth of the spring are below 15 o C. 5.6 Future data collection in support of the minimum flows The proposed minimum flows will require much more intensive management of flows from the spring than has been done in the past. The continuation of data recorders in the spring pool, the upper spring run, and the lower Hillsborough River will be necessary to determine if the management goals for salinity incursions and a thermal refuge are met. These data will need to be available on a real-time for basis if the City chooses to implement a tide-based 10 cfs minimum flow, or reduce the minimum flow to 13 cfs during water shortages in cold months. It is recommended that benthic invertebrates continue to be sampled periodically to check the effectiveness of the minimum flows for maintaining invertebrate populations in the upper spring run. Also, the proposed minimum flows and relationships of flows from Sulphur Springs to the lower river should be examined as part of the re-evaluation of minimum flows to the Lower Hillsborough River which are scheduled for completion by 2005. 5 - 51
- Page 139: DRAFT reach of the river 50 meters
- Page 142 and 143: DRAFT of the dam. The experiments w
- Page 144 and 145: DRAFT Salinity incursions above the
- Page 146 and 147: DRAFT Figure 5-3. A - D. Box and wh
- Page 148 and 149: DRAFT The results of the vertical p
- Page 150 and 151: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 152 and 153: DRAFT Other breakpoints in the data
- Page 154 and 155: DRAFT 40 Percent of Observations -
- Page 156 and 157: DRAFT It is possible that infrequen
- Page 158 and 159: DRAFT The effects of tide stage on
- Page 160 and 161: DRAFT medians rise to near -0.2 fee
- Page 162 and 163: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 164 and 165: DRAFT Sulphur Springs on salinity d
- Page 166 and 167: 7 29 DRAFT Elevation (m) 0/0cfs 1 0
- Page 168 and 169: 23 24 24 25 25 29 DRAFT Figures 14,
- Page 170 and 171: DRAFT Viewed strictly from the infl
- Page 172 and 173: DRAFT water removed would fluctuate
- Page 174 and 175: DRAFT euryhaline, there were also m
- Page 176 and 177: DRAFT 01/90 01/93 01/96 01/99 01/02
- Page 178 and 179: DRAFT the intent of that condition
- Page 180 and 181: DRAFT included inflows to the model
- Page 182 and 183: DRAFT Flows for Sulphur Springs wer
- Page 184 and 185: DRAFT ∆T represents the differenc
- Page 186 and 187: DRAFT Figure 25 Temp (C) 22 Histori
- Page 188 and 189: DRAFT Figure 26 Temp (C) 24 22 Hist
- Page 192 and 193: DRAFT 5.7. Consideration of future
- Page 194 and 195: DRAFT Culter, J. 1986. Benthic Inve
- Page 196 and 197: DRAFT Shafland, P. L. and K. J. Foo
- Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX A (from Chapter 2) Time se
- Page 201 and 202: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 203 and 204: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 205 and 206: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 207 and 208: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 209: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 213 and 214: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 215 and 216: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 217: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 220 and 221: Appendix C. Percent composition of
- Page 222 and 223: Appendix C. Percent composition of
- Page 225 and 226: APPENDIX D (from Chapter 3) Percent
- Page 227 and 228: APPENDIX D. Percent composition of
- Page 229 and 230: APPENDIX D. Percent composition of
- Page 231 and 232: APPENDIX E (from Chapter 3) Abundan
- Page 233 and 234: BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 235 and 236: BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 237 and 238: BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 239: BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
DRAFT<br />
toward the end <strong>of</strong> the dry season. <strong>The</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> an 18 cfs minimum flow during<br />
relatively brief periods in the winter should thus have a very minor effect on the use <strong>of</strong><br />
the spring to augment the City's water supplies during water shortages.<br />
Considering these factors, the minimum flows recommended in Section 5.4.1 should be<br />
supplemented with a restriction that the minimum flow will be 18 cfs when water<br />
temperatures in either surface or bottom waters in the Lower Hillsborough River near<br />
the spring outfall are below 15 o C. <strong>The</strong> compete minimum flow recommendation <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> is:<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposed minimum flow <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> is 18 cfs. This minimum flow<br />
may be reduced to 10 cfs during low tide stages in the lower Hillsborough River<br />
if it does not result in salinity incursions from the Lower Hillsborough River into<br />
the upper spring run. Salinity incursions shall be defined as when salinity values<br />
in the upper spring pool are 1 ppt greater than the concurrent salinity value in<br />
the spring pool. A minimum flow <strong>of</strong> 13 cfs can be implemented when water<br />
levels in the Hillsborough River reservoir fall below 19 feet NGVD. This<br />
minimum flow can be reduced to 10 cfs at low tide stages in the lower river if it<br />
does not result in salinity incursions into the upper spring run. A minimum flow<br />
<strong>of</strong> 18 cfs will be maintained if the temperature <strong>of</strong> either surface or bottom waters<br />
in the Lower Hillsborough River near the mouth <strong>of</strong> the spring are below 15 o C.<br />
5.6 Future data collection in support <strong>of</strong> the minimum flows<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposed minimum flows will require much more intensive management <strong>of</strong> flows<br />
from the spring than has been done in the past. <strong>The</strong> continuation <strong>of</strong> data recorders in<br />
the spring pool, the upper spring run, and the lower Hillsborough River will be necessary<br />
to determine if the management goals <strong>for</strong> salinity incursions and a thermal refuge are<br />
met. <strong>The</strong>se data will need to be available on a real-time <strong>for</strong> basis if the City chooses to<br />
implement a tide-based 10 cfs minimum flow, or reduce the minimum flow to 13 cfs<br />
during water shortages in cold months.<br />
It is recommended that benthic invertebrates continue to be sampled periodically to<br />
check the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the minimum flows <strong>for</strong> maintaining invertebrate populations in<br />
the upper spring run. Also, the proposed minimum flows and relationships <strong>of</strong> flows from<br />
<strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> to the lower river should be examined as part <strong>of</strong> the re-evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
minimum flows to the Lower Hillsborough River which are scheduled <strong>for</strong> completion by<br />
2005.<br />
5 - 51