The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
DRAFT the intent of that condition is to ensure that Sulphur Spring is used only as a back-up water supply source that is used during times of impending water shortages. The condition specifies that withdrawals from Sulphur Springs cannot occur until water levels in the reservoir fall below 20 feet for the months from March through June, or below 18 feet for the remaining eight months of the year. The minimum flows recommended by this report will require that pumpage rates from the spring be considerably less than the 20 mgd rate the City has used in the past. As previously discussed, the City now has the capability to manage withdrawals in increments which will allow much smaller withdrawal rates to be possible. Since the withdrawal rates will have to be reduced to meet minimum flows, it is recommended that linking spring withdrawals to water levels in the reservoir be dropped from the City's water use permit as long as minimum flows for Sulphur Springs are met. This will allow the City to withdraw water from Sulphur Springs much sooner, albeit at smaller withdrawal rates, to meet water supply needs in the dry season. It is reiterated the minimum flow will be linked to reservoir levels, so that slightly higher withdrawal rates will be possible if water supplies in the reservoir become low. 5.5 Criterion 3 - Maintain a thermal refuge for manatees 5.5.1 Purpose Changes in water temperatures that would result from reducing or re-routing flows from Sulphur Springs were investigated to assess any adverse potential impacts to the biological communities in the spring run and lower river due to alterations of the spring's flow regime. As described earlier, the lower river and the spring run are utilized by the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latritostris), a federally listed endangered species. The water temperature of flow from Sulphur Springs remains near 25 o C throughout the year, while the waters of the lower river are more influenced by seasonal air temperatures and can be considerably cooler. During cold winter periods, the warmer water from Sulphur Springs provides a thermal refuge for manatees in the spring run and the lower river near the mouth of the spring run. Flows from the spring also benefit other species that are sensitive to cold, such as the snook, a highly valued saltwater game fish that is found in the lower river. The objective of the analysis presented below was to evaluate the effect of reducing or re-routing flow from Sulphur Springs on water temperatures in the lower river during winter months. It was reasoned that water temperature in the spring run should be less sensitive to flow alterations than temperature in the nearby river. Therefore, if the requirements of a thermal refuge in the lower river near the spring were met, the thermal requirements of a refuge in the spring run would be met as well. Analyses were conducted to determine if the minimum flows that are recommended to meet salinity requirements of the spring run and lower river are sufficient to meet the temperature requirements of a thermal refuge for manatees in the lower river. 5 - 38
DRAFT 5.5.2 Methods and description of thermal model A two-dimensional laterally averaged hydrodynamic and water quality model was utilized to evaluate the effect of various flow scenarios on the thermal regime of the Lower Hillsborough River. This work was performed by Janicki Environmental, Inc. for the District. The model that used was CE-QUAL-W2, which was developed and is supported by the US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (Cole and Wells 2000). At a minimum, the model predicts water surface elevations, velocities, and temperature at a specified time interval. The Hillsborough River temperature model developed using the CE_QUAL-W2 software was previously calibrated as described in Pribble et al. (2003). For the flow scenarios described in this report, the model was set to output data at hourly frequencies. The model provides predictions that are laterally averaged (across the entire water body perpendicular to the direction of horizontal flow) so that the model integrates any lateral differences in velocities, temperatures, or other modeled constituents. Given the narrow width of the channel of the lower river, the District's LAMFE model indicated that threedimensional modeling was not necessary to characterize circulation in the lower river (Chen et al. 2001). The thermal model accommodates multiple inflows and time-varying boundary conditions for surface elevation and temperature. 5.5.3 Model Data Requirements The model requires the following input data: • geometric data, • initial conditions, • boundary conditions, and • hydraulic parameters. The geometric data for the system being modeled were generated using the system bathymetry from the District's LAMFE model. The bottom depth as well as the lateral (cross-stream) width of the system at selected depths was estimated from the bathymetry. The grid construct derived for the modeled system was also based on the bathymetry from the LAMFE model, and was refined to provide the greatest resolution in those regions of greatest importance to the objectives of the model study. Initial conditions were input for temperatures and salinity concentrations, as these variables can exert strong effects on water density and circulation. These conditions were input either as a single value over the entire domain as a vertical profile of values over all columns or as longitudinally and vertically varying fields over the model domain. Initial conditions were also input for downstream tidal elevation. The model scenarios 5 - 39
- Page 127 and 128: DRAFT Figure 3-31 1999 2000 2001 20
- Page 129 and 130: DRAFT Figure 3-33 2001 2002 2003 20
- Page 131 and 132: DRAFT CHAPTER 4 TECHNICAL APPROACH
- Page 133 and 134: DRAFT The sum of these consideratio
- Page 135 and 136: DRAFT It is the conclusion of this
- Page 137 and 138: DRAFT criteria. The
- Page 139: DRAFT reach of the river 50 meters
- Page 142 and 143: DRAFT of the dam. The experiments w
- Page 144 and 145: DRAFT Salinity incursions above the
- Page 146 and 147: DRAFT Figure 5-3. A - D. Box and wh
- Page 148 and 149: DRAFT The results of the vertical p
- Page 150 and 151: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 152 and 153: DRAFT Other breakpoints in the data
- Page 154 and 155: DRAFT 40 Percent of Observations -
- Page 156 and 157: DRAFT It is possible that infrequen
- Page 158 and 159: DRAFT The effects of tide stage on
- Page 160 and 161: DRAFT medians rise to near -0.2 fee
- Page 162 and 163: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 164 and 165: DRAFT Sulphur Springs on salinity d
- Page 166 and 167: 7 29 DRAFT Elevation (m) 0/0cfs 1 0
- Page 168 and 169: 23 24 24 25 25 29 DRAFT Figures 14,
- Page 170 and 171: DRAFT Viewed strictly from the infl
- Page 172 and 173: DRAFT water removed would fluctuate
- Page 174 and 175: DRAFT euryhaline, there were also m
- Page 176 and 177: DRAFT 01/90 01/93 01/96 01/99 01/02
- Page 180 and 181: DRAFT included inflows to the model
- Page 182 and 183: DRAFT Flows for Sulphur Springs wer
- Page 184 and 185: DRAFT ∆T represents the differenc
- Page 186 and 187: DRAFT Figure 25 Temp (C) 22 Histori
- Page 188 and 189: DRAFT Figure 26 Temp (C) 24 22 Hist
- Page 190 and 191: DRAFT Similar to the coldest period
- Page 192 and 193: DRAFT 5.7. Consideration of future
- Page 194 and 195: DRAFT Culter, J. 1986. Benthic Inve
- Page 196 and 197: DRAFT Shafland, P. L. and K. J. Foo
- Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX A (from Chapter 2) Time se
- Page 201 and 202: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 203 and 204: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 205 and 206: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 207 and 208: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 209: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 213 and 214: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 215 and 216: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 217: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 220 and 221: Appendix C. Percent composition of
- Page 222 and 223: Appendix C. Percent composition of
- Page 225 and 226: APPENDIX D (from Chapter 3) Percent
- Page 227 and 228: APPENDIX D. Percent composition of
DRAFT<br />
5.5.2 Methods and description <strong>of</strong> thermal model<br />
A two-dimensional laterally averaged hydrodynamic and water quality model was<br />
utilized to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> various flow scenarios on the thermal regime <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lower Hillsborough River. This work was per<strong>for</strong>med by Janicki Environmental, Inc. <strong>for</strong><br />
the District. <strong>The</strong> model that used was CE-QUAL-W2, which was developed and is<br />
supported by the US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (Cole and Wells<br />
2000). At a minimum, the model predicts water surface elevations, velocities, and<br />
temperature at a specified time interval. <strong>The</strong> Hillsborough River temperature model<br />
developed using the CE_QUAL-W2 s<strong>of</strong>tware was previously calibrated as described in<br />
Pribble et al. (2003). For the flow scenarios described in this report, the model was set<br />
to output data at hourly frequencies.<br />
<strong>The</strong> model provides predictions that are laterally averaged (across the entire water body<br />
perpendicular to the direction <strong>of</strong> horizontal flow) so that the model integrates any lateral<br />
differences in velocities, temperatures, or other modeled constituents. Given the narrow<br />
width <strong>of</strong> the channel <strong>of</strong> the lower river, the District's LAMFE model indicated that threedimensional<br />
modeling was not necessary to characterize circulation in the lower river<br />
(Chen et al. 2001). <strong>The</strong> thermal model accommodates multiple inflows and time-varying<br />
boundary conditions <strong>for</strong> surface elevation and temperature.<br />
5.5.3 Model Data Requirements<br />
<strong>The</strong> model requires the following input data:<br />
• geometric data,<br />
• initial conditions,<br />
• boundary conditions, and<br />
• hydraulic parameters.<br />
<strong>The</strong> geometric data <strong>for</strong> the system being modeled were generated using the system<br />
bathymetry from the District's LAMFE model. <strong>The</strong> bottom depth as well as the lateral<br />
(cross-stream) width <strong>of</strong> the system at selected depths was estimated from the<br />
bathymetry. <strong>The</strong> grid construct derived <strong>for</strong> the modeled system was also based on the<br />
bathymetry from the LAMFE model, and was refined to provide the greatest resolution<br />
in those regions <strong>of</strong> greatest importance to the objectives <strong>of</strong> the model study.<br />
Initial conditions were input <strong>for</strong> temperatures and salinity concentrations, as these<br />
variables can exert strong effects on water density and circulation. <strong>The</strong>se conditions<br />
were input either as a single value over the entire domain as a vertical pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> values<br />
over all columns or as longitudinally and vertically varying fields over the model domain.<br />
Initial conditions were also input <strong>for</strong> downstream tidal elevation. <strong>The</strong> model scenarios<br />
5 - 39