The Supreme Court of Ohio - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Commission on Technology & the Courts Robert D. Stuart, secretary Lee Baker David S. Bloomfield Jr. Hon. Gary Byers, chair Rockne Clarke Lisa Wu Fate Hon. Dan Favreau Martin Frantz Phil Giavasis Hon. Cheryl Grant Hon. Charles Hague Charles Lawrie Hon. Julie Lynch Christian Moeller Hon. Richard Parrott Hon. Mike Powell Hon. Jack Puffenberger Michael P. Randle Hon. Lynn Slaby Hon. James F. Stevenson Kenneth R. Teleis W. James Walsh Hon. Timothy Williams Hon. John Wise Technology Services Section The Technology Services Section provides project support for the OCN project and assists other courts in the state with technology-related decisions and projects, such as casemanagement system implementation and equipment purchases. This group also supports the Commission on Technology & the Courts in its efforts. Commission on Technology & the Courts The Commission on Technology & the Courts held its first meeting in fall 2008. The commission’s primary responsibilities are to foster awareness of technology issues affecting Ohio courts and to provide input on the development, governance and use of the OCN. The commission replaces the Advisory Committee on Technology & the Courts, which was in existence for several years. 82 2008 Annual Report • The Supreme Court of Ohio
Technology & the courts 2008 survey Every two years the Supreme Court’s Information Technology staff surveys Ohio courts to learn about the technology used throughout Ohio, as well as how the Supreme Court can help courts improve their technology. The Technology & the Courts 2008 Survey showed that courts found several Supreme Court services to be of value to the trial and appellate courts in their use and management of technology. For example, consultation services, especially in the areas of disaster recovery planning, case management system upgrades and document imaging systems, were noted most often as valuable resources offered by the Supreme Court. Other Court services noted to be valuable to Ohio courts included: • Sharing of standards and guidelines • Development of OCN • Education and advice on technology • Information on vendors and software used by Ohio courts • Facilitation of networking and collaboration with other courts • Training • Supreme Court Web site • Appellate Case Management System. Information for the 2008 survey was based on responses received from Ohio’s 372 trial-level courts, the 12 district courts of appeals and the Supreme Court. Complete survey results are available at supremecourt.ohio.gov. 2008 Annual Report • The Supreme Court of Ohio 83 Clerk's division Office of the Clerk Case Mediation Section
Page 1:
Annual Report The Supreme Court of
Page 4 and 5:
A Message from the Chief Justice 20
Page 6 and 7:
The Supreme Court of Ohio 2008 Paul
Page 8 and 9:
Justices of the Supreme Court of Oh
Page 10 and 11:
Paul E. Pfeifer Justice 2008 Staff
Page 12 and 13:
Maureen O’Connor Justice 2008 Sta
Page 14 and 15:
Judith Ann Lanzinger Justice 2008 S
Page 16 and 17:
2008 Annual Report • The Supreme
Page 18 and 19:
May 5 Justice O’Connor serves as
Page 20 and 21:
Oct. 2 Scholarships provided by the
Page 22 and 23:
hio Summit on Children Working toge
Page 24 and 25:
Supreme Court Takes Lead Against Fo
Page 26 and 27:
Event Recognizes Ohio Judicial Cent
Page 28 and 29:
Supreme Court Protects Public Acces
Page 30 and 31:
Supreme Court Administrative Operat
Page 32 and 33:
The Supreme Court of Ohio 2008 Admi
Page 34 and 35:
Administrative Division Office of t
Page 36 and 37:
The Office of the Administrative Di
Page 38 and 39: Task Force on the Code of Judicial
Page 40 and 41: Visitor Education Center 2008 Volun
Page 42 and 43: Clerk’s Division Office of the Cl
Page 44 and 45: 2008 CASE STATISTICS sUMMARY OF aCT
Page 46 and 47: 2008 CASE STATISTICS final disposit
Page 48 and 49: 2008 CASE STATISTICS practice of la
Page 50 and 51: 2008 CASE STATISTICS notes 1. This
Page 52 and 53: 2008 CASE STATISTICS time to dispos
Page 54 and 55: Legal Resources Division Office of
Page 56 and 57: 106 court of appeals opinions requi
Page 58 and 59: Attorney Services Division Office o
Page 60 and 61: Commission on Continuing Legal Educ
Page 62 and 63: Office of Bar Admissions The Office
Page 64 and 65: Judicial & Court Services Division
Page 66 and 67: Judicial College Board of Trustees
Page 68 and 69: Children, Families & the Courts Sec
Page 70 and 71: Dispute Resolution Section The Disp
Page 72 and 73: Advisory Committee on Dispute Resol
Page 74 and 75: Advisory Committee on Mental Illnes
Page 76 and 77: Advisory Committee on Domestic Viol
Page 78 and 79: Fiscal & Management Resources Divis
Page 80 and 81: Additionally, the Office of Fiscal
Page 82 and 83: Judiciary/Supreme Court Budget fisc
Page 84 and 85: Information Technology Division Off
Page 86 and 87: • Installation of a digital certi
Page 90 and 91: Facilities Management Division Offi
Page 92 and 93: trained on electrical safety system
Page 94 and 95: Advisory Committee on Court Securit
Page 96 and 97: Affiliated Offices Office of Discip
Page 98 and 99: The office conducted its annual fal
Page 100 and 101: Professional Conduct reported and d
Page 102 and 103: Visiting Judges According to the Oh
Page 104: photos page 2 Chief Justice Thomas
show all

The Supreme Court of Ohio - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?