The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
DRAFT Viewed strictly from the inflow needs of the lower river, a lesser minimum flow at the spring run could possibly be acceptable if all of the remaining flow was routed to the base of the dam. Scenarios 9 through 11 involve apportioning different amounts of the total 31 cfs average flow between the spring run and the base of the dam, with no removal of water from the system. For example, scenario 9 provides 18 cfs at the spring outfall and 13 cfs at the base of the dam. Scenarios 10 and 11 involve incrementally reducing flow to the spring run and increasing flow at the dam, with final scenario leaving 10 cfs at the spring run and 21 cfs at the dam. The salinity distributions for these scenarios are illustrated in Figures 5-17 through 5-19. Moving additional water to the base of the dam increases the volume of
8 10 22 22 23 25 28 29 DRAFT Figure 18 – 19 Elevation (m) 0/18cfs 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 7 5 5 11 13 cfs 6 10 8 11 12 13 9 14 15 13 15 17 16 10 12 11 14 13 16 18 18 14 17 15 19 16 18 17 19 19 20 20 21 22 23 21 24 23 25 26 22 27 24 25 28 23 29 28 26 27 -6 Dam 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 River Kilometers 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Mouth Figure 5-18. Two-dimensional plot of salinity distributions for inflows of 18 cfs of springwater at the dam and 13 cfs of springflow at Sulphur Springs. (Scenario 10) Elevation (m) 0/21cfs 1 0 -1 -2 2 3 4 3 -3 -4 -5 -6 Dam 16 15 5 6 7 8 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 6 7 11 10 cfs 5 1212 10 11 12 8 9 14 10 13 13 15 15 16 17 11 12 15 16 14 18 18 15 16 18 1717 19 19 20 20 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 River Kilometers 21 22 21 23 24 25 26 24 27 22 27 23 28 26 25 29 0 Mouth Figure 5-19. Two-dimensional plot of salinity distributions for inflows of 21 cfs of springwater at the dam and 10 cfs of springflow at Sulphur Springs. (Scenario 11) 5 - 31
- Page 119 and 120: DRAFT as manatees seek fresh water
- Page 121 and 122: 1999 2000 2001 2002 DRAFT 35 TmpSS_
- Page 123 and 124: DRAFT Platt Street 1974-2002 Columb
- Page 125 and 126: DRAFT Median and minimum water temp
- Page 127 and 128: DRAFT Figure 3-31 1999 2000 2001 20
- Page 129 and 130: DRAFT Figure 3-33 2001 2002 2003 20
- Page 131 and 132: DRAFT CHAPTER 4 TECHNICAL APPROACH
- Page 133 and 134: DRAFT The sum of these consideratio
- Page 135 and 136: DRAFT It is the conclusion of this
- Page 137 and 138: DRAFT criteria. The
- Page 139: DRAFT reach of the river 50 meters
- Page 142 and 143: DRAFT of the dam. The experiments w
- Page 144 and 145: DRAFT Salinity incursions above the
- Page 146 and 147: DRAFT Figure 5-3. A - D. Box and wh
- Page 148 and 149: DRAFT The results of the vertical p
- Page 150 and 151: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 152 and 153: DRAFT Other breakpoints in the data
- Page 154 and 155: DRAFT 40 Percent of Observations -
- Page 156 and 157: DRAFT It is possible that infrequen
- Page 158 and 159: DRAFT The effects of tide stage on
- Page 160 and 161: DRAFT medians rise to near -0.2 fee
- Page 162 and 163: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 164 and 165: DRAFT Sulphur Springs on salinity d
- Page 166 and 167: 7 29 DRAFT Elevation (m) 0/0cfs 1 0
- Page 168 and 169: 23 24 24 25 25 29 DRAFT Figures 14,
- Page 172 and 173: DRAFT water removed would fluctuate
- Page 174 and 175: DRAFT euryhaline, there were also m
- Page 176 and 177: DRAFT 01/90 01/93 01/96 01/99 01/02
- Page 178 and 179: DRAFT the intent of that condition
- Page 180 and 181: DRAFT included inflows to the model
- Page 182 and 183: DRAFT Flows for Sulphur Springs wer
- Page 184 and 185: DRAFT ∆T represents the differenc
- Page 186 and 187: DRAFT Figure 25 Temp (C) 22 Histori
- Page 188 and 189: DRAFT Figure 26 Temp (C) 24 22 Hist
- Page 190 and 191: DRAFT Similar to the coldest period
- Page 192 and 193: DRAFT 5.7. Consideration of future
- Page 194 and 195: DRAFT Culter, J. 1986. Benthic Inve
- Page 196 and 197: DRAFT Shafland, P. L. and K. J. Foo
- Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX A (from Chapter 2) Time se
- Page 201 and 202: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 203 and 204: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 205 and 206: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 207 and 208: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 209: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 213 and 214: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 215 and 216: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 217: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
8<br />
10<br />
22<br />
22<br />
23<br />
25<br />
28<br />
29<br />
DRAFT<br />
Figure 18 – 19<br />
Elevation (m)<br />
0/18cfs<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-1<br />
-2<br />
-3<br />
-4<br />
-5<br />
2<br />
3<br />
3 4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
8<br />
9<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30<br />
7<br />
5<br />
5<br />
11<br />
13 cfs<br />
6<br />
10<br />
8<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
9<br />
14<br />
15<br />
13<br />
15<br />
17<br />
16<br />
10<br />
12<br />
11<br />
14<br />
13<br />
16<br />
18 18<br />
14<br />
17<br />
15<br />
19<br />
16<br />
18<br />
17<br />
19 19<br />
20 20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
21<br />
24<br />
23<br />
25<br />
26<br />
22<br />
27<br />
24<br />
25<br />
28<br />
23<br />
29<br />
28<br />
26<br />
27<br />
-6<br />
Dam<br />
16<br />
15<br />
14<br />
13<br />
12<br />
11<br />
10<br />
9 8<br />
River Kilometers<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Mouth<br />
Figure 5-18. Two-dimensional plot <strong>of</strong> salinity distributions <strong>for</strong> inflows <strong>of</strong> 18 cfs <strong>of</strong> springwater<br />
at the dam and 13 cfs <strong>of</strong> springflow at <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong>. (Scenario 10)<br />
Elevation (m)<br />
0/21cfs<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-1<br />
-2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
-3<br />
-4<br />
-5<br />
-6<br />
Dam<br />
16 15<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
8<br />
9<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30<br />
6<br />
7<br />
11<br />
10 cfs<br />
5<br />
1212<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
8<br />
9<br />
14<br />
10<br />
13 13<br />
15<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
11<br />
12<br />
15<br />
16<br />
14<br />
18 18<br />
15<br />
16<br />
18<br />
1717<br />
19<br />
19<br />
20 20<br />
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1<br />
River Kilometers<br />
21<br />
22<br />
21<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
24<br />
27<br />
22<br />
27<br />
23<br />
28<br />
26<br />
25<br />
29<br />
0<br />
Mouth<br />
Figure 5-19. Two-dimensional plot <strong>of</strong> salinity distributions <strong>for</strong> inflows <strong>of</strong> 21 cfs <strong>of</strong> springwater<br />
at the dam and 10 cfs <strong>of</strong> springflow at <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong>. (Scenario 11)<br />
5 - 31
Change language