N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process
N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process
N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5<br />
5. Discussion<br />
5.1 Process performance<br />
Theoretical maximum nitrogen removal by the <strong>anammox</strong> <strong>process</strong> is 88%, (Strous et al.,<br />
1998), highest achieved performance <strong>in</strong> the <strong>MBBR</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g the period of this master<br />
thesis work was about 80% with fluctuations down to a reduction correspond<strong>in</strong>g to only<br />
20%, the mean nitrogen conversion was 58%. Non stable <strong>process</strong> performance is<br />
probably due to operation disturbances like; stop <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluent flow, power failure,<br />
fluctuations <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluent nitrogen compounds, (caused by microbial conversion of<br />
nitrogen compounds <strong>in</strong> the synthetic wastewater).<br />
As the reactor operation mode was shifted <strong>in</strong>to cont<strong>in</strong>uous aeration at a lower DO<br />
concentration both % reduction and removal rate <strong>in</strong> gN/m 2 d was more stable and<br />
higher than the average dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent aeration shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 13 and Figure 14.<br />
This is consistent with results obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Szatkowska et al., (2003) who showed that<br />
higher DO concentrations impact a <strong>MBBR</strong> <strong>anammox</strong> <strong>process</strong> negatively with decreased<br />
nitrogen conversion rates as a result. S<strong>in</strong>ce the oxygen penetration depth with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
biofilm <strong>in</strong>creases with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g DO (Henze et al., 1997) the anaerobic layer where<br />
<strong>anammox</strong> activity is tak<strong>in</strong>g part will be th<strong>in</strong>ner which is caus<strong>in</strong>g a lower <strong>in</strong>organic<br />
nitrogen conversion rate.<br />
One drawback with the <strong>anammox</strong> <strong>process</strong> is that NO3-N is produced dur<strong>in</strong>g cell<br />
synthesis of <strong>anammox</strong> bacteria. However this problem is not significant s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
effluent from the <strong>anammox</strong> <strong>process</strong> can be re-circulated with the <strong>in</strong>fluent water to the<br />
wastewater treatment plant.<br />
5.2 <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>production</strong><br />
Compared to <strong>N2O</strong> emissions from nitrogen removal <strong>process</strong>es found <strong>in</strong> literature (Table<br />
3) the emissions from the s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>stage</strong> <strong>nitritation</strong>/<strong>anammox</strong> system exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this<br />
work can be regarded as relatively high.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g this study <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>production</strong> have been higher at <strong>in</strong>termittent aeration where the<br />
dissolved oxygen concentration averaged around 3 mg/l <strong>in</strong> the aerated period. Lowest<br />
<strong>N2O</strong> <strong>production</strong> recorded was dur<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uous aeration at DO concentrations<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 1.0-1.5 mg/l. The emissions dur<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uous aeration are <strong>in</strong> the<br />
same range as emissions from a nitrify<strong>in</strong>g SBR reactor (2.8%) and a Sharon reactor<br />
(1.7%) reported by Kampschreur et al., (2008 b and a). R 2 value obta<strong>in</strong>ed when<br />
compar<strong>in</strong>g % <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>production</strong> of removed <strong>in</strong>organic nitrogen with DO concentrations<br />
shows that there is a correlation between the higher <strong>N2O</strong> emissions and DO <strong>in</strong> the, see<br />
Figure 27.<br />
44