04.09.2014 Views

The Supreme Court of Ohio - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

The Supreme Court of Ohio - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

The Supreme Court of Ohio - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Protects Public Access to <strong>Court</strong> Records<br />

M<br />

ore than 100 years ago, drawing on a large body <strong>of</strong> law, a<br />

Cincinnati judge first crystallized a fundamental principle<br />

that is still a cornerstone <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> government. Today, <strong>Ohio</strong><br />

judges are working to take this important concept into the 21 st<br />

century.<br />

“Public records are the people’s records. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials in<br />

whose custody they happen to be are mere trustees for the<br />

people ….”<br />

So wrote Judge Rufus B. Smith <strong>of</strong> the Superior <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Cincinnati (a body that no longer exists) in 1901. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Supreme</strong><br />

<strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> quoted Judge Smith verbatim when it first<br />

adopted this universal principle <strong>of</strong> openness as statewide law in<br />

1960. <strong>The</strong> idea was codified in statute with the passage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Public Records Act in 1963. It was reaffirmed in 1976 in the<br />

foundational public records case <strong>of</strong> Dayton Newspapers v. City <strong>of</strong><br />

Dayton, decided by the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong>, and it remains<br />

the bedrock <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> public records law to this day.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> in 2008 completed an<br />

administrative process to craft judicial rules that will maintain<br />

this principle and keep court records open.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rules were crafted by the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Commission<br />

on the Rules <strong>of</strong> Superintendence for <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>Court</strong>s, chaired by<br />

Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger, and they were put out for two<br />

periods <strong>of</strong> extensive public comment that resulted in revisions<br />

and improvements.<br />

Among other provisions, the rules establish that<br />

court records are presumed open and state that a<br />

court may restrict access to a particular document<br />

only “if it finds by clear and convincing evidence<br />

that the presumption <strong>of</strong> allowing public access is<br />

outweighed by a higher interest.” <strong>The</strong> rule <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

specific factors for judges to consider when weighing<br />

the “higher interest,” including,<br />

but not limited to, “risk <strong>of</strong> injury to<br />

persons, individual privacy rights<br />

and interests, proprietary business<br />

information, public safety, and<br />

fairness <strong>of</strong> the adjudicatory process.”<br />

22<br />

2008 Annual Report • <strong>The</strong> <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!