The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
DRAFT Salinity incursions above the weir were not apparent at any of the stations in the upper run during experiments 1, 2 and 4 (Figures 5-3 a, b, and d). The daily flow values corresponding to the second sampling event for these experiments ranged from 15 cfs to 23 cfs (Table 5-1). Salinity in the spring run, however, can vary with tide stage during low flows, and the sampling event could have missed the time of salinity incursion. To check the representiveness of the experimental results, time series plots of 15-minute values for salinity and water levels at the continuous recorder in the spring run are presented in Appendix H for each experimental period. Efforts were made to sample the spring run near slack high tide, when the potential for incursions of river water is the greatest. Plots of water levels at the continuous recorder in the upper run show that this was largely achieved for experiments 1 and 4, but sampling for experiment 2 occurred after high tide and was actually near the time of minimum low water. Salinity remained stable at the recorder throughout experiments 1, 2 and 4, however, indicating that salinity incursions did not occur over the tidal cycle. In contrast, salinity values did vary with tide at the recorder at the spring mouth (also shown in Appendix H). Elevated salinity was more prolonged during experiments 2 and 4 than during preceding or following days when higher flows occurred. The box and whisker plots show that slight salinity incursions occurred during experiments 3 and 6 (Figures 5-3 c and g). Slightly higher salinity values were observed at station 20 near the opening of the weir during experiment 3, when the flow was 19 cfs. This sample was taken near the secondary high tide peak for the day. Salinity at the recorder in the upper run did not show evidence of any salinity incursion at that location. This recorder is located about 100 feet upstream of station 20, indicating that the salinity incursion in the upper run during experiment 3 was restricted to near the weir opening. Experiment 6 (June 20, 2002) showed a similar result, in that sampling was conducted near high tide and comparison of the box and whisker plot with the recorder data indicates that salinity increases were restricted to the most downstream stations in the upper run. This test produced unusual results in that the flow from the spring was only 2.5 cfs. There was no flow from the Hillsborough River dam on this day, which generally results in high salinity in the river near the spring outfall. However, the summer rainy season had commenced by mid-June, and reductions in salinity were observed at the nearby continuous recorders in the river. The lack of a strong salinity incursion during experiment 6 may have been related to low salinity in the river and the effects of localized rainfall on salinity in and near the spring run. The most striking result among the six test flows was the result for test 5 on June 12, 2002 (Figure 5-3e). Flow on this day was 13 cfs and was maintained at that rate for the previous 9 days (Appendix G). This represented the only successful attempt to maintain a constant, intermediate flow rate during the experimental period. Boat failure restricted sampling on that day to stations 16 through 24, but the data indicated a substantial salinity incursion. Mean water column values were between 6.7 and 10.6 ppt at stations 16 through 21 in the upper pool, with bottom values ranging from 11.5 to 15.9 ppt. 5 - 4
DRAFT Figure 5-2. Location of vertical profile stations measured during experimental flow releases. 5 - 5
- Page 93 and 94: DRAFT 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
- Page 95 and 96: DRAFT . 1000.00 100.00 10.00 1.00 0
- Page 97 and 98: DRAFT 3.9.2 The effects of flows fr
- Page 99 and 100: DRAFT Data from the Tampa Bay Water
- Page 101 and 102: DRAFT EPCHC Period of Record Data L
- Page 103 and 104: DRAFT 35 30 1996 1997 1998 1999 200
- Page 105 and 106: 7 DRAFT Elevation (m) 1 0 -1 -2 -3
- Page 107 and 108: 8 24 25 29 DRAFT Figure 3-20, 3-21
- Page 109 and 110: DRAFT Figure 3-22 HBMP & EPCHC 2000
- Page 111 and 112: DRAFT of the river between the dam
- Page 113 and 114: DRAFT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11
- Page 115 and 116: DRAFT The HBMP project (PBSJ 2003)
- Page 117 and 118: DRAFT xanthurus) red drum (Sciaenop
- Page 119 and 120: DRAFT as manatees seek fresh water
- Page 121 and 122: 1999 2000 2001 2002 DRAFT 35 TmpSS_
- Page 123 and 124: DRAFT Platt Street 1974-2002 Columb
- Page 125 and 126: DRAFT Median and minimum water temp
- Page 127 and 128: DRAFT Figure 3-31 1999 2000 2001 20
- Page 129 and 130: DRAFT Figure 3-33 2001 2002 2003 20
- Page 131 and 132: DRAFT CHAPTER 4 TECHNICAL APPROACH
- Page 133 and 134: DRAFT The sum of these consideratio
- Page 135 and 136: DRAFT It is the conclusion of this
- Page 137 and 138: DRAFT criteria. The
- Page 139: DRAFT reach of the river 50 meters
- Page 142 and 143: DRAFT of the dam. The experiments w
- Page 146 and 147: DRAFT Figure 5-3. A - D. Box and wh
- Page 148 and 149: DRAFT The results of the vertical p
- Page 150 and 151: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 152 and 153: DRAFT Other breakpoints in the data
- Page 154 and 155: DRAFT 40 Percent of Observations -
- Page 156 and 157: DRAFT It is possible that infrequen
- Page 158 and 159: DRAFT The effects of tide stage on
- Page 160 and 161: DRAFT medians rise to near -0.2 fee
- Page 162 and 163: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 164 and 165: DRAFT Sulphur Springs on salinity d
- Page 166 and 167: 7 29 DRAFT Elevation (m) 0/0cfs 1 0
- Page 168 and 169: 23 24 24 25 25 29 DRAFT Figures 14,
- Page 170 and 171: DRAFT Viewed strictly from the infl
- Page 172 and 173: DRAFT water removed would fluctuate
- Page 174 and 175: DRAFT euryhaline, there were also m
- Page 176 and 177: DRAFT 01/90 01/93 01/96 01/99 01/02
- Page 178 and 179: DRAFT the intent of that condition
- Page 180 and 181: DRAFT included inflows to the model
- Page 182 and 183: DRAFT Flows for Sulphur Springs wer
- Page 184 and 185: DRAFT ∆T represents the differenc
- Page 186 and 187: DRAFT Figure 25 Temp (C) 22 Histori
- Page 188 and 189: DRAFT Figure 26 Temp (C) 24 22 Hist
- Page 190 and 191: DRAFT Similar to the coldest period
- Page 192 and 193: DRAFT 5.7. Consideration of future
DRAFT<br />
Figure 5-2. Location <strong>of</strong> vertical pr<strong>of</strong>ile stations measured during experimental flow releases.<br />
5 - 5