06.09.2014 Views

ESRC Seminar Series - Briefing Paper 5 - Swansea University

ESRC Seminar Series - Briefing Paper 5 - Swansea University

ESRC Seminar Series - Briefing Paper 5 - Swansea University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Amplify migrant voices and perspectives and to reach and engage a diversity of<br />

audiences;<br />

• Facilitate workshops, events and mentoring activities and then to transfer skills, into<br />

the NGO sector; and<br />

• Research migration and produce media in the service of social justice<br />

A critical point for FOMACS is the politics of story telling - the politics of the voice in terms<br />

of migrant experiences. As Áine highlighted “…everybody has voices, everybody has<br />

agencies, however, the problem is not just about giving voice it is about having those voices<br />

heard meaningfully.” Áine identified the politics of listening as a major factor in the<br />

intersection between story and strategy, particularly in relation to the impact of social media<br />

campaigns and their ability to effect change. Drawing on Romand Coles’ work on the power<br />

of listening, Áine left us with the following quote:<br />

“A big part of the problem too, is likely to be that most of us do not listen to one<br />

another well if and when we listen at all. We have not only marginalized the arts of<br />

voice, we have, relatedly, and perhaps even more so, marginalized the arts of<br />

listening. Certainly the democratic arts of voice and listening are deeply related, but<br />

all too often we interpret and seek to nurture democracy through a lens that greatly<br />

accents the former and adds the latter almost as an afterthought. The alternative<br />

idea here is that if democratic voices are weak in a community, it is probably<br />

significantly because efforts to develop political voice have not dwelled in nor<br />

sufficiently passed through the arts of listening” (Coles, 2004, p.687)<br />

The presentation was concluded with the showing of a variety of examples of FOMACS<br />

work, each of which represented very different types of story telling. These included a<br />

documentary film, an excerpt from a feature length film, a three minute animation and a<br />

digital story.<br />

‘Stories that matter: refugee women and the representation of political claims’ -<br />

Dr Leah Bassel, City <strong>University</strong><br />

Dr Leah Bassel’s presentation explored the ways in which migrant voices are, or are not,<br />

taken up in broader social and political narrative and how this particularly impacts upon the<br />

voices of migrant women and their ability to be heard.<br />

Leah firstly outlined the theoretical elements of her argument, drawn from democratic<br />

theory and the approach known as intersectionality. She then discussed practice on the<br />

ground in terms of the existing power relations and limits to articulating an alternative<br />

perspective, and how these become visible at the intersection between asylum and<br />

integration and immigration. Situating this in the broader social context of a “gendered<br />

politics of integration, the gendered politics of the way people make the transition from<br />

outsider to citizen”, Leah postulated that some women’s voices may be subject to<br />

misinterpretation and instrumetalisation whilst others may be denied or silenced. Leah<br />

related this to current debates around multiculturalism articulated through the veil, the<br />

burka, or full face covering, and issues around female genital mutilation and forced marriage,<br />

in this context she argued, the politics of integration can increasingly be viewed as a<br />

gendered politics of the body. However for Leah the issue is less about the politics of<br />

multiculturalism and more about the voice, agency and possibilities of participation for the<br />

women who are at the centre of these debates but who are also situated at the interception<br />

of multiple social justice agendas.<br />

Leah argued that “…it is not enough for the women who are seen to be at the centre of<br />

these debates to just be able to participate within them…meaningful participation …has to<br />

mean something more. It has to mean being able also to challenge the terms of the debate<br />

itself, to challenge the way that democratic context is even constructed.” Furthermore, Leah<br />

perceives the exclusion of voices that do not conform to the victim versus agent narrative<br />

as a democratic failure, a failure of politics. She concluded her presentation with an appeal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!