Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Box 20: The New or “Singapore” Issues<br />
At the Marrakech Conference which concluded the Uruguay Round and established<br />
the WTO, the concluding remarks of the Chairman set out the elements of a possible<br />
work programme for the new Organization. 111 In addition to trade and labour<br />
standards strongly advocated by the United States, the list included a wide range of<br />
items such as the relationship between immigration policies and international trade,<br />
international trade and company law, the establishment of a compensation mechanism<br />
for the erosion of trade preferences and the link between trade, development , political<br />
stability, and the alleviation of poverty. Only two of these, trade and investment and<br />
trade and competition policy were retained at the first WTO Ministerial Conference in<br />
Singapore in 1996 to which were added transparency in government procurement and<br />
trade facilitation (i.e. the Singapore issues). All but trade facilitation were dropped at<br />
the Cancun Conference in 2003. 112 Nevertheless, the developed country proponents of<br />
the Singapore Issues have continued to pursue the missing three in FTAs with<br />
developing countries.<br />
<strong>Policy</strong> Space within FTAs<br />
While it should be expected that a FTA will result in the elimination of tariff<br />
protection for “substantially all” of the mutual trade between its members, (i.e. in<br />
conformity with Article XXIV of GATT), many FTAs involve additional<br />
commitments that can severely reduce or eliminate “policy space” permitted by<br />
WTO agreements. Such commitments negatively affect the ability of developing<br />
countries to pursue development objectives.Attention should be given to <strong>Policy</strong> Space<br />
in such areas as:<br />
(a) Intellectual property. Particular attention should be given to provisions of FTAs<br />
which may impose commitments which eliminate flexibilities provided by the TRIPS<br />
Agreement, by seriously constraining the scope to impose compulsory licensing, even<br />
those applied to pharmaceuticals for health purposes 113 . Such provisions undermine<br />
both the spirit and the intent of the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, in<br />
addition to permitting patent holders to block parallel imports 114 . FTAs in this area<br />
may also require the patenting of plants and/or animals or even all life forms and<br />
undermine measures intended to prevent bio-piracy 115 . <strong>Trade</strong> marks may be given<br />
precedence so as to pre-empt the use of GIs by communities, while patent and<br />
111 See document MTN.TNC/Min(94)/6 (www.wto.org).<br />
112 For an insight into the events leading to this decision see Supperamaniam M. Epilogue, in Sieh Mei<br />
Ling op.cit.<br />
113 See Sanya Reid Smith, TRIPs provisions in US free trade agreements that effect medicine prices<br />
paper paper presented to Regional meeting of Civil Society organiz ations on FTAs .in the Arab region<br />
, Cairo 9-11 December 2006<br />
114 Recent United States legislation discourages the inclusion of provisions restricting parallel<br />
importation in future FTAs Sec. 631 of Science, State, Justice and Commerce and Related<br />
Appropriations Act 2006, Public Law 109-108,..<br />
115 See Silvia Rodriguez Cervantes, FTAs: Trading Away Traditional Knowledge, GRAIN briefings<br />
2006 (http://www.grain.org/briefings_files/fta-tk-03-2006-en.pdf).<br />
58