- Page 1 and 2:
The Determination of Minimum Flows
- Page 4 and 5:
DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tab
- Page 6:
4.5 Goal 1 - Minimize the incursion
- Page 10 and 11:
DRAFT LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 2 - P
- Page 12 and 13:
Fig. 3-13 Fig. 3-14 Fig. 3-15 Fig.
- Page 14 and 15:
Fig. 5-7 Fig. 5-8 Fig. 5-9 Fig. 5-1
- Page 16 and 17:
Acronyms and Definitions DRAFT AMO
- Page 18 and 19:
DRAFT Executive Summary The Southwe
- Page 20:
DRAFT below 19 feet NGVD of 1929. T
- Page 24 and 25:
CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND OF
- Page 26 and 27:
DRAFT water, or aquifer, provided t
- Page 28:
DRAFT one the indicators were the f
- Page 31 and 32:
DRAFT The spring and its run lie in
- Page 33 and 34:
DRAFT Figure 2-3. Recent photograph
- Page 35 and 36:
2 - 6 DRAFT
- Page 37 and 38:
DRAFT -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.4 4
- Page 39 and 40:
DRAFT 10.0 Yrly_Pumpage.grf 15 Annu
- Page 41 and 42:
DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 35 D
- Page 43 and 44:
DRAFT Figure 2-14. Return flow stru
- Page 45 and 46:
DRAFT 40 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Ju
- Page 47 and 48:
DRAFT due to withdrawals for public
- Page 49 and 50:
DRAFT Figure 2-19 . Temporal trend
- Page 51 and 52:
DRAFT Figure 2-20. Temporal trends
- Page 53:
DRAFT In comparison to specific con
- Page 57 and 58:
DRAFT average daily withdrawals for
- Page 59 and 60:
DRAFT Figure 2-25. Average specific
- Page 61 and 62:
DRAFT withdrawal rate of 31 cfs dur
- Page 63 and 64:
DRAFT Table 2-2. Sulphur Springs su
- Page 65 and 66:
DRAFT These plots indicate that his
- Page 67 and 68:
DRAFT CHAPTER 3 ECOLOGICAL RESOURCE
- Page 69 and 70:
DRAFT 3 Run_Riv_Stg.grf Water Surfa
- Page 71 and 72:
DRAFT 3.4 Salinity in the spring ru
- Page 73 and 74:
DRAFT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
- Page 75 and 76:
DRAFT pumping events resulted in sa
- Page 77 and 78:
DRAFT As discussed in Section 2.5.3
- Page 79 and 80:
DRAFT tolerate and are frequently f
- Page 81 and 82:
DRAFT Appendix B are color coded to
- Page 83 and 84:
DRAFT habitat in the lower river pr
- Page 85 and 86:
DRAFT The FWC using a modified stra
- Page 87 and 88:
DRAFT increased with a return to no
- Page 89 and 90:
DRAFT 2000. The results from three
- Page 91 and 92:
DRAFT species (10 to 13) were colle
- Page 93 and 94:
DRAFT 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
- Page 95 and 96:
DRAFT . 1000.00 100.00 10.00 1.00 0
- Page 97 and 98:
DRAFT 3.9.2 The effects of flows fr
- Page 99 and 100:
DRAFT Data from the Tampa Bay Water
- Page 101 and 102:
DRAFT EPCHC Period of Record Data L
- Page 103 and 104:
DRAFT 35 30 1996 1997 1998 1999 200
- Page 105 and 106:
7 DRAFT Elevation (m) 1 0 -1 -2 -3
- Page 107 and 108:
8 24 25 29 DRAFT Figure 3-20, 3-21
- Page 109 and 110:
DRAFT Figure 3-22 HBMP & EPCHC 2000
- Page 111 and 112:
DRAFT of the river between the dam
- Page 113 and 114: DRAFT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11
- Page 115 and 116: DRAFT The HBMP project (PBSJ 2003)
- Page 117 and 118: DRAFT xanthurus) red drum (Sciaenop
- Page 119 and 120: DRAFT as manatees seek fresh water
- Page 121 and 122: 1999 2000 2001 2002 DRAFT 35 TmpSS_
- Page 123 and 124: DRAFT Platt Street 1974-2002 Columb
- Page 125 and 126: DRAFT Median and minimum water temp
- Page 127 and 128: DRAFT Figure 3-31 1999 2000 2001 20
- Page 129 and 130: DRAFT Figure 3-33 2001 2002 2003 20
- Page 131 and 132: DRAFT CHAPTER 4 TECHNICAL APPROACH
- Page 133 and 134: DRAFT The sum of these consideratio
- Page 135 and 136: DRAFT It is the conclusion of this
- Page 137 and 138: DRAFT criteria. The
- Page 139: DRAFT reach of the river 50 meters
- Page 142 and 143: DRAFT of the dam. The experiments w
- Page 144 and 145: DRAFT Salinity incursions above the
- Page 146 and 147: DRAFT Figure 5-3. A - D. Box and wh
- Page 148 and 149: DRAFT The results of the vertical p
- Page 150 and 151: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 152 and 153: DRAFT Other breakpoints in the data
- Page 154 and 155: DRAFT 40 Percent of Observations -
- Page 156 and 157: DRAFT It is possible that infrequen
- Page 158 and 159: DRAFT The effects of tide stage on
- Page 160 and 161: DRAFT medians rise to near -0.2 fee
- Page 162 and 163: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 166 and 167: 7 29 DRAFT Elevation (m) 0/0cfs 1 0
- Page 168 and 169: 23 24 24 25 25 29 DRAFT Figures 14,
- Page 170 and 171: DRAFT Viewed strictly from the infl
- Page 172 and 173: DRAFT water removed would fluctuate
- Page 174 and 175: DRAFT euryhaline, there were also m
- Page 176 and 177: DRAFT 01/90 01/93 01/96 01/99 01/02
- Page 178 and 179: DRAFT the intent of that condition
- Page 180 and 181: DRAFT included inflows to the model
- Page 182 and 183: DRAFT Flows for Sulphur Springs wer
- Page 184 and 185: DRAFT ∆T represents the differenc
- Page 186 and 187: DRAFT Figure 25 Temp (C) 22 Histori
- Page 188 and 189: DRAFT Figure 26 Temp (C) 24 22 Hist
- Page 190 and 191: DRAFT Similar to the coldest period
- Page 192 and 193: DRAFT 5.7. Consideration of future
- Page 194 and 195: DRAFT Culter, J. 1986. Benthic Inve
- Page 196 and 197: DRAFT Shafland, P. L. and K. J. Foo
- Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX A (from Chapter 2) Time se
- Page 201 and 202: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 203 and 204: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 205 and 206: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 207 and 208: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 209: Sulphur Springs Water Quality 1991-
- Page 213 and 214: Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 215 and 216:
Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 217:
Appendix B. Presence of macroinvert
- Page 220 and 221:
Appendix C. Percent composition of
- Page 222 and 223:
Appendix C. Percent composition of
- Page 225 and 226:
APPENDIX D (from Chapter 3) Percent
- Page 227 and 228:
APPENDIX D. Percent composition of
- Page 229 and 230:
APPENDIX D. Percent composition of
- Page 231 and 232:
APPENDIX E (from Chapter 3) Abundan
- Page 233 and 234:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 235 and 236:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 237 and 238:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 239:
BARE SAND FILAMENTOUS ALGAE COMBINE
- Page 242 and 243:
APPENDIX F - HILLSBOROUGH RIVER TEM
- Page 244 and 245:
Appendix G Daily values for mean, m
- Page 247:
APPENDIX H (from Chapter 5) Time se
- Page 253:
Experiment Number 6
- Page 257 and 258:
Appendix I Daily values for minimum
- Page 259 and 260:
28FEB2000 9.8 0.0 1.9 9.7 7.8 . 18.
- Page 261 and 262:
12FEB2001 14.0 3.5 1.7 4.6 2.9 1.1
- Page 263:
----------------------------------