06.09.2014 Views

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

electrical potential than the sensor port which can create an electric potential and<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased nitrate flux over the biochamber membrane. (There are two different<br />

possibilities to ground the environment <strong>in</strong> the close range of the microsensors. The first<br />

option is to use the ground channel connected to sensor port on the piccoameter, the<br />

electric potential of the sensor and ground channel is the same. The other option is use<br />

the ground port on the backside of the piccoameter, this port has another electric<br />

potential than the sensor port).<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the biosensor relies on denitrify<strong>in</strong>g bacteria convert<strong>in</strong>g NO2-N to <strong>N2O</strong>, the sensor<br />

was hard to work with. The bacteria <strong>in</strong> the biochamber are chang<strong>in</strong>g and adapt<strong>in</strong>g their<br />

metabolism as their physical environment with available substrates changes (Larsen et<br />

al., 1997). This means that their metabolism might be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by mov<strong>in</strong>g from the<br />

environment <strong>in</strong> which they are kept <strong>in</strong> between measurements, via the calibration setup<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the <strong>MBBR</strong> where measurements are performed. At some occasions the biosensor<br />

had to be recalibrated one to three times before giv<strong>in</strong>g a stable signal, which is very time<br />

consum<strong>in</strong>g. The sensor also has to be well nursed <strong>in</strong> between measurements <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

keep the microorganisms viable.<br />

To obta<strong>in</strong> the same sal<strong>in</strong>ity dur<strong>in</strong>g calibration and measurement the biosensor was<br />

calibrated <strong>in</strong> the synthetic wastewater feed<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>MBBR</strong>. The microbial nitrogen<br />

conversion <strong>in</strong> the <strong>MBBR</strong> is chang<strong>in</strong>g the ionic composition of the <strong>in</strong>fluent wastewater<br />

with a difference <strong>in</strong> ionic strength of <strong>in</strong>fluent medium and effluent as result. S<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

biosensor is sensitive to ionic strength as well as sal<strong>in</strong>ity (Nielsen et al., 2004) better<br />

results might have been obta<strong>in</strong>ed by calibration of the biosensor <strong>in</strong> the effluent water.<br />

(S<strong>in</strong>ce the effluent water conta<strong>in</strong>s NO2-N this calibration method gives a background<br />

signal of NO2-N which has to be corrected for).<br />

The biosensor might be a good option if changes of NO2-N are go<strong>in</strong>g to be studied dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cyclic changes of a microbial <strong>process</strong>. However the sensitivity of the sensor and the fact<br />

that it has to be well looked after <strong>in</strong> between measurements has to be taken <strong>in</strong>to account<br />

when consider<strong>in</strong>g the biosensor as an option to conventional methods of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

the NO2-N concentrations. The biosensor and required equipment is also a significant<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment cost.<br />

5.4 Diffusivity and stripp<strong>in</strong>g test of <strong>N2O</strong><br />

Test<strong>in</strong>g the diffusivity of <strong>N2O</strong> through mechanical mix<strong>in</strong>g with K1–heavy carriers<br />

without biofilm showed that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!