The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa The Determination of Minimum Flows for Sulphur Springs, Tampa
DRAFT The effects of removing or rerouting water from Sulphur Springs on the thermal characteristics of the lower river during cold periods are examined in Chapter 5. A hydrodynamic thermal model of the river is used to evaluate the effects of removing different quantities of spring water from the river or moving it to the base of the dam. These results are used in conjunction with the findings of analyses of salinity distributions and the biological characteristics of the spring run and lower river to evaluate a recommended minimum flow for Sulphur Springs. 3 - 64
DRAFT CHAPTER 4 TECHNICAL APPROACH FOR DETERMINING MINIMUM FLOWS FOR SULPHUR SPRINGS 4.1 Overview The chapter presents the District's approach for determining minimum flows for Sulphur Springs. As discussed in Chapter 3, flows from Sulphur Springs provide important ecological functions to both the spring run and the Lower Hillsborough River. The District's approach to establishing minimum flows for Sulphur Springs therefore considered potential impacts to natural systems in both the spring run and lower river. The resource characteristics and management goals upon which the minimum flows for Sulphur Springs are based are described below. The results of empirical data analyses and mechanistic modeling that were used to determine the minimum flow are described in Chapter Five, along with the proposed minimum flows. 4.2 Consideration of structural alterations to the determination of minimum flows In keeping with directives provided by Florida Statutes (373.0421(1a) F.S., the District took into consideration structural alterations to the spring and river system in the determination of minimum flows. One of the most important alterations is that the spring pool is enclosed by a circular concrete wall that extends about three feet above the land surface. Under normal operations, the pool is hydraulically isolated from the spring run and is not used as habitat by aquatic biota in the spring run or lower river. As a result of this physical isolation, the determination of minimum flows for Sulphur Springs did not evaluate the ecology of the spring pool proper, but instead focused on the functions of flow from the pool on the downstream biological communities in the spring run and lower Hillsborough River. Other structural alterations, such as the presence of the weir in the run and the hardening of much of the shoreline, were accounted for as they affect the hydraulic and ecological characteristics of the spring run and river system. The term "minimum flows and levels" is often used to identify regulations that address the hydrologic requirements of natural systems, as many biological communities respond to changes in water levels as well as flow. However, the determination of minimum flows and levels for Sulphur Springs only involved a flow component, as it was concluded that water level fluctuations in the spring pool are relevant only as they affect discharge from the spring pool. Therefore, the term "minimum flows" (without levels) is used throughout this report 4 - 1
- Page 79 and 80: DRAFT tolerate and are frequently f
- Page 81 and 82: DRAFT Appendix B are color coded to
- Page 83 and 84: DRAFT habitat in the lower river pr
- Page 85 and 86: DRAFT The FWC using a modified stra
- Page 87 and 88: DRAFT increased with a return to no
- Page 89 and 90: DRAFT 2000. The results from three
- Page 91 and 92: DRAFT species (10 to 13) were colle
- Page 93 and 94: DRAFT 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
- Page 95 and 96: DRAFT . 1000.00 100.00 10.00 1.00 0
- Page 97 and 98: DRAFT 3.9.2 The effects of flows fr
- Page 99 and 100: DRAFT Data from the Tampa Bay Water
- Page 101 and 102: DRAFT EPCHC Period of Record Data L
- Page 103 and 104: DRAFT 35 30 1996 1997 1998 1999 200
- Page 105 and 106: 7 DRAFT Elevation (m) 1 0 -1 -2 -3
- Page 107 and 108: 8 24 25 29 DRAFT Figure 3-20, 3-21
- Page 109 and 110: DRAFT Figure 3-22 HBMP & EPCHC 2000
- Page 111 and 112: DRAFT of the river between the dam
- Page 113 and 114: DRAFT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11
- Page 115 and 116: DRAFT The HBMP project (PBSJ 2003)
- Page 117 and 118: DRAFT xanthurus) red drum (Sciaenop
- Page 119 and 120: DRAFT as manatees seek fresh water
- Page 121 and 122: 1999 2000 2001 2002 DRAFT 35 TmpSS_
- Page 123 and 124: DRAFT Platt Street 1974-2002 Columb
- Page 125 and 126: DRAFT Median and minimum water temp
- Page 127 and 128: DRAFT Figure 3-31 1999 2000 2001 20
- Page 129: DRAFT Figure 3-33 2001 2002 2003 20
- Page 133 and 134: DRAFT The sum of these consideratio
- Page 135 and 136: DRAFT It is the conclusion of this
- Page 137 and 138: DRAFT criteria. The
- Page 139: DRAFT reach of the river 50 meters
- Page 142 and 143: DRAFT of the dam. The experiments w
- Page 144 and 145: DRAFT Salinity incursions above the
- Page 146 and 147: DRAFT Figure 5-3. A - D. Box and wh
- Page 148 and 149: DRAFT The results of the vertical p
- Page 150 and 151: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 152 and 153: DRAFT Other breakpoints in the data
- Page 154 and 155: DRAFT 40 Percent of Observations -
- Page 156 and 157: DRAFT It is possible that infrequen
- Page 158 and 159: DRAFT The effects of tide stage on
- Page 160 and 161: DRAFT medians rise to near -0.2 fee
- Page 162 and 163: DRAFT Sulphur Springs < 33 cfs, Hil
- Page 164 and 165: DRAFT Sulphur Springs on salinity d
- Page 166 and 167: 7 29 DRAFT Elevation (m) 0/0cfs 1 0
- Page 168 and 169: 23 24 24 25 25 29 DRAFT Figures 14,
- Page 170 and 171: DRAFT Viewed strictly from the infl
- Page 172 and 173: DRAFT water removed would fluctuate
- Page 174 and 175: DRAFT euryhaline, there were also m
- Page 176 and 177: DRAFT 01/90 01/93 01/96 01/99 01/02
- Page 178 and 179: DRAFT the intent of that condition
DRAFT<br />
CHAPTER 4<br />
TECHNICAL APPROACH FOR DETERMINING MINIMUM FLOWS FOR<br />
SULPHUR SPRINGS<br />
4.1 Overview<br />
<strong>The</strong> chapter presents the District's approach <strong>for</strong> determining minimum flows <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sulphur</strong><br />
<strong>Springs</strong>. As discussed in Chapter 3, flows from <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> provide important<br />
ecological functions to both the spring run and the Lower Hillsborough River. <strong>The</strong><br />
District's approach to establishing minimum flows <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
considered potential impacts to natural systems in both the spring run and lower river.<br />
<strong>The</strong> resource characteristics and management goals upon which the minimum flows <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> are based are described below. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> empirical data analyses<br />
and mechanistic modeling that were used to determine the minimum flow are described<br />
in Chapter Five, along with the proposed minimum flows.<br />
4.2 Consideration <strong>of</strong> structural alterations to the determination <strong>of</strong> minimum<br />
flows<br />
In keeping with directives provided by Florida Statutes (373.0421(1a) F.S., the District<br />
took into consideration structural alterations to the spring and river system in the<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> minimum flows. One <strong>of</strong> the most important alterations is that the spring<br />
pool is enclosed by a circular concrete wall that extends about three feet above the land<br />
surface. Under normal operations, the pool is hydraulically isolated from the spring run<br />
and is not used as habitat by aquatic biota in the spring run or lower river. As a result <strong>of</strong><br />
this physical isolation, the determination <strong>of</strong> minimum flows <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> did not<br />
evaluate the ecology <strong>of</strong> the spring pool proper, but instead focused on the functions <strong>of</strong><br />
flow from the pool on the downstream biological communities in the spring run and<br />
lower Hillsborough River. Other structural alterations, such as the presence <strong>of</strong> the weir<br />
in the run and the hardening <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the shoreline, were accounted <strong>for</strong> as they affect<br />
the hydraulic and ecological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the spring run and river system.<br />
<strong>The</strong> term "minimum flows and levels" is <strong>of</strong>ten used to identify regulations that address<br />
the hydrologic requirements <strong>of</strong> natural systems, as many biological communities<br />
respond to changes in water levels as well as flow. However, the determination <strong>of</strong><br />
minimum flows and levels <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sulphur</strong> <strong>Springs</strong> only involved a flow component, as it was<br />
concluded that water level fluctuations in the spring pool are relevant only as they affect<br />
discharge from the spring pool. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, the term "minimum flows" (without levels) is<br />
used throughout this report<br />
4 - 1