07.09.2014 Views

The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa

The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa

The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DRAFT<br />

Table 5-1 includes dates and the rates <strong>of</strong> springflow on the days <strong>of</strong> field sampling <strong>for</strong><br />

each experiment. <strong>The</strong> daily flow values from the spring pool during each experiment are<br />

listed in Appendix G, along with flows <strong>for</strong> several days preceding and following the<br />

experiment and the daily mean, minimum, and maximum salinity value at the spring run<br />

recorder <strong>for</strong> all days listed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> design <strong>of</strong> the flow experiments involved monitoring the movement <strong>of</strong> brackish water<br />

into the upper spring run. <strong>The</strong> experiments were discontinued in the summer <strong>of</strong> 2002<br />

when a period <strong>of</strong> high flows began at the Hillsborough River dam, causing the river to be<br />

fresh near the <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> outfall. Due to unusually wet conditions during the<br />

remainder <strong>of</strong> 2002 and 2003, high flows continued at the dam, thus effectively ending<br />

the experimental period in June 2002.<br />

Table 5-1 Rates <strong>of</strong> springflow and dates <strong>of</strong> salinity sampling <strong>for</strong> controlled<br />

release experiments from <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> pool<br />

Experiment Rate <strong>of</strong> springflow on days when salinity Dates <strong>of</strong> salinity pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles were made<br />

1 31 & 23 cfs November 26 & 30, 2001<br />

2 31 & 19 cfs December 3 & 6, 2001<br />

3 31 & 19 cfs December 10 and 13, 2001<br />

4 25 & 15 cfs March 5 and 8, 2002<br />

5 13 cfs June 12, 2002<br />

6 2.5 cfs June 20, 2002<br />

5.2.3 Salinity response during the controlled release experiments<br />

Vertical pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> specific conductance, salinity, temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen<br />

were measured in the upper spring run and lower spring run <strong>for</strong> each sampling event.<br />

Salinity data were collected at a systematic series <strong>of</strong> 21 sites in the upper spring run and<br />

3 sites in the lower spring run (Figure 5-2). <strong>The</strong> sites were numbered from upstream to<br />

downstream within the spring run in triplets. For example, sites 1, 2, and 3 were located<br />

laterally across the most upstream zone <strong>of</strong> the upper spring run; sites 19, 20, and 21<br />

were located laterally across the most downstream zone in the upper spring run, and<br />

sites 22, 23 and 24 were located laterally across the lower run.<br />

Box and whisker plots <strong>for</strong> salinity values measured at the 24 stations on the last<br />

sampling day <strong>for</strong> each experiment are shown in Figures 5-3 a through f. Salinity values<br />

from all depths at each station are included. With the exception <strong>of</strong> Experiment 2, salinity<br />

values at stations in the lower run were higher that stations in the upper run. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

results indicate that salinity in the lower run is much more sensitive to the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

reduced flows than the upper run, as the hydraulics <strong>of</strong> the lower run are more linked to<br />

the Lower Hillsborough River, while the upper run is more isolated from the river due to<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> the weir.<br />

5 - 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!