06.09.2014 Views

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10<br />

8<br />

DO concentration, pH & temperature<br />

35<br />

28<br />

DO (mg/l), pH<br />

6<br />

4<br />

21<br />

14<br />

Temp °C<br />

DO (mg/l)<br />

pH<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

2<br />

7<br />

0<br />

0<br />

14/09/09<br />

19/09/09<br />

24/09/09<br />

29/09/09<br />

Date<br />

04/10/09<br />

09/10/09<br />

14/10/09<br />

19/10/09<br />

350<br />

Concentrations of <strong>in</strong>fluent and effluent total <strong>in</strong>organic nitrogen<br />

Total <strong>in</strong>organic nitrogen (mg/l)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Σ TIN <strong>in</strong> (mg/l)<br />

Σ TIN out (mg/l)<br />

14/09/09<br />

19/09/09<br />

24/09/09<br />

29/09/09<br />

Date<br />

04/10/09<br />

09/10/09<br />

14/10/09<br />

19/10/09<br />

Removal rate (gN/m²d)<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Removal rate (gN/m²d) & % reduction of <strong>in</strong>comm<strong>in</strong>g nitrogen<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

% reduction<br />

Removal rate<br />

(gN/m2d)<br />

% reduction<br />

14/09/09<br />

19/09/09<br />

24/09/09<br />

29/09/09<br />

Date<br />

04/10/09<br />

09/10/09<br />

14/10/09<br />

19/10/09<br />

Figure 14. Illustration of how the <strong>process</strong> performance changes with changed operation mode, The<br />

top graph illustrates DO dur<strong>in</strong>g the aerobe phase, pH and temperature. The second graph shows<br />

total concentration of <strong>in</strong>organic nitrogen <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluent feed and effluent water. The third graph<br />

shows the removal rate gN/m 2 d and the reduced nitrogen <strong>in</strong> %.<br />

4.3 <strong>N2O</strong> emissions from partial <strong>nitritation</strong>/<strong>anammox</strong> <strong>MBBR</strong><br />

The microsensor measured the <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>in</strong> the water phase dur<strong>in</strong>g different operation modes<br />

and aeration rates of the <strong>MBBR</strong>. The actual <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>production</strong> was not measured s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>N2O</strong><br />

left the water phase cont<strong>in</strong>uously through stripp<strong>in</strong>g and or by diffusion. However an<br />

estimation of the <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>production</strong> was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by measur<strong>in</strong>g the accumulation of the<br />

<strong>N2O</strong> directly after the airflow is turned off assum<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>N2O</strong> diffusion from water to air<br />

is negligible. If corrections for the <strong>N2O</strong> leav<strong>in</strong>g the reactor with the effluent water is<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!