06.09.2014 Views

Download the September/October 2004 Issue in PDF format - Gear ...

Download the September/October 2004 Issue in PDF format - Gear ...

Download the September/October 2004 Issue in PDF format - Gear ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

shows that <strong>the</strong>re is no difference with regard to <strong>the</strong> bearable exactly by means of structure research (Fig. 11). The structure<br />

load reversal at a torque of T 1T<br />

= 400 Nm, <strong>in</strong>dependent of a images show, by <strong>the</strong> means of a dark tempered zone and a th<strong>in</strong><br />

structural impact on <strong>the</strong> tip of <strong>the</strong> p<strong>in</strong>ion. The experiments new harden<strong>in</strong>g area, <strong>the</strong> gear damage caused by <strong>the</strong> gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

were aborted after a runn<strong>in</strong>g time of 300 hours. Contrary to process. By means of <strong>the</strong> material structure, it becomes obvious<br />

that <strong>the</strong> structural damage is strongly shaped <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of<br />

that, <strong>the</strong> test torque collapses early at a torque of T 1T<br />

= 600 Nm,<br />

because of pitt<strong>in</strong>g damages which occur closely underneath <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> tip flank. Compared to <strong>the</strong> damage on <strong>the</strong> root flank, <strong>the</strong> tip<br />

generat<strong>in</strong>g circle. Yet here is still no visible difference between flank has some deep cracks, which are processed normally to<br />

<strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle variants with regard to <strong>the</strong> load carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity. <strong>the</strong> flank surface and deeply <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> surface. In a depth of<br />

Measurements of <strong>the</strong> profile form and <strong>the</strong> tooth trace form approximately 6 mm, <strong>the</strong> cracks process parallel to <strong>the</strong> flank<br />

of <strong>the</strong> used p<strong>in</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> teeth without pitt<strong>in</strong>g damages show surface. The course of <strong>the</strong> cracks <strong>in</strong>dicates that, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

use of <strong>the</strong> test p<strong>in</strong>ion, a massive damage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of a<br />

locations <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> tooth flank is mostly impacted dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> operation (Fig. 10).<br />

large surface of material break-outs of <strong>the</strong> tooth flank, or a<br />

Independent of <strong>the</strong> test variant and <strong>the</strong> chosen torque, <strong>the</strong>re break of <strong>the</strong> tooth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tip area, could have occurred.<br />

are visible deviations of approximately 10 µm <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower area This realized damage could have been caused by <strong>the</strong> high<br />

of <strong>the</strong> root flank. The deviat<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t is a plastic de<strong>format</strong>ion of measured tensile stresses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> structural damaged zone by<br />

<strong>the</strong> material dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g or at fatigue phenomena of tooth gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g burns, which leads to an exceed<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> material<br />

flanks (wear). The pitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this area <strong>in</strong> experiments with a stability (Refs. 7, 17).<br />

torque of T 1T<br />

= 600 Nm can contribute to <strong>the</strong> high local flank In <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong> structural damage, <strong>the</strong> hardness on <strong>the</strong><br />

pressure and <strong>the</strong> negative slippage (Ref. 17).<br />

tooth flank surface is reduced for at least 100 HV0.05, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from 750 HV0.05, measured on <strong>the</strong> undamaged structure<br />

On <strong>the</strong> p<strong>in</strong>ion with a new harden<strong>in</strong>g area, profile form<br />

deviations occur <strong>in</strong>dependently of <strong>the</strong> load level at <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong> flank root. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> stability of metallic<br />

flank, as it can be clearly seen on <strong>the</strong> right tooth flank after a materials depends on <strong>the</strong> material hardness (Ref. 21), <strong>the</strong><br />

number of load cycles of N ≈ 50 • 10 6 at a torque of T 1T<br />

= 400 strong decrease of <strong>the</strong> hardness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g burns<br />

Nm. The local generat<strong>in</strong>g load of <strong>the</strong> material <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicates a reduced load carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity of <strong>the</strong> surface.<br />

flank tip is lower because of <strong>the</strong> lower flank pressure and <strong>the</strong> Contrary to this, <strong>the</strong> area underneath <strong>the</strong> pitch circle<br />

positive slippage. The deviations <strong>the</strong>refore po<strong>in</strong>t at <strong>the</strong> fact, shows only a low cleft <strong>format</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fr<strong>in</strong>ge area. The cracks<br />

that <strong>the</strong> load carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity of <strong>the</strong> material is strongly are runn<strong>in</strong>g contrary to <strong>the</strong> slid<strong>in</strong>g direction and are typical for<br />

reduced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fr<strong>in</strong>ge structure, which is damaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

process.<br />

Metallographical exam<strong>in</strong>ations additionally show that a<br />

gears under generat<strong>in</strong>g load (Ref. 17).<br />

The lead trace, measured on <strong>the</strong> pitch diameter, shows no strong damag<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> fr<strong>in</strong>ge through <strong>the</strong> gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g process can<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forced deviations compared to <strong>the</strong> gears which were not also be recognized on used gears and that evidence is derivable<br />

used. The convexity is still existent, so that a curtail<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> on turned-out gears.<br />

experiments through <strong>the</strong> gear<strong>in</strong>g deviants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> or Research Depend<strong>in</strong>g on Profile Contact Ratio<br />

<strong>the</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g-out area of <strong>the</strong> gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g wheel can be excluded. In this section, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence of an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g flank load<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong> damaged workpiece material, on <strong>the</strong><br />

The destructive pitt<strong>in</strong>g at a torque of T 1T<br />

= 600 Nm is<br />

clearly visible <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong> tooth flank underneath <strong>the</strong> number of tolerable alternations will be shown. The area where<br />

pitch circle d w<br />

, as o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>vestigations show. If a torque of 400 pitt<strong>in</strong>g occurs does not change through an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g torque.<br />

Nm is chosen, a destructive pitt<strong>in</strong>g does not occur. In this case, Therefore <strong>the</strong> test gear<strong>in</strong>g needs to be modified. For that reason<br />

<strong>the</strong> contact ratio is reduced from ε α<br />

only <strong>in</strong>itial pitt<strong>in</strong>g or gray discoloration occur closely underneath<br />

<strong>the</strong> pitch circle.<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> tip diameter of <strong>the</strong> mat<strong>in</strong>g gear. Fig. 12 shows <strong>the</strong><br />

= 1.44 to ε α<br />

= 1.05 by<br />

Smaller material break-outs can be found on <strong>the</strong> tip flank result<strong>in</strong>g flank pressure versus <strong>the</strong> angular position of <strong>the</strong> p<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

for a torque of T 1T<br />

of <strong>the</strong> gear<strong>in</strong>g beside rills <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lead direction. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> rills<br />

= 400 Nm.<br />

could also have been partially caused by <strong>the</strong> gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g process, A comparison of <strong>the</strong> distribution of <strong>the</strong> flank pressure for<br />

<strong>the</strong> chipp<strong>in</strong>g could also be seen as <strong>in</strong>itial pitt<strong>in</strong>g and attributed equal torque shows that <strong>the</strong> contact distance has decreased.<br />

to <strong>the</strong> material fatigue, which is caused by <strong>the</strong> generat<strong>in</strong>g load. The p<strong>in</strong>ion’s tooth root comes <strong>in</strong>to contact with <strong>the</strong> tip of <strong>the</strong><br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> little material break-outs can be found on both test mat<strong>in</strong>g gear at a later po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time. This reduces <strong>the</strong> area with<br />

gears, <strong>the</strong> damage cannot be attributed to <strong>the</strong> slight impact of double tooth contact significantly so that <strong>the</strong> flank pressure<br />

<strong>the</strong> structure, which is caused by gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

escalates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of s<strong>in</strong>gle tooth contact. The calculations<br />

Compared to this, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>in</strong> which a torque of show that, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> area, <strong>the</strong> maximum pressure is<br />

T 1T<br />

= 400 Nm was chosen, <strong>the</strong> damages occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tip flank equal for both contact ratios. For <strong>the</strong> gear with <strong>the</strong> contact ratio<br />

too. Yet, <strong>the</strong>re are no damages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong> gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g burn, of ε α<br />

= 1.05, <strong>the</strong> gradient of <strong>the</strong> flank pressure is relatively constant<br />

for all angular positions and just decreases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tip area<br />

which could have led to a breakdown of <strong>the</strong> gear<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> 300<br />

hours.<br />

of <strong>the</strong> p<strong>in</strong>ion. The gradient of <strong>the</strong> flank pressure <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

The realized flank damages should be analyzed more <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of structural damage, <strong>the</strong> load<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> flank is sig-<br />

www.powertransmission.com • www.geartechnology.com • GEAR TECHNOLOGY • SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER <strong>2004</strong> 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!